An energy-efficient and deadline-aware workflow scheduling algorithm in the fog and cloud environment

The Internet of Things (IoT) is constantly evolving. The variety of IoT applications has caused new demands to emerge on users’ part and competition between computing service providers. On the one hand, an IoT application may exhibit several important criteria, such as deadline and runtime simultane...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Computing Ročník 106; číslo 1; s. 109 - 137
Hlavní autoři: Khaledian, Navid, Khamforoosh, Keyhan, Akraminejad, Reza, Abualigah, Laith, Javaheri, Danial
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Vienna Springer Vienna 01.01.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
ISSN:0010-485X, 1436-5057
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The Internet of Things (IoT) is constantly evolving. The variety of IoT applications has caused new demands to emerge on users’ part and competition between computing service providers. On the one hand, an IoT application may exhibit several important criteria, such as deadline and runtime simultaneously, and it is confronted with resource limitations and high energy consumption on the other hand. This has turned to adopting a computing environment and scheduling as a fundamental challenge. To resolve the issue, IoT applications are considered in this paper as a workflow composed of a series of interdependent tasks. The tasks in the same workflow (at the same level) are subject to priorities and deadlines for execution, making the problem far more complex and closer to the real world. In this paper, a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Simulated Annealing algorithm (PSO–SA) is used for prioritizing tasks and improving fitness function. Our proposed method managed the task allocation and optimized energy consumption and makespan at the fog-cloud environment nodes. The simulation results indicated that the PSO–SA enhanced energy and makespan by 5% and 9% respectively on average compared with the baseline algorithm (IKH-EFT).
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0010-485X
1436-5057
DOI:10.1007/s00607-023-01215-4