Peer Role-Play for Training Communication Skills in Medical Students: A Systematic Review

Peer role-play (PRP) is a simulation-based training method (SBTM) in which medical students alternately play the patient's and clinician's role. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of PRP for improving the communication skills of medical students. A systematic search was conducte...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Medical Simulation Ročník 15; číslo 2; s. 106
Hlavní autori: Gelis, Anthony, Cervello, Sophie, Rey, Romain, Llorca, Guy, Lambert, Philippe, Franck, Nicolas, Dupeyron, Arnaud, Delpont, Marion, Rolland, Benjamin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.04.2020
Predmet:
Clinical Competence
Communication
Education, Medical - organization & administration
Education, Medical - standards
Humans
Peer Group
Simulation Training - organization & administration
Simulation Training - standards
ISSN:1559-713X, 1559-713X
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Peer role-play (PRP) is a simulation-based training method (SBTM) in which medical students alternately play the patient's and clinician's role. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of PRP for improving the communication skills of medical students. A systematic search was conducted in the MedLine, PsycInfo, and ERIC databases. Studies were qualitatively analyzed according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation level (Kirkpatrick level) and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.Twenty-two studies were included. Studies assessing the "reaction" of students (Kirkpatrick level 1, n = 15) found that PRP was appreciated, whereas those assessing the effect of PRP on "learning" (Kirkpatrick level 2, n = 12) found that PRP improves communication skills but no more than other SBTMs. No study assessed real-life "attitudes" or "clinical outcomes" (Kirkpatrick levels 3 and 4), whereas 2 studies found that using PRP had a better cost-efficacy ratio than the use of simulated patients. Compared with other SBTMs, PRP improved communication skills similarly in medical students and seemed less expensive.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1559-713X
1559-713X
DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000412