Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire
Thus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower extremity amputation and successful prosthesis fitting. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was translated and cross-culturally adapte...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Disability and rehabilitation Jg. 40; H. 17; S. 2081 - 2087 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
14.08.2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0963-8288, 1464-5165, 1464-5165 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Thus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower extremity amputation and successful prosthesis fitting.
The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Finnish. Participants completed a questionnaire package including the Finnish version of the PEQ and the 15 D HRQoL instrument. Scales (n = 10) were tested for internal consistency, floor-ceiling effect, and reproducibility for which participants completed the PEQ twice within a 2-week interval. Validity was tested by estimating the correlation between the 15 D index and the scales. The authors included 122 participants who had completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions in the final analysis.
Mean scale scores of the 10 scales varied from 52 to 83. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.67 to 0.96. The total score showed no floor-ceiling effect. Reproducibility of the scales was good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78-0.87; coefficient of repeatability, 19-36). Significant correlations were observed between the 15 D index and the scales for ambulation, social burden, usefulness, and well-being.
This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ in assessing the HRQoL among major lower extremity amputated patients who have been fitted with prosthesis. Implications for rehabilitation Measurement of quality of life during rehabilitation can provide important information on patients' well-being. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) is a valid instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after major lower extremity amputation. This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ for assessing HRQoL among patient who have undergone major lower extremity amputation. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Thus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower extremity amputation and successful prosthesis fitting.BACKGROUNDThus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower extremity amputation and successful prosthesis fitting.The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Finnish. Participants completed a questionnaire package including the Finnish version of the PEQ and the 15 D HRQoL instrument. Scales (n = 10) were tested for internal consistency, floor-ceiling effect, and reproducibility for which participants completed the PEQ twice within a 2-week interval. Validity was tested by estimating the correlation between the 15 D index and the scales. The authors included 122 participants who had completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions in the final analysis.METHODSThe prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Finnish. Participants completed a questionnaire package including the Finnish version of the PEQ and the 15 D HRQoL instrument. Scales (n = 10) were tested for internal consistency, floor-ceiling effect, and reproducibility for which participants completed the PEQ twice within a 2-week interval. Validity was tested by estimating the correlation between the 15 D index and the scales. The authors included 122 participants who had completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions in the final analysis.Mean scale scores of the 10 scales varied from 52 to 83. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.67 to 0.96. The total score showed no floor-ceiling effect. Reproducibility of the scales was good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78-0.87; coefficient of repeatability, 19-36). Significant correlations were observed between the 15 D index and the scales for ambulation, social burden, usefulness, and well-being.RESULTSMean scale scores of the 10 scales varied from 52 to 83. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.67 to 0.96. The total score showed no floor-ceiling effect. Reproducibility of the scales was good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78-0.87; coefficient of repeatability, 19-36). Significant correlations were observed between the 15 D index and the scales for ambulation, social burden, usefulness, and well-being.This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ in assessing the HRQoL among major lower extremity amputated patients who have been fitted with prosthesis. Implications for rehabilitation Measurement of quality of life during rehabilitation can provide important information on patients' well-being. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) is a valid instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after major lower extremity amputation. This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ for assessing HRQoL among patient who have undergone major lower extremity amputation.CONCLUSIONSThis study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ in assessing the HRQoL among major lower extremity amputated patients who have been fitted with prosthesis. Implications for rehabilitation Measurement of quality of life during rehabilitation can provide important information on patients' well-being. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) is a valid instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after major lower extremity amputation. This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ for assessing HRQoL among patient who have undergone major lower extremity amputation. Thus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower extremity amputation and successful prosthesis fitting. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Finnish. Participants completed a questionnaire package including the Finnish version of the PEQ and the 15 D HRQoL instrument. Scales (n = 10) were tested for internal consistency, floor-ceiling effect, and reproducibility for which participants completed the PEQ twice within a 2-week interval. Validity was tested by estimating the correlation between the 15 D index and the scales. The authors included 122 participants who had completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions in the final analysis. Mean scale scores of the 10 scales varied from 52 to 83. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.67 to 0.96. The total score showed no floor-ceiling effect. Reproducibility of the scales was good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78-0.87; coefficient of repeatability, 19-36). Significant correlations were observed between the 15 D index and the scales for ambulation, social burden, usefulness, and well-being. This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ in assessing the HRQoL among major lower extremity amputated patients who have been fitted with prosthesis. Implications for rehabilitation Measurement of quality of life during rehabilitation can provide important information on patients' well-being. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) is a valid instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after major lower extremity amputation. This study provided evidence of the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the PEQ for assessing HRQoL among patient who have undergone major lower extremity amputation. |
| Author | Piitulainen, Kirsi Kautiainen, Hannu Repo, Jussi Petteri Häkkinen, Arja Roine, Risto Paavo Becker, Paju Tukiainen, Erkki Juhani |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jussi Petteri orcidid: 0000-0002-4688-5698 surname: Repo fullname: Repo, Jussi Petteri organization: Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland – sequence: 2 givenname: Kirsi surname: Piitulainen fullname: Piitulainen, Kirsi organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland;, Department of Physical Medicine, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland – sequence: 3 givenname: Arja surname: Häkkinen fullname: Häkkinen, Arja organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland;, Department of Physical Medicine, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland – sequence: 4 givenname: Risto Paavo surname: Roine fullname: Roine, Risto Paavo organization: Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;, Department of Health and Social Management, Research Centre for Comparative Effectiveness and Patient Safety, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland – sequence: 5 givenname: Hannu surname: Kautiainen fullname: Kautiainen, Hannu organization: Department of General Practice, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland – sequence: 6 givenname: Paju surname: Becker fullname: Becker, Paju organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland – sequence: 7 givenname: Erkki Juhani surname: Tukiainen fullname: Tukiainen, Erkki Juhani organization: Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkMtKxDAUhoOMOBd9BKVLN625J8WVDI4KA4Loxk1I24SJdNKxaQfm7U3n4sKN2Zxcvv9w8k3ByDfeAHCNYIaghHcw50RiKTMMkcgQwQQSfAYmiHKaMsTZCEwGJh2gMZiG8AUhRETQCzDGkkouGZ-AzzdTO1242nW7RPsq2eraVcOhsUm3MsnCee_CKtmaNrjGn643bRNiDS4kJkZ63Q2P370Jw8Zr15pLcG51HczVsc7Ax-Lxff6cLl-fXuYPy7QkjHeplZBZYQsqjNC4EsxarcuC0ApDnktCy7iIqTAnpSXUsALpimBNEINIckZm4PbQN860H0CtXShNXWtvmj4oJPMcQcEFjejNEe2LtanUpnVr3e7UyUcE2AEo4_9Ca-wvgqAavKuTdzV4V0fvMXf_J1e6bu-ka7Wr_0n_AGpriGk |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_PXR_0000000000000227 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17082691 crossref_primary_10_1097_PXR_0000000000000197 crossref_primary_10_3390_prosthesis7040089 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90090-9 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.011 10.1097/01.nmd.0000230392.83607.c5 10.1177/0309364611433442 10.1589/jpts.27.1677 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00008 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x 10.1007/s11136-014-0787-4 10.1177/0272989X15613522 10.1177/0309364615612635 10.1023/A:1026475531996 10.1007/BF02310555 10.1093/oso/9780198528470.001.0001 10.1371/journal.pone.0073990 10.2340/16501977-0033 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 10.3109/07853890109002090 10.1007/BF01593882 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90278-X 10.1590/1677-5449.0038 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.011 10.3109/07853890109002086 10.1007/s11136-008-9317-6 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323032 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Social Welfare & Social Work Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy |
| EISSN | 1464-5165 |
| EndPage | 2087 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 28486856 10_1080_09638288_2017_1323032 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 00X 03L 0R~ 29G 36B 4.4 5GY 6PF AAGDL AAIKC AAMIU AAMNW AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL AAYXX ABBKH ABEIZ ABIVO ABJNI ABLCE ABLIJ ABLJU ABUPF ABWVI ABXYU ACENM ACGEJ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIEZ ACKLR ACVOX ADCVX ADRBQ ADXPE AECIN AENEX AEOZL AFKVX AFRVT AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AIAGR AIJEM AIRBT AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALYBC ARJSQ BABNJ BLEHA BOHLJ BTKSN CCCUG CITATION CS3 DKSSO DU5 EBS EIHBH EJD F5P FEDTE H13 HZ~ KRBQP KSSTO KWAYT KYCEM LGLTD M4Z O9- P2P RNANH RVRKI TASJS TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TFDNU TFL TFW TUROJ V1S ~1N .GJ 0BK 34G 39C 53G 5VS AADGC AALIY AAPXX ABGNL ACKFH ACWGZ ADPSL ADVEQ ADYSH AEIQB AELXL AETHL AEXKJ AFLJA AFOSN AGXXK AIKPT APIUT AWYRJ CAG COF COGVJ HAMGP HVGLF IPNFZ LJTGL M44 NPM NUSFT OHT YCJ ZGI ZXP 7X8 AQTUD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f805f7fb47e7a2d75ffaacb34d2069834cccc3ed263cf34e5b1ad32a315018653 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 4 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000434263100014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0963-8288 1464-5165 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 11:14:45 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:43:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:29:58 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:29:48 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 17 |
| Keywords | psychometrics amputation Rehabilitation validity prosthesis reliability |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-f805f7fb47e7a2d75ffaacb34d2069834cccc3ed263cf34e5b1ad32a315018653 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4688-5698 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/311586 |
| PMID | 28486856 |
| PQID | 1899107674 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1899107674 pubmed_primary_28486856 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2017_1323032 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_09638288_2017_1323032 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2018-08-14 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-08-14 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2018 text: 2018-08-14 day: 14 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Disability and rehabilitation |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Disabil Rehabil |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| References | CIT0010 CIT0012 Dewolf L (CIT0011) 2009 CIT0014 CIT0013 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0018 CIT0017 CIT0019 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0001 CIT0022 Boone DA (CIT0009) 2006; 18 (CIT0023) 2009; 46 CIT0003 CIT0025 CIT0002 CIT0024 CIT0005 CIT0027 CIT0004 CIT0026 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0008 |
| References_xml | – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90090-9 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.011 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000230392.83607.c5 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1177/0309364611433442 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1677 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00008 – volume: 18 start-page: P68 year: 2006 ident: CIT0009 publication-title: JPO – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0787-4 – volume: 46 start-page: 196 year: 2009 ident: CIT0023 publication-title: J Soc Med – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1177/0272989X15613522 – volume-title: EORTC quality of life group translation procedure year: 2009 ident: CIT0011 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1177/0309364615612635 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1023/A:1026475531996 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198528470.001.0001 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073990 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.2340/16501977-0033 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.3109/07853890109002090 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1007/BF01593882 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90278-X – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.0038 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.011 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.3109/07853890109002086 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9317-6 |
| SSID | ssj0001374 |
| Score | 2.2384546 |
| Snippet | Thus far there have been no specific patient-reported outcome instrument in Finnish for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment after major lower... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 2081 |
| Title | Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486856 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1899107674 |
| Volume | 40 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000434263100014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor and Francis Online Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1464-5165 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001374 issn: 0963-8288 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 19920101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db5swELfSbg972Uf2la6rPGnry0QEGLB5rLZGk1ZlVUTVaC_IgK2yRJDSJOp_s391Z2yTROu07mE8IHSJDeJ-nM_23e8Qeu9mghUwlXDiKC5USk7sMB5xR00FhCSUEZK3xSboeMym0_i81_tpc2HWc1pV7PY2XvxXVYMMlK1SZ_9B3V2nIIBrUDqcQe1wvpfiVZCxJt_W1ErQd1mYwAvlZY7KqlI0Rmu9UmbFC5X-cSUUP8mGAfxjO2rARcVtlKxxZD8bbl5zk2aH8LvbxQHvXqd-wJenQoEVMXRnjMtyuZpz8HJbw_dVLZ90IGv374PZzP560vzoxo9JXepl2ImiRQAfmK_r7cULT5FhOzpp1NjbIAqc0NPlIobiDpkx0prTyYKRbptcV9d8-W0sMMGTysL4rI3io0OYe8OY7W8GP7vhP_6Wji7OztLkdJocL64dVZZMbd-bGi176IFPw1iZzWR02Q31Hmlpvrsntiliirz9rvvuOj9_mNG0nk3yFD02UxJ8oqH0DPVE1UcftumncaK5J_Axnuwouo-enJsP3f6njw51yje-FHPJGwGNrKBuZs_R9y2AYsAOtgDFtcSAQGwAig1ArXgDULwBKN4B6At0MTpNPn1xTIUPJydhtHQkc0NJZRZQQblf0FBKzvOMBIXvRjEjQQ4HEYUfkVySQISZxwvic-IpHsooJC_RflVX4jXCXEpfgq8pPDcPwK3OiiCDowh8L5OsoAMU2Fef5uYlqSos89SzLLlGY6nSWGo0NkDDrtlC87_8rcE7q9cULLXafuOVqFc3qcdgLuYq8qwBeqUV3nUJTiKLWBgd3KP1G_Ro8ykdov1lsxJv0cN8vSxvmiO0R6fsqIXpL9Hzvck |
| linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability+and+validity+of+the+Finnish+version+of+the+prosthesis+evaluation+questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Disability+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Repo%2C+Jussi+Petteri&rft.au=Piitulainen%2C+Kirsi&rft.au=H%C3%A4kkinen%2C+Arja&rft.au=Roine%2C+Risto+Paavo&rft.date=2018-08-14&rft.issn=1464-5165&rft.eissn=1464-5165&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F09638288.2017.1323032&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0963-8288&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0963-8288&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0963-8288&client=summon |