An exploratory study into the use of qualitative research methods in descriptive process modelling

The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different techniques. To set the context, the paper describes qualitative methods, particularly grounded theory and its techniques, and then explores the na...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Information and software technology Ročník 47; číslo 2; s. 113 - 127
Hlavní autoři:	Carvalho, Lucila, Scott, Louise, Jeffery, Ross
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.02.2005 Elsevier Science Ltd
Témata:	Data analysis Data processing Descriptive process modelling Grounded theory Process engineering Qualitative methods Qualitative research Qualitative research methods Research methods Software Software engineering Studies Qualitative research methods Process engineering Descriptive process modelling Software engineering
ISSN:	0950-5849, 1873-6025
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different techniques. To set the context, the paper describes qualitative methods, particularly grounded theory and its techniques, and then explores the nature of the differences in the two models produced. It suggests ways in which constant comparison may contribute to the process-modelling task. As far as we are aware, it also serves as the first exploratory research on the application of this method in the software engineering process research domain. Based on data analysis using the technique of constant comparison often used in grounded theory research, a naive process modeller derived one of the models. An experienced process engineer relying heavily on experience and skill using an ad hoc approach derived the second model. The aim of the study was to explore differences in the models derived and to use this comparison as a basis for reflection on the method conventionally used in descriptive process modelling in contrast with the use of more formal qualitative analysis. The results show that (1) data analysis using the technique of constant comparison could be successfully applied to analyse process data, (2) the person with little experience in process modelling could produce a process model based on the data analysis using constant comparison and (3) the process model produced by the naive modeller was not equivalent to that produced by an experienced process engineer.
AbstractList	The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different techniques. To set the context, the paper describes qualitative methods, particularly grounded theory and its techniques, and then explores the nature of the differences in the two models produced. It suggests ways in which constant comparison may contribute to the process-modelling task. As far as we are aware, it also serves as the first exploratory research on the application of this method in the software engineering process research domain. Based on data analysis using the technique of constant comparison often used in grounded theory research, a naive process modeller derived one of the models. An experienced process engineer relying heavily on experience and skill using an ad hoc approach derived the second model. The aim of the study was to explore differences in the models derived and to use this comparison as a basis for reflection on the method conventionally used in descriptive process modelling in contrast with the use of more formal qualitative analysis. The results show that (1) data analysis using the technique of constant comparison could be successfully applied to analyse process data, (2) the person with little experience in process modelling could produce a process model based on the data analysis using constant comparison and (3) the process model produced by the naive modeller was not equivalent to that produced by an experienced process engineer. (Original abstract) The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different techniques. To set the context, the paper describes qualitative methods, particularly grounded theory and its techniques, and then explores the nature of the differences in the two models produced. It suggests ways in which constant comparison may contribute to the process-modelling task. As far as we are aware, it also serves as the first exploratory research on the application of this method in the software engineering process research domain. Based on data analysis using the technique of constant comparison often used in grounded theory research, a naive process modeller derived one of the models. An experienced process engineer relying heavily on experience and skill using an ad hoc approach derived the second model. The aim of the study was to explore differences in the models derived and to use this comparison as a basis for reflection on the method conventionally used in descriptive process modelling in contrast with the use of more formal qualitative analysis. The results show that (1) data analysis using the technique of constant comparison could be successfully applied to analyse process data, (2) the person with little experience in process modelling could produce a process model based on the data analysis using constant comparison and (3) the process model produced by the naive modeller was not equivalent to that produced by an experienced process engineer. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different techniques. To set the context, the paper describes qualitative methods, particularly grounded theory and its techniques, and then explores the nature of the differences in the two models produced. It suggests ways in which constant comparison may contribute to the process-modelling task. As far as we are aware, it also serves as the first exploratory research on the application of this method in the software engineering process research domain. Based on data analysis using the technique of constant comparison often used in grounded theory research, a naive process modeller derived one of the models. An experienced process engineer relying heavily on experience and skill using an ad hoc approach derived the second model. The aim of the study was to explore differences in the models derived and to use this comparison as a basis for reflection on the method conventionally used in descriptive process modelling in contrast with the use of more formal qualitative analysis. The results show that (1) data analysis using the technique of constant comparison could be successfully applied to analyse process data, (2) the person with little experience in process modelling could produce a process model based on the data analysis using constant comparison and (3) the process model produced by the naive modeller was not equivalent to that produced by an experienced process engineer.
Author	Carvalho, Lucila Jeffery, Ross Scott, Louise
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Lucila surname: Carvalho fullname: Carvalho, Lucila – sequence: 2 givenname: Louise surname: Scott fullname: Scott, Louise – sequence: 3 givenname: Ross surname: Jeffery fullname: Jeffery, Ross email: ross.jeffery@nicta.com.au, rossj@cse.unsw.edu.au
BookMark	eNqFkLFOHDEURa2ISFlI_iCFRZFuhufx2LOmQEKIhEhIaZLa8nies17N2ovtQdm_j2GpKKB6xTv36uqckpMQAxLylUHLgMmLbeuDy9G1HUDfgmwBxAeyYuuBNxI6cUJWoAQ0Yt2rT-Q05y0AG4DDiozXgeK__RyTKTEdaC7LdKA-lEjLBumSkUZHHxYz-2KKf0SaMKNJdkN3WDZxyhWmE2ab_P75v0_RYs50FyecZx_-fiYfnZkzfnm5Z-TP99vfN3fN_a8fP2-u7xvLZV8aK6x0OPIeB2RGdANYicMwwmjtaJRkyjnOjegVKGZV50TnhrEzynDFJznyM_Lt2FsXPCyYi975bOsGEzAuWYtBdpKzvoLnr8BtXFKo2zRTsmdyzVmFLo-QTTHnhE7bZwMxlGT8rBnoJ_d6q4_u9ZN7DVJX9zXcvwrvk9-ZdHgvdnWMYdX06DHpbD0Gi5NPaIueon-74D-5iaSA
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1108_17410390810911221 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2023_3305325 crossref_primary_10_3390_app15095098 crossref_primary_10_51574_ijrer_v3i1_1397 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00766_017_0284_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2007_02_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2010_02_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00766_021_00360_6
Cites_doi	10.1109/METRIC.2002.1011331 10.1109/ISESE.2003.1237966 10.1145/130994.130998 10.1016/S0950-5849(02)00080-0 10.1287/isre.7.1.63 10.1109/32.799955 10.1007/3-540-48738-7_10 10.1145/292182.292194
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2004 Elsevier B.V. Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 1, 2005
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2004 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 1, 2005
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D E3H F2A
DOI	10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005
DatabaseName	CrossRef Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
DatabaseTitleList	Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Business
EISSN	1873-6025
EndPage	127
ExternalDocumentID	777222261 10_1016_j_infsof_2004_06_005 S0950584904000977
Genre	Feature
GroupedDBID	--K --M -~X .DC .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 1~5 29I 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 77K 8P~ 9JN AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO AAYFN AAYOK ABBOA ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABTAH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACNNM ACRLP ACZNC ADBBV ADEZE ADJOM ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHZHX AIALX AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOUOD ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BKOMP BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q G8K GBLVA GBOLZ HLZ HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LG9 M41 MO0 MS~ N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SBC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSV SSZ T5K TWZ UHS UNMZH WH7 WUQ XFK ZY4 ~G- 77I 9DU AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABDPE ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D E3H F2A
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-c5c6feb34e7e1a5270c6e77b0bccba9619ff33a549091c92f52f7b2a9a393d6b3
ISICitedReferencesCount	15
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000226260000004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0950-5849
IngestDate	Thu Oct 02 05:57:39 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 30 04:05:49 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:40:31 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:04:24 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:23:55 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	2
Keywords	Qualitative research methods Process engineering Descriptive process modelling Software engineering
Language	English
License	https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c364t-c5c6feb34e7e1a5270c6e77b0bccba9619ff33a549091c92f52f7b2a9a393d6b3
Notes	SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
PQID	196416831
PQPubID	41979
PageCount	15
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_57626314 proquest_journals_196416831 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_infsof_2004_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2004_06_005 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_infsof_2004_06_005
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2005-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2005-02-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 02 year: 2005 text: 2005-02-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2000
PublicationPlace	Amsterdam
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle	Information and software technology
PublicationYear	2005
Publisher	Elsevier B.V Elsevier Science Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Science Ltd
References	Urquhart (bib11) 1997 Carver, Shull, Basili (bib19) 2003; 2003 Pidgeon (bib13) 1996 Seaman (bib1) 1999; 25 Becker-Kornstaedt (bib15) 1999 Jaccheri, Lago, Picco (bib4) 1998; 7 Burrel, Morgan (bib7) 1979 Curtis, Kellner, Over (bib2) 1992; 35 Orlikowski (bib12) 1996; 7 NVivo, QSR International Pty Ltd, 2000. Wohlin (bib17) 2002 Glaser, Strauss (bib9) 1967 Strauss, Corbin (bib10) 1990 Shull, Carver, Travassos (bib18) 2001 Crotty (bib8) 1998 Pidgeon, Henwood (bib14) 1996 Strauss, Corbin (bib5) 1998 Scott, Carvalho, Jeffery, D'Ambra, Becker-Kornstaedt (bib20) 2002; 44 Bandinelli (bib3) 1994 Hoeltje (bib6) 1994 Pidgeon (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib14) 1996 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib16 Pidgeon (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib13) 1996 Crotty (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib8) 1998 Scott (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib20) 2002; 44 Urquhart (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib11) 1997 Becker-Kornstaedt (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib15) 1999 Strauss (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib10) 1990 Glaser (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib9) 1967 Shull (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib18) 2001 Hoeltje (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib6) 1994 Seaman (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib1) 1999; 25 Strauss (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib5) 1998 Wohlin (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib17) 2002 Orlikowski (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib12) 1996; 7 Carver (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib19) 2003; 2003 Curtis (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib2) 1992; 35 Bandinelli (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib3) 1994 Jaccheri (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib4) 1998; 7 Burrel (10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib7) 1979
References_xml	– start-page: 288 year: 2001 end-page: 296 ident: bib18 article-title: ‘An empirical methodology for introducing software processes’ publication-title: Proceedings of the Joint Eighth European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and Ninth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9), Vienna, Austria, September 10–14 – volume: 7 start-page: 368 year: 1998 end-page: 410 ident: bib4 article-title: Eliciting software process models with the E3 language publication-title: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology – volume: 35 start-page: 75 year: 1992 end-page: 90 ident: bib2 article-title: Process modelling publication-title: Communications of the ACM – start-page: 86 year: 1996 end-page: 101 ident: bib14 article-title: Grounded theory: practical implementation publication-title: Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods – year: 1998 ident: bib5 article-title: Grounded theory methodology: an overview publication-title: Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry – year: 1998 ident: bib8 article-title: The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process – reference: NVivo, QSR International Pty Ltd, 2000. – year: 1979 ident: bib7 article-title: Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis publication-title: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life – year: 1967 ident: bib9 article-title: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research – year: 2002 ident: bib17 article-title: ‘Software inspection benchmarking—a qualitative and quantitative comparative opportunity’ publication-title: Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Software Metrics, 4–7 June, 2002, Ottawa, Canada – volume: 25 start-page: 557 year: 1999 end-page: 572 ident: bib1 article-title: Qualitative methods in empirical studies in software engineering publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – volume: 7 start-page: 63 year: 1996 end-page: 92 ident: bib12 article-title: Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective publication-title: Information Systems Research – year: 1994 ident: bib6 article-title: Eliciting formal models of software engineering processes publication-title: Proceedings of the CAS Conference – volume: 2003 start-page: 72 year: 2003 end-page: 79 ident: bib19 article-title: ‘Observational studies to accelerate process experience in classroom studies: an evaluation’ publication-title: Proceedings of ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2003). September – start-page: 75 year: 1996 end-page: 85 ident: bib13 article-title: Grounded theory: theoretical background publication-title: Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods – year: 1994 ident: bib3 article-title: SPADE: An Environment for Software Process Analysis, Design and Enactment – year: 1990 ident: bib10 article-title: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques – year: 1997 ident: bib11 article-title: Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering, in information systems and qualitative research publication-title: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research – start-page: 119 year: 1999 end-page: 133 ident: bib15 article-title: Support for the process engineer: the spearmint approach to software process definition and process guidance publication-title: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering CAiSE'99 – volume: 44 start-page: 601 year: 2002 end-page: 616 ident: bib20 article-title: ‘Understanding the use of an electronic process guide’ publication-title: Information and Software Technology – start-page: 86 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib14 article-title: Grounded theory: practical implementation – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib17 article-title: ‘Software inspection benchmarking—a qualitative and quantitative comparative opportunity’ doi: 10.1109/METRIC.2002.1011331 – volume: 2003 start-page: 72 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib19 article-title: ‘Observational studies to accelerate process experience in classroom studies: an evaluation’ publication-title: Proceedings of ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2003). September doi: 10.1109/ISESE.2003.1237966 – start-page: 288 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib18 article-title: ‘An empirical methodology for introducing software processes’ publication-title: Proceedings of the Joint Eighth European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and Ninth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9), Vienna, Austria, September 10–14 – start-page: 75 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib13 article-title: Grounded theory: theoretical background – volume: 35 start-page: 75 issue: 9 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib2 article-title: Process modelling publication-title: Communications of the ACM doi: 10.1145/130994.130998 – volume: 44 start-page: 601 issue: 10 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib20 article-title: ‘Understanding the use of an electronic process guide’ publication-title: Information and Software Technology doi: 10.1016/S0950-5849(02)00080-0 – year: 1967 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib9 – year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib7 article-title: Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis – ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib16 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib11 article-title: Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering, in information systems and qualitative research – volume: 7 start-page: 63 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib12 article-title: Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective publication-title: Information Systems Research doi: 10.1287/isre.7.1.63 – year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib10 – volume: 25 start-page: 557 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib1 article-title: Qualitative methods in empirical studies in software engineering publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering doi: 10.1109/32.799955 – year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib5 article-title: Grounded theory methodology: an overview – start-page: 119 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib15 article-title: Support for the process engineer: the spearmint approach to software process definition and process guidance publication-title: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering CAiSE'99 doi: 10.1007/3-540-48738-7_10 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib3 – year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib8 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib6 article-title: Eliciting formal models of software engineering processes publication-title: Proceedings of the CAS Conference – volume: 7 start-page: 368 issue: 4 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005_bib4 article-title: Eliciting software process models with the E3 language publication-title: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology doi: 10.1145/292182.292194
SSID	ssj0017030
Score	1.805481
Snippet	The paper describes an exploratory study that investigated two descriptive software process models derived from the same process data using two different...
SourceID	proquest crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	113
SubjectTerms	Data analysis Data processing Descriptive process modelling Grounded theory Process engineering Qualitative methods Qualitative research Qualitative research methods Research methods Software Software engineering Studies
Title	An exploratory study into the use of qualitative research methods in descriptive process modelling
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.005 https://www.proquest.com/docview/196416831 https://www.proquest.com/docview/57626314
Volume	47
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000226260000004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-6025 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017030 issn: 0950-5849 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1La9wwEBbbpJReSp_k0YcOvRUXS7Is-7iElLaEUJoU9mYkRSa7GDtk7W1-SX5vRy_vtktJW-jFLF57rdV8nhmNZr5B6K1MBQW7AoscYkM31NhXSsiEFwrMH6wosly6ZhPi9LSYzcovk8ltrIVZNaJti5ub8uq_ihrOgbBt6exfiHv8UTgBn0HocASxw_GPBD91tP1NF_bPHX-sZYXwPubgY_e-ltKTfge-n8vQTTokyAZ1srKFVK6WwDfNaaKpW8QU-LH88Z2Pwdf9d5tN1m_F7I9sG6Lm0sVmTwY9b0aLcKZD2shJN8zXu0V289n4bf6v3fLnAAWPOc0xarZVORPCjykAwtOVvjde-RaCJXnqC6GjdvZ8nAGFdEPVEl_DGqw28QwDWwbBxyYWdhUDE-DiAY6vNeVrAzimJZ7ZUdlBWc2Wgmd8D-1SwUvQlrvTT8ezz-P-lNWTnsXR_4tYlOkyB7ef9Tun5xfz73ya88foUViM4KkH0RM0Me1T9CDWQjxDatriDSxhhyVssYQBSxiwhLsab2AJRyzhgCW4GG9gCQcs4RFLz9G3D8fnRx-T0JQj0SzP-kRznddGscwIQySnItW5EUKlSmslS1iP1zVjksMklkSXtOa0ForKUrKSXeSKvUA7bdeaPYS5yoihQjJBVXYhMlAPokhrRaTMdFGSfcTirFU6MNbbxilNFVMTF5Wfa9tMNatchibfR8l415VnbLnjehEFUgWv03uTFWDojjsPo_yqoACWlSW4I3nBYPRvxm9BZdt9ONmablhWsMSnOSPZwT8_-RA9XL9pL9FOfz2YV-i-XvXz5fXrANYfDkvClw
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+exploratory+study+into+the+use+of+qualitative+research+methods+in+descriptive+process+modelling&rft.jtitle=Information+and+software+technology&rft.au=Carvalho%2C+Lucila&rft.au=Scott%2C+Louise&rft.au=Jeffery%2C+Ross&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0950-5849&rft.eissn=1873-6025&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=127&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.infsof.2004.06.005&rft.externalDocID=S0950584904000977
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0950-5849&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0950-5849&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0950-5849&client=summon