Faculty Experiences: Virtual versus Traditional Problem-based Learning during COVID-19 in a Saudi Medical College
Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COV...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 191 - 196 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
India
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
01.07.2024
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| Edition: | 2 |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2589-627X, 2589-6288 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Abstract
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi medical college.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University's College of Medicine. We compared the perceptions of faculty members who facilitated traditional face-to-face PBL in 2019-2020 and virtual PBL in 2020-2021. An online survey with demographic and practice data was distributed. The faculty's perception of PBL facilitation, student learning, and overall satisfaction was investigated using a 5-degree Likert scale: 15 items grouped into three main areas. All of the questions were written in a way that compares traditional and virtual PBL. Mean scores were determined for all parts, and the findings were reported as mean standard deviation, with scores of 3 and above considered positive, and scores of <3 considered negative. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0.
Results:
In the study period, 57 faculty members facilitating PBL replied to the survey (response rate 67.85%). There were no gender variations in the representation of participants (male 56.1%, female 43.9%), and they come from a variety of basic and clinical departments. The majority of participants (91.3%) have more than 2 years of PBL facilitation experience, and 64.2% have received training in both virtual and traditional PBL facilitation. The faculty assessment of facilitating virtual PBL was favorable as overall satisfaction, with the mean of the components in the satisfaction section being 3.67. In terms of facilitation preferences, we discovered that despite the amount of effort involved in facilitating traditional PBL sessions (mean = 3.47), their motivation to facilitate traditional PBL was higher than that of virtual PBL (mean = 3.33). Faculty perceptions of students' learning in PBL were more traditional, with the mean of the items in this section (such as students' motivation, participation, and group dynamics) being higher (3.616).
Conclusions:
The faculty's satisfaction with their abilities to properly facilitate virtual PBL sessions did not detract from their motivation to be in direct personal interaction with students during PBL sessions. To ensure faculty care about students' learning in virtual PBL, their perception had to be correlated to their learning outcomes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi medical college. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University’s College of Medicine. We compared the perceptions of faculty members who facilitated traditional face-to-face PBL in 2019–2020 and virtual PBL in 2020–2021. An online survey with demographic and practice data was distributed. The faculty’s perception of PBL facilitation, student learning, and overall satisfaction was investigated using a 5-degree Likert scale: 15 items grouped into three main areas. All of the questions were written in a way that compares traditional and virtual PBL. Mean scores were determined for all parts, and the findings were reported as mean standard deviation, with scores of 3 and above considered positive, and scores of <3 considered negative. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0. Results: In the study period, 57 faculty members facilitating PBL replied to the survey (response rate 67.85%). There were no gender variations in the representation of participants (male 56.1%, female 43.9%), and they come from a variety of basic and clinical departments. The majority of participants (91.3%) have more than 2 years of PBL facilitation experience, and 64.2% have received training in both virtual and traditional PBL facilitation. The faculty assessment of facilitating virtual PBL was favorable as overall satisfaction, with the mean of the components in the satisfaction section being 3.67. In terms of facilitation preferences, we discovered that despite the amount of effort involved in facilitating traditional PBL sessions (mean = 3.47), their motivation to facilitate traditional PBL was higher than that of virtual PBL (mean = 3.33). Faculty perceptions of students’ learning in PBL were more traditional, with the mean of the items in this section (such as students’ motivation, participation, and group dynamics) being higher (3.616). Conclusions: The faculty’s satisfaction with their abilities to properly facilitate virtual PBL sessions did not detract from their motivation to be in direct personal interaction with students during PBL sessions. To ensure faculty care about students’ learning in virtual PBL, their perception had to be correlated to their learning outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi medical college. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University's College of Medicine. We compared the perceptions of faculty members who facilitated traditional face-to-face PBL in 2019-2020 and virtual PBL in 2020-2021. An online survey with demographic and practice data was distributed. The faculty's perception of PBL facilitation, student learning, and overall satisfaction was investigated using a 5-degree Likert scale: 15 items grouped into three main areas. All of the questions were written in a way that compares traditional and virtual PBL. Mean scores were determined for all parts, and the findings were reported as mean standard deviation, with scores of 3 and above considered positive, and scores of <3 considered negative. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0. In the study period, 57 faculty members facilitating PBL replied to the survey (response rate 67.85). There were no gender variations in the representation of participants (male 56.1, female 43.9), and they come from a variety of basic and clinical departments. The majority of participants (91.3) have more than 2 years of PBL facilitation experience, and 64.2 have received training in both virtual and traditional PBL facilitation. The faculty assessment of facilitating virtual PBL was favorable as overall satisfaction, with the mean of the components in the satisfaction section being 3.67. In terms of facilitation preferences, we discovered that despite the amount of effort involved in facilitating traditional PBL sessions (mean = 3.47), their motivation to facilitate traditional PBL was higher than that of virtual PBL (mean = 3.33). Faculty perceptions of students' learning in PBL were more traditional, with the mean of the items in this section (such as students' motivation, participation, and group dynamics) being higher (3.616). The faculty's satisfaction with their abilities to properly facilitate virtual PBL sessions did not detract from their motivation to be in direct personal interaction with students during PBL sessions. To ensure faculty care about students' learning in virtual PBL, their perception had to be correlated to their learning outcomes. Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi medical college. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University's College of Medicine. We compared the perceptions of faculty members who facilitated traditional face-to-face PBL in 2019-2020 and virtual PBL in 2020-2021. An online survey with demographic and practice data was distributed. The faculty's perception of PBL facilitation, student learning, and overall satisfaction was investigated using a 5-degree Likert scale: 15 items grouped into three main areas. All of the questions were written in a way that compares traditional and virtual PBL. Mean scores were determined for all parts, and the findings were reported as mean standard deviation, with scores of 3 and above considered positive, and scores of <3 considered negative. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0. Results: In the study period, 57 faculty members facilitating PBL replied to the survey (response rate 67.85%). There were no gender variations in the representation of participants (male 56.1%, female 43.9%), and they come from a variety of basic and clinical departments. The majority of participants (91.3%) have more than 2 years of PBL facilitation experience, and 64.2% have received training in both virtual and traditional PBL facilitation. The faculty assessment of facilitating virtual PBL was favorable as overall satisfaction, with the mean of the components in the satisfaction section being 3.67. In terms of facilitation preferences, we discovered that despite the amount of effort involved in facilitating traditional PBL sessions (mean = 3.47), their motivation to facilitate traditional PBL was higher than that of virtual PBL (mean = 3.33). Faculty perceptions of students' learning in PBL were more traditional, with the mean of the items in this section (such as students' motivation, participation, and group dynamics) being higher (3.616). Conclusions: The faculty's satisfaction with their abilities to properly facilitate virtual PBL sessions did not detract from their motivation to be in direct personal interaction with students during PBL sessions. To ensure faculty care about students' learning in virtual PBL, their perception had to be correlated to their learning outcomes. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified teaching strategies. The current study sought to examine faculty perceptions of virtual versus traditional PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi medical college. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University's College of Medicine. We compared the perceptions of faculty members who facilitated traditional face-to-face PBL in 2019-2020 and virtual PBL in 2020-2021. An online survey with demographic and practice data was distributed. The faculty's perception of PBL facilitation, student learning, and overall satisfaction was investigated using a 5-degree Likert scale: 15 items grouped into three main areas. All of the questions were written in a way that compares traditional and virtual PBL. Mean scores were determined for all parts, and the findings were reported as mean standard deviation, with scores of 3 and above considered positive, and scores of <3 considered negative. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0. Results: In the study period, 57 faculty members facilitating PBL replied to the survey (response rate 67.85). There were no gender variations in the representation of participants (male 56.1, female 43.9), and they come from a variety of basic and clinical departments. The majority of participants (91.3) have more than 2 years of PBL facilitation experience, and 64.2 have received training in both virtual and traditional PBL facilitation. The faculty assessment of facilitating virtual PBL was favorable as overall satisfaction, with the mean of the components in the satisfaction section being 3.67. In terms of facilitation preferences, we discovered that despite the amount of effort involved in facilitating traditional PBL sessions (mean = 3.47), their motivation to facilitate traditional PBL was higher than that of virtual PBL (mean = 3.33). Faculty perceptions of students' learning in PBL were more traditional, with the mean of the items in this section (such as students' motivation, participation, and group dynamics) being higher (3.616). Conclusions: The faculty's satisfaction with their abilities to properly facilitate virtual PBL sessions did not detract from their motivation to be in direct personal interaction with students during PBL sessions. To ensure faculty care about students' learning in virtual PBL, their perception had to be correlated to their learning outcomes. Keywords: COVID-19, faculty, learning, medical college, problem-based learning, traditional problem-based learning, virtual problem-based learning |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Almansour, Mohammed Alrumaihi, Nouf Alanazi, Omar Soliman, Mona Feda, Jude Saeed, Majda |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mohammed surname: Almansour fullname: Almansour, Mohammed – sequence: 2 givenname: Nouf surname: Alrumaihi fullname: Alrumaihi, Nouf – sequence: 3 givenname: Omar surname: Alanazi fullname: Alanazi, Omar – sequence: 4 givenname: Jude surname: Feda fullname: Feda, Jude – sequence: 5 givenname: Majda surname: Saeed fullname: Saeed, Majda – sequence: 6 givenname: Mona surname: Soliman fullname: Soliman, Mona email: msoliman1@ksu.edu.sa |
| BookMark | eNp1kd1rFDEUxQdpobXtex8DPs-aSeYj8a2sra6sVLAW38Ld5M6SbSapyUzX_vdmu7UoKIF7w-Gec0N-r4sDHzwWxXlFZ3VF-duNT8NsVxSjXDH-qjhmjZBly4Q4eLl334-Ks5Q2lFImqBSiOy5-XIGe3PhILn_eY7ToNaZ35NbGcQJHHjCmKZGbCMaONvgsfYlh5XAoV5DQkCVC9NaviZnirs2vbxfvy0oS6wmQrzAZSz6jsTo758E5XONpcdiDS3j23E-Kb1eXN_OP5fL6w2J-sSw1b7gvuRactTWsWqr7qkapO17rniGIRgtWd53s0BgmmwpqU2neNlmvteRGyAY4PykW-1wTYKPuox0gPqoAVj0JIa4VxNFqhwq41Bp6pLnUHBoQQI2BljY8h8s2Z73ZZ60hj1vfhzGCHmzS6kKw_J2ykbuNs39M5WNwsDoT623W_zLQvUHHkFLE_uWZFVU7sOqJ6R9gs-XT3rINbsx07ty0xagGNHc-bP_rU5Ws1DNq9Rs1_wUzzLRz |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02484.x 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003441 10.1186/s12909-021-02682-z 10.1186/s12916-020-01712-9 10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2 10.1186/s12909-018-1214-2 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.055 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 10.2196/12945 10.34190/ejel.19.4.2350 10.1080/10872981.2017.1338504 10.1001/jama.2020.5227 10.2147/AMEP.S404461 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.083 10.3109/0142159X.2011.558137 10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1 10.1159/000505210 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789 10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_146_20 10.26803/ijlter.20.6.2 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
| DOI | 10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_203_23 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Education |
| EISSN | 2589-6288 |
| Edition | 2 |
| EndPage | 196 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a39ccafe0caf43a5a8a0dda60531a496 A820029593 10_4103_jnsm_jnsm_203_23 JNSM-7-191 |
| GeographicLocations | Saudi Arabia |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Saudi Arabia |
| GroupedDBID | ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS GROUPED_DOAJ H13 IAO IHR ITC OK1 OVD RMW TEORI W3E AAYXX ADJBI CITATION M~E |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c353n-3c83264ab60cf14e9c734cf2ea85c8247797edd2951a4d1c3655c84c93d895a33 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2589-627X |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:50:52 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 13:55:08 EST 2025 Sat Mar 08 18:51:02 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:14:45 EST 2025 Wed May 28 23:13:36 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | COVID-19 medical college problem-based learning learning traditional problem-based learning virtual problem-based learning faculty |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c353n-3c83264ab60cf14e9c734cf2ea85c8247797edd2951a4d1c3655c84c93d895a33 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/a39ccafe0caf43a5a8a0dda60531a496 |
| PageCount | 6 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a39ccafe0caf43a5a8a0dda60531a496 gale_infotracmisc_A820029593 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A820029593 crossref_primary_10_4103_jnsm_jnsm_203_23 wolterskluwer_medknow_10_4103_jnsm_jnsm_203_23_191_Faculty_Experien |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20240701 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 20240701 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | India |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: India |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow – name: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd – name: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| References | O'Doherty (R24-20240906) 2018; 18 Foo (R8-20240906) 2021; 21 O Doherty (R20-20240906) 2018; 18 Abdelmola (R22-20240906) 2021; 10 Karasneh (R21-20240906) 2021; 19 Prem (R1-20240906) 2020; 5 Rose (R4-20240906) 2020; 323 Alsaif (R26-20240906) 2023; 14 Ferrel (R5-20240906) 2020; 12 Hayat (R14-20240906) 2021; 21 Kim (R15-20240906) 2017; 22 Lim (R9-20240906) 2009; 12 Soliman (R19-20240906) 2021; 4 Tan (R2-20240906) 2020; 87 Quilty (R6-20240906) 2020; 18 Almuwais (R27-20240906) 2021; 20 Alsafi (R13-20240906) 2020; 78 Mukhtar (R3-20240906) 2020; 36 de Leng (R12-20240906) 2006; 40 Liang (R7-20240906) 2020; 95 Tudor Car (R28-20240906) 2019; 21 Hofer (R10-20240906) 2021; 121 Venkatesh (R17-20240906) 2020; 29 Karasneh (R23-20240906) 2021; 60 Shahrvini (R16-20240906) 2021; 21 Elzainy (R25-20240906) 2020; 15 Azer (R18-20240906) 2011; 33 |
| References_xml | – volume: 40 start-page: 568 year: 2006 ident: R12-20240906 article-title: Student perceptions of a virtual learning environment for a problem-based learning undergraduate medical curriculum publication-title: Med Educ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02484.x – volume: 18 start-page: 130 year: 2018 ident: R24-20240906 article-title: Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education –An integrative review publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0 – volume: 15 start-page: 456 year: 2020 ident: R25-20240906 article-title: Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the college of medicine, Qassim university publication-title: J Taibah Univ Med Sci – volume: 95 start-page: 1359 year: 2020 ident: R7-20240906 article-title: Pandemics and their impact on medical training: Lessons from Singapore publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003441 – volume: 21 start-page: 247 year: 2021 ident: R14-20240906 article-title: Challenges and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic in medical education: A qualitative study publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02682-z – volume: 18 start-page: 259 year: 2020 ident: R6-20240906 article-title: The effect of travel restrictions on the geographical spread of COVID-19 between large cities in China: A modelling study publication-title: BMC Med doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01712-9 – volume: 21 start-page: 13 year: 2021 ident: R16-20240906 article-title: Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2 – volume: 10 start-page: 112 year: 2021 ident: R22-20240906 article-title: E-learning during COVID-19 pandemic, faculty perceptions, challenges, and recommendations publication-title: MedEdPublish – volume: 18 start-page: 96 year: 2018 ident: R20-20240906 article-title: What can we learn from problem-based learning tutors at a graduate entry medical school? A mixed method approach publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1214-2 – volume: 36 start-page: S27 year: 2020 ident: R3-20240906 article-title: Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era publication-title: Pak J Med Sci doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 – volume: 87 start-page: 84 year: 2020 ident: R2-20240906 article-title: Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of Chinese workforce publication-title: Brain Behav Immun doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.055 – volume: 5 start-page: e261 year: 2020 ident: R1-20240906 article-title: The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: A modelling study publication-title: Lancet Public Health doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 – volume: 21 start-page: e12945 year: 2019 ident: R28-20240906 article-title: Digital problem-based learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/12945 – volume: 12 start-page: 282 year: 2009 ident: R9-20240906 article-title: Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment publication-title: J Educ Technol Soc – volume: 19 start-page: 252 year: 2021 ident: R21-20240906 article-title: Attitudes and practices of educators towards e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic publication-title: Electron J E Learn doi: 10.34190/ejel.19.4.2350 – volume: 22 year: 2017 ident: R15-20240906 article-title: The gap between medical faculty's perceptions and use of e-learning resources publication-title: Med Educ Online doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1338504 – volume: 323 start-page: 2131 year: 2020 ident: R4-20240906 article-title: Medical student education in the time of COVID-19 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227 – volume: 12 start-page: e7492 year: 2020 ident: R5-20240906 article-title: The impact of COVID-19 on medical education publication-title: Cureus – volume: 14 start-page: 453 year: 2023 ident: R26-20240906 article-title: Experience of sudden shift from traditional to virtual problem-based learning during COVID-19 pandemic at a Medical College in Saudi Arabia publication-title: Adv Med Educ Pract doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S404461 – volume: 78 start-page: 64 year: 2020 ident: R13-20240906 article-title: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: Adaptations in medical education publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.083 – volume: 33 start-page: 808 year: 2011 ident: R18-20240906 article-title: Introducing a problem-based learning program: 12 tips for success publication-title: Med Teach doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.558137 – volume: 21 start-page: 141 year: 2021 ident: R8-20240906 article-title: A comparative study regarding distance learning and the conventional face-to-face approach conducted problem-based learning tutorial during the COVID-19 pandemic publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1 – volume: 29 start-page: 396 year: 2020 ident: R17-20240906 article-title: Factors influencing medical students'experiences and satisfaction with blended integrated e-learning publication-title: Med Princ Pract doi: 10.1159/000505210 – volume: 121 start-page: 106789 year: 2021 ident: R10-20240906 article-title: Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations publication-title: Comput Human Behav doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789 – volume: 4 start-page: 85 year: 2021 ident: R19-20240906 article-title: Experience from a medical college in Saudi Arabia on undergraduate curriculum management and delivery during COVID-19 pandemic publication-title: J Nat Sci Med doi: 10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_146_20 – volume: 60 start-page: 459 year: 2021 ident: R23-20240906 article-title: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic performance of medical students in clinical courses: A nationwide cross-sectional study publication-title: Ann Med Surg – volume: 20 start-page: 16 year: 2021 ident: R27-20240906 article-title: An emergency shift to e-learning in health professions education: A comparative study of perspectives between students and instructors publication-title: Int J Learn Teach Educ Res doi: 10.26803/ijlter.20.6.2 |
| SSID | ssj0002809887 ssib050594742 ssib050733874 |
| Score | 2.260568 |
| Snippet | Abstract
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one... Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the... The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a fast change to new teaching approaches based on online education. Problem-based learning (PBL) was one of the modified... |
| SourceID | doaj gale crossref wolterskluwer |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 191 |
| SubjectTerms | covid-19; faculty; learning; medical college; problem-based learning; traditional problem-based learning; virtual problem-based learning Education Educational aspects Educational research Epidemics Methods Online education Original Article Saudi Arabia Surveys |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Medknow Open Access Journals dbid: W3E link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96-iAcfqDi6il5EMSHapqvJvd2rrcoyHmgHvsWpkkqveN6ut1V_O8v02bPXVDwwZdC09Cm85HJZGZ-IeR5nWxMZIoVyRgnB8UrX4CyTeGDjkZLW8MImf-hOjoy87k9zvsdWAuzEb-XJROvT7v-_BVeHGfCcXGd3OBY_oi1I-JwLTkKUUfWTt5wXyXXKy9sToctJGbNcFoeV8YWmlfzMWb5x49s2agByv9qwt79eYFR7P5sSGLfMEWzO__-E3fJ7bzcpAejfNwj12J3n3yfAQJu_KK_cY77fXrSLrCWhGKexqqnyYiFdtwopMfjqTMFmrxAMyTrVzqWONLpx5P3b4vS0rajQD_BKrQ0x39o3pd4QL7MDj9P3xX56IXCCyW6Qvik6VpCrZlvShmtr4T0DY9glDdcVpWtYgg8rc9AhtILrVK79FYEYxUI8ZDsdBddfEQoCxCD5qaO1sqmkrUvg2AemOchJjd4Ql6uie2-jQgbLnkmSDg30GyDcBPyBrlx1Q-xsYeGRG2XVc2BsEksm5i-0UgBCgywEEDjdAPS6gl5gbx0qMHLBXjIhQhpuIiF5Q4MJq4gYPOE7G31TJrntx5Pt6TBnY8VjH8dvkvOscssdmsWP_4vb3lCbvG03BoTiffIznKxik_JTf9j2faLZ4OyXAJALhLP priority: 102 providerName: Wolters Kluwer Health |
| Title | Faculty Experiences: Virtual versus Traditional Problem-based Learning during COVID-19 in a Saudi Medical College |
| URI | https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_203_23 https://doaj.org/article/a39ccafe0caf43a5a8a0dda60531a496 |
| Volume | 7 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2589-6288 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002809887 issn: 2589-627X databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20180101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2589-6288 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssib050733874 issn: 2589-627X databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20180101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVEMX databaseName: Medknow Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2589-6288 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002809887 issn: 2589-627X databaseCode: W3E dateStart: 20180101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.medknow.com/journals.asp providerName: Wolters Kluwer Health |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PT9swFLamisOkaQKxaR0F-YCEdsjqxM4PcyulFUisq7SN9Wa92M4UJgI0LYgLfzvPccraw7TLLu_gWIrzPr88P_u9z4Qc5uhjLItZgM4YAxQd6wBiWQTaJDZLhMzBU-ZfpJNJNpvJ6dpVXy4nzNMDe8X1gUt8SWEZCsEhhgyYMZC4yQNCNmTbLJVrwdRVs2XEJJqPP5cUIeP9q6q-_uyEihhXEd_wQw1d_8tP-c3DjTuprn83iepr7ma8Td6260Q68OPbIa9stUvuxuCYMh7pH4Li-phelnNXBEJdgsWypuh9TOl3-OjUXxcTOF9laMul-ov62kQ6_Hp5fhqEkpYVBfoNlqak7cENbTcU3pEf49H34VnQ3pkQaB7zKuAaTTQRkCdMF6GwUqdc6CKykMU6i0SaytQaE-HCCoQJNU9ibBdacpPJGDh_TzrVTWU_EMoMWJNEWW6lFEUqch0ajjAwHRmL8WuXfFppUN16agyFIYXTtmoUvabtLjlxKn7p50itmwaEWrVQq39B3SVHDiDlTG8xBw1tBQEO15FYqUHmMk4c03KX9DZ6osnojcfDDYjVtS89_OvwFUa1qoVYrSD--D--aY-8jnCZ5BOAe6SzmC_tPtnS94uynh80kxrll6cRyp989AwgKgOV |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty+Experiences%3A+Virtual+versus+Traditional+Problem-based+Learning+during+COVID-19+in+a+Saudi+Medical+College&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Nature+and+Science+of+Medicine&rft.au=Almansour%2C+Mohammed&rft.au=Alrumaihi%2C+Nouf&rft.au=Alanazi%2C+Omar&rft.au=Feda%2C+Jude&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.pub=Medknow+Publications+and+Media+Pvt.+Ltd&rft.issn=2589-627X&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103%2Fjnsm.jnsm_203_23&rft.externalDocID=A820029593 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2589-627X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2589-627X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2589-627X&client=summon |