Resist‐accept‐direct (RAD) considerations for climate change adaptation in fisheries: The Wisconsin experience

Decision‐makers in inland fisheries management must balance ecologically and socially palatable objectives for ecosystem services within financial or physical constraints. Climate change has transformed the potential range of ecosystem services available. The Resist‐Accept‐Direct (RAD) framework off...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries management and ecology Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 346 - 363
Main Authors: Feiner, Zachary S., Shultz, Aaron D., Sass, Greg G., Trudeau, Ashley, Mitro, Matthew G., Dassow, Colin J., Latzka, Alexander W., Isermann, Daniel A., Maitland, Bryan M., Homola, Jared J., Embke, Holly S., Preul, Michael
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2022
Subjects:
ISSN:0969-997X, 1365-2400
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Decision‐makers in inland fisheries management must balance ecologically and socially palatable objectives for ecosystem services within financial or physical constraints. Climate change has transformed the potential range of ecosystem services available. The Resist‐Accept‐Direct (RAD) framework offers a foundation for responding to climate‐induced ecosystem modification; however, ecosystem trajectories and current practices must be understood to improve future decisions. Using Wisconsin's diverse inland fisheries as a case study, management strategies for recreational and subsistence fisheries in response to climate change were reviewed within the RAD framework. Current strategies largely focus on resist actions, while future strategies may need to shift toward accept or direct actions. A participatory adaptive management framework and co‐production of policies between state and tribal agencies could prioritise lakes for appropriate management action, with the goal of providing a landscape of diverse fishing opportunities. This knowledge co‐production represents a process of social learning requiring substantial investments of funding and time.
Bibliography:Funding information
Authors contributed equally to the development of this manuscript. Author order after the first author was decided randomly in R using
sample(x=c("Embke", "Latzka", "Sass", "Shultz", "Trudeau", "Dassow", "Maitland", "Mitro", "Isermann", "Homola", "Preul"))
Z.S. Feiner, G.G. Sass, and M. Mitro were supported by funding from US Fish and Wildlife Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
set.seed(188)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0969-997X
1365-2400
DOI:10.1111/fme.12549