An empirical Q‐matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model

As a core component of most cognitive diagnosis models, the Q‐matrix, or item and attribute association matrix, is typically developed by domain experts, and tends to be subjective. It is critical to validate the Q‐matrix empirically because a misspecified Q‐matrix could result in erroneous attribut...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:British journal of mathematical & statistical psychology Ročník 73; číslo 1; s. 142 - 163
Hlavní autoři: Ma, Wenchao, Torre, Jimmy
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England British Psychological Society 01.02.2020
Témata:
ISSN:0007-1102, 2044-8317, 2044-8317
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:As a core component of most cognitive diagnosis models, the Q‐matrix, or item and attribute association matrix, is typically developed by domain experts, and tends to be subjective. It is critical to validate the Q‐matrix empirically because a misspecified Q‐matrix could result in erroneous attribute estimation. Most existing Q‐matrix validation procedures are developed for dichotomous responses. However, in this paper, we propose a method to empirically detect and correct the misspecifications in the Q‐matrix for graded response data based on the sequential generalized deterministic inputs, noisy ‘and’ gate (G‐DINA) model. The proposed Q‐matrix validation procedure is implemented in a stepwise manner based on the Wald test and an effect size measure. The feasibility of the proposed method is examined using simulation studies. Also, a set of data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 mathematics assessment is analysed for illustration.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-1102
2044-8317
2044-8317
DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12156