Pump scheduling optimization in water distribution system based on mixed integer linear programming

•A novel linearization method for the bivariate nonlinear functions is proposed.•A strategy that can adaptively adjust the number of breakpoints is developed.•The computational efficiency and the objective value are improved. The energy consumption in water distribution systems (WDSs) is significant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of operational research Vol. 313; no. 3; pp. 1140 - 1151
Main Authors: Shao, Yu, Zhou, Xinhong, Yu, Tingchao, Zhang, Tuqiao, Chu, Shipeng
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 16.03.2024
Subjects:
ISSN:0377-2217, 1872-6860
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A novel linearization method for the bivariate nonlinear functions is proposed.•A strategy that can adaptively adjust the number of breakpoints is developed.•The computational efficiency and the objective value are improved. The energy consumption in water distribution systems (WDSs) is significant. Improving the efficiency of pump operation can significantly reduce energy costs. However, optimal pump operation is a nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, which can be challenging to solve. A feasible approach is to linearize the problem and convert it into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. However, this approach introduces many auxiliary variables, which can lead to inefficiency in finding the optimal solution due to the expanded search space. To address this issue, we propose a novel method for linearization of the original MINLP problem and a strategy that can adaptively adjust the number of piecewise linearization breakpoints. By reducing the number of auxiliary variables, our approach achieved competitive computing efficiency and the ability to save energy costs, as demonstrated in two benchmark instances. Furthermore, in a realistic large-scale WDS, our approach saved 9.83% more energy costs than the genetic algorithm and achieved a gap of only 7.36% from the lower bound.
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.055