Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the Social and Problem-Based Nature of Literary Reading and Reasoning

Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the academic disciplines—there are questions about what disciplinary literacy instruction means for the prominent school domain of English langua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reading research quarterly Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 53 - 71
Main Author: Rainey, Emily C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Newark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2017
Wiley-Blackwell
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
ISSN:0034-0553, 1936-2722
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the academic disciplines—there are questions about what disciplinary literacy instruction means for the prominent school domain of English language arts. This article investigates the disciplinary literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university-based literary scholars who participated in semistructured interviews and verbal protocols with literary fiction. Findings point to the fundamentally social and problem-based nature of academic work with literature and to a set of six shared literary literacy practices that scholars use in their work with literature. These findings were generated as part of a larger study that compared literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university-based scholars and 12 high school English language arts teachers (Rainey, 2015).
AbstractList Despite many calls for K–12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the academic disciplines—there are questions about what disciplinary literacy instruction means for the prominent school domain of English language arts. This article investigates the disciplinary literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university‐based literary scholars who participated in semistructured interviews and verbal protocols with literary fiction. Findings point to the fundamentally social and problem‐based nature of academic work with literature and to a set of six shared literary literacy practices that scholars use in their work with literature. These findings were generated as part of a larger study that compared literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university‐based scholars and 12 high school English language arts teachers (Rainey, 2015). Chinese 尽管许多人呼吁从幼儿园到高中(K‐12)都要采用学科读写教学 (教授学生各学科领域专门的阅读、写作和推理方法),然而学科读写教学对英语语言艺术这门重要的学科而言,究竟所指是什么?本文考查10位教授大学文学的学者所采用的学科读写教学实践和教学方法,他们参与了半结构式的访谈调查和有关文学小说的放声思考报告调查。结果发现这些学者处理文学学术工作的手法,是具有社会性和以解决问题为主的基要本质,而且他们都有一套共同的六种文学读写文化实践的做法。这些研究结果的产生是属于一个更大的研究(雷尼,2015年)的一部分,该研究旨在比较10位任职大学的学者和12位任职高中的英语语言艺术教师在读写文化实践上和读写教学方法上的异同。 Spanish A pesar de llamamientos para la alfabetización de disciplinas en los grados K‐12—instrucción que le enseña a los estudiantes las formas especializadas de lectura, escritura y razonamiento de las disciplinas académicas—hay dudas sobre lo que es la alfabetización de disciplinas en el campo importante de las artes lingüísticas del inglés. Este artículo investiga las prácticas de la alfabetización de disciplinas y los acercamientos a la enseñanza de 10 profesores universitarios de literatura quienes participaron en entrevistas semiestructuradas y protocolos orales con la ficción literaria. Las conclusiones indican la naturaleza fundamentalmente social y basada en la solución de problemas del trabajo académico en cuanto a la literatura y a un grupo de seis prácticas de alfabetización literaria que los profesores universitarios tienen en común al trabajar con la literatura. Estas conclusiones surgieron como parte de un estudio mayor que comparó las prácticas de alfabetización y las aproximaciones a la enseñanza de 10 profesores universitarios y 12 maestros de inglés en la escuela secundaria (Rainey, 2015). Arabic على الرغم من الدعوات الكثيرة للتعليمات المنهجية (literacy instruction) لصفوف الروضة إلى الثانوية ‐ التعليمات التي تعلم الطلاب الطرق المتخصصة للقراءة وللكتابة، وللتفكير المتعلقة بالتخصصات الأكاديمية ‐ هناك تساؤلات حول ما تعنيه التعليمات المنهجية للمجال الدراسي البارز في فنون اللغة الإنجليزية. هذه المقالة تحقق في ممارسات التعليمات المنهجية وأساليب التدريس ل 10 علماء جامعيين والذين شاركوا في مقابلات شبه منظمة وبروتوكولات شفوية في الأدب الروائي. وتشير النتائج إلى الطبيعة الاجتماعية والمتشابكة الأساسية للعمل الأكاديمي الأدبي. وتشير ايضا الى ستة ممارسات مشتركة للتعليمات المنهجية الأدبية والتي يستخدمها العلماء في عملهم مع الأدب. تم إستخلاص هذه النتائج كجزء من دراسة أكبر والتي قارنت ممارسات تعليمية وأساليب التدريس من 10 علماء جامعيين ومعلمين فنون اللغة الإنجليزية من 12 مدرسة ثانوية (ريني < Rainey>، 2015). Russian Несмотря на многочисленные призывы к обучению грамотности на материале отдельных предметов в старших классах – то есть к развитию чтения, письма и рассуждения на темы школьных дисциплин, – остается открытым вопрос о развитии грамотности на уроках родного, т.е. английского языка. В статье исследуются методы развития грамотности и подходы к обучению, которые применяли десять университетских преподавателей. Эти ученые дали полуструктурированные интервью и позволили вести записи на своих занятиях художественной литературой со студентами. Результаты свидетельствуют о том, что научная работа с такими текстами по природе своей социальна, основана на проблематизации и существует шесть методов развития грамотности, которыми пользовались все преподаватели литературы. Результаты были получены в рамках более крупного исследования, где сравнивались методы и подходы десяти университетских преподавателей и двенадцати школьных учителей словесности (Rainey, 2015). French Malgré de nombreuses appels en vue d'un enseignement de la liitératie en tant que discipline – un enseignement présentant aux élèves les différentes façons de lire, écrire, et raisonner des disciplines académiques – il demeure des questions sur ce que signifie un enseignement de la liitératie en tant que discipline dans le cas de ce domaine scolaire majeur qu'est l'anglais à l’école. Cet article examine les pratiques de la littératie en tant que discipline et les approches pédagogiques d'universitaires enseignant la lttératie dans 10 universités qui ont participé à des entretiens semi‐structurés et à des protocoles verbaux relatifs à la fiction littéraire. Les résultats mettent en évidence la nature sociale fondamentale et basée sur un problème du travail académique dans le cas de la littérature et un ensemble de six pratiques communes de litttératie de la liitérature que les utilisent dans leur travail avec la littérature. Ces résultats sont une partie d'un travail plus large qui compare les pratiques de littératie et les approches pédagogiques de 10 enseignants d'université et de 12 professeurs d'anglais au lycée (Rainey, 2015).
Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the academic disciplines—there are questions about what disciplinary literacy instruction means for the prominent school domain of English language arts. This article investigates the disciplinary literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university-based literary scholars who participated in semistructured interviews and verbal protocols with literary fiction. Findings point to the fundamentally social and problem-based nature of academic work with literature and to a set of six shared literary literacy practices that scholars use in their work with literature. These findings were generated as part of a larger study that compared literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university-based scholars and 12 high school English language arts teachers (Rainey, 2015).
Despite many calls for K–12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the academic disciplines—there are questions about what disciplinary literacy instruction means for the prominent school domain of English language arts. This article investigates the disciplinary literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university‐based literary scholars who participated in semistructured interviews and verbal protocols with literary fiction. Findings point to the fundamentally social and problem‐based nature of academic work with literature and to a set of six shared literary literacy practices that scholars use in their work with literature. These findings were generated as part of a larger study that compared literacy practices and teaching approaches of 10 university‐based scholars and 12 high school English language arts teachers (Rainey, 2015). 尽管许多人呼吁从幼儿园到高中(K‐12)都要采用学科读写教学 (教授学生各学科领域专门的阅读、写作和推理方法),然而学科读写教学对英语语言艺术这门重要的学科而言,究竟所指是什么?本文考查10位教授大学文学的学者所采用的学科读写教学实践和教学方法,他们参与了半结构式的访谈调查和有关文学小说的放声思考报告调查。结果发现这些学者处理文学学术工作的手法,是具有社会性和以解决问题为主的基要本质,而且他们都有一套共同的六种文学读写文化实践的做法。这些研究结果的产生是属于一个更大的研究(雷尼,2015年)的一部分,该研究旨在比较10位任职大学的学者和12位任职高中的英语语言艺术教师在读写文化实践上和读写教学方法上的异同。 A pesar de llamamientos para la alfabetización de disciplinas en los grados K‐12—instrucción que le enseña a los estudiantes las formas especializadas de lectura, escritura y razonamiento de las disciplinas académicas—hay dudas sobre lo que es la alfabetización de disciplinas en el campo importante de las artes lingüísticas del inglés. Este artículo investiga las prácticas de la alfabetización de disciplinas y los acercamientos a la enseñanza de 10 profesores universitarios de literatura quienes participaron en entrevistas semiestructuradas y protocolos orales con la ficción literaria. Las conclusiones indican la naturaleza fundamentalmente social y basada en la solución de problemas del trabajo académico en cuanto a la literatura y a un grupo de seis prácticas de alfabetización literaria que los profesores universitarios tienen en común al trabajar con la literatura. Estas conclusiones surgieron como parte de un estudio mayor que comparó las prácticas de alfabetización y las aproximaciones a la enseñanza de 10 profesores universitarios y 12 maestros de inglés en la escuela secundaria (Rainey, 2015). على الرغم من الدعوات الكثيرة للتعليمات المنهجية (literacy instruction) لصفوف الروضة إلى الثانوية ‐ التعليمات التي تعلم الطلاب الطرق المتخصصة للقراءة وللكتابة، وللتفكير المتعلقة بالتخصصات الأكاديمية ‐ هناك تساؤلات حول ما تعنيه التعليمات المنهجية للمجال الدراسي البارز في فنون اللغة الإنجليزية. هذه المقالة تحقق في ممارسات التعليمات المنهجية وأساليب التدريس ل 10 علماء جامعيين والذين شاركوا في مقابلات شبه منظمة وبروتوكولات شفوية في الأدب الروائي. وتشير النتائج إلى الطبيعة الاجتماعية والمتشابكة الأساسية للعمل الأكاديمي الأدبي. وتشير ايضا الى ستة ممارسات مشتركة للتعليمات المنهجية الأدبية والتي يستخدمها العلماء في عملهم مع الأدب. تم إستخلاص هذه النتائج كجزء من دراسة أكبر والتي قارنت ممارسات تعليمية وأساليب التدريس من 10 علماء جامعيين ومعلمين فنون اللغة الإنجليزية من 12 مدرسة ثانوية (ريني < Rainey>، 2015). Несмотря на многочисленные призывы к обучению грамотности на материале отдельных предметов в старших классах – то есть к развитию чтения, письма и рассуждения на темы школьных дисциплин, – остается открытым вопрос о развитии грамотности на уроках родного, т.е. английского языка. В статье исследуются методы развития грамотности и подходы к обучению, которые применяли десять университетских преподавателей. Эти ученые дали полуструктурированные интервью и позволили вести записи на своих занятиях художественной литературой со студентами. Результаты свидетельствуют о том, что научная работа с такими текстами по природе своей социальна, основана на проблематизации и существует шесть методов развития грамотности, которыми пользовались все преподаватели литературы. Результаты были получены в рамках более крупного исследования, где сравнивались методы и подходы десяти университетских преподавателей и двенадцати школьных учителей словесности (Rainey, 2015). Malgré de nombreuses appels en vue d'un enseignement de la liitératie en tant que discipline – un enseignement présentant aux élèves les différentes façons de lire, écrire, et raisonner des disciplines académiques – il demeure des questions sur ce que signifie un enseignement de la liitératie en tant que discipline dans le cas de ce domaine scolaire majeur qu'est l'anglais à l’école. Cet article examine les pratiques de la littératie en tant que discipline et les approches pédagogiques d'universitaires enseignant la lttératie dans 10 universités qui ont participé à des entretiens semi‐structurés et à des protocoles verbaux relatifs à la fiction littéraire. Les résultats mettent en évidence la nature sociale fondamentale et basée sur un problème du travail académique dans le cas de la littérature et un ensemble de six pratiques communes de litttératie de la liitérature que les utilisent dans leur travail avec la littérature. Ces résultats sont une partie d'un travail plus large qui compare les pratiques de littératie et les approches pédagogiques de 10 enseignants d'université et de 12 professeurs d'anglais au lycée (Rainey, 2015).
Audience Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Author Rainey, Emily C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Emily C.
  surname: Rainey
  fullname: Rainey, Emily C.
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1124451$$DView record in ERIC
BookMark eNp10E1vFCEYB3Bi2sRta_wEJiQePJipvAzM4K2ta7XZ-LLqecIwD1s2U9gCG91Tv3rZzKYHo1yAPD_-PHlO0JEPHhB6Sck5JYS9i_H-nIr6GZpRxWXFGsaO0IwQXldECP4cnaS0JmUJxmfo4YNLxm1G53Xc4YXLELXZYefx3K9Gl27xQvvVVq8AX8Sc3uP5n80YovMrnG8B_wjG6RFrP-BvMfQj3FWXOsGAv-i8jYCDPWSW8CXoYf9uj8s5BV9uZ-jY6jHBi8N-in59nP-8-lQtvl5_vrpYVIZLWVet4koQkJw1lhitCB1qgBooB2Vtr_qeKa41NW0P0AzNQAsn1iorDDSS8VP0esrdxHC_hZS7ddhGX77saCtkKxUTpKhXk4LoTLeJ7q403s1vKGV1LWipv5nqJoaUItgnQ0m3n35Xpt-V6RdZ_SWNyzq74HPUbvyHfzv5326E3f9iu-Xy-6QPfa5TDvFJMykZE03LHwGz5qBv
CODEN RRQUA6
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11145_018_9839_4
crossref_primary_10_58680_ee202231980
crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2018_1485023
crossref_primary_10_58680_ej201829718
crossref_primary_10_1002_ets2_12304
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220272_2020_1836260
crossref_primary_10_1080_10573569_2025_2511109
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2020_103123
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_70029
crossref_primary_10_1080_15348458_2025_2477477
crossref_primary_10_58680_rte202131258
crossref_primary_10_1080_19388071_2020_1867264
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1039
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_12_2019_0167
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_476
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_233
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_594
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_943
crossref_primary_10_1080_04250494_2023_2266453
crossref_primary_10_1177_0042085918804011
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_669
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_196
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2024_104884
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702711_2022_2126048
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmathb_2020_100799
crossref_primary_10_1080_1554480X_2024_2313980
crossref_primary_10_1080_01626620_2024_2392727
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_01_2024_0012
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_06_2021_0075
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_06_2021_0073
crossref_primary_10_58680_vm202131175
crossref_primary_10_1080_10573569_2022_2046220
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1189
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1066
crossref_primary_10_1080_07370008_2022_2092482
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_677
crossref_primary_10_58680_ee201930190
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702711_2022_2128953
crossref_primary_10_1177_0022487120913853
crossref_primary_10_58680_ee20245719
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_02_2020_0013
crossref_primary_10_1080_04250494_2018_1509672
crossref_primary_10_2478_amns_2024_0265
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_06_2021_0065
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_70008
crossref_primary_10_1002_trtr_2070
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2018_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2025_105173
crossref_primary_10_1080_10790195_2022_2116128
crossref_primary_10_2478_amns_2023_2_00521
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15021279
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702711_2021_1968087
crossref_primary_10_1108_ETPC_06_2021_0059
crossref_primary_10_3102_0002831217710423
crossref_primary_10_58680_ej202231571
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1408
crossref_primary_10_1075_langct_24006_kel
crossref_primary_10_1080_10790195_2019_1631231
Cites_doi 10.1017/CBO9780511841057
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.06.001
10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
10.1002/rrq.71
10.1598/RT.39.6.11
10.1080/09500690305018
10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
10.1177/003172171209300514
10.1016/S0883‐0355(97)89730‐3
10.2307/798843
10.17763/0017‐8055.85.2.254
10.1598/JAAL.54.4.4
10.1080/00405841.2015.1044369
10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1
10.1080/10573560903120656
10.58680/ee201221575
10.1177/016146811511700206
10.2307/747625
10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001
10.4135/9781452230153
10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_2
10.1016/0304‐422X(91)90031‐J
10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
10.3102/0091732X07300046001
10.1075/ssol.3.1.10lev
10.1177/1474022202001001003
10.1177/0022487110397842
10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
10.1016/0304‐422X(96)00004‐6
10.4159/harvard.9780674433014
10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
10.1177/1474022202001001006
10.2307/821546
10.1037/0022‐0663.83.1.73
10.3102/00028312028003495
10.1598/RRQ.36.3.3
10.58680/rte19991685
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2017 International Literacy Association
2016 International Literacy Association
Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jan-Mar 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2017 International Literacy Association
– notice: 2016 International Literacy Association
– notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jan-Mar 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7T9
AHOVV
DOI 10.1002/rrq.154
DatabaseName CrossRef
ERIC
ERIC (Ovid)
ERIC
ERIC
ERIC (Legacy Platform)
ERIC( SilverPlatter )
ERIC
ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
ERIC
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
Education Research Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ERIC
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
DatabaseTitleList

Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
ERIC
CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1936-2722
ERIC EJ1124451
EndPage 71
ExternalDocumentID 4297359601
EJ1124451
10_1002_rrq_154
RRQ154
26622578
Genre article
GroupedDBID -DZ
-W8
-~X
.GO
05W
0R~
123
1OC
29P
2AX
2KS
33P
3R3
50Y
50Z
52U
8-0
8-1
85S
8R4
8R5
930
A04
AAAZS
AABNI
AAESR
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABAWQ
ABBHK
ABCUV
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLWH
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABSOO
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHJO
ACHQT
ACKOT
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADEPB
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNFJ
ADUKH
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEUPB
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGNAY
AGXDD
AHBTC
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIURR
ALAGY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASTYK
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BRXPI
CS3
DCZOG
DPXWK
DRFUL
DRSSH
DU5
EBS
EDJ
EJD
F5P
G-S
G50
GENNL
GODZA
HGLYW
HZ~
IAO
ICO
IEA
IOF
IPSME
JAAYA
JAV
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPL
JST
KOO
L7B
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M0P
MEWTI
MQT
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MVM
MXFUL
MXSSH
MY~
N04
N06
NEJ
NF~
O66
O9-
OMK
P2P
P2W
Q.N
Q2X
Q3B
QB0
QM7
QN7
R.K
RJX
ROL
RX1
SA0
SJN
SUPJJ
TN5
UKR
V8K
WBKPD
WGMDG
WH7
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WSUWO
WXSBR
XZL
ZCA
ZZTAW
~WP
.Y3
0-V
3-9
31~
3EH
68V
7K8
8A4
8FI
8FJ
8G5
AAHHS
AAHSB
AANHP
AAYJJ
AAYOK
ABCQX
ABOPQ
ABUWG
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACRPL
ACTDY
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AEEZP
AEQDE
AFFNX
AFKRA
AIKWM
AIMQZ
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALEEW
ARALO
ASPBG
AS~
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWQXO
FEDTE
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HF~
HGD
HVGLF
H~9
IER
ITC
LIQON
M2M
M2O
M6I
NHB
P-O
PADUT
PHGZT
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSYQQ
QF4
QZG
S0X
UBC
UKHRP
VQA
WHG
XOL
YCJ
YYP
ZCG
AAWJA
AAYXX
ABUFD
AFFHD
AGQPQ
CITATION
LH4
O8X
PHGZM
PMKZF
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7T9
AHOVV
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3664-893950e6327f0ca901d4ee4e13e9ffb9bb293aa1c8bee7d7d19500ff9f5ce7623
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 63
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000391985700004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0034-0553
IngestDate Mon Nov 10 00:55:14 EST 2025
Tue Dec 02 16:42:37 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 20:41:35 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:09:18 EST 2025
Wed Mar 05 09:12:24 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:32:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3664-893950e6327f0ca901d4ee4e13e9ffb9bb293aa1c8bee7d7d19500ff9f5ce7623
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135650/2/rrq154_am.pdf
PQID 1856869250
PQPubID 577
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_1856869250
eric_primary_EJ1124451
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_154
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_rrq_154
wiley_primary_10_1002_rrq_154_RRQ154
jstor_primary_26622578
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Newark
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Newark
PublicationTitle Reading research quarterly
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley-Blackwell
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: Wiley-Blackwell
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 1995; 30
2010; 54
2013; 3
1965; 12
2010; 19
2011; 62
2004; 3
1986; 39
2008; 78
2007; 31
1998; 87
1978
1998; 16
2000
2004; 36
2015; 85
1991a; 83
1987
1985
1984
1983
1981
1996; 23
2009; 25
2010
2015; 54
2002; 1
2014; 49
2008
1997
1996; 52
2007
1995
1997; 27
2005
1994
1993
2004
2008; 52
2002
2011; 36
1996; 14
2012; 32
1998; 22
2012; 30
2014; 42
2012; 93
1991; 20
1991b; 28
1994; 12
1999; 34
2003; 25
2015
2015; 117
2013
2012; 45
2001; 36
Rainey E.C. (e_1_2_6_46_1) 2015
e_1_2_6_32_1
Eagleton T. (e_1_2_6_9_1) 2008
e_1_2_6_30_1
Langer J.A. (e_1_2_6_20_1) 1995
e_1_2_6_19_1
Reisman A. (e_1_2_6_49_1) 2015; 117
Bain R.B. (e_1_2_6_3_1) 2005
e_1_2_6_13_1
Lee C.D. (e_1_2_6_24_1) 2007
e_1_2_6_36_1
e_1_2_6_59_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_55_1
Rabinowitz P.J. (e_1_2_6_45_1) 1987
NGSS Lead States (e_1_2_6_39_1) 2013
e_1_2_6_62_1
e_1_2_6_43_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
e_1_2_6_60_1
Bain R.B. (e_1_2_6_2_1) 2000
e_1_2_6_5_1
Lee C.D. (e_1_2_6_23_1) 2004; 3
e_1_2_6_7_1
Rex L.A. (e_1_2_6_51_1) 1999; 34
e_1_2_6_28_1
e_1_2_6_54_1
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
Pressley M. (e_1_2_6_44_1) 2004
Weiss R.S. (e_1_2_6_58_1) 1994
Lankshear C. (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2007
e_1_2_6_50_1
Street B.V. (e_1_2_6_57_1) 1984
Rainey E.C. (e_1_2_6_47_1) 2012; 45
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_33_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_56_1
Graves B. (e_1_2_6_15_1) 1996
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
Goldman S.R. (e_1_2_6_12_1) 2002
e_1_2_6_63_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
e_1_2_6_61_1
Bain R.B. (e_1_2_6_4_1) 2012; 45
National Council for the Social Studies (e_1_2_6_38_1) 2013
Scholes R. (e_1_2_6_53_1) 1985
e_1_2_6_8_1
Lee C.D. (e_1_2_6_26_1) 2010
e_1_2_6_6_1
Rosenblatt L.M. (e_1_2_6_52_1) 1978
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_48_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
Nystrand M. (e_1_2_6_40_1) 1997
References_xml – year: 1985
– volume: 85
  start-page: 254
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  end-page: 278
  article-title: Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise
  publication-title: Harvard Educational Review
– start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 24
– volume: 23
  start-page: 453
  issue: 6
  year: 1996
  end-page: 470
  article-title: Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers
  publication-title: Poetics
– volume: 25
  start-page: 250
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 270
  article-title: Defending interpretations of literary texts: The effects of topoi instruction on the literary arguments of high school students
  publication-title: Reading & Writing Quarterly
– year: 1981
– start-page: 331
  year: 2000
  end-page: 353
– volume: 54
  start-page: 213
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 227
  article-title: Assessing literary reasoning: Text and task complexities
  publication-title: Theory Into Practice
– volume: 22
  start-page: 319
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 346
  article-title: Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
– volume: 14
  start-page: 441
  issue: 4
  year: 1996
  end-page: 486
  article-title: Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history
  publication-title: Cognition and Instruction
– volume: 3
  start-page: 105
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 136
  article-title: Using affective appraisal to help readers construct literary interpretations
  publication-title: Scientific Study of Literature
– volume: 25
  start-page: 689
  issue: 6
  year: 2003
  end-page: 725
  article-title: Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research
  publication-title: International Journal of Science Education
– volume: 52
  start-page: 397
  year: 1996
  end-page: 418
– volume: 3
  start-page: 14
  year: 2004
  end-page: 25
  article-title: Literacy in the academic disciplines and the needs of adolescent struggling readers
  publication-title: Voices in Urban Education
– volume: 78
  start-page: 40
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content‐area literacy
  publication-title: Harvard Educational Review
– volume: 28
  start-page: 495
  issue: 3
  year: 1991b
  end-page: 519
  article-title: On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy
  publication-title: American Educational Research Journal
– year: 1994
– volume: 36
  start-page: 334
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 354
  article-title: Topoi and literary interpretation: The effects of a critical reading and writing intervention on high school students’ analytic literary essays
  publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology
– volume: 52
  start-page: 96
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change
  publication-title: Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
– volume: 45
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Building insider knowledge: Teaching students to read, write, and think in ELA and across the disciplines
  publication-title: English Education
– year: 2008
– volume: 1
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Problem‐based learning in literary studies
  publication-title: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
– volume: 49
  start-page: 283
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Making interpretation visible with an affect‐based strategy
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– volume: 36
  start-page: 141
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 176
  article-title: Thinking like a historian: College students’ reading of multiple historical documents
  publication-title: Journal of Literacy Research
– year: 1997
– volume: 42
  start-page: 228
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 274
  article-title: Developing historical reading and writing with adolescent readers: Effects on student learning
  publication-title: Theory and Research in Social Education
– volume: 34
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 129
  article-title: “If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important”: The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices
  publication-title: Research in the Teaching of English
– volume: 83
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 1991a
  end-page: 87
  article-title: Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology
– volume: 62
  start-page: 260
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 272
  article-title: Learning to open up history for students: Preservice teachers’ emerging pedagogical content knowledge
  publication-title: Journal of Teacher Education
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  end-page: 26
  article-title: Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative
  publication-title: Poetics
– start-page: 308
  year: 2004
  end-page: 321
– year: 1993
– year: 2015
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 44
  article-title: Developing socially just subject‐matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching
  publication-title: Review of Research in Education
– volume: 32
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 18
  article-title: What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?
  publication-title: Topics in Language Disorders
– volume: 12
  start-page: 436
  issue: 4
  year: 1965
  end-page: 445
  article-title: The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis
  publication-title: Social Problems
– year: 1983
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  end-page: 44
  article-title: Entering the historical problem space: Whole‐class text‐based discussion in history class
  publication-title: Teachers College Record
– volume: 30
  start-page: 442
  issue: 3
  year: 1995
  end-page: 463
  article-title: Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– volume: 87
  start-page: 16
  issue: 2
  year: 1998
  end-page: 23
  article-title: Thinking and doing literature: An eight‐year study
  publication-title: English Journal
– volume: 39
  start-page: 564
  issue: 6
  year: 1986
  end-page: 570
  article-title: KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text
  publication-title: The Reading Teacher
– start-page: 19
  year: 2002
  end-page: 50
– year: 2007
– year: 1987
– volume: 45
  start-page: 513
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  end-page: 532
  article-title: Using disciplinary literacy to develop coherence in history teacher education: The Clinical Rounds Project
  publication-title: The History Teacher
– start-page: 179
  year: 2005
  end-page: 214
– volume: 27
  start-page: 221
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  end-page: 232
  article-title: Instructional explanations in history
  publication-title: International Journal of Educational Research
– volume: 16
  start-page: 235
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 263
  article-title: Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert–novice study
  publication-title: Cognition and Instruction
– year: 2010
– volume: 19
  start-page: 539
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 568
  article-title: Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing
  publication-title: Journal of the Learning Sciences
– volume: 12
  start-page: 277
  issue: 4
  year: 1994
  end-page: 312
  article-title: Expert–novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature
  publication-title: Cognition and Instruction
– year: 1984
– volume: 30
  start-page: 86
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Reading like a historian: A document‐based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools
  publication-title: Cognition and Instruction
– volume: 93
  start-page: 62
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 65
  article-title: Mapping the teacher education terrain for novices
  publication-title: Phi Delta Kappan
– volume: 54
  start-page: 267
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 273
  article-title: In praise of amateurism: A friendly critique of Moje's “Call for Change” in secondary literacy
  publication-title: Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
– year: 1995
– volume: 36
  start-page: 288
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  end-page: 314
  article-title: The remaking of a high school reader
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– year: 1978
– volume: 1
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 42
  article-title: The problem problem and other oddities of academic discourse
  publication-title: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
– year: 2013
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511841057
– start-page: 19
  volume-title: The psychology of science text comprehension
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
– volume-title: The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.06.001
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
– volume-title: Literacy in theory and practice
  year: 1984
  ident: e_1_2_6_57_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrq.71
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1598/RT.39.6.11
– ident: e_1_2_6_62_1
  doi: 10.1080/09500690305018
– volume-title: Literary theory: An introduction
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
– volume-title: Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
– volume-title: Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_61_1
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
– volume-title: Textual power, literary theory and the teaching of English
  year: 1985
  ident: e_1_2_6_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1177/003172171209300514
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0883‐0355(97)89730‐3
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.2307/798843
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: A new literacies sampler
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
– volume-title: What does it mean to read literary works? The literacy practices, epistemologies, and instructional approaches of literary scholars and high school English language arts teachers
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_6_46_1
– start-page: 179
  volume-title: How students learn: History in the classroom
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.17763/0017‐8055.85.2.254
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.4.4
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1080/00405841.2015.1044369
– volume-title: Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation
  year: 1987
  ident: e_1_2_6_45_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_55_1
  doi: 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
– ident: e_1_2_6_48_1
  doi: 10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
– ident: e_1_2_6_63_1
  doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1080/10573560903120656
– volume-title: Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_6_58_1
– volume: 45
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_6_47_1
  article-title: Building insider knowledge: Teaching students to read, write, and think in ELA and across the disciplines
  publication-title: English Education
  doi: 10.58680/ee201221575
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_6_49_1
  article-title: Entering the historical problem space: Whole‐class text‐based discussion in history class
  publication-title: Teachers College Record
  doi: 10.1177/016146811511700206
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.2307/747625
– start-page: 397
  volume-title: Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.4135/9781452230153
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_2
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/0304‐422X(91)90031‐J
– volume-title: Culture, literacy and learning: Taking Bloom in the midst of the whirlwind
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
  doi: 10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
– ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  doi: 10.3102/0091732X07300046001
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  doi: 10.1075/ssol.3.1.10lev
– volume-title: Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1177/1474022202001001003
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1177/0022487110397842
– start-page: 331
  volume-title: Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_56_1
  doi: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
– start-page: 308
  volume-title: Literacy research methodologies
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
– volume: 3
  start-page: 14
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  article-title: Literacy in the academic disciplines and the needs of adolescent struggling readers
  publication-title: Voices in Urban Education
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/0304‐422X(96)00004‐6
– ident: e_1_2_6_54_1
  doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674433014
– volume: 45
  start-page: 513
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  article-title: Using disciplinary literacy to develop coherence in history teacher education: The Clinical Rounds Project
  publication-title: The History Teacher
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1177/1474022202001001006
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.2307/821546
– ident: e_1_2_6_59_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022‐0663.83.1.73
– volume-title: The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_6_52_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_60_1
  doi: 10.3102/00028312028003495
– ident: e_1_2_6_50_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.36.3.3
– volume: 34
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_6_51_1
  article-title: “If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important”: The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices
  publication-title: Research in the Teaching of English
  doi: 10.58680/rte19991685
– volume-title: Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
SSID ssj0000523
Score 2.4379249
Snippet Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the...
Despite many calls for K–12 disciplinary literacy instruction—instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the...
Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction--instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of the...
Despite many calls for K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction -- instruction that teaches students the specialized ways of reading, writing, and reasoning of...
SourceID proquest
eric
crossref
wiley
jstor
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 53
SubjectTerms Academic disciplines
Academic work
Academic writing
Adolescence
Arts
College Faculty
College/university students
Content Area Reading
Content Area Writing
Content literacy
Elementary Secondary Education
English
English language
Fiction
Grounded Theory
Higher education
Instructional models
Instructional strategies
Intellectual Disciplines
In‐service
Language Arts
Language teaching methods
Literacy
Literacy Education
Literature
Literature‐based instruction
Logical Thinking
Preservice
Problem Based Learning
Purpose
Reading Instruction
Reasoning
Scholarship
Secondary schools
Semi Structured Interviews
Social Problems
Sociocultural
Specific subject areas (math art etc.)
Strategies methods and materials
Teacher education professional development
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
teaching strategies
Theoretical perspectives
United States Literature
Writing
Title Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the Social and Problem-Based Nature of Literary Reading and Reasoning
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/26622578
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Frrq.154
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1124451
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1856869250
Volume 52
WOSCitedRecordID wos000391985700004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1936-2722
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000523
  issn: 0034-0553
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19960101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB509eDFt7i-yEG8FdsmaRtvvhYRWXRR8FaSNAFBurpVwZv-A3-jv8S8rCsiCJ5ayDQtmcnkYzrzDcA2SRXOmWKRYDKPSMVwxDmmkftpJ7KCMClcs4m83y-ur9n5WKsvzw_RBtzsznD-2m5wLprdL9LQ0ejehkUmYSo1Vks7MHU06F2dfblhmgbGXRLFlGJfMWsf3g2PfjuKQrazT0r8BjfHQas7dXpz__jeeZgNUBPte9tYgAlVL9ouzSGjYwlej8ZKcpGnz5DP6KZGobgXnYVopp2k2UNtwh4ysBH5yl7E6wqd-7Y07y9vB-ZUrFDf0YWioQ6zmulDtr4TN_eNCwMvw1Xv-PLwJAotGSKJs4xEBt0wGqsMp7mOJTdgoiJKEZVgxbQWTAgDHzhPZCGUyqu8sl1mY62ZplIZv4tXoFMPa7UKKFMpxjkRmMeSUK64LqqYxbIgPKGaZ13Y-dROKQNfuW2bcVt6puW0NCtamhXtAmoF7zxFx0-RFavedvj4NLG4hiZmwCm8HTF4JbVerAsbnxZQhl3dlAbbZEXGDGrswrbT9W8vLAeDC3NZ-5vYOsykFi24yM4GdB5Gj2oTpuXTw00z2gqG_QFiH_10
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7xqEQvBdoitl3AB8QtIontJOZGWVY8lhWsQOIWOY4trYQC3aWVemv_QX8jv4TxgwBCSEicEskTJ_KMx58mM98AbLJU01xoEVVC5RGrBY2kpDxyP-2qrGBCVa7ZRD4cFpeX4jRkVdpaGM8P0Qbc7M5w_tpucBuQ3n5kDZ1Mftq4yCzMMzQitO753qh_MXj0wzwNlLssijmnvmTWPrwdHn12FoV0Z5-V-AxvPkWt7tjpL77ng5fgUwCbZNdbxzLM6Oaz7dMccjq-wL_ek6Jc4gk01B8ybkgo7yWDEM-0k0x3SJuyRxA4El_bS2RTk1PfmObu7_8feC7WZOgIQ8m1CbPi9CFf34nj_dQFgr_CRX__fO8gCk0ZIkWzjEWIbwSPdUbT3MRKIpyomdZMJ1QLYypRVQggpExUUWmd13lt-8zGxgjDlUbPS1dgrrlu9CqQTKeU5qyiMlaMSy1NUcciVgWTCTcy68DWg3pKFRjLbeOMq9JzLaclrmiJK9oB0greeJKOlyIrVr_t8P5RYpENT3DAabwdQcSSWj_Wge6DCZRhX09LRDdZkQnEjR3YdMp-7YXlaHSGl29vE9uAhYPzk0E5OBwef4ePqcUOLs7ThbnbyS-9Bh_U79vxdLIerPwegzIBcw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB50FfHiW1yfOYi3YtskbeNNXRcfy7IuCt5KmiawIFV3VfCm_8Df6C8xL6siguCphUzSkkkmH5OZbwC2SSxxyiQLCibSgJQMB5xjGthLuyLJCBOFLTaRdrvZ1RXr-ahKkwvj-CFqh5vZGdZemw0ub0u1-8kaOhzeGb_IOEwQU0KmAROtfvuy82mHaewpd0kQUopdyqzpvOu7fjuLfLizi0r8hje_olZ77LRn__PDczDjwSbad6tjHsZktWDqNPuYjkV4aX1JykWOQEM8oUGFfHov6nh_phlktIfqkD2kgSNyub2IVyXqucI0b8-vB_pcLFHXEoaiG-VH1cP7eH0rrt9H1hG8BJfto4vD48AXZQgEThISaHzDaCgTHKcqFFzDiZJISWSEJVOqYEWhAQTnkcgKKdMyLU2d2VAppqiQ2vLiZWhUN5VcAZTIGOOUFJiHglAuucrKkIUiIzyiiidN2PlQTy48Y7kpnHGdO67lONczmusZbQKqBW8dScdPkWWj37r56DQyyIZGusFqvG7RiCU2dqwJ6x9LIPf7epRrdJNkCdO4sQnbVtm_fTDv98_1Y_VvYlsw1Wu1885J92wNpmMDHaybZx0a98MHuQGT4vF-MBpu-kX-Dg3tAO4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disciplinary+Literacy+in+English+Language+Arts%3A+Exploring+the+Social+and+Problem%E2%80%90Based+Nature+of+Literary+Reading+and+Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Reading+research+quarterly&rft.au=Rainey%2C+Emily+C.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.issn=0034-0553&rft.eissn=1936-2722&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=71&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Frrq.154&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Frrq.154&rft.externalDocID=RRQ154
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon