Effect of computer‐aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Background and Aim Multiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are importan...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 162 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.02.2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0815-9319, 1440-1746, 1440-1746 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Background and Aim
Multiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer‐aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials.
Methods
A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR.
Results
Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25–0.49, P < 0.001, I2 = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–0.65, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39–1.67, P = 0.04, I2 = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18–3.16, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%).
Conclusions
The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer-aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials.BACKGROUND AND AIMMultiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer-aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials.A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR.METHODSA comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR.Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49, P < 0.001, I2 = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.67, P = 0.04, I2 = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%).RESULTSFourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49, P < 0.001, I2 = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.67, P = 0.04, I2 = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%).The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics.CONCLUSIONSThe results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics. Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer-aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR. Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49, P < 0.001, I = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65, P < 0.01, I = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.67, P = 0.04, I = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16, P < 0.01, I = 0%). The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics. Background and Aim Multiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer‐aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials. Methods A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR. Results Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25–0.49, P < 0.001, I2 = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–0.65, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39–1.67, P = 0.04, I2 = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18–3.16, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). Conclusions The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics. Background and AimMultiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer‐aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials.MethodsA comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR.ResultsFourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25–0.49, P < 0.001, I2 = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–0.65, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39–1.67, P = 0.04, I2 = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18–3.16, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%).ConclusionsThe results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics. |
| Author | Moosvi, Zain Samarasena, Jason Monachese, Marc Ortizo, Ronald Chehade, Nabil El Hage Shah, Sagar Chahine, Anastasia Tiritilli, Amelie Park, Nathan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sagar surname: Shah fullname: Shah, Sagar organization: University of California Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Nathan surname: Park fullname: Park, Nathan organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Nabil El Hage surname: Chehade fullname: Chehade, Nabil El Hage organization: Case Western Reserve University MetroHealth Medical Center – sequence: 4 givenname: Anastasia surname: Chahine fullname: Chahine, Anastasia organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center – sequence: 5 givenname: Marc surname: Monachese fullname: Monachese, Marc organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Amelie surname: Tiritilli fullname: Tiritilli, Amelie organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center – sequence: 7 givenname: Zain surname: Moosvi fullname: Moosvi, Zain organization: University of Pittsburgh – sequence: 8 givenname: Ronald surname: Ortizo fullname: Ortizo, Ronald organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center – sequence: 9 givenname: Jason orcidid: 0000-0002-2981-3078 surname: Samarasena fullname: Samarasena, Jason email: jsamaras@hs.uci.edu organization: University of California Irvine Medical Center |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kcFuFSEYhYmpsbdXF76AIXGji2lhGGBw1zS11TRxo2vChX-Um5lhBKbN7HyEPmOfRG7v7aZRNn_4850TOOcEHY1hBITeUnJKyznb_vx1SgXh6gVa0aYhFZWNOEIr0lJeKUbVMTpJaUsIaYjkr9AxE4yXS7tCy2XXgc04dNiGYZozxIc_98Y7cGXRhzEkG6YFhxEbB2MYDB58SjiaDAmb0eEp9MuEHeRi48P4CZ_jtKQMg8ne4gi3Hu4ewQGy2XmPpl-ST6_Ry870Cd4c5hr9-Hz5_eK6uvl29eXi_KayjDNVCSWdpJ1QpmVCCm5aomphOTS1bFqxkY2TjkPXbgznxilmN1ZRVsRgeU06tkYf9r5TDL9nSFmXD1joezNCmJOuJWsErVURrdH7Z-g2zLG8d0fJpgRWc1aodwdq3gzg9BT9YOKin0ItwNkesDGkFKHT1mezCydH43tNid7Vpktt-rG2ovj4TPFk-i_24H7ne1j-D-qvV9d7xV8ZLaiQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastrohep_2024_502210 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16242 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1422942 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_024_01162_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16182 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_media_2024_103449 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000001298 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00521_023_08762_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_024_08760_8 crossref_primary_10_7326_ANNALS_24_00981 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002286 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2038_7078 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2189_4890 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_025_11890_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2023_10_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_01_021 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1276520 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24032458 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2023_12_027 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2023_2280773 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3505619 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2024_09_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15082193 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16655 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00508_025_02561_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2023_08_021 crossref_primary_10_1089_aipo_2024_0025 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2210_7999 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_024_01334_y crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16135 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 10.1007/s00535-021-01808-w 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.074 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00796.x 10.1038/ajg.2015.365 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.028 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.038 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.011 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.007 10.1002/cam4.4261 10.1136/gut.2009.185884 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X 10.1309/V2EPTPLJRB3FGHJL 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324471 10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00009 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.023 10.3322/caac.21551 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.043 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.066 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2 10.3390/diagnostics9030099 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1159/000366034 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70668-8 10.1002/ijc.32055 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1426 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3 10.4103/sjg.SJG_377_19 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. – notice: 2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7U9 H94 K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/jgh.16059 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Immunology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Immunology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1440-1746 |
| EndPage | 176 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 36350048 10_1111_jgh_16059 JGH16059 |
| Genre | article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO KMS LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOQ WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAMMB AAYXX AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7U9 H94 K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-697d71f69a836765a80926c5e427486b74d7d5ef8ba55ad93cbc913c35ec520f3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 39 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000897119800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 14:00:20 EST 2025 Tue Oct 07 06:42:39 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:24:49 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:02:06 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 20:55:45 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:24:09 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | adenoma detection rate polyp detection rate colorectal cancer adenoma miss rate computer-aided colonoscopy computer-aided detection artificial intelligence |
| Language | English |
| License | 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3539-697d71f69a836765a80926c5e427486b74d7d5ef8ba55ad93cbc913c35ec520f3 |
| Notes | Author contribution The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Sagar Shah: Conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Nathan Park: conception and design, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Nabil El Hage Chehade: conception and design, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Anastasia Chahine: critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Marc Monachese: drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Amelie Tiritilli: drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Ronald Ortizo: conception and design, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Zain Moosvi: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Jason Samarasena: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. Declaration of conflict of interest All of the above authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2981-3078 |
| PMID | 36350048 |
| PQID | 2774048253 |
| PQPubID | 2045136 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2734612991 proquest_journals_2774048253 pubmed_primary_36350048 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jgh_16059 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16059 wiley_primary_10_1111_jgh_16059_JGH16059 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | February 2023 2023-02-00 2023-Feb 20230201 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: February 2023 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Australia |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia – name: Richmond |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Gastroenterol Hepatol |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | 2019; 9 2010; 59 1991; 37 2022; 71 2017; 49 2017; 66 2004; 141 2015; 33 1997; 112 2016; 31 2006; 131 2021; 93 2019; 144 2018; 68 2020; 5 2021; 10 2022; 163 2021; 56 2017; 15 2021 2010; 138 2020 2005; 124 2010; 139 2019; 68 2020; 91 2019; 69 2015; 110 2020; 159 2020; 115 2020; 26 2016; 111 1999; 94 2018; 16 2019; 156 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 Kolb JM (e_1_2_6_35_1) 2020; 115 Brown JR (e_1_2_6_15_1) 2021 Luo Y (e_1_2_6_27_1) 2020 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 Aniwan S (e_1_2_6_30_1) 2016; 111 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 36751949 - J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;38(2):157-158 |
| References_xml | – volume: 91 start-page: 415 year: 2020 end-page: 424 article-title: Impact of a real‐time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos) publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 56 start-page: 746 year: 2021 end-page: 757 article-title: Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial publication-title: J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 163 start-page: 732 year: 2022 end-page: 741 article-title: Computer‐aided detection improves adenomas per colonoscopy for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: a randomized trial publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 33 start-page: 38 year: 2015 end-page: 41 article-title: Small colorectal polyps publication-title: Dig. Dis. – volume: 159 start-page: 512 year: 2020 end-page: 520 article-title: Efficacy of real‐time computer‐aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial publication-title: Gastroenterology – start-page: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 8 article-title: Artificial intelligence‐assisted colonoscopy for detection of colon polyps: a prospective, randomized cohort study publication-title: J. Gastrointest. Surg. – volume: 139 start-page: 1503 year: 2010 end-page: 1510 article-title: The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 141 start-page: 352 year: 2004 end-page: 359 article-title: Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med. – volume: 49 start-page: 34 year: 2017 end-page: 37 article-title: Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps publication-title: Dig. Liver Dis. – volume: 159 start-page: 1252 year: 2020 end-page: 1261 article-title: Lower adenoma miss rate of computer‐aided detection‐assisted colonoscopy vs routine white‐light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 10 start-page: 7184 year: 2021 end-page: 7193 article-title: Artificial intelligence‐assisted colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection publication-title: Cancer Med. – volume: 59 start-page: 1094 year: 2010 end-page: 1100 article-title: Increased colorectal cancer risk during follow‐up in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a multicentre cohort study publication-title: Gut – volume: 94 start-page: 194 year: 1999 end-page: 199 article-title: The colonoscopic miss rate and true one‐year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps: Polyp Prevention Study Group publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 93 start-page: 77 year: 2021 end-page: 85 article-title: Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 115 start-page: 980 year: 2020 end-page: 988 article-title: Increased risk of colorectal cancer tied to advanced colorectal polyps: an untapped opportunity to screen first‐degree relatives and decrease cancer burden publication-title: ACG – volume: 9 start-page: 99 year: 2019 article-title: Application of artificial intelligence in the detection and differentiation of colon polyps: a technical review for physicians publication-title: Diagnostics – volume: 112 start-page: 24 year: 1997 end-page: 28 article-title: Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back‐to‐back colonoscopies publication-title: Gastroenterology – year: 2021 article-title: Deep Learning Computer‐aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi‐center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT‐CS Trial) publication-title: Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – volume: 163 start-page: 295 year: 2022 end-page: 304.e5 publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 26 start-page: 13 year: 2020 article-title: Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial‐intelligence‐aided colonoscopy publication-title: Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology: Official Journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association – volume: 5 start-page: 352 year: 2020 end-page: 361 article-title: Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real‐time computer‐aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – volume: 69 start-page: 7 year: 2019 end-page: 34 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2019 publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin – volume: 110 start-page: 1657 year: 2015 end-page: 1664 article-title: Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: exploring explanations and solutions publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 111 start-page: 723 year: 2016 end-page: 729 article-title: The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate publication-title: ACG – volume: 131 start-page: 1400 year: 2006 end-page: 1407 article-title: High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 68 start-page: 394 year: 2018 end-page: 424 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin – volume: 16 start-page: 1754 year: 2018 end-page: 1761 article-title: Risk of malignancy in adenomas detected during screening colonoscopy publication-title: Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – volume: 139 start-page: 1497 year: 2010 end-page: 1502 article-title: Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 138 start-page: 2088 year: 2010 end-page: 2100 article-title: Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 66 start-page: 683 year: 2017 end-page: 691 article-title: Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality publication-title: Gut – volume: 156 start-page: 1661 year: 2019 end-page: 1674 article-title: Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 15 start-page: 411 year: 2017 article-title: Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies publication-title: Intestinal research – volume: 31 start-page: 1426 year: 2016 end-page: 1430 article-title: Risk factors of advanced adenoma in small and diminutive colorectal polyp publication-title: J. Korean Med. Sci. – volume: 5 start-page: 343 year: 2020 end-page: 351 article-title: Effect of a deep‐learning computer‐aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe‐DB trial): a double‐blind randomised study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – volume: 124 start-page: 380 year: 2005 end-page: 391 article-title: Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept publication-title: Am. J. Clin. Pathol. – volume: 37 start-page: 125 year: 1991 end-page: 127 article-title: Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss‐rate of large colorectal polyps publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 68 start-page: 1813 year: 2019 end-page: 1819 article-title: Real‐time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study publication-title: Gut – volume: 144 start-page: 2992 year: 2019 end-page: 3000 article-title: Global trends in colorectal cancer mortality: projections to the year 2035 publication-title: Int. J. Cancer. – volume: 71 start-page: 757 year: 2022 end-page: 765 article-title: Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials publication-title: Gut – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01808-w – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.074 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00796.x – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.365 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.028 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.038 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.011 – year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 article-title: Deep Learning Computer‐aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi‐center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT‐CS Trial) publication-title: Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.007 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.1002/cam4.4261 – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.185884 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1309/V2EPTPLJRB3FGHJL – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324471 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00009 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.023 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21551 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.043 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.066 – start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 article-title: Artificial intelligence‐assisted colonoscopy for detection of colon polyps: a prospective, randomized cohort study publication-title: J. Gastrointest. Surg. – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2 – volume: 111 start-page: 723 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 article-title: The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate publication-title: ACG – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9030099 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1159/000366034 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70668-8 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1002/ijc.32055 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1426 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_377_19 – volume: 115 start-page: 980 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 article-title: Increased risk of colorectal cancer tied to advanced colorectal polyps: an untapped opportunity to screen first‐degree relatives and decrease cancer burden publication-title: ACG – reference: 36751949 - J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;38(2):157-158 |
| SSID | ssj0004075 |
| Score | 2.5410903 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background and Aim
Multiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during... Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby... Background and AimMultiple computer‐aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 162 |
| SubjectTerms | Adenoma Adenoma - diagnosis adenoma detection rate adenoma miss rate Artificial Intelligence Clinical trials Colonic Polyps - pathology Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - methods Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Computers computer‐aided colonoscopy computer‐aided detection Humans Lesions Meta-analysis Physical characteristics polyp detection rate Polyps Systematic review Tumors |
| Title | Effect of computer‐aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjgh.16059 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350048 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2774048253 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2734612991 |
| Volume | 38 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000897119800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1440-1746 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004075 issn: 0815-9319 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1baxQxFD60WxFftF6qq22J4oMvA7uTZJLoU7HdFqlFxMK-DZlcWqGdWTpbYd_8Cf7G_pKeZLJTiwpC3wbmZDIk5_Llcr4D8FZIjqBC0mwkjMgYzV1WYdTKmGIYrri33kfK_ENxdCSnU_VlBT4sc2E6foh-wy1YRvTXwcB11f5u5CenYWuEq1VYy1Fv2QDWdr9Ojg9v0iI7nl0MejxTqGqJWChe5Fk2vh2O_sCYtyFrjDmTR3f623V4mKAm2el04zGsuPoJ3P-cDtOfwqJjLiaNJybVdrj6-StQRloSuKzrJqSsLEhTE43eqTnXBJWiJYFcoiW6tmTWnC1mxLp5vM9Vvyc75IYZmnRZMVHw3M11-HZiQHkGx5O9bx8PslSJITOUU5UVSlgx9oXSMjC8cS1HKi8MdwwXtbKoBLPCcudlpTnXVlFTGTWm2NgZno883YBB3dTuBRBuhKZjDJ0eV37jwkhbudw7Zqx2nOliCO-WE1KaRFMeqmWclf1y5eS0jEM5hDe96Kzj5vib0OZyVstknm2Zo36i68o5HcLr_jWOYTgt0bVrLoMMZQj_ED8P4XmnDX0vFGFa8H34s3HS_919-Wn_ID68_H_RV_AgFLXv7oZvwmB-cem24J75Mf_eXmzDqpjK7aTr13K9AiU |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bTxQxFD7BxagvgIq6gFCND75Msjttp1PDCwHWVZaNMZDwNun0AiYws2EXk33zJ_gb_SWedrqDRE1MfJtkTqeT9juXXs53AN6InGNQkdOkJ7RIGE1tUqLXSphk6K64M84FyvyRGI_zszP5aQl2F7kwDT9Eu-HmNSPYa6_gfkP6Vy0_v_B7I1zeg2WGMOIdWD74PDgd3eZFNkS76PV4IhFrkVko3ORZNL7rj34LMu_GrMHpDFb_73fXYCUGm2SvQcdjWLLVE3hwHI_Tn8K84S4mtSM6Vnf48e27J400xLNZV7VPWpmTuiIK7VN9pQjCYko8vcSUqMqQSX05nxBjZ-FGV_WO7JFbbmjS5MUEwSs7U_7bkQNlHU4Hhyf7wyTWYkg05VQmmRRG9F0mVe453rjKezLNNLcMl7V5VgpmhOHW5aXiXBlJdalln2Jjq3nac_QZdKq6si-AcC0U7aPzdLj262c6N6VNnWXaKMuZyrrwdjEjhY5E5b5exmXRLljOL4owlF143YpOGnaOPwltLaa1iAo6LVJEKBqvlNMuvGpf4xj68xJV2frGy1CGASBG0F143sCh7YVioOatH_5smPW_d198fD8MDxv_LroDD4cnx6Ni9GF8tAmPfIn75qb4FnRm1zf2JdzXX2dfptfbEfI_AcfgBS0 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bTxQxFD6BxRBe8ALIKmo1PPAyye60nU6NL0RcUdcNMZLwNun0AiYws9ldSPbNn-Bv9Jd42ukOEiEh8W2SOZ1O2nP5ejnfAdgVOUdQkdOkJ7RIGE1tUmLUSphkGK64M84FyvyhGI3ykxN5tATvFrkwDT9Eu-HmLSP4a2_gdmzc31Z-eub3RrhchhXGZYZmuXLwbXA8vM6LbIh2MerxRKKuRWahcJNn0fhmPPoHZN7ErCHoDB7-3-8-gvUINsl-ox2PYclWT2D1azxO34B5w11Makd0rO7w--cvTxppiGezrmqftDIndUUU-qf6QhFUiynx9BJToipDxvX5fEyMnYUbXdVbsk-uuaFJkxcTBC_sTPlvRw6UTTgefPj-_jCJtRgSTTmVSSaFEX2XSZV7jjeu8p5MM80tw2VtnpWCGWG4dXmpOFdGUl1q2afY2Gqe9hzdgk5VV3YbCNdC0T4GT4drv36mc1Pa1FmmjbKcqawLe4sZKXQkKvf1Ms6LdsFyelaEoezCm1Z03LBz3Ca0s5jWIhrotEhRQ9F5pZx24XX7GsfQn5eoytaXXoYyBICIoLvwtFGHtheKQM17P_zZMOt3d198_ngYHp7dX_QVrB4dDIrhp9GX57DmK9w3F8V3oDObXNoX8EBfzX5MJy-jxv8BTFIEqA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+computer%E2%80%90aided+colonoscopy+on+adenoma+miss+rates+and+polyp+detection%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastroenterology+and+hepatology&rft.au=Shah%2C+Sagar&rft.au=Park%2C+Nathan&rft.au=Chehade%2C+Nabil+El+Hage&rft.au=Chahine%2C+Anastasia&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjgh.16059&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fjgh.16059&rft.externalDocID=JGH16059 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |