2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set
We compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic performance using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set. Thirty-three individuals with varying laparoscopic experience com...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A Ročník 22; číslo 9; s. 865 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
01.11.2012
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1557-9034, 1557-9034 |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | We compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic performance using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set.
Thirty-three individuals with varying laparoscopic experience completed three essential drills from the FLS skill set (peg transfer, pattern cutting, and suturing/knot tying) in both 2D and 3D. Participants were randomized to begin all tasks in either 2D or 3D. Time to completion and number of attempts required to achieve proficiency were measured for each task. Errors were also noted. Participants completed questionnaires evaluating their experiences with both visual modalities.
Across all tasks, greater speed was achieved in 3D versus 2D: peg transfer, 183.4 versus 245.6 seconds (P<.0001); pattern cutting, 167.7 versus 209.3 seconds (P=.004); and suturing/knot tying, 255.2 versus 329.5 seconds (P=.031). Fewer errors were committed in the peg transfer task in 3D versus 2D (P=.008). Fourteen participants required multiple attempts to achieve proficiency in one or more tasks in 2D, compared with 7 in 3D. Subjective measures of efficiency and accuracy also favored 3D visualization. The advantage of 3D vision persisted independent of participants' level of technical expertise (novice versus intermediate/expert). There were no differences in reported side effects between the two visual modalities. Overall, 87.9% of participants preferred 3D visualization.
Three-dimensional vision appears to greatly enhance laparoscopic proficiency based on objective and subjective measures. In our experience, 3D visualization produced no more eye strain, headaches, or other side effects than 2D visualization. Participants overwhelmingly preferred 3D visualization. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic performance using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set.INTRODUCTIONWe compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic performance using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set.Thirty-three individuals with varying laparoscopic experience completed three essential drills from the FLS skill set (peg transfer, pattern cutting, and suturing/knot tying) in both 2D and 3D. Participants were randomized to begin all tasks in either 2D or 3D. Time to completion and number of attempts required to achieve proficiency were measured for each task. Errors were also noted. Participants completed questionnaires evaluating their experiences with both visual modalities.SUBJECTS AND METHODSThirty-three individuals with varying laparoscopic experience completed three essential drills from the FLS skill set (peg transfer, pattern cutting, and suturing/knot tying) in both 2D and 3D. Participants were randomized to begin all tasks in either 2D or 3D. Time to completion and number of attempts required to achieve proficiency were measured for each task. Errors were also noted. Participants completed questionnaires evaluating their experiences with both visual modalities.Across all tasks, greater speed was achieved in 3D versus 2D: peg transfer, 183.4 versus 245.6 seconds (P<.0001); pattern cutting, 167.7 versus 209.3 seconds (P=.004); and suturing/knot tying, 255.2 versus 329.5 seconds (P=.031). Fewer errors were committed in the peg transfer task in 3D versus 2D (P=.008). Fourteen participants required multiple attempts to achieve proficiency in one or more tasks in 2D, compared with 7 in 3D. Subjective measures of efficiency and accuracy also favored 3D visualization. The advantage of 3D vision persisted independent of participants' level of technical expertise (novice versus intermediate/expert). There were no differences in reported side effects between the two visual modalities. Overall, 87.9% of participants preferred 3D visualization.RESULTSAcross all tasks, greater speed was achieved in 3D versus 2D: peg transfer, 183.4 versus 245.6 seconds (P<.0001); pattern cutting, 167.7 versus 209.3 seconds (P=.004); and suturing/knot tying, 255.2 versus 329.5 seconds (P=.031). Fewer errors were committed in the peg transfer task in 3D versus 2D (P=.008). Fourteen participants required multiple attempts to achieve proficiency in one or more tasks in 2D, compared with 7 in 3D. Subjective measures of efficiency and accuracy also favored 3D visualization. The advantage of 3D vision persisted independent of participants' level of technical expertise (novice versus intermediate/expert). There were no differences in reported side effects between the two visual modalities. Overall, 87.9% of participants preferred 3D visualization.Three-dimensional vision appears to greatly enhance laparoscopic proficiency based on objective and subjective measures. In our experience, 3D visualization produced no more eye strain, headaches, or other side effects than 2D visualization. Participants overwhelmingly preferred 3D visualization.CONCLUSIONSThree-dimensional vision appears to greatly enhance laparoscopic proficiency based on objective and subjective measures. In our experience, 3D visualization produced no more eye strain, headaches, or other side effects than 2D visualization. Participants overwhelmingly preferred 3D visualization. We compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic performance using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set. Thirty-three individuals with varying laparoscopic experience completed three essential drills from the FLS skill set (peg transfer, pattern cutting, and suturing/knot tying) in both 2D and 3D. Participants were randomized to begin all tasks in either 2D or 3D. Time to completion and number of attempts required to achieve proficiency were measured for each task. Errors were also noted. Participants completed questionnaires evaluating their experiences with both visual modalities. Across all tasks, greater speed was achieved in 3D versus 2D: peg transfer, 183.4 versus 245.6 seconds (P<.0001); pattern cutting, 167.7 versus 209.3 seconds (P=.004); and suturing/knot tying, 255.2 versus 329.5 seconds (P=.031). Fewer errors were committed in the peg transfer task in 3D versus 2D (P=.008). Fourteen participants required multiple attempts to achieve proficiency in one or more tasks in 2D, compared with 7 in 3D. Subjective measures of efficiency and accuracy also favored 3D visualization. The advantage of 3D vision persisted independent of participants' level of technical expertise (novice versus intermediate/expert). There were no differences in reported side effects between the two visual modalities. Overall, 87.9% of participants preferred 3D visualization. Three-dimensional vision appears to greatly enhance laparoscopic proficiency based on objective and subjective measures. In our experience, 3D visualization produced no more eye strain, headaches, or other side effects than 2D visualization. Participants overwhelmingly preferred 3D visualization. |
| Author | Madison, Kerry M Benway, Brian M Paradis, Alethea G Sandhu, Gurdarshan S Varela, J Esteban Tanagho, Youssef S Andriole, Gerald L |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Youssef S surname: Tanagho fullname: Tanagho, Youssef S email: tanaghoy@wudosis.wustl.edu organization: Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. tanaghoy@wudosis.wustl.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Gerald L surname: Andriole fullname: Andriole, Gerald L – sequence: 3 givenname: Alethea G surname: Paradis fullname: Paradis, Alethea G – sequence: 4 givenname: Kerry M surname: Madison fullname: Madison, Kerry M – sequence: 5 givenname: Gurdarshan S surname: Sandhu fullname: Sandhu, Gurdarshan S – sequence: 6 givenname: J Esteban surname: Varela fullname: Varela, J Esteban – sequence: 7 givenname: Brian M surname: Benway fullname: Benway, Brian M |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23072406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpVkDtPxDAQhC10iHtASYtc0uTw4xzHdOh4SifRQB05zvowJHaIY9Dx64nEIcE2M8W3s6uZo4kPHhA6pWRJSaEuGt0tGaFsSRgjB2hGhZCZInw1-eOnaB7jKxlH8dURmjJOJFuRfIY-2TX-gD6miPnoXEy6cV96cMFfYtd22gw4eDxe0X2IJnTO4K4P1hkH3uxwis5v8fAC2CZf6xb8oJuIg_2_ElO_hX6H45trGhxhOEaHdgThZK8L9Hx787S-zzaPdw_rq01muFBDxjhnhkOtbE4sAZBcmspyWkthCyIqUxe5sFbkueaF0qbiSilZFbU21tSSswU6_8kdn35PEIeyddFA02gPIcWSUkHHgnIhR_Rsj6aqhbrsetfqflf-lsW-AedWcCM |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2017_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2017_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_016_1526_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2014_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4189_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2021_1990231 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_023_02876_4 crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350619853136 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2016_08_027 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000281 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4083_3 crossref_primary_10_1017_S002221512200010X crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_017_1629_y crossref_primary_10_3109_13645706_2014_968171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2015_12_055 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2013_2243731 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_15653 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10330_016_0179_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12152 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2015_0085 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10551_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4211_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2016_03_020 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2017_1362102 crossref_primary_10_4103_gmit_gmit_140_21 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JBO_29_9_093506 crossref_primary_10_1080_2331205X_2018_1426232 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0284 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_023_07335_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_06645_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_03_080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_11_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2015_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2018_0765 crossref_primary_10_21815_JDE_019_187 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5525_x crossref_primary_10_3390_mi11050488 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2018_03_016 crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350621991224 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0183789 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_015_1660_y crossref_primary_10_1177_2192568218775072 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_014_3949_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2016_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_023_01465_z crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2024_2354609 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2013_2293815 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2013_0630 crossref_primary_10_1177_20514158211017414 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10172_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06726_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10271_y crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000138 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_4197693 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2015_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_12387 crossref_primary_10_4103_jmas_jmas_122_21 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2018_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2024_102754 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_017_1247_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_020_07980_z crossref_primary_10_4103_gmit_gmit_99_23 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2014_09_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_12078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2013_07_047 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2016_0078 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_020_00732_7 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2014_0608 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_018_0693_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_08941939_2019_1587113 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08785_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2674_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_014_3635_2 crossref_primary_10_1109_TVCG_2016_2598602 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11020862 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_4561468 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1347583 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2021_0108 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_024_07630_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2015_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2018_0164 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000231 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13121706 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_022_02681_8 crossref_primary_10_1177_014556131709601201 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_11275_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_016_1428_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_media_2017_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1159_000506059 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep06820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2015_10_042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350614550720 crossref_primary_10_1002_jdd_13682 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13022_015_0018_x crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000027042 crossref_primary_10_1111_ases_12628 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000536 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2016_07_030 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2024_0370 crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_13395 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_circen_2015_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2018_07_051 crossref_primary_10_1111_vsu_13637 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4357_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_015_1658_5 crossref_primary_10_1145_3698137 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2016_0155 crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350616687434 crossref_primary_10_1109_JTEHM_2020_3007031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2016_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42399_021_00774_x crossref_primary_10_1002_jdd_12916 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1089/lap.2012.0220 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1557-9034 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 23072406 |
| Genre | Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .GJ 0R~ 34G 36B 39C 4.4 53G 5GY AAWTL ABBKN ABJNI ACGFS ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BNQNF CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF DU5 EBS ECM EIF EJD EMOBN F5P IM4 L7B MV1 NPM NQHIM O9- RIG RML RMSOB UE5 7X8 SCNPE |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-2332c3ed9f60f0ee737cbf31d75f805bcd865ff566a389acb39997b8dacfcd732 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 140 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000310916800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1557-9034 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 15:06:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:57:08 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 9 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c359t-2332c3ed9f60f0ee737cbf31d75f805bcd865ff566a389acb39997b8dacfcd732 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| PMID | 23072406 |
| PQID | 1151034657 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1151034657 pubmed_primary_23072406 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-Nov 20121101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2012 text: 2012-Nov |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| SSID | ssj0000934 |
| Score | 2.3851213 |
| Snippet | We compared the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) visualization on both objective and subjective measures of laparoscopic... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 865 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Clinical Competence Depth Perception Female Humans Inservice Training Laparoscopy - standards Male Surveys and Questionnaires Task Performance and Analysis |
| Title | 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23072406 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1151034657 |
| Volume | 22 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000310916800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qevDiA1_riwhew7ZJ07ReRNTFgy57UNhbSdNEFpd2NbuK_96ZtsviQRA8tPQyEGYmydd5fEPIBdwhiZNBznIhNYtiGzFA4THseGUtAIoodDVl_oMaDJLRKB22ATffllUuzsT6oC4qgzHyHiCXMBBRLNXV9I3h1CjMrrYjNFZJRwCUQa9WoyVbOPyt11llKRVLQbjl2AyStDfRSFaJgUDOg9_RZX3L9Lf-u75tstniS3rdOMQOWbHlLvnktxTLL-aeCvgae-ykbPovL2nTJ0mrksJqNZJbVtOxofUw73rjf1Esjn-hABWpw8aRZh6Ap5X7KeKbFmvqX8eTCfV2tkee-3dPN_esnbjAjJDpjHEhuBG2SF0cuMBaJZTJnQgLJV0SyNwUSSydA2NqADra5KDzVOVJoY0zhRJ8n6yVVWkPCTWxiSKpeaQcPFylKrQxL5RBtiCjky45X-gxA4_GNIUubTX32VKTXXLQGCObNtQbGZatIwY5-oP0MdlACzeNgyek40Az9pSsm4_Z2L-f1a4C78Hw8Rvyqsqm |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2D+versus+3D+visualization%3A+impact+on+laparoscopic+proficiency+using+the+fundamentals+of+laparoscopic+surgery+skill+set&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+laparoendoscopic+%26+advanced+surgical+techniques.+Part+A&rft.au=Tanagho%2C+Youssef+S&rft.au=Andriole%2C+Gerald+L&rft.au=Paradis%2C+Alethea+G&rft.au=Madison%2C+Kerry+M&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.eissn=1557-9034&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=865&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089%2Flap.2012.0220&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23072406&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23072406&rft.externalDocID=23072406 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1557-9034&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1557-9034&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1557-9034&client=summon |