Reading music from screens vs paper

The reading of music text from a computer screen was compared to paper in a laboratory controlled study. Computer-based animated score tracking devices of three types were tested, as well as a static screen representation of the music text and its paper-based counterpart. A proof-reading exercise wa...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Behaviour & information technology Ročník 16; číslo 2; s. 72 - 78
Hlavní autor: Picking, Richard
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.1997
Taylor & Francis
Témata:
ISSN:0144-929X, 1362-3001
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The reading of music text from a computer screen was compared to paper in a laboratory controlled study. Computer-based animated score tracking devices of three types were tested, as well as a static screen representation of the music text and its paper-based counterpart. A proof-reading exercise was given to subjects, which involved them listening to pieces of music and identifying intentional errors in the score. Their subjective views were also recorded. No significant difference between the five presentation styles were apparent in the proofreading study. However, subjects showed a significant preference for animation over paper and static representation. The most popular style of animation was where each note on the score was marked in time to the music. The medium of paper performed better overall than the static screen representation.
ISSN:0144-929X
1362-3001
DOI:10.1080/014492997119914