An randomized controlled trial of Post‐it® notes did not increase postal response rates in older depressed participants

Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post‐it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4‐month postal follow‐up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen‐Positive Elders (CASPER) trials. Method O...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Jg. 23; H. 1; S. 102 - 107
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, Helen, Keding, Ada, Bosanquet, Katharine, Gilbody, Simon, Torgerson, David
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2017
Schlagworte:
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
attrition
Clinical trials
depression
Depression - therapy
Direct marketing
England
Evidence-based medicine
Female
Human subjects
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Medical research
Mental depression
nested trial
older adults
Older people
questionnaire response rates
Reminder Systems
Research Design
Response rates
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
older adults
attrition
depression
questionnaire response rates
nested trial
ISSN:1356-1294, 1365-2753
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post‐it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4‐month postal follow‐up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen‐Positive Elders (CASPER) trials. Method Our trial was a two‐arm randomized controlled trial comparing response rates to questionnaires with a printed Post‐it® note (intervention) and without (control), nested in multi centred randomized controlled trials of older people with varying levels of depressive symptoms; the CASPER+ and CASPER Self Help for those At Risk of Depression (SHARD) trials. A total of 611 participants were eligible and randomized. The primary outcome was response rates, secondary outcomes were time to response and need for a reminder. Results Of 297 participants, 266 (89.6%) returned their 4‐month questionnaire in the post‐it note arm, compared with 282 of 314 participants (89.8%) in the control arm (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65, P = 0.913). There were no statistically significant differences in time to respond or the need to be sent a reminder. Patients with a major depressive episode were more likely to return questionnaires with post‐it notes (P of interaction = .019). Conclusion There was no significant difference in response rates, time to response, or the need for a reminder between the intervention and control at 4‐month follow up for older people with depressive symptoms. However, there was a significant interaction between the Post‐it® note group and level of depression.
AbstractList Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month postal follow-up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen-Positive Elders (CASPER) trials. Our trial was a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing response rates to questionnaires with a printed Post-it® note (intervention) and without (control), nested in multi centred randomized controlled trials of older people with varying levels of depressive symptoms; the CASPER and CASPER Self Help for those At Risk of Depression (SHARD) trials. A total of 611 participants were eligible and randomized. The primary outcome was response rates, secondary outcomes were time to response and need for a reminder. Of 297 participants, 266 (89.6%) returned their 4-month questionnaire in the post-it note arm, compared with 282 of 314 participants (89.8%) in the control arm (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65, P = 0.913). There were no statistically significant differences in time to respond or the need to be sent a reminder. Patients with a major depressive episode were more likely to return questionnaires with post-it notes (P of interaction = .019). There was no significant difference in response rates, time to response, or the need for a reminder between the intervention and control at 4-month follow up for older people with depressive symptoms. However, there was a significant interaction between the Post-it® note group and level of depression.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVESOur aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month postal follow-up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen-Positive Elders (CASPER) trials.METHODOur trial was a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing response rates to questionnaires with a printed Post-it® note (intervention) and without (control), nested in multi centred randomized controlled trials of older people with varying levels of depressive symptoms; the CASPER+ and CASPER Self Help for those At Risk of Depression (SHARD) trials. A total of 611 participants were eligible and randomized. The primary outcome was response rates, secondary outcomes were time to response and need for a reminder.RESULTSOf 297 participants, 266 (89.6%) returned their 4-month questionnaire in the post-it note arm, compared with 282 of 314 participants (89.8%) in the control arm (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65, P = 0.913). There were no statistically significant differences in time to respond or the need to be sent a reminder. Patients with a major depressive episode were more likely to return questionnaires with post-it notes (P of interaction = .019).CONCLUSIONThere was no significant difference in response rates, time to response, or the need for a reminder between the intervention and control at 4-month follow up for older people with depressive symptoms. However, there was a significant interaction between the Post-it® note group and level of depression.
Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month postal follow-up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen-Positive Elders (CASPER) trials. Method Our trial was a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing response rates to questionnaires with a printed Post-it note (intervention) and without (control), nested in multi centred randomized controlled trials of older people with varying levels of depressive symptoms; the CASPER+ and CASPER Self Help for those At Risk of Depression (SHARD) trials. A total of 611 participants were eligible and randomized. The primary outcome was response rates, secondary outcomes were time to response and need for a reminder. Results Of 297 participants, 266 (89.6%) returned their 4-month questionnaire in the post-it note arm, compared with 282 of 314 participants (89.8%) in the control arm (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65, P=0.913). There were no statistically significant differences in time to respond or the need to be sent a reminder. Patients with a major depressive episode were more likely to return questionnaires with post-it notes (P of interaction=.019). Conclusion There was no significant difference in response rates, time to response, or the need for a reminder between the intervention and control at 4-month follow up for older people with depressive symptoms. However, there was a significant interaction between the Post-it note group and level of depression.
Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post‐it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4‐month postal follow‐up questionnaire sent to participants taking part in the Collaborative Care in Screen‐Positive Elders (CASPER) trials. Method Our trial was a two‐arm randomized controlled trial comparing response rates to questionnaires with a printed Post‐it® note (intervention) and without (control), nested in multi centred randomized controlled trials of older people with varying levels of depressive symptoms; the CASPER+ and CASPER Self Help for those At Risk of Depression (SHARD) trials. A total of 611 participants were eligible and randomized. The primary outcome was response rates, secondary outcomes were time to response and need for a reminder. Results Of 297 participants, 266 (89.6%) returned their 4‐month questionnaire in the post‐it note arm, compared with 282 of 314 participants (89.8%) in the control arm (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65, P = 0.913). There were no statistically significant differences in time to respond or the need to be sent a reminder. Patients with a major depressive episode were more likely to return questionnaires with post‐it notes (P of interaction = .019). Conclusion There was no significant difference in response rates, time to response, or the need for a reminder between the intervention and control at 4‐month follow up for older people with depressive symptoms. However, there was a significant interaction between the Post‐it® note group and level of depression.
Author Lewis, Helen
Bosanquet, Katharine
Gilbody, Simon
Torgerson, David
Keding, Ada
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Helen
  surname: Lewis
  fullname: Lewis, Helen
  email: helen.lewis@york.ac.uk
  organization: University of York
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ada
  surname: Keding
  fullname: Keding, Ada
  organization: University of York
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Katharine
  surname: Bosanquet
  fullname: Bosanquet, Katharine
  organization: University of York
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Simon
  surname: Gilbody
  fullname: Gilbody, Simon
  organization: University of York
– sequence: 5
  givenname: David
  surname: Torgerson
  fullname: Torgerson, David
  organization: University of York
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27569403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctqVTEUhoNU7EUHvoAEnOhgt7nuy7CUeqNgBzoO2ckK5JCTbJMcpB31EXwSH8JH8UnM9lQHBc0kf9b61k9Y_zE6iCkCQs8pOaXtnG1gOaWsp-MjdER5Lzs2SH6watl3lE3iEB2XsiGEciKHJ-iw9ftJEH6Ebs8jzjratPW3YLFJseYUQpM1ex1wcvg6lfrz7puvP77jmCoUbL1dFfbRZNAF8NKQBmcoS4rtnfWK-YhTsJCxhaW1SjNddK7e-EXHWp6ix06HAs_u7xP0-c3lp4t33dXHt-8vzq86wyUfO0vlSPRs3ACjdMJKZoUjjAnixGj02MOk5cypI3bqmZ1F3yqMDk5MM7Pa8RP0au-75PRlB6WqrS8GQtAR0q4oOsppoGIUrKEvH6CbtMux_U7RiREx9tPAG_XintrNW7BqyX6r8436s9UGvN4DJqdSMri_CCVqTUy1xNTvxBp79oA1vurq1yC0D_-b-OoD3PzbWn24vN5P_ALrwKnQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_MR000008_pub5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2018_02_019
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_14591_1
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_14591_2
Cites_doi 10.3310/hta5310
10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003821
10.1192/apt.9.3.229
10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_8
10.1093/ijpor/edn048
10.1111/jep.12284
10.1177/140349480303100603
10.1097/00001648-199307000-00014
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
– notice: 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/jep.12618
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
British Nursing Index
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
British Nursing Index
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1365-2753
EndPage 107
ExternalDocumentID 27569403
10_1111_jep_12618
JEP12618
Genre article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institute for Health Research HTA
  funderid: 10/57/43
– fundername: York Trials Unit.
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29K
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABIVO
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
D-I
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
DUUFO
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBB
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK0
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
O8X
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-d1580abcf7e85f4d52d4f02240f48ca86e9a5b31f0d962db466e9217f49b2daf3
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000395024900014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1356-1294
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 09:16:11 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 07:17:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:54:54 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:04:47 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:25:43 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:20:22 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords older adults
attrition
depression
questionnaire response rates
nested trial
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3538-d1580abcf7e85f4d52d4f02240f48ca86e9a5b31f0d962db466e9217f49b2daf3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 27569403
PQID 1920486973
PQPubID 2045102
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1859714842
proquest_journals_1920486973
pubmed_primary_27569403
crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_12618
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jep_12618
wiley_primary_10_1111_jep_12618_JEP12618
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2017
2017-02-00
2017-Feb
20170201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2017
  text: February 2017
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
PublicationTitleAlternate J Eval Clin Pract
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 1993; 9
1995
2014; 4
2014
2008; 20
2009; 3
2005; 15
2001; 5
2003; 31
2003; 9
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
Armstrong B. K. (e_1_2_8_4_1) 1995
References_xml – volume: 9
  start-page: 229
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 238
  article-title: Challenges in recruitment of research participants
  publication-title: Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
– volume: 31
  start-page: 411
  year: 2003
  end-page: 417
  article-title: Non‐response bias in a postal questionnaire survey on respiratory health in the old and very old
  publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
– volume: 20
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  article-title: Alternatives to prepaid monetary incentives in mail surveys
  publication-title: International Journal of Public Opinion Research
– volume: 3
  year: 2009
  article-title: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
  publication-title: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
– start-page: 294
  year: 1995
  end-page: 321
– volume: 15
  start-page: 230
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  end-page: 237
  article-title: Post‐it® Note Persuasion: A sticky influence
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
– volume: 4
  year: 2014
  article-title: Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: BMJ Open
– volume: 9
  start-page: 375
  year: 1993
  end-page: 379
  article-title: Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire
  publication-title: Epidemiology
– year: 2014
  article-title: Randomized trial within a trial of yellow ‘post‐it notes’ did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain
  publication-title: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
– volume: 5
  issue: 31
  year: 2001
  article-title: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patient
  publication-title: Health Technology Assessment
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.3310/hta5310
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003821
– start-page: 294
  volume-title: Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics Volume 21
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1192/apt.9.3.229
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_8
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn048
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/jep.12284
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1177/140349480303100603
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1097/00001648-199307000-00014
SSID ssj0013057
Score 2.1393042
Snippet Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post‐it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4‐month...
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month postal follow-up questionnaire...
Rationale, aims and objectives Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month...
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVESOur aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Post-it® note to increase response rates and shorten response times to a 4-month...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 102
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
attrition
Clinical trials
depression
Depression - therapy
Direct marketing
England
Evidence-based medicine
Female
Human subjects
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Medical research
Mental depression
nested trial
older adults
Older people
questionnaire response rates
Reminder Systems
Research Design
Response rates
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Title An randomized controlled trial of Post‐it® notes did not increase postal response rates in older depressed participants
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjep.12618
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27569403
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1920486973
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1859714842
Volume 23
WOSCitedRecordID wos000395024900014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1365-2753
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013057
  issn: 1356-1294
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NatwwEB6STSm9pOn_tklQSw-5uNiyZEv0FNospaQhlAb2Zmz9gCGxzXrTQ059hD5JHyKPkifJSNa6DU2g0JuwRpKRNNI3nvE3AG9jl70nVioSFUMDRWRJVGaMRyrjXHGmc6N81pLD_OhIzOfyeA3er_6FGfghxg9uTjP8ee0UvKz6P5XcdO8SxP9iHTYo7ls-gY2PX2cnh7-dCLEn-kxSR7VHJQvEQj6QZ9X45nX0F8a8CVn9nTN7-F9vuwWbAWqS_WFvPII10zyG-1-CM_0JXOw3BG8q3Z7VF0aTELR-ikWfyoO0lrhUvlc_ftbLy1-kaRGVEl1rVyJ14-Bmb0iHIii8GGJtDXHUEz1Wk9bl_yYh0hY77coQwd0s-6dwMjv49uFTFFIxRCp1R6JOuIjLStncCG6Z5lQz6-GAZUKVIjOy5FWa2FjLjOqKZfgErR3LZEV1adNnMGnaxrwAop0vV1e5xN4YToi0VmeUWplTq1guprC3WpFCBZ5yly7jtBjtFdMVfi6n8GYU7QZyjtuEtlfLWgT97AvEtY5rUObpFF6P1ahZzl1SNqY9RxmBxhZai4xO4fmwHcZRHGm-ZDG23vOrfvfwxeeDY194-e-ir-ABdejBB4dvw2S5ODc7cE99X9b9YhfW87nYDZv9GqsEA3M
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NTtwwEB5RqNpeCv1fSlu36oFLqsRxElvqBRVWlC4rVIHELUr8I0WiSbRZeuDUR-iT9CF4FJ6EseMNIIpUqTcrGduRPWN_Y0--AfgY2uw9oZQBLxk6KDyNgiJlSSDTJJEJU5mWLmvJJJtO-fGxOFiCz4t_YXp-iOHAzVqGW6-tgdsD6etWrttPEToA_B6sMFQj1O-V7e_jo8nVLULomD6j2HLtUcE8s5CL5FlUvrkf3QKZNzGr23TGq__3uWvw2INNstVrxxNY0vVTeLDvr9OfwdlWTXCvUs2P6kwr4sPWT7DoknmQxhCbzPfi1-9qfv6H1A3iUqIqZUukqi3g7DRpUQSFZ320rSaWfKLD16SxGcCJj7XFRtvCx3DX8-45HI13Dr_sBj4ZQyBjuyiqKOFhUUqTaZ4YphKqmHGAwDAuC55qUSRlHJlQiZSqkqX4BP0dw0RJVWHiF7BcN7V-BUTZ21xVZgJbYzggwhiVUmpERo1kGR_B5mJKcumZym3CjJN88Fh0m7uxHMGHQbTt6Tn-JrSxmNfcW2iXI7K1bIMii0fwfniNtmUvTIpaN6cow9HdQn-R0RG87PVh6MXS5gsWYu1NN-13d5_v7Ry4wvq_i76Dh7uH-5N88nX67TU8ohZLuFDxDViez071G7gvf86rbvbW6_wlCXwGew
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtQwEB6VLap64R-6UMAgDr0E5cdJbIlLRbviZ1mtEJV6ixL_SJFKEm22HHriEXgSHoJH4UmYcbyBCpCQuFnx2I5sjz2TmXwfwLOQ2HtCpQJRcXRQRBYFZcbTQGVpqlKuc6Mca8k8XyzE6alcbsGLzb8wAz7E-MGNNMOd16TgptP2Vy033fMIHQBxBbY5kchMYPvo_exk_jOKEDqkzyghrL1Yco8s5DJ5No0v30e_GZmXbVZ36cyu_9_r3oBr3thkh8PuuAlbprkFO-98OP02XBw2DO8q3X6sL4xmPm39DIuOzIO1lhGZ7_fPX-r1t6-sadEuZbrWVGJ1QwZnb1iHIii8GrJtDSPwiR6rWUsM4Mzn2mKnXelzuJt1fwdOZscfXr4KPBlDoBI6FHWUirCslM2NSC3Xaay5dQaB5UKVIjOyTKsksqHGpdAVz_AJ-juWyyrWpU3uwqRpG7MHTFM0V1e5xN44Toi0VmdxbGUeW8VzMYWDzZIUyiOVE2HGWTF6LKYr3FxO4eko2g3wHH8S2t-sa-E1tC_QsiW0QZknU3gyVqNuUcCkbEx7jjIC3S30F3k8hXvDfhhHIdh8yUNsfeCW_e_DF2-Ol65w_99FH8PO8mhWzF8v3j6A3ZhMCZcpvg-T9ercPISr6tO67leP_Jb_AYxrBfY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+randomized+controlled+trial+of+Post-it%C2%AE+notes+did+not+increase+postal+response+rates+in+older+depressed+participants&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+evaluation+in+clinical+practice&rft.au=Lewis%2C+Helen&rft.au=Keding%2C+Ada&rft.au=Bosanquet%2C+Katharine&rft.au=Gilbody%2C+Simon&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjep.12618&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1356-1294&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1356-1294&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1356-1294&client=summon