Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing

Research suggests that English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ argumentative writing benefits from interactions with peers. However, finding an ideal partner to interact with can be difficult in practice, and chatbots have been suggested as a potential solution to this problem. Chatbots are a...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Assessing writing Ročník 54; s. 100666
Hlavní autori: Guo, Kai, Wang, Jian, Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Elsevier Inc 01.10.2022
Predmet:
ISSN:1075-2935, 1873-5916
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Research suggests that English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ argumentative writing benefits from interactions with peers. However, finding an ideal partner to interact with can be difficult in practice, and chatbots have been suggested as a potential solution to this problem. Chatbots are a form of artificial intelligence (AI) designed to engage in turn-by-turn conversations with human users. In this paper, we propose a chatbot-assisted approach to the teaching and learning of argumentative writing. We describe Argumate, a novel chatbot system that we developed to scaffold students’ argument construction, and we discuss the advantages and limitations of using this system to assist students in producing high-quality argumentative writing. •Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots into writing classrooms.•Proposal of a chatbot-assisted approach to argumentative writing.•Design and development of a chatbot system named Argumate.•Argumate can help with students’ idea generation and counterargument integration.
AbstractList Research suggests that English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ argumentative writing benefits from interactions with peers. However, finding an ideal partner to interact with can be difficult in practice, and chatbots have been suggested as a potential solution to this problem. Chatbots are a form of artificial intelligence (AI) designed to engage in turn-by-turn conversations with human users. In this paper, we propose a chatbot-assisted approach to the teaching and learning of argumentative writing. We describe Argumate, a novel chatbot system that we developed to scaffold students’ argument construction, and we discuss the advantages and limitations of using this system to assist students in producing high-quality argumentative writing. •Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots into writing classrooms.•Proposal of a chatbot-assisted approach to argumentative writing.•Design and development of a chatbot system named Argumate.•Argumate can help with students’ idea generation and counterargument integration.
ArticleNumber 100666
Author Guo, Kai
Wang, Jian
Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kai
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Kai
  email: kaiguo@connect.hku.hk
  organization: Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jian
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jian
  email: csjiwang@comp.polyu.edu.hk
  organization: Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Samuel Kai Wah
  surname: Chu
  fullname: Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
  email: samchu@hku.hk, kaiguo@connect.hku.hk
  organization: Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
BookMark eNp9kM9OAjEQhxuDiYA-gLe-wGL_bLtsvGgIqAmJFzk33XYWu4GtaQvEm6_h6_kkluDJA6eZyeSbzO8boUHve0DolpIJJVTedRMdDxNGGMszkVJeoCGdVrwQNZWD3JNKFKzm4gqNYuwIoSXhfIgeVtH1a2zedWp8ijh5HI1uW7-xeL5Y4ph2FvoUf76-sQ7r3TYPOrk94ENwKaPX6LLVmwg3f3WMVov52-y5WL4-vcwel4XhkqfCamZoQ6u65JRADcJMKWkEnzIAaKrWyLoxlRZ5wTkDnTMJ22rZmBxHlJaPET3dNcHHGKBVH8FtdfhUlKijAtWprEAdFaiTgsxU_xjjjt_7PgXtNmfJ-xMJOdLeQVDROOgNWBfAJGW9O0P_Alu2ebU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2025_101185
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241247465
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220671_2025_2510409
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2025_2511248
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13471_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2025_101181
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_03755_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_024_02248_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_12230_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2024_100975
crossref_primary_10_1080_08874417_2024_2441758
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeap_2025_101570
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0958344025000035
crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_4184
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijal_12798
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2025_105022
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40593_025_00503_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2024_107598
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12981_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40299_025_01042_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_17501229_2025_2511273
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJCALLT_367276
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_13231_8
crossref_primary_10_1108_ITSE_12_2022_0165
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1259531
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103618
crossref_primary_10_3390_languages9010005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_stueduc_2025_101480
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e25953
crossref_primary_10_64152_10125_73639
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2023_101380
crossref_primary_10_1080_02188791_2024_2305156
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_21_010149
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11135_024_01946_2
crossref_primary_10_36923_jicc_v23i2_125
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asw_2024_100896
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2024_2372646
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103775
crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440251321853
crossref_primary_10_1080_17516234_2024_2363128
crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2024_2404132
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_1049401
crossref_primary_10_1080_09588221_2025_2530555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2024_108337
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220671_2025_2525243
crossref_primary_10_1109_TLT_2023_3322128
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2023_2207181
crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2025_2472462
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amper_2025_100224
crossref_primary_10_1108_AEDS_12_2024_0314
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2024_103362
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11742_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_12397_x
crossref_primary_10_24310_ijtei_111_2025_20896
crossref_primary_10_3390_languages8030212
crossref_primary_10_1177_20965311241310883
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2025_101208
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chbah_2025_100160
crossref_primary_10_1080_02602938_2024_2301722
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_caeai_2025_100472
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2025_2538756
crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440251369938
crossref_primary_10_1080_17501229_2024_2445719
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2024_2361381
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_caeo_2025_100264
crossref_primary_10_1080_09588221_2025_2503900
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijal_12809
crossref_primary_10_1002_rev3_3489
crossref_primary_10_1080_07380569_2024_2446239
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12819_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chbr_2024_100566
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40561_024_00319_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220671_2025_2510382
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2025_2531267
crossref_primary_10_1093_applin_amaf045
crossref_primary_10_1177_00336882241264030
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40561_024_00295_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_70226
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1268549
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241312363
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09744_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104862
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103837
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2025_1614673
Cites_doi 10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_21
10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
10.1145/3362789.3362798
10.1111/jcal.12610
10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.002
10.1177/0956797611402512
10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
10.1145/365153.365168
10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92
10.64152/10125/44068
10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
10.1002/tea.20216
10.1002/sce.20402
10.1177/0741088309333019
10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
10.3102/0013189X17699172
10.3233/AAC-191007
10.1037/a0022545
10.3115/v1/D14-1181
10.1002/tesq.3025
10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
10.18653/v1/W17-5506
10.1002/tea.20035
10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_84
10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 Elsevier Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Languages & Literatures
Education
EISSN 1873-5916
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_asw_2022_100666
S1075293522000629
GroupedDBID --K
--M
-DZ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
23N
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JO
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYOK
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABPPZ
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMHC
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFFNX
AFKWA
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKYCK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOMHK
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HMY
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IHE
J1W
KOM
M3Y
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSB
SSO
SSS
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WUQ
~G-
9DU
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABJNI
ABWVN
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
~HD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-da2c1b1794310e9e5c810b5382eeeb7fc69bc7a5e5c332ea0165dfa6bc10054d3
ISICitedReferencesCount 106
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000854984800002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1075-2935
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 07:07:15 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:11:18 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:40:04 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Argumentative writing
Chatbots
Artificial intelligence
Argumate
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c363t-da2c1b1794310e9e5c810b5382eeeb7fc69bc7a5e5c332ea0165dfa6bc10054d3
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asw_2022_100666
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_asw_2022_100666
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_asw_2022_100666
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2022
2022-10-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2022
  text: October 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Assessing writing
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Lin, Chang (bib24) 2020; 23
Smutny, Schreiberova (bib30) 2020; 151
Storch (bib31) 2005; 14
Eric, M., Krishnan, L., Charette, F., & Manning, C.D. (2017). Key-value retrieval networks for task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGDial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 37–49).
Huang, Hew, Fryer (bib14) 2021; 38
Vázquez-Cano, Mengual-Andrés, López-Meneses (bib32) 2021; 18
Kılıçkaya (bib18) 2020
Pereira, J., & Barcina, M.A. (2019). A chatbot assistant for writing good quality technical reports. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 59–64).
Beauvais, Olive, Passerault (bib3) 2011; 103
Berland, McNeill (bib4) 2010; 94
Haines (bib13) 1995; 4
Nussbaum, Schraw (bib27) 2007; 76
Coirier, Andriessen, Chanquoy (bib6) 1999
Nagata, R., Hashiguchi, T., & Sadoun, D. (2019). Is the simplest chatbot effective in English writing learning assistance? In International Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 245–256). Springer, Singapore.
Osborne, Erduran, Simon (bib28) 2004; 41
Qin, Karabacak (bib29) 2010; 38
Weizenbaum (bib34) 1966; 9
Jia, Chen, Ding, Ruan (bib15) 2012; 58
Guo, Gu, Jin (bib11) 2021; 55
Kellogg, Whiteford, Turner, Cahill, Merlens (bib17) 2013; 5
Hadoux, Hunter (bib12) 2019; 10
Kim, Y. (2014). Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1746–1751). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Kuhn, Moore (bib22) 2015; 1
Barron (bib2) 2003; 12
Dung (bib7) 1995; 77
Fryer, Ainley, Thompson, Gibson, Sherlock (bib9) 2017; 75
Wang, Matsumura, Correnti, Litman, Zhang, Howe, Quintana (bib33) 2020; 44
Kuhn (bib20) 1991
.
Clark, Sampson (bib5) 2008; 45
Fryer, Carpenter (bib10) 2006; 10
Majidi, Janssen, Graaff (bib25) 2021; 101
Jia, J., & Ruan, M. (2008). Use chatbot CSIEC to facilitate the individual learning in English instruction: A case study. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 706–708). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Kuhn, Crowell (bib21) 2011; 22
Lee (bib23) 2017; 46
Bailey, D. (2019). Chatbots as conversational agents in the context of language learning. In Proceedings of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Education (pp. 32–41).
Wolfe, Britt, Butler (bib35) 2009; 26
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib26
Kuhn (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib22) 2015; 1
Kuhn (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib20) 1991
Wang (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib33) 2020; 44
Berland (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib4) 2010; 94
Kılıçkaya (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib18) 2020
Kuhn (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib21) 2011; 22
Smutny (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib30) 2020; 151
Weizenbaum (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib34) 1966; 9
Fryer (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib9) 2017; 75
Storch (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib31) 2005; 14
Hadoux (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib12) 2019; 10
Vázquez-Cano (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib32) 2021; 18
Wolfe (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib35) 2009; 26
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib16
Huang (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib14) 2021; 38
Nussbaum (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib27) 2007; 76
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib1
Guo (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib11) 2021; 55
Haines (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib13) 1995; 4
Kellogg (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib17) 2013; 5
Lin (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib24) 2020; 23
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib36
Barron (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib2) 2003; 12
Qin (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib29) 2010; 38
Majidi (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib25) 2021; 101
Fryer (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib10) 2006; 10
Beauvais (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib3) 2011; 103
Lee (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib23) 2017; 46
Coirier (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib6) 1999
Dung (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib7) 1995; 77
Jia (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib15) 2012; 58
Clark (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib5) 2008; 45
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib8
10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib19
Osborne (10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib28) 2004; 41
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 8
  year: 2006
  end-page: 14
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Bots as language learning tools
  publication-title: Language Learning & Technology
– volume: 23
  start-page: 78
  year: 2020
  end-page: 92
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot: A mixed-method classroom study
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Technology & Society
– reference: Jia, J., & Ruan, M. (2008). Use chatbot CSIEC to facilitate the individual learning in English instruction: A case study. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 706–708). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 444
  year: 2010
  end-page: 456
  ident: bib29
  article-title: The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing
  publication-title: System
– volume: 101
  year: 2021
  ident: bib25
  article-title: The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education
  publication-title: System
– volume: 44
  year: 2020
  ident: bib33
  article-title: eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
  publication-title: Assessing Writing
– volume: 26
  start-page: 183
  year: 2009
  end-page: 209
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation
  publication-title: Written Communication
– volume: 22
  start-page: 545
  year: 2011
  end-page: 552
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking
  publication-title: Psychological Science
– volume: 41
  start-page: 994
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1020
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
  publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching
– reference: Bailey, D. (2019). Chatbots as conversational agents in the context of language learning. In Proceedings of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Education (pp. 32–41).
– volume: 45
  start-page: 293
  year: 2008
  end-page: 321
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality
  publication-title: Journal of Research on Science Teaching
– reference: Nagata, R., Hashiguchi, T., & Sadoun, D. (2019). Is the simplest chatbot effective in English writing learning assistance? In International Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 245–256). Springer, Singapore.
– start-page: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 28
  ident: bib6
  article-title: From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing
  publication-title: Foundations of argumentative text processing
– volume: 46
  start-page: 90
  year: 2017
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Common core state standards for ELA/literacy and next generation science standards: Convergences and discrepancies using argument as an example
  publication-title: Educational Researcher
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  end-page: 20
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments
  publication-title: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
– volume: 58
  start-page: 63
  year: 2012
  end-page: 76
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 77
  start-page: 321
  year: 1995
  end-page: 357
  ident: bib7
  article-title: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
  publication-title: Artificial Intelligence
– volume: 5
  start-page: 159
  year: 2013
  end-page: 190
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model
  publication-title: Journal of Writing Research
– volume: 75
  start-page: 461
  year: 2017
  end-page: 468
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– start-page: 221
  year: 2020
  end-page: 238
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Using a chatbot, Replika, to practice writing through conversations in L2 English: A case study
  publication-title: New Technological Applications for Foreign and Second Language Learning and Teaching
– volume: 10
  start-page: 113
  year: 2019
  end-page: 147
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion
  publication-title: Argument & Computation
– volume: 9
  start-page: 36
  year: 1966
  end-page: 45
  ident: bib34
  article-title: ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
  publication-title: Communications of the ACM
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1060
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1070
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Evaluating sources of evidence for argumentative writing: A collaborative learning design
  publication-title: TESOL Quarterly
– volume: 4
  start-page: 55
  year: 1995
  end-page: 58
  ident: bib13
  article-title: For and against pairwork
  publication-title: Modern English Teacher
– volume: 14
  start-page: 153
  year: 2005
  end-page: 173
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
  publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing
– reference: .
– reference: Kim, Y. (2014). Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1746–1751). Association for Computational Linguistics.
– reference: Pereira, J., & Barcina, M.A. (2019). A chatbot assistant for writing good quality technical reports. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 59–64).
– volume: 1
  start-page: 66
  year: 2015
  end-page: 78
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Argument as core curriculum
  publication-title: Learning: Research and Practice
– reference: Eric, M., Krishnan, L., Charette, F., & Manning, C.D. (2017). Key-value retrieval networks for task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGDial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 37–49).
– volume: 12
  start-page: 307
  year: 2003
  end-page: 359
  ident: bib2
  article-title: When smart groups fail
  publication-title: Journal of the Learning Sciences
– volume: 38
  start-page: 237
  year: 2021
  end-page: 257
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning
  publication-title: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
– volume: 103
  start-page: 415
  year: 2011
  end-page: 428
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology
– year: 1991
  ident: bib20
  article-title: The skills of argument
– volume: 151
  year: 2020
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the facebook messenger
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 94
  start-page: 765
  year: 2010
  end-page: 793
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts
  publication-title: Science Education
– volume: 76
  start-page: 59
  year: 2007
  end-page: 92
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing
  publication-title: The Journal of Experimental Education
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib26
  doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_21
– volume: 14
  start-page: 153
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib31
  article-title: Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
  publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing
  doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib36
  doi: 10.1145/3362789.3362798
– volume: 38
  start-page: 237
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib14
  article-title: Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning
  publication-title: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  doi: 10.1111/jcal.12610
– volume: 58
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib15
  article-title: Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject
  publication-title: Computers & Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.002
– volume: 22
  start-page: 545
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib21
  article-title: Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking
  publication-title: Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1177/0956797611402512
– volume: 12
  start-page: 307
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib2
  article-title: When smart groups fail
  publication-title: Journal of the Learning Sciences
  doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
– volume: 1
  start-page: 66
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib22
  article-title: Argument as core curriculum
  publication-title: Learning: Research and Practice
– volume: 75
  start-page: 461
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib9
  article-title: Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
– volume: 9
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 1966
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib34
  article-title: ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
  publication-title: Communications of the ACM
  doi: 10.1145/365153.365168
– volume: 76
  start-page: 59
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib27
  article-title: Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing
  publication-title: The Journal of Experimental Education
  doi: 10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92
– volume: 10
  start-page: 8
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib10
  article-title: Bots as language learning tools
  publication-title: Language Learning & Technology
  doi: 10.64152/10125/44068
– volume: 23
  start-page: 78
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib24
  article-title: Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot: A mixed-method classroom study
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Technology & Society
– volume: 44
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib33
  article-title: eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
  publication-title: Assessing Writing
  doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
– volume: 45
  start-page: 293
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib5
  article-title: Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality
  publication-title: Journal of Research on Science Teaching
  doi: 10.1002/tea.20216
– start-page: 221
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib18
  article-title: Using a chatbot, Replika, to practice writing through conversations in L2 English: A case study
– volume: 94
  start-page: 765
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib4
  article-title: A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts
  publication-title: Science Education
  doi: 10.1002/sce.20402
– volume: 26
  start-page: 183
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib35
  article-title: Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation
  publication-title: Written Communication
  doi: 10.1177/0741088309333019
– start-page: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib6
  article-title: From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing
– volume: 38
  start-page: 444
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib29
  article-title: The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing
  publication-title: System
  doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
– volume: 46
  start-page: 90
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib23
  article-title: Common core state standards for ELA/literacy and next generation science standards: Convergences and discrepancies using argument as an example
  publication-title: Educational Researcher
  doi: 10.3102/0013189X17699172
– volume: 10
  start-page: 113
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib12
  article-title: Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion
  publication-title: Argument & Computation
  doi: 10.3233/AAC-191007
– volume: 103
  start-page: 415
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib3
  article-title: Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/a0022545
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib19
  doi: 10.3115/v1/D14-1181
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1060
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib11
  article-title: Evaluating sources of evidence for argumentative writing: A collaborative learning design
  publication-title: TESOL Quarterly
  doi: 10.1002/tesq.3025
– volume: 5
  start-page: 159
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib17
  article-title: Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model
  publication-title: Journal of Writing Research
– volume: 77
  start-page: 321
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib7
  article-title: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
  publication-title: Artificial Intelligence
  doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
– volume: 151
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib30
  article-title: Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the facebook messenger
  publication-title: Computers & Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib8
  doi: 10.18653/v1/W17-5506
– volume: 41
  start-page: 994
  issue: 10
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib28
  article-title: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
  publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching
  doi: 10.1002/tea.20035
– volume: 4
  start-page: 55
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib13
  article-title: For and against pairwork
  publication-title: Modern English Teacher
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib16
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_84
– year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib20
– volume: 101
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib25
  article-title: The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education
  publication-title: System
  doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
– ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib1
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666_bib32
  article-title: Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments
  publication-title: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8
SSID ssj0014033
Score 2.5613728
Snippet Research suggests that English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ argumentative writing benefits from interactions with peers. However, finding an ideal...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 100666
SubjectTerms Argumate
Argumentative writing
Artificial intelligence
Chatbots
Title Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
Volume 54
WOSCitedRecordID wos000854984800002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-5916
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0014033
  issn: 1075-2935
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LbtQwFLVgyoINKuVVCsgLxIJRqiROYntHVU0FaFQhUWB2kZ-01TSpJknbJb_B7_El-DmdlocAiU00cuJxdI8VX1-fey4AzzMhM6pTmnCtzAaFYZoQIWkiRM5kWcgSuyoRH6d4f5_MZvRdqNLXuXICuGnIxQU9_a9QmzYDtk2d_Qu4l39qGsxvA7q5GtjN9Y-A9yQAcch63vZOv6ETTOt2LseTvanTk3XkicByoGO2-Dyc-BSkMzU-typHYTmL6rTuYNhFbVduWtLO0HpGxtFlXD4wfFdm3e7h4GPPJ4Oa24fHn0IQOkQbzEY18tZCCCymwVxhaZotZJkYv8EfTyvfRjBKSuoTKeOn1utF__DV9gGE423WnW_bQS11o6quKWS7Nfe9HcqOlLsUo5zeBGs5LikZgbWdN5PZ2-UJUpEin1wRXi2eaDtu37WBfu6TrPgZB-vgTtggwB0P7F1wQzUbtrZ24OFsgIfTEGLu4As4Xapid_fAKwc9jNDDvoURemighxH6b1--wiugw4DrffBhb3Kw-zoJFTISgSrUJ5LlIuNO5C9LFVWlIFnKzRqWK6U41qKiXGBWmhsI5YrZ3DWpWcVFZn11iR6AUdM26hGApda5lMZouqKF0AUX1jvERJMKIU7JJkijjWoR5ONtFZN5HXmCx7Uxa23NWnuzboKXyy6nXjvldw8X0fB1cP68U1ebWfLrbo__rdsWuH05u5-AUb8Y1FNwS5z1R93iWZhL3wEjB3u6
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+chatbots+to+scaffold+EFL+students%E2%80%99+argumentative+writing&rft.jtitle=Assessing+writing&rft.au=Guo%2C+Kai&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jian&rft.au=Chu%2C+Samuel+Kai+Wah&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1075-2935&rft.eissn=1873-5916&rft.volume=54&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.asw.2022.100666&rft.externalDocID=S1075293522000629
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1075-2935&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1075-2935&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1075-2935&client=summon