A Comparative Simulation Study of the Different Variations of PZT Piezoelectric Material by Using A MEMS Vibration Energy Harvester

In this article, the presented work aims to scavenge maximum electrical outputs by using the novel microelectromechanical system flared-U shaped spring based piezoelectric vibration energy harvester (PVEH). The performance studies were carried out by employing four different variations of lead zirco...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:IEEE transactions on industry applications Ročník 58; číslo 3; s. 3901 - 3908
Hlavní autoři: Debnath, Bapi, Kumar, R.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York IEEE 01.05.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Témata:
ISSN:0093-9994, 1939-9367
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In this article, the presented work aims to scavenge maximum electrical outputs by using the novel microelectromechanical system flared-U shaped spring based piezoelectric vibration energy harvester (PVEH). The performance studies were carried out by employing four different variations of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) piezoelectric material namely PZT-4, PZT-5A, PZT-5H, and PZT-8 in the same size and shape of the proposed device. The maximum output powers employing PZT-4, PZT-5A, PZT-5H, and PZT-8 piezoelectric materials are 7.156 nW, 8.657 nW, 10.738 nW, 5.701 nW over 30 Hz, 28.4 Hz, 28.6 Hz, and 30.2 Hz, resonant frequency, respectively, at input acceleration of 0.07 g. From the finite element method simulator COMSOL Multiphysics 5.4 (licensed version) simulation-based outcomes, it is inferred that PZT-5H piezoelectric material performs better than other variations of PZT, such as PZT-4, PZT-5A, and PZT-8 piezoelectric materials.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0093-9994
1939-9367
DOI:10.1109/TIA.2022.3160144