Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups

Although the social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) demonstrates that identity, efficacy, and injustice are key correlates of collective action, longitudinal tests of these causal assumptions are absent from the literature. Moreover, most collective action research focuses on disadvantag...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Personality & social psychology bulletin Ročník 46; číslo 6; s. 823 - 838
Hlavní autoři:	Thomas, Emma F., Zubielevitch, Elena, Sibley, Chris G., Osborne, Danny
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2020 SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Témata:	Action research Adult Aged At risk populations Collective action Cooperative Behavior Disadvantaged Efficacy Female Humans Injustice Interpersonal Relations Justice Longitudinal Studies Male Middle Aged Minority groups Models, Psychological Motivation New Zealand Panel data Social Change Social groups Social Identification Social identity Social Justice Vulnerable Populations - statistics & numerical data White People - statistics & numerical data New Zealand social identity theory political efficacy injustice SIMCA collective action longitudinal data
ISSN:	0146-1672, 1552-7433, 1552-7433
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Popis
Shrnutí:	Although the social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) demonstrates that identity, efficacy, and injustice are key correlates of collective action, longitudinal tests of these causal assumptions are absent from the literature. Moreover, most collective action research focuses on disadvantaged groups’ responses to injustice, with few studies examining what motivates advantaged groups to protest. We address these oversights using nationally representative longitudinal panel data to investigate SIMCA among members of disadvantaged (N = 2,574) and advantaged (N = 13,367) groups. As hypothesized, identity predicted increases in injustice, efficacy, and collective action support over time. In turn, injustice (but not efficacy) mediated the longitudinal association between identity and collective action support. Notably, results were largely consistent across disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Thus, we provide the first demonstration that identity temporally precedes collective action across objectively disadvantaged and advantaged groups, but identify complexities regarding the role of efficacy in protest.
Bibliografie:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
ISSN:	0146-1672 1552-7433 1552-7433
DOI:	10.1177/0146167219879111