Assessment gaps and biases in knowledge of conservation status of fishes

More than 33,500 fish species inhabit freshwater and marine environments, according to FishBase database records. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has assessed the conservation status of approximately half of them, the lowest percentage in any vertebrate group. In order...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Aquatic conservation Ročník 30; číslo 2; s. 225 - 236
Hlavní autoři: Miqueleiz, Imanol, Bohm, Monika, Ariño, Arturo Hugo, Miranda, Rafael
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2020
Témata:
Conservation
Conservation status
distribution patterns
Economics
extinction risk
Fish
Freshwater
Freshwater fish
Freshwater fishes
freshwater realm
habitats
Inland water environment
IUCN red list
Life history
Marine environment
marine realm
Nature conservation
South America
Species
Subgroups
Taxonomy
threatened species
Vertebrates
Wildlife conservation
South America
ISSN:1052-7613, 1099-0755
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:More than 33,500 fish species inhabit freshwater and marine environments, according to FishBase database records. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has assessed the conservation status of approximately half of them, the lowest percentage in any vertebrate group. In order to identify what factors may underlie this assessment gap, several traits were examined related to distribution, life‐history, taxonomy, conservation, and the economic relevance of species according to their assessment status. IUCN assessment patterns were explored and separate analyses were included for freshwater and marine species. The results showed that IUCN assessments were biased towards economically developed regions, species with early description dates and species covered by current IUCN specialist groups. Species living in remote areas or habitats were more likely to be unassessed. In particular, South America had low assessment levels. Other traits such as commercial importance did not influence the assessment status of fish species. We therefore encourage assessment in poorly assessed areas and taxonomic subgroups to prompt timely conservation action to prevent species extinctions.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1052-7613
1099-0755
DOI:10.1002/aqc.3282