Parameterized complexity of multiwinner determination: more effort towards fixed-parameter tractability

We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k -committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems Jg. 37; H. 2; S. 28
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Yongjie, Wang, Jianxin
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York Springer US 01.12.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1387-2532, 1573-7454
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k -committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computationally hard. Although they have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view with respect to several natural parameters, many of them turned out to be W[1]-hard or W[2]-hard. Aiming at obtaining plentiful fixed-parameter algorithms, we revisit these problems by considering more natural single parameters, combined parameters, and structural parameters.
AbstractList We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k -committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computationally hard. Although they have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view with respect to several natural parameters, many of them turned out to be -hard or -hard. Aiming at obtaining plentiful fixed-parameter algorithms, we revisit these problems by considering more natural single parameters, combined parameters, and structural parameters.
We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k-committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computationally hard. Although they have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view with respect to several natural parameters, many of them turned out to be W[1]-hard or W[2]-hard. Aiming at obtaining plentiful fixed-parameter algorithms, we revisit these problems by considering more natural single parameters, combined parameters, and structural parameters.
We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k -committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computationally hard. Although they have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view with respect to several natural parameters, many of them turned out to be W[1]-hard or W[2]-hard. Aiming at obtaining plentiful fixed-parameter algorithms, we revisit these problems by considering more natural single parameters, combined parameters, and structural parameters.
ArticleNumber 28
Author Yang, Yongjie
Wang, Jianxin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yongjie
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7731-6818
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Yongjie
  email: yyongjiecs@gmail.com
  organization: Chair of Economic Theory, Saarland University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jianxin
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jianxin
  organization: School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Xiangjiang Laboratory
BookMark eNp9kE9PAyEQxYmpiVr9Ap5IPKMDLCz1Zoz_EhM96JlQYA1md6lAY-2nl1qNiQdPM4f3ezPvHaDJGEeP0DGFUwrQnmUKjVAEGCcwkxTIegftU9Fy0jaimdSdq5YwwdkeOsj5FYBKJuk-enk0yQy--BTW3mEbh0XvV6F84NjhYdmX8B7G0SfsNpohjKaEOJ7jISaPfdfFVHCJ7ya5jLuw8o4sfgxxScYWMw99tTtEu53psz_6nlP0fH31dHlL7h9u7i4v7onlkhdilOg4dYy1VAI1ci6tEJ7NnVKqMaA4o0xRkHTW1gTUOtYACAvCNTPrlOVTdLL1XaT4tvS56Ne4TGM9qTkTDeMgFVSV2qpsijkn32kbyley-nPoNQW9qVVva9W1Vv1Vq15XlP1BFykMJn38D_EtlKt4fPHp96t_qE81OY6P
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1145_3749377
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.artint.2016.09.003
10.1287/moor.8.4.538
10.1007/978-3-031-09016-5
10.1016/j.dam.2019.01.027
10.24963/ijcai.2021/31
10.1016/0304-3975(93)90064-Z
10.1186/s13015-022-00213-z
10.1007/978-3-642-30891-8_12
10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12
10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16722
10.1007/s00355-007-0235-2
10.1137/130947374
10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_15
10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x
10.1613/jair.1.11253
10.1016/j.artint.2020.103403
10.1145/301136.301303
10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_6
10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00434-9
10.1007/11534273_5
10.24963/ijcai.2019/90
10.1016/0304-3975(76)90059-1
10.1007/3-540-54233-7_162
10.1613/jair.1.11732
10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_62
10.1007/978-3-031-20614-6_8
10.1007/BFb0045375
10.1613/jair.3896
10.1006/inco.1997.2697
10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8823
10.1016/0196-6774(86)90023-4
10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11460
10.1613/jair.5628
10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10049
10.1016/j.jcss.2017.06.004
10.1007/s00355-018-1126-4
10.1137/1.9780898719796
10.1016/j.tcs.2020.01.017
10.1006/jagm.1995.1037
10.1007/s10732-018-9376-y
10.1093/comjnl/bxm086
10.1007/s00453-017-0297-1
10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5551
10.1007/s00355-017-1026-z
10.1007/s00355-016-1019-3
10.1016/0304-3975(94)00097-3
10.1016/j.jet.2020.105173
10.1016/j.tcs.2014.12.012
10.1007/978-1-4471-5559-1
10.1016/j.ic.2017.10.002
10.24963/ijcai.2019/91
10.1109/TST.2014.6867519
10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3
10.2307/1957270
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
8FE
8FG
ABJCF
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
JQ2
K7-
L6V
M7S
P5Z
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
DOI 10.1007/s10458-023-09610-z
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer Science Database
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering collection
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Computer Science Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Computer Science Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Computer Science
EISSN 1573-7454
ExternalDocumentID 10_1007_s10458_023_09610_z
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 62172446
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809
– fundername: Universität des Saarlandes (1036)
– fundername: Open Project of Xiangjiang Laboratory
  grantid: 22XJ02002; 22XJ03005
GroupedDBID -59
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.DC
.VR
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
203
23N
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
5GY
5VS
67Z
6J9
6NX
6TJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTD
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACREN
ACSNA
ACZOJ
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFGCZ
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYJHY
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BDATZ
BGNMA
BSONS
C6C
CAG
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
LAK
LLZTM
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9J
OAM
OVD
P2P
P9O
PF0
PT4
PT5
QOS
R89
R9I
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RSV
RZC
RZE
RZK
S16
S1Z
S27
S3B
SAP
SCO
SDH
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
STPWE
SZN
T13
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TUC
U2A
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7X
Z81
Z83
Z88
ZMTXR
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABJCF
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFKRA
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ARAPS
ATHPR
AYFIA
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
CITATION
HCIFZ
K7-
M7S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQGLB
PTHSS
8FE
8FG
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
JQ2
L6V
P62
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a85f31d2271601a6b6c55e2bd8884a08321281061970161cd24005c05d49cd8c3
IEDL.DBID M7S
ISICitedReferencesCount 1
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001018421400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1387-2532
IngestDate Sat Sep 27 04:20:27 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:33:09 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:33:13 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:40:52 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords W-hard
Proportional approval voting
Multiwinner voting
Chamberlin–Courant’s approval voting
Minimax approval voting
Fixed-parameter tractability
Treewidth
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c363t-a85f31d2271601a6b6c55e2bd8884a08321281061970161cd24005c05d49cd8c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-7731-6818
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10458-023-09610-z
PQID 3254230680
PQPubID 2043870
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_3254230680
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10458_023_09610_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10458_023_09610_z
springer_journals_10_1007_s10458_023_09610_z
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20231200
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 20231200
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
PublicationTitle Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
PublicationTitleAbbrev Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Thiele, T. N. (1895). Om Flerfoldsvalg. In: Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger (pp. 415–441).
BramsSJKilgourDMSanverMRA minimax procedure for electing committeesPublic Choice20071323–4401420
YangYGuoJThe control complexity of r\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r$$\end{document}-approval: From the single-peaked case to the general caseJournal of Computer and System Sciences2017894324493681252
LeGrand, R. (2004). Analysis of the minimax procedure. Techical Report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
SkowronPYuLFaliszewskiPElkindEThe complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electoratesTheoretical Computer Science201556943573299789
LacknerMSkowronPConsistent approval-based multi-winner rulesJournal of Economic Theory20211924202182
ElkindEFaliszewskiPSkowronPSlinkoAProperties of multiwinner voting rulesSocial Choice and Welfare20174835996323620814
Elkind, E., & Lackner, M. (2015). Structure in dichotomous preferences. In IJCAI (pp. 2019–2025).
DomMLokshtanovDSaurabhSKernelization lower bounds through colors and IDsACM Transactions on Algorithms2014112133283568
Bodlaender, H. L. (2012). Fixed-parameter tractability of treewidth and pathwidth. In The Multivariate Algorithmic Revolution and Beyond (pp. 196–227).
CyganMFominFVKowalikLLokshtanovDMarxDPilipczukMPilipczukMSaurabhSParameterized algorithms2015Springer
Brandstädt, A., Le, V. B., & Spinrad, J. P. (1999). Graph classes: A survey. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Clearwater, A., Puppe, C., & Slinko, A. (2015). Generalizing the single-crossing property on lines and trees to intermediate preferences on median graphs. In IJCAI (pp. 32–38).
FaliszewskiPSkowronPSlinkoATalmonNMultiwinner analogues of the plurality rule: Axiomatic and algorithmic perspectivesSocial Choice and Welfare20185135135503856879
WestDBIntroduction to graph theory2000Prentice-Hall
EndrissUTrends in computational social choice2017AI Access
BetzlerNSlinkoAUhlmannJOn the computation of fully proportional representationJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2013474755193090736
Sui, X., Francois-Nienaber, A., & Boutilier, C. (2013). Multi-dimensional single-peaked consistency and its approximations. In IJCAI (pp. 375–382).
Lin, A.P. (2011). The complexity of manipulating k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k$$\end{document}-approval elections. In ICAART (Vol. 2, pp. 212–218). arXiv:1005.4159.
BredereckRFaliszewskiPKaczmarczykANiedermeierRSkowronPTalmonNRobustness among multiwinner voting rulesArtificial Intelligence20212901034034173242
LovászLPlummerMDMatching theory1986Elsevier
CyganMKowalikLSocalaASornatKApproximation and parameterized complexity of minimax approval votingJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2018634955133899746
Yu, L., Chan, H., & Elkind, E. (2013). Multiwinner elections under preferences that are single-peaked on a tree. In IJCAI (pp. 425–431).
Yang, Y. (2020). On the complexity of destructive bribery in approval-based multi-winner voting. In AAMAS (pp. 1584–1592).
YamaguchiAAokiKFMamitsukaHGraph complexity of chemical compounds in biological pathwaysGenome Informatics200314376377
Agrawal, A., Choudhary, P., Jain, P., Kanesh, L., Sahlot, V., & Saurabh, S. (2018). Hitting and covering partially. In COCOON (pp. 751–763).
KrausePKLarischLSalfelderFThe tree-width of CDiscrete Applied Mathematics20202781361524087196
BodlaenderHLDrangePGDregiMSFominFVLokshtanovDPilipczukMA ckn\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$c^k n$$\end{document} 5-approximation algorithm for treewidthSIAM Journal on Computing20164523173783479705
Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., & Talmon, N. (2017). Bribery as a measure of candidate success: Complexity results for approval-based multiwinner rules. In AAMAS (pp. 6–14).
Peters, D., & Elkind, E. (2016). Preferences single-peaked on nice trees. In AAAI (pp. 594–600).
Misra, N., Nabeel, A., & Singh, H. (2015). On the parameterized complexity of minimax approval voting. In: AAMAS (pp. 97–105).
KilgourDMLaslierJ-FSanverMRApproval balloting for multi-winner electionsHandbook on Approval Voting2010Springer105124
CaiLParameterized complexity of cardinality constrained optimization problemsThe Computer Journal2008511102121
Yang, Y. (2021). A model of winners allocation. In: AAAI (pp. 5760–5767).
Byrka, J., & Sornat, K. (2014). PTAS for minimax approval voting. In WINE (pp. 203–217).
ChamberlinJRCourantPNRepresentative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the Borda ruleAmerican Political Science Review1983773718733
Gupta, S., Jain, P., Saurabh, S., & Talmon, N. (2021). Even more effort towards improved bounds and fixed-parameter tractability for multiwinner rules. In IJCAI (pp. 217–223).
Gawron, G., & Faliszewski. P. (2022). Using multiwinner voting to search for movies. In EUMAS (pp. 134–151).
Yang, Y. (2019). On the tree representations of dichotomous preferences. In IJCAI (pp. 644–650).
Ghosh, S., Mundhe, M., Hernandez, K., & Sen, S. (1999). Voting for movies: The anatomy of a recommender system. In AGENTS (pp. 434–435).
ProcacciaADRosenscheinJSZoharAOn the complexity of achieving proportional representationSocial Choice and Welfare20083033533622377346
KilgourDMMarshallEFelsenthalDSMachoverMApproval balloting for fixed-size committeesElectoral systems-paradoxes, assumptions, and procedures2012Springer305326
Procaccia, A.D., Rosenschein, J.S., & Zohar, A. (2007). Multi-winner elections: Complexity of manipulation, control and winner-determination. In IJCAI (pp. 1476–1481).
Kloks, T. (eds.) (1994). Treewidth: Computations and approximations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 842. Springer.
ThorupMAll structured programs have small tree-width and good register allocationInformation and Computation199814221591811613875
BläserMComputing small partial coveringsInformation Processing Letters20038563273311956935
LacknerMSkowronPMulti-winner voting with approval preferences2023Springer
Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2018). Parameterized complexity of multi-winner determination: More effort towards fixed-parameter tractability. In AAMAS (pp. 2142–2144).
SkowronPFPT approximation schemes for maximizing submodular functionsInformation and Computation201725765783723701
Maniu, S., Senellart, P., & Jog, S. (2019). An experimental study of the treewidth of real-world graph data. In ICDT (p. 12).
Bodlaender, H. L., & Kloks, T. (1991). Better algorithms for the pathwidth and treewidth of graphs. In ICALP (pp. 544–555).
PetersDLacknerMPreferences single-peaked on a circleJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2020684635024123622
SkowronPFaliszewskiPChamberlin-Courant rule with approval ballots: Approximating the maxcover problem with bounded frequencies in FPT timeJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2017606877163732763
AzizHBrillMConitzerVElkindEFreemanRWalshTJustified representation in approval-based committee votingSocial Choice and Welfare20174824614853611519
Elkind, E., & Lackner, M. (2014). On detecting nearly structured preference profiles. In AAAI (pp. 661–667).
Downey, R. G., & Fellows, M. R. (1992). Fixed parameter tractability and completeness. In Complexity Theory: Current Research (pp. 191–225).
MarchandBPontyYBulteauLTree diet: reducing the treewidth to unlock FPT algorithms in RNA bioinformaticsAlgorithms for Molecular Biology20221718
Guo, J., Niedermeier, R., & Wernicke, S. (2005). Parameterized complexity of generalized vertex cover problems. In WADS (pp. 36–48).
BodlaenderHLA tourist guide through treewidthActa Cybernetica1993111–21211268488
GareyMRJohnsonDSStockmeyerLSome simplified NP-complete graph problemsTheoretical Computer Science197613237267411240
Peters, D. (2018). Single-peakedness and total unimodularity: New polynomial-time algorithms for multi-winner elections. In AAAI (pp. 1169–1176).
Downey, R. G., & Fellows, M. R. (2013). Fundamentals of parameterized complexity. Texts in computer science. Springer.
Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Gudmundsson, J., Mackenzie, S., Mattei, N., & Walsh, T. (2015). Computational aspects of multi-winner approval voting. In AAMAS (pp. 107–115).
CourcelleBMosbahMMonadic second-order evaluations on tree-decomposable graphsTheoretical Computer Science19931091–249821205621
SkowronPFaliszewskiPLangJFinding a collective set of items: From proportional multirepresentation to group recommendationArtificial Intelligence20162411912163558243
SchrijverATheory of linear and integer programming1986Wiley
LenstraHWInteger programming with a fixed number of variablesMathematics of Operations Research198384538548727410
Boehmer, N., & Schaar, N. (2023). Collecting, classifying, analyzing, and using real-world ranking data. In AAMAS (pp. 1706–1715).
Cornaz, D., Galand, L., & Spanjaard, O. (2012). Bounded single-peaked width and proportional representation. In ECAI (pp. 270–275).
FominFVLiedloffMMontealegrePTodincaIAlgorithms parameterized by vertex cover and modular width, through potential maximal cliquesAlgorithmica2018804114611693769285
Liu, H., & Guo, J. (2016). Parameterized complexity of winner determination in minimax committee elections. In AAMAS (pp. 341–349).
RobertsonNSeymourPDGraph minors. II. Algorithmic aspects of tree-widthJournal of algorithms198673309322855559
FaliszewskiPSlinkoAStahlKTalmonNAchieving fully proportional representation by clustering votersJournal of Heuristics2018245725756
Fer
9610_CR42
9610_CR45
H Aziz (9610_CR2) 2017; 48
RG Downey (9610_CR26) 1995; 141
PK Krause (9610_CR47) 2020; 278
AD Procaccia (9610_CR61) 2008; 30
L Cai (9610_CR17) 2008; 51
DM Kilgour (9610_CR43) 2010
P Skowron (9610_CR65) 2017; 257
E Elkind (9610_CR28) 2017; 48
SJ Brams (9610_CR11) 2007; 132
R Bredereck (9610_CR15) 2020; 814
9610_CR80
M Dom (9610_CR24) 2014; 11
M Lackner (9610_CR48) 2023
9610_CR81
M Cygan (9610_CR22) 2015
9610_CR40
9610_CR41
9610_CR53
9610_CR10
B Courcelle (9610_CR21) 1993; 109
9610_CR55
9610_CR12
A Yamaguchi (9610_CR74) 2003; 14
9610_CR13
9610_CR57
9610_CR58
9610_CR59
9610_CR16
B Marchand (9610_CR56) 2022; 17
DB West (9610_CR73) 2000
9610_CR19
P Faliszewski (9610_CR35) 2018; 24
M Thorup (9610_CR71) 1998; 142
P Faliszewski (9610_CR32) 2018; 51
FV Fomin (9610_CR37) 2018; 80
HW Lenstra (9610_CR51) 1983; 8
L Lovász (9610_CR54) 1986
P Skowron (9610_CR67) 2016; 241
Y Yang (9610_CR79) 2017; 89
M Cygan (9610_CR23) 2018; 63
A Schrijver (9610_CR64) 1986
H Fernau (9610_CR36) 2014; 19
9610_CR50
9610_CR52
9610_CR3
9610_CR20
R Bredereck (9610_CR14) 2021; 290
N Robertson (9610_CR63) 1986; 7
JR Chamberlin (9610_CR18) 1983; 77
9610_CR6
9610_CR25
9610_CR69
9610_CR9
9610_CR27
9610_CR29
P Skowron (9610_CR66) 2017; 60
HL Bodlaender (9610_CR8) 2016; 45
N Betzler (9610_CR4) 2013; 47
M Bläser (9610_CR5) 2003; 85
(9610_CR31) 2017
MR Garey (9610_CR38) 1976; 1
9610_CR62
T Kloks (9610_CR46) 1995; 19
M Lackner (9610_CR49) 2021; 192
P Skowron (9610_CR68) 2015; 569
9610_CR75
9610_CR76
9610_CR33
9610_CR77
9610_CR34
9610_CR78
HL Bodlaender (9610_CR7) 1993; 11
9610_CR39
DM Kilgour (9610_CR44) 2012
9610_CR70
9610_CR72
9610_CR1
9610_CR30
D Peters (9610_CR60) 2020; 68
References_xml – reference: Sui, X., Francois-Nienaber, A., & Boutilier, C. (2013). Multi-dimensional single-peaked consistency and its approximations. In IJCAI (pp. 375–382).
– reference: Clearwater, A., Puppe, C., & Slinko, A. (2015). Generalizing the single-crossing property on lines and trees to intermediate preferences on median graphs. In IJCAI (pp. 32–38).
– reference: Liu, H., & Guo, J. (2016). Parameterized complexity of winner determination in minimax committee elections. In AAMAS (pp. 341–349).
– reference: ChamberlinJRCourantPNRepresentative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the Borda ruleAmerican Political Science Review1983773718733
– reference: SchrijverATheory of linear and integer programming1986Wiley
– reference: PetersDLacknerMPreferences single-peaked on a circleJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2020684635024123622
– reference: KilgourDMLaslierJ-FSanverMRApproval balloting for multi-winner electionsHandbook on Approval Voting2010Springer105124
– reference: LenstraHWInteger programming with a fixed number of variablesMathematics of Operations Research198384538548727410
– reference: CourcelleBMosbahMMonadic second-order evaluations on tree-decomposable graphsTheoretical Computer Science19931091–249821205621
– reference: BredereckRFaliszewskiPNiedermeierRSkowronPTalmonNMixed integer programming with convex/concave constraints: Fixed-parameter tractability and applications to multicovering and votingTheoretical Computer Science2020814861054074730
– reference: FaliszewskiPSlinkoAStahlKTalmonNAchieving fully proportional representation by clustering votersJournal of Heuristics2018245725756
– reference: Ghosh, S., Mundhe, M., Hernandez, K., & Sen, S. (1999). Voting for movies: The anatomy of a recommender system. In AGENTS (pp. 434–435).
– reference: KrausePKLarischLSalfelderFThe tree-width of CDiscrete Applied Mathematics20202781361524087196
– reference: Yang, Y. (2021). A model of winners allocation. In: AAAI (pp. 5760–5767).
– reference: Byrka, J., & Sornat, K. (2014). PTAS for minimax approval voting. In WINE (pp. 203–217).
– reference: Yang, Y. (2019). Complexity of manipulating and controlling approval-based multiwinner voting. In IJCAI (pp. 637–643).
– reference: Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., & Talmon, N. (2017). Bribery as a measure of candidate success: Complexity results for approval-based multiwinner rules. In AAMAS (pp. 6–14).
– reference: BramsSJKilgourDMSanverMRA minimax procedure for electing committeesPublic Choice20071323–4401420
– reference: GareyMRJohnsonDSStockmeyerLSome simplified NP-complete graph problemsTheoretical Computer Science197613237267411240
– reference: KilgourDMMarshallEFelsenthalDSMachoverMApproval balloting for fixed-size committeesElectoral systems-paradoxes, assumptions, and procedures2012Springer305326
– reference: BodlaenderHLA tourist guide through treewidthActa Cybernetica1993111–21211268488
– reference: Downey, R. G., & Fellows, M. R. (1992). Fixed parameter tractability and completeness. In Complexity Theory: Current Research (pp. 191–225).
– reference: Kloks, T. (eds.) (1994). Treewidth: Computations and approximations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 842. Springer.
– reference: Lin, A.P. (2011). The complexity of manipulating k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k$$\end{document}-approval elections. In ICAART (Vol. 2, pp. 212–218). arXiv:1005.4159.
– reference: BetzlerNSlinkoAUhlmannJOn the computation of fully proportional representationJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2013474755193090736
– reference: LeGrand, R. (2004). Analysis of the minimax procedure. Techical Report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
– reference: Elkind, E., & Lackner, M. (2014). On detecting nearly structured preference profiles. In AAAI (pp. 661–667).
– reference: Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2018). Parameterized complexity of multi-winner determination: More effort towards fixed-parameter tractability. In AAMAS (pp. 2142–2144).
– reference: Brandstädt, A., Le, V. B., & Spinrad, J. P. (1999). Graph classes: A survey. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
– reference: Yang, Y. (2019). On the tree representations of dichotomous preferences. In IJCAI (pp. 644–650).
– reference: MarchandBPontyYBulteauLTree diet: reducing the treewidth to unlock FPT algorithms in RNA bioinformaticsAlgorithms for Molecular Biology20221718
– reference: Peters, D., & Elkind, E. (2016). Preferences single-peaked on nice trees. In AAAI (pp. 594–600).
– reference: ProcacciaADRosenscheinJSZoharAOn the complexity of achieving proportional representationSocial Choice and Welfare20083033533622377346
– reference: Downey, R. G., & Fellows, M. R. (2013). Fundamentals of parameterized complexity. Texts in computer science. Springer.
– reference: Procaccia, A.D., Rosenschein, J.S., & Zohar, A. (2007). Multi-winner elections: Complexity of manipulation, control and winner-determination. In IJCAI (pp. 1476–1481).
– reference: Yang, Y. (2020). On the complexity of destructive bribery in approval-based multi-winner voting. In AAMAS (pp. 1584–1592).
– reference: Guo, J., Niedermeier, R., & Wernicke, S. (2005). Parameterized complexity of generalized vertex cover problems. In WADS (pp. 36–48).
– reference: CyganMFominFVKowalikLLokshtanovDMarxDPilipczukMPilipczukMSaurabhSParameterized algorithms2015Springer
– reference: Yu, L., Chan, H., & Elkind, E. (2013). Multiwinner elections under preferences that are single-peaked on a tree. In IJCAI (pp. 425–431).
– reference: Gawron, G., & Faliszewski. P. (2022). Using multiwinner voting to search for movies. In EUMAS (pp. 134–151).
– reference: KloksTKratschDTreewidth of chordal bipartite graphsJournal of Algorithms19951922662811344547
– reference: SkowronPFaliszewskiPChamberlin-Courant rule with approval ballots: Approximating the maxcover problem with bounded frequencies in FPT timeJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2017606877163732763
– reference: Bodlaender, H. L., & Kloks, T. (1991). Better algorithms for the pathwidth and treewidth of graphs. In ICALP (pp. 544–555).
– reference: YamaguchiAAokiKFMamitsukaHGraph complexity of chemical compounds in biological pathwaysGenome Informatics200314376377
– reference: FernauHFominFVLokshtanovDMnichMPhilipGSaurabhSSocial choice meets graph drawing: How to get subexponential time algorithms for ranking and drawing problemsTsinghua Science and Technology20141943743863260440
– reference: FominFVLiedloffMMontealegrePTodincaIAlgorithms parameterized by vertex cover and modular width, through potential maximal cliquesAlgorithmica2018804114611693769285
– reference: Misra, N., Nabeel, A., & Singh, H. (2015). On the parameterized complexity of minimax approval voting. In: AAMAS (pp. 97–105).
– reference: SkowronPFaliszewskiPLangJFinding a collective set of items: From proportional multirepresentation to group recommendationArtificial Intelligence20162411912163558243
– reference: LacknerMSkowronPConsistent approval-based multi-winner rulesJournal of Economic Theory20211924202182
– reference: Agrawal, A., Choudhary, P., Jain, P., Kanesh, L., Sahlot, V., & Saurabh, S. (2018). Hitting and covering partially. In COCOON (pp. 751–763).
– reference: Cornaz, D., Galand, L., & Spanjaard, O. (2012). Bounded single-peaked width and proportional representation. In ECAI (pp. 270–275).
– reference: SkowronPYuLFaliszewskiPElkindEThe complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electoratesTheoretical Computer Science201556943573299789
– reference: LacknerMSkowronPMulti-winner voting with approval preferences2023Springer
– reference: SkowronPFPT approximation schemes for maximizing submodular functionsInformation and Computation201725765783723701
– reference: van der Zanden, T. C. (2019). Theory and practical applications of treewidth. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, Netherlands.
– reference: CyganMKowalikLSocalaASornatKApproximation and parameterized complexity of minimax approval votingJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research2018634955133899746
– reference: RobertsonNSeymourPDGraph minors. II. Algorithmic aspects of tree-widthJournal of algorithms198673309322855559
– reference: CaiLParameterized complexity of cardinality constrained optimization problemsThe Computer Journal2008511102121
– reference: Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Gudmundsson, J., Mackenzie, S., Mattei, N., & Walsh, T. (2015). Computational aspects of multi-winner approval voting. In AAMAS (pp. 107–115).
– reference: LovászLPlummerMDMatching theory1986Elsevier
– reference: ThorupMAll structured programs have small tree-width and good register allocationInformation and Computation199814221591811613875
– reference: Elkind, E., & Lackner, M. (2015). Structure in dichotomous preferences. In IJCAI (pp. 2019–2025).
– reference: Peters, D. (2018). Single-peakedness and total unimodularity: New polynomial-time algorithms for multi-winner elections. In AAAI (pp. 1169–1176).
– reference: BläserMComputing small partial coveringsInformation Processing Letters20038563273311956935
– reference: Bodlaender, H. L. (2012). Fixed-parameter tractability of treewidth and pathwidth. In The Multivariate Algorithmic Revolution and Beyond (pp. 196–227).
– reference: FaliszewskiPSkowronPSlinkoATalmonNMultiwinner analogues of the plurality rule: Axiomatic and algorithmic perspectivesSocial Choice and Welfare20185135135503856879
– reference: Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., & Talmon, N. (2016). Committee scoring rules: Axiomatic classification and hierarchy. In IJCAI (pp. 250–256).
– reference: DomMLokshtanovDSaurabhSKernelization lower bounds through colors and IDsACM Transactions on Algorithms2014112133283568
– reference: WestDBIntroduction to graph theory2000Prentice-Hall
– reference: Maniu, S., Senellart, P., & Jog, S. (2019). An experimental study of the treewidth of real-world graph data. In ICDT (p. 12).
– reference: EndrissUTrends in computational social choice2017AI Access
– reference: BodlaenderHLDrangePGDregiMSFominFVLokshtanovDPilipczukMA ckn\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$c^k n$$\end{document} 5-approximation algorithm for treewidthSIAM Journal on Computing20164523173783479705
– reference: Bredereck, R., Faliszewski, P., Kaczmarczyk, A., Knop, D., & Niedermeier, R. (2021). Parameterized algorithms for finding a collective set of items. In AAAI (pp. 1838–1845).
– reference: BredereckRFaliszewskiPKaczmarczykANiedermeierRSkowronPTalmonNRobustness among multiwinner voting rulesArtificial Intelligence20212901034034173242
– reference: YangYGuoJThe control complexity of r\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r$$\end{document}-approval: From the single-peaked case to the general caseJournal of Computer and System Sciences2017894324493681252
– reference: Boehmer, N., & Schaar, N. (2023). Collecting, classifying, analyzing, and using real-world ranking data. In AAMAS (pp. 1706–1715).
– reference: Gupta, S., Jain, P., Saurabh, S., & Talmon, N. (2021). Even more effort towards improved bounds and fixed-parameter tractability for multiwinner rules. In IJCAI (pp. 217–223).
– reference: DowneyRGFellowsMRFixed-parameter tractability and completeness II: On completeness for W[1]Theoretical Computer Science19951411–21091311323150
– reference: Thiele, T. N. (1895). Om Flerfoldsvalg. In: Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger (pp. 415–441).
– reference: AzizHBrillMConitzerVElkindEFreemanRWalshTJustified representation in approval-based committee votingSocial Choice and Welfare20174824614853611519
– reference: ElkindEFaliszewskiPSkowronPSlinkoAProperties of multiwinner voting rulesSocial Choice and Welfare20174835996323620814
– volume: 241
  start-page: 191
  year: 2016
  ident: 9610_CR67
  publication-title: Artificial Intelligence
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2016.09.003
– volume: 8
  start-page: 538
  issue: 4
  year: 1983
  ident: 9610_CR51
  publication-title: Mathematics of Operations Research
  doi: 10.1287/moor.8.4.538
– volume-title: Multi-winner voting with approval preferences
  year: 2023
  ident: 9610_CR48
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-09016-5
– ident: 9610_CR69
– volume: 278
  start-page: 136
  year: 2020
  ident: 9610_CR47
  publication-title: Discrete Applied Mathematics
  doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2019.01.027
– ident: 9610_CR52
– ident: 9610_CR81
– ident: 9610_CR42
  doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2021/31
– volume: 109
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1–2
  year: 1993
  ident: 9610_CR21
  publication-title: Theoretical Computer Science
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3975(93)90064-Z
– volume: 17
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 9610_CR56
  publication-title: Algorithms for Molecular Biology
  doi: 10.1186/s13015-022-00213-z
– ident: 9610_CR6
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30891-8_12
– ident: 9610_CR33
– start-page: 305
  volume-title: Electoral systems-paradoxes, assumptions, and procedures
  year: 2012
  ident: 9610_CR44
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12
– ident: 9610_CR75
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16722
– volume: 30
  start-page: 353
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 9610_CR61
  publication-title: Social Choice and Welfare
  doi: 10.1007/s00355-007-0235-2
– volume: 45
  start-page: 317
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 9610_CR8
  publication-title: SIAM Journal on Computing
  doi: 10.1137/130947374
– ident: 9610_CR16
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_15
– volume: 132
  start-page: 401
  issue: 3–4
  year: 2007
  ident: 9610_CR11
  publication-title: Public Choice
  doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x
– volume: 63
  start-page: 495
  year: 2018
  ident: 9610_CR23
  publication-title: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  doi: 10.1613/jair.1.11253
– volume: 290
  start-page: 103403
  year: 2021
  ident: 9610_CR14
  publication-title: Artificial Intelligence
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103403
– ident: 9610_CR10
– ident: 9610_CR40
  doi: 10.1145/301136.301303
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1–2
  year: 1993
  ident: 9610_CR7
  publication-title: Acta Cybernetica
– start-page: 105
  volume-title: Handbook on Approval Voting
  year: 2010
  ident: 9610_CR43
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_6
– volume: 85
  start-page: 327
  issue: 6
  year: 2003
  ident: 9610_CR5
  publication-title: Information Processing Letters
  doi: 10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00434-9
– ident: 9610_CR53
– ident: 9610_CR29
– ident: 9610_CR41
  doi: 10.1007/11534273_5
– ident: 9610_CR77
  doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/90
– ident: 9610_CR80
– volume: 1
  start-page: 237
  issue: 3
  year: 1976
  ident: 9610_CR38
  publication-title: Theoretical Computer Science
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3975(76)90059-1
– ident: 9610_CR57
– ident: 9610_CR70
– ident: 9610_CR9
  doi: 10.1007/3-540-54233-7_162
– volume: 68
  start-page: 463
  year: 2020
  ident: 9610_CR60
  publication-title: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  doi: 10.1613/jair.1.11732
– ident: 9610_CR1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_62
– ident: 9610_CR19
– ident: 9610_CR39
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20614-6_8
– ident: 9610_CR45
  doi: 10.1007/BFb0045375
– ident: 9610_CR3
– volume: 47
  start-page: 475
  year: 2013
  ident: 9610_CR4
  publication-title: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  doi: 10.1613/jair.3896
– volume: 142
  start-page: 159
  issue: 2
  year: 1998
  ident: 9610_CR71
  publication-title: Information and Computation
  doi: 10.1006/inco.1997.2697
– ident: 9610_CR30
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8823
– volume: 7
  start-page: 309
  issue: 3
  year: 1986
  ident: 9610_CR63
  publication-title: Journal of algorithms
  doi: 10.1016/0196-6774(86)90023-4
– ident: 9610_CR58
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11460
– volume: 60
  start-page: 687
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR66
  publication-title: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  doi: 10.1613/jair.5628
– ident: 9610_CR59
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10049
– volume: 89
  start-page: 432
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR79
  publication-title: Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcss.2017.06.004
– volume: 51
  start-page: 513
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 9610_CR32
  publication-title: Social Choice and Welfare
  doi: 10.1007/s00355-018-1126-4
– volume-title: Matching theory
  year: 1986
  ident: 9610_CR54
– ident: 9610_CR12
  doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719796
– volume: 814
  start-page: 86
  year: 2020
  ident: 9610_CR15
  publication-title: Theoretical Computer Science
  doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.01.017
– ident: 9610_CR50
– volume: 19
  start-page: 266
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  ident: 9610_CR46
  publication-title: Journal of Algorithms
  doi: 10.1006/jagm.1995.1037
– volume-title: Trends in computational social choice
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR31
– volume: 24
  start-page: 725
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 9610_CR35
  publication-title: Journal of Heuristics
  doi: 10.1007/s10732-018-9376-y
– ident: 9610_CR62
– ident: 9610_CR20
– volume: 51
  start-page: 102
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 9610_CR17
  publication-title: The Computer Journal
  doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxm086
– volume: 80
  start-page: 1146
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 9610_CR37
  publication-title: Algorithmica
  doi: 10.1007/s00453-017-0297-1
– volume-title: Introduction to graph theory
  year: 2000
  ident: 9610_CR73
– ident: 9610_CR13
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5551
– volume: 48
  start-page: 599
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR28
  publication-title: Social Choice and Welfare
  doi: 10.1007/s00355-017-1026-z
– volume: 48
  start-page: 461
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR2
  publication-title: Social Choice and Welfare
  doi: 10.1007/s00355-016-1019-3
– volume: 141
  start-page: 109
  issue: 1–2
  year: 1995
  ident: 9610_CR26
  publication-title: Theoretical Computer Science
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3975(94)00097-3
– ident: 9610_CR27
– volume: 192
  year: 2021
  ident: 9610_CR49
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Theory
  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2020.105173
– ident: 9610_CR55
– volume: 569
  start-page: 43
  year: 2015
  ident: 9610_CR68
  publication-title: Theoretical Computer Science
  doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.12.012
– ident: 9610_CR76
– ident: 9610_CR25
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5559-1
– ident: 9610_CR72
– volume: 14
  start-page: 376
  year: 2003
  ident: 9610_CR74
  publication-title: Genome Informatics
– volume: 11
  start-page: 13
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 9610_CR24
  publication-title: ACM Transactions on Algorithms
– volume: 257
  start-page: 65
  year: 2017
  ident: 9610_CR65
  publication-title: Information and Computation
  doi: 10.1016/j.ic.2017.10.002
– ident: 9610_CR34
– volume-title: Theory of linear and integer programming
  year: 1986
  ident: 9610_CR64
– ident: 9610_CR78
  doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/91
– volume: 19
  start-page: 374
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 9610_CR36
  publication-title: Tsinghua Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1109/TST.2014.6867519
– volume-title: Parameterized algorithms
  year: 2015
  ident: 9610_CR22
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3
– volume: 77
  start-page: 718
  issue: 3
  year: 1983
  ident: 9610_CR18
  publication-title: American Political Science Review
  doi: 10.2307/1957270
SSID ssj0016261
Score 2.3868728
Snippet We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k -committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting...
We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k-committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting...
SourceID proquest
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 28
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Artificial Intelligence
Candidates
Committees
Complexity
Computer Science
Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks
Decision making
Elections
Graphs
Parameterization
Parameters
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Voters
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Springer LINK
  dbid: RSV
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PS8MwFH7o9ODF-ROnU3LwpoE0bbfUm4jDg8jwx9ittEkqA9nGWnXurzcvbTYVFfTcNC3vJXnvke99H8BxmiVcI6JGRKmgQRYwGgmlqYwYl4E2h6Vl5-9dt29uRL8fdaumsNyh3d2VpD2pPzS7BaGgJsZQlClhdLYMKybcCRRsuL3rze8OTIpellkCOQh8XrXKfD_H53C0yDG_XIvaaNOp_-8_N2C9yi7JebkcNmFJD7eg7pQbSLWRt-GxmyAoC3maZ1oRiyvXU5OQk1FGLMbw1WpyEeXQMui_M4KoXKIzk-gWpLCA25xkg6lWdOwmJAX2XZXs32878NC5vL-4opXkApV-yy9oIsLM9xTnpoxiXtJKWzIMNU-VKZSDhKGsERdYRUZtzBWlQghqKFmogghZBvxdqA1HQ70HRHEhtInAqp15gVkqJhRKX8lWmnLzFaYa4DnLx7LiI0dZjKd4waSMloyNJWNryXjWgJP5O-OSjePX0U3n0LjamXnsm4oYyy7BGnDqHLh4_PNs-38bfgBrqExfIl-aUCsmz_oQVuVLMcgnR3bFvgPdlueC
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Parameterized complexity of multiwinner determination: more effort towards fixed-parameter tractability
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-023-09610-z
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254230680
Volume 37
WOSCitedRecordID wos001018421400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Computer Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-7454
  dateEnd: 20241212
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0016261
  issn: 1387-2532
  databaseCode: K7-
  dateStart: 20230601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/compscijour
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Engineering Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-7454
  dateEnd: 20241212
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0016261
  issn: 1387-2532
  databaseCode: M7S
  dateStart: 20230601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-7454
  dateEnd: 20241212
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0016261
  issn: 1387-2532
  databaseCode: P5Z
  dateStart: 20230601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-7454
  dateEnd: 20241212
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0016261
  issn: 1387-2532
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20230601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-7454
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0016261
  issn: 1387-2532
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 19980301
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3PS8MwFH7o9ODF-ROnc-TgTYNt2q6pF1GZCMoY_kK8lDZJZSDbXKvO_fXmpalDQS9eemmbFr4k773ky_cB7KVZwhQyaniUcupnvkMjLhUVkcOEr_RkadT576_Cbpc_PEQ9u-CWW1plNSeaiVoOBa6RH3q6ksF0mTvHoxeKrlG4u2otNOZhAVUSXEPdu_naRdDJellwcVQj8Jg9NGOPzvkBpzpiUTQ9cej0e2CaZZs_NkhN3Dmv__ePV2DZZpzkpOwiqzCnBmtQr9wciB3c6_DUS5CohdrNUyWJ4ZqriU7SyTAjhnf4bny6iKwYNIjpEUGmLlGZTn4LUhgSbk6y_kRJOqoaJAWexSoVwT824O68c3t2Qa0NAxVe2ytowoPMcyVjurRy3KSdtkUQKJZKXTz7iYNWR4xjZRmFmD8KibTUQDiB9CNUHvA2oTYYDtQWEMk4VzoqyzBzfd19dHgUnhTtNGX6K45sgFthEAurUY5WGc_xTF0ZcYs1brHBLZ42YP_rnVGp0PHn080KrNiO1jyeIdWAgwru2e3fW9v-u7UdWEJ3-pL90oRaMX5Vu7Ao3op-Pm7Bwmmn27tuwfxlSFum5-prL3jU1-ub-08znPUo
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LS8NAEB60CnrxLVar7kFPuphukmYjiIgPlNbiQcVbTHY3UpC2tvHR_ih_ozubrEVBbx48J5mQ5JvZ-bLfzABsJWnMFCpqeJhw6qWeQ0MuFRWhw4SndLA03flvG0Gzye_uwqsxeLe1MCirtDHRBGrZEfiPfM_VTAbTZe4cdp8oTo3C3VU7QiOHRV0NXjVl6x9cnOjvu83Y2en18TktpgpQ4dbcjMbcT92qZEwzBaca15Ka8H3FEqm5oBc7OLmHcSRKYYDpkJCosvSF40svxEJ6V9sdhwnP5QH6VT2gn7sWmhzkBI9j9wOXFUU6Rame53OqV0iKQ1YcOvy6EI6y228bsmadO5v9b29oDmaKjJoc5S4wD2OqvQCzdloFKYLXIjxcxShEw97UQyWJ0dKrN01CSCclRlf5auaQEWkVQojZfYJKZKJSndxnJDMi4z5JW29K0q41SDKsNcs7ng-W4OZPHncZSu1OW60AkYxzpbMOGaRVT7uHXv6FK0UtSZi-iyPLULXfPBJFD3YcBfIYjbpHI04ijZPI4CQalmHn85pu3oHk17MrFhxREY360QgZZdi18Bod_tna6u_WNmHq_PqyETUumvU1mGaIbqP0qUAp6z2rdZgUL1mr39swfkLg_q9h9wHop0jI
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1dS8MwFL3oFPHF-YnTqXnwTYNt2m6pb6IOxTEG6thbaZNUBtKNrercrzc3bbcpKojPbdOSm_TeQ849B-A4ikOmkFHD_YhTN3Yt6nOpqPAtJlylf5ZGnb_TrLdavNv123Nd_IbtXhxJZj0NqNKUpGcDGZ_NNb65Hqc631C0LLHoZBGWXCTSI16_70zPEXS5nkEujnoEDsvbZr4f43NqmtWbX45ITeZplP__zeuwlled5CJbJhuwoJJNKBeODiTf4Fvw1A6RrIX6zRMlieGbq7Eu1Ek_JoZ7-Ga8uogsWDQY13OCbF2iYl0ApyQ1RNwRiXtjJemgGJCk2I-VqYK_b8Nj4_rh8obmVgxUODUnpSH3YseWjGl4ZdlhLaoJz1MskhpAu6GFdkeMI7r061hDConUVE9YnnR9VB9wdqCU9BO1C0QyzpXOzLIe265eQjpFCkeKWhQx_RZLVsAuohCIXKcc7TKeg5nCMs5koGcyMDMZTCpwMn1mkKl0_Hp3tQhukO_YUeBopIxwjFsVOC2CObv882h7f7v9CFbaV42gedu624dVNK_PyDFVKKXDF3UAy-I17Y2Gh2YhfwD3e_NK
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parameterized+complexity+of+multiwinner+determination%3A+more+effort+towards+fixed-parameter+tractability&rft.jtitle=Autonomous+agents+and+multi-agent+systems&rft.au=Yang%2C+Yongjie&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jianxin&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=1387-2532&rft.eissn=1573-7454&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=28&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10458-023-09610-z
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1387-2532&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1387-2532&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1387-2532&client=summon