An update on the role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting and monitoring multiple sclerosis progression

While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established in diagnosing and monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), its utility in predicting and monitoring disease progression is less clear. The authors consider changing concepts in the phenotypic classification of MS, including progres...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Expert review of neurotherapeutics Ročník 24; číslo 2; s. 201 - 216
Hlavní autori: Ananthavarathan, Piriyankan, Sahi, Nitin, Chard, Declan T
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England 01.02.2024
Predmet:
ISSN:1473-7175, 1744-8360, 1744-8360
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established in diagnosing and monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), its utility in predicting and monitoring disease progression is less clear. The authors consider changing concepts in the phenotypic classification of MS, including progression independent of relapses; pathological processes underpinning progression; advances in MRI measures to assess them; how well MRI features explain and predict clinical outcomes, including models that assess disease effects on neural networks, and the potential role for machine learning. Relapsing-remitting and progressive MS have evolved from being viewed as mutually exclusive to having considerable overlap. Progression is likely the consequence of several pathological elements, each important in building more holistic prognostic models beyond conventional phenotypes. MRI is well placed to assess pathogenic processes underpinning progression, but we need to bridge the gap between MRI measures and clinical outcomes. Mapping pathological effects on specific neural networks may help and machine learning methods may be able to optimize predictive markers while identifying new, or previously overlooked, clinically relevant features. The ever-increasing ability to measure features on MRI raises the dilemma of what to measure and when, and the challenge of translating research methods into clinically useable tools.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1473-7175
1744-8360
1744-8360
DOI:10.1080/14737175.2024.2304116