Understanding Formal Responses to Intimate Partner Violence and Women’s Resistance Processes: A Scoping Review

Intimate partner violence (IPV) literature addresses the ways in which women oppose violent male partners through acts of “everyday resistance.” There is a limited understanding, however, of the relationship between women’s resistance and their formal help-seeking in the context of IPV. Our scoping...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Trauma, violence & abuse Ročník 23; číslo 5; s. 1405 - 1419
Hlavní autoři:	Osborn, Max, Rajah, Valli
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2022 Sage Publications Ltd
Témata:	Aggression Domestic violence English language Female Help seeking behavior Humans Individual differences Intimate partner violence Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control Literature Locus of control Male Resistance Responses Sense of control Survival Survivor Survivors Violence Women perceptions of domestic violence intervention/treatment battered women intimate partner violence domestic violence cultural contexts scoping review
ISSN:	1524-8380, 1552-8324, 1552-8324
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Popis
Shrnutí:	Intimate partner violence (IPV) literature addresses the ways in which women oppose violent male partners through acts of “everyday resistance.” There is a limited understanding, however, of the relationship between women’s resistance and their formal help-seeking in the context of IPV. Our scoping review, which includes 74 articles published in English-language journals between 1994 and 2017, attempts to help fill this gap by developing systematic knowledge regarding the following research questions: (1) How are formal institutional responses discussed within the literature on resistance to IPV? (2) How does institutional help-seeking facilitate or obstruct IPV survivors’ personal efforts to resist violence? We find that institutions and organizations succeed in facilitating resistance processes when they counter victim-blaming ideas and provide IPV survivors with shared community and a sense of control over their futures. However, they fall short in terms of helping survivors by expecting survivors to adhere to a rigid narrative about appropriate responses to violence, devoting insufficient attention to individual-level factors impacting survivors’ vulnerability and ability to access help, and replicating abuse dynamics when interacting with survivors. Policy and practice implications are discussed.
Bibliografie:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Literature Review-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23
ISSN:	1524-8380 1552-8324 1552-8324
DOI:	10.1177/1524838020967348