Person and the syntax–discourse interface: An eye-tracking study of agreement

•We investigated the role of morphosyntax and discourse in agreement comprehension.•We compared unagreement, standard agreement, null-subject and incorrect sentences.•One grammatical judgment task and three eye-tracking experiments were used.•Morphosyntactic checking between subject and verb guides...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of memory and language Vol. 76; pp. 141 - 157
Main Authors: Mancini, Simona, Molinaro, Nicola, Davidson, Doug J., Avilés, Alberto, Carreiras, Manuel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01.10.2014
Elsevier
Elsevier BV
Subjects:
Agreement
Agreements
Biological and medical sciences
Comprehension
Discourse
Discourse analysis
Dissociation
Experiments
Eye movements
Eye tracking
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grammar
Grammatical agreement
Grammatical subject
Grammaticality
Interfaces
Judgment
Language
Morphosyntax
Person
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Sentence structure
Sentences
Spanish language
Syntactic phases
Syntax
Syntax discourse relationship
Tracking
Unagreement
Verbs
Agreement
Discourse
Eye-tracking
Unagreement
Human
Experimental study
Grammatical agreement
Eye movement
Reading
Language
Spanish
Syntax
Sentence
ISSN:0749-596X, 1096-0821
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We investigated the role of morphosyntax and discourse in agreement comprehension.•We compared unagreement, standard agreement, null-subject and incorrect sentences.•One grammatical judgment task and three eye-tracking experiments were used.•Morphosyntactic checking between subject and verb guides initial stages of processing.•Discourse-related analysis takes place in later phases of agreement processing. The time-course of agreement processing was investigated through three eye-tracking experiments and one grammaticality judgment task by making use of the Spanish Unagreement pattern, which allows the presence of a 3rd person plural subject followed by a 1st person plural verb, as in Los manifestantes anunciamos una huelga (The protesters3.pl announced1.pl a strike). Grammaticality is ensured by re-interpreting the subject as 1st person plural, thereby changing the underlying discourse composition of the sentence (We protesters announced a strike). The comparison of Unagreement with structurally similar sentences (Experiment 1), truly person-anomalous sentences (Experiments 2 and 3) and discourse-incongruent sentences (Experiment 4) revealed a clear dissociation between morphosyntactic-related and discourse-related analysis in agreement comprehension. The constant first-pass effect elicited by Unagreement with respect to structurally similar (grammatical and ungrammatical) sentences across the four experiments evidences the sensitivity of early stages to morphosyntactic evaluation, while the differential effect for discourse-congruous and discourse-incongruous sentences in later measures suggests that discourse-related analyses are dealt with by the parser in subsequent stages of processing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.010