With Respect to Prejudice

The basic assumptions of psychotherapy must necessarily reflect the cultural orientations and dilemmas of the western societies, and historical periods, in which these originated. This paper considers how the racialised biases of that period, namely, the era of European domination built upon the con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of analytical psychology Jg. 64; H. 2; S. 189 - 205
1. Verfasser:	Maitra, Begum
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2019
Schlagworte:	Adult assunti culturali Bias Colonialism Colonization Covert cultural bias Cultural Competency Dominance European cultural groups formación psicoterapéutica formation des psychothérapeutes Health Personnel Humans Jung Jungian Theory kulturelle Voreingenommenheit Multiculturalism & pluralism Neocolonialism Personal experiences pregiudizio Prejudice prejuicio prejuicio cultural préjugés culturels préjugés racistes et autres Psychotherapieausbildung Psychotherapists Psychotherapy psychotherapy training race Racism Rasse raza razza supervision supervisione supervisión Training training psicoterapeutico Usefulness Vorurteil культурные пристрастия предубеждение психотерапевтический тренинг раса супервизия Юнг 心理治疗训练成见文化偏见督导种族荣格 prejudice psychotherapy training cultural bias race Jung supervision раса formación psicoterapéutica 心理治疗训练 pregiudizio психотерапевтический тренинг Psychotherapieausbildung formation des psychothérapeutes préjugés racistes et autres Юнг training psicoterapeutico Supervision prejuicio культурные пристрастия Vorurteil raza assunti culturali prejuicio cultural razza Rasse 文化偏见 préjugés culturels 荣格 supervisión 种族 supervisione супервизия 督导 kulturelle Voreingenommenheit предубеждение 成见
ISSN:	0021-8774, 1468-5922, 1468-5922
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The basic assumptions of psychotherapy must necessarily reflect the cultural orientations and dilemmas of the western societies, and historical periods, in which these originated. This paper considers how the racialised biases of that period, namely, the era of European domination built upon the conquest, colonisation and enslavement of non-European peoples, may linger in psychotherapeutic training and practice today. This not only limits the potential usefulness of the discipline in the multicultural populations of the west, but also risks it being read as covert neo-colonialism in the ‘non-west’. In a world that ever more clearly demonstrates the human costs of prejudice psychotherapists in general, and Jungians in particular, might wish to consider how, wittingly or otherwise, they maintain prejudiced ways of thinking. This paper examines material from the author's professional and personal experience, using literature that lies outside the specifically Jungian canon, to expose how such bias might work.
Bibliographie:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Memoir/Personal Document-3
ISSN:	0021-8774 1468-5922 1468-5922
DOI:	10.1111/1468-5922.12478