Rapid evolution in native plants cultivated for ecological restoration: not a general pattern

The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large‐scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild‐collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 551 - 558
Main Authors: Nagel, R., Durka, W., Bossdorf, O., Bucharova, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2019
Subjects:
ISSN:1435-8603, 1438-8677, 1438-8677
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large‐scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild‐collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants experience novel environmental conditions compared to those in natural populations, and there is a danger that the plants in cultivation are subject to unintended selection and lose their adaptation to natural habitats. Although the propagation methods are usually designed to maintain as much natural genetic diversity as possible, the effectiveness of these measures have never been tested. We obtained seed of five common grassland species from one of the largest native seed producers in Germany. For each species, the seeds were from multiple generations of seed production. We used AFLP markers and a common garden experiment to test for genetic and phenotypic changes during cultivation of these plants. The molecular markers detected significant evolutionary changes in three out of the five species and we found significant phenotypic changes in two species. The only species that showed substantial genetic and phenotypic changes was the short‐lived and predominantly selfing Medicago lupulina , while in the other, mostly perennial and outcrossing species, the observed changes were mostly minor. Agricultural propagation of native seed material for restoration can cause evolutionary changes, at least in some species. We recommend caution, particularly in selfing and short‐lived species, where evolution may be more rapid and effects may thus be more severe.
AbstractList The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large-scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild-collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants experience novel environmental conditions compared to those in natural populations, and there is a danger that the plants in cultivation are subject to unintended selection and lose their adaptation to natural habitats. Although the propagation methods are usually designed to maintain as much natural genetic diversity as possible, the effectiveness of these measures have never been tested. We obtained seed of five common grassland species from one of the largest native seed producers in Germany. For each species, the seeds were from multiple generations of seed production. We used AFLP markers and a common garden experiment to test for genetic and phenotypic changes during cultivation of these plants. The molecular markers detected significant evolutionary changes in three out of the five species and we found significant phenotypic changes in two species. The only species that showed substantial genetic and phenotypic changes was the short-lived and predominantly selfing Medicago lupulina, while in the other, mostly perennial and outcrossing species, the observed changes were mostly minor. Agricultural propagation of native seed material for restoration can cause evolutionary changes, at least in some species. We recommend caution, particularly in selfing and short-lived species, where evolution may be more rapid and effects may thus be more severe.
The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large-scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild-collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants experience novel environmental conditions compared to those in natural populations, and there is a danger that the plants in cultivation are subject to unintended selection and lose their adaptation to natural habitats. Although the propagation methods are usually designed to maintain as much natural genetic diversity as possible, the effectiveness of these measures have never been tested. We obtained seed of five common grassland species from one of the largest native seed producers in Germany. For each species, the seeds were from multiple generations of seed production. We used AFLP markers and a common garden experiment to test for genetic and phenotypic changes during cultivation of these plants. The molecular markers detected significant evolutionary changes in three out of the five species and we found significant phenotypic changes in two species. The only species that showed substantial genetic and phenotypic changes was the short-lived and predominantly selfing Medicago lupulina, while in the other, mostly perennial and outcrossing species, the observed changes were mostly minor. Agricultural propagation of native seed material for restoration can cause evolutionary changes, at least in some species. We recommend caution, particularly in selfing and short-lived species, where evolution may be more rapid and effects may thus be more severe.The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large-scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild-collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants experience novel environmental conditions compared to those in natural populations, and there is a danger that the plants in cultivation are subject to unintended selection and lose their adaptation to natural habitats. Although the propagation methods are usually designed to maintain as much natural genetic diversity as possible, the effectiveness of these measures have never been tested. We obtained seed of five common grassland species from one of the largest native seed producers in Germany. For each species, the seeds were from multiple generations of seed production. We used AFLP markers and a common garden experiment to test for genetic and phenotypic changes during cultivation of these plants. The molecular markers detected significant evolutionary changes in three out of the five species and we found significant phenotypic changes in two species. The only species that showed substantial genetic and phenotypic changes was the short-lived and predominantly selfing Medicago lupulina, while in the other, mostly perennial and outcrossing species, the observed changes were mostly minor. Agricultural propagation of native seed material for restoration can cause evolutionary changes, at least in some species. We recommend caution, particularly in selfing and short-lived species, where evolution may be more rapid and effects may thus be more severe.
The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced through large‐scale cultivation on specialised farms, using wild‐collected seeds as the original sources. However, during cultivation, plants experience novel environmental conditions compared to those in natural populations, and there is a danger that the plants in cultivation are subject to unintended selection and lose their adaptation to natural habitats. Although the propagation methods are usually designed to maintain as much natural genetic diversity as possible, the effectiveness of these measures have never been tested. We obtained seed of five common grassland species from one of the largest native seed producers in Germany. For each species, the seeds were from multiple generations of seed production. We used AFLP markers and a common garden experiment to test for genetic and phenotypic changes during cultivation of these plants. The molecular markers detected significant evolutionary changes in three out of the five species and we found significant phenotypic changes in two species. The only species that showed substantial genetic and phenotypic changes was the short‐lived and predominantly selfing Medicago lupulina , while in the other, mostly perennial and outcrossing species, the observed changes were mostly minor. Agricultural propagation of native seed material for restoration can cause evolutionary changes, at least in some species. We recommend caution, particularly in selfing and short‐lived species, where evolution may be more rapid and effects may thus be more severe.
Author Bossdorf, O.
Bucharova, A.
Durka, W.
Nagel, R.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R.
  surname: Nagel
  fullname: Nagel, R.
  organization: Plant Evolutionary Ecology Institute of Evolution & Ecology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
– sequence: 2
  givenname: W.
  surname: Durka
  fullname: Durka, W.
  organization: Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research‐UFZ Halle Germany, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
– sequence: 3
  givenname: O.
  surname: Bossdorf
  fullname: Bossdorf, O.
  organization: Plant Evolutionary Ecology Institute of Evolution & Ecology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
– sequence: 4
  givenname: A.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5468-5426
  surname: Bucharova
  fullname: Bucharova, A.
  organization: Plant Evolutionary Ecology Institute of Evolution & Ecology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany, Nature Conservation and landscape Ecology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkUtLAzEQx4Mo2lYPfgEJeNFD22ST7MObFF9QEESPsqTZ2RJJkzXJFvz2pg89iHOZGeY3w8z8h-jQOgsInVMyocmmnVlMaFYReoAGlLNyXOZFcbiNRYoJO0HDED4IoTxBx-iEEZqRMq8G6P1FdrrBsHamj9pZrC22Muo14M5IGwNWvUmpjNDg1nkMyhm31Eoa7CFE5-Wm7QZbF7HES7DgU6mTMYK3p-iolSbA2d6P0Nv93evscTx_fnia3c7HivEyjjOQvFBELChTVDAqCKdFU9Gcl62kEiBvSUlJDqXIcsFzWcBCVS3PGta2TcXZCF3t5nbeffZprXqlgwKTLgDXhzodW5WiEJwl9PIP-uF6b9N2dZaRosgE5ZuBF3uqX6ygqTuvV9J_1T-PS8D1DlDeheCh_UUoqTei1EmUeitKYqd_WKXj9m3RS23-6fgGmLaN7A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2020_108630
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_692_4_042085
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13105732
crossref_primary_10_1111_eva_13275
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_17655
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10592_018_01138_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2022_109748
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2024_152570
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14067
crossref_primary_10_1111_plb_12984
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13521
crossref_primary_10_1080_17550874_2025_2549547
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_024_02124_7
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2219664120
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13190
crossref_primary_10_1111_eva_13243
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13914
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13603
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2021_126046
crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12035
crossref_primary_10_3390_d15080896
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13336
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14155
crossref_primary_10_3390_land12061265
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_886162
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_019_01859_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13866
crossref_primary_10_1111_eva_13614
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13131
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_021_02149_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14354
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2020_125819
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01778.x
10.1093/aob/mcp006
10.1111/mec.12835
10.1007/s10592-011-0309-7
10.1007/s00606-012-0719-0
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.001
10.1002/bimj.200810425
10.1111/1365-2664.12739
10.3368/er.34.1.39
10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001233
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01381.x
10.1093/aob/mcs117
10.1002/ece3.3585
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
10.1007/s10592-004-7833-7
10.1093/genetics/131.2.479
10.1111/rec.12011
10.1371/journal.pone.0071066
10.3368/npj.16.1.37
10.1017/CBO9780511808999
10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.036
10.1016/j.baae.2009.09.002
10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01185.x
10.1007/BF00985821
10.1111/rec.12295
10.1111/1365-2664.12636
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.012
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
2019 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
– notice: 2019 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/plb.12901
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
Ecology
EISSN 1438-8677
EndPage 558
ExternalDocumentID 30120869
10_1111_plb_12901
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OC
29O
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYXX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AUFTA
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CITATION
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
H13
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O8X
O9-
OIG
P2W
P2X
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RTC
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~WT
AAHHS
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AIWBW
AJBDE
BIYOS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RIG
1OB
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ea47c05b13c153150417d91648fa1aee6f08106e8526546a7ebc9f42d3ffd943
ISICitedReferencesCount 32
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000465088600021&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1435-8603
1438-8677
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 15:15:45 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 11:07:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:06:45 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:09:56 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:37:48 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords local adaptation
seed production
ex-situ conservation
resurrection experiment
revegetation
Cultivation syndrome
Language English
License 2018 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c348t-2ea47c05b13c153150417d91648fa1aee6f08106e8526546a7ebc9f42d3ffd943
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5468-5426
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/plb.12901
PMID 30120869
PQID 2207725144
PQPubID 2045112
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2089857543
proquest_journals_2207725144
pubmed_primary_30120869
crossref_primary_10_1111_plb_12901
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_plb_12901
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-05-00
2019-May
20190501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-05-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)
PublicationTitleAlternate Plant Biol (Stuttg)
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
Husband B. (e_1_2_8_18_1) 2004
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
Klotz S. (e_1_2_8_21_1) 2002; 38
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
McDonald T. (e_1_2_8_23_1) 2016
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
R Development Core Team (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2015
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
Kiehl K. (e_1_2_8_20_1) 2014
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
Menges E.S. (e_1_2_8_25_1) 2004
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01778.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp006
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/mec.12835
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10592-011-0309-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00606-012-0719-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.001
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12739
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.3368/er.34.1.39
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001233
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01381.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs117
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/ece3.3585
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10592-004-7833-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/rec.12011
– volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071066
– volume-title: International standards for the practice of ecological restoration – including principles and key concepts
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.3368/npj.16.1.37
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808999
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.036
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2009.09.002
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  article-title: BIOLFLOR – Eine Datenbank mit biologisch‐ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland
  publication-title: Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01185.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00985821
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/rec.12295
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12636
– start-page: 231
  volume-title: Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
– start-page: 305
  volume-title: Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
– volume-title: Guidelines for native seed production and grassland restoration
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.012
SSID ssj0014901
Score 2.3807232
Snippet The growing number of restoration projects worldwide increases the demand for seed material of native species. To meet this demand, seeds are often produced...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 551
SubjectTerms Alfalfa
Amplified fragment length polymorphism
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
Biological evolution
Change detection
Cultivation
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental conditions
Environmental restoration
Evolution
Farms
Genetic diversity
Grasslands
Hazards
Indigenous plants
Indigenous species
Markers
Natural populations
Plant propagation
Propagation
Restoration
Seeds
Seeds - physiology
Title Rapid evolution in native plants cultivated for ecological restoration: not a general pattern
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120869
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2207725144
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2089857543
Volume 21
WOSCitedRecordID wos000465088600021&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8677
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0014901
  issn: 1435-8603
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19990101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELe6bg-8IL5XGJNBCCFVQflwEps3YBs8TB0andQXFDmOgyqqJLRptf1l_HvcJY6bSTDggZeoda1Y9f1yvrvc3Y-QF2HO85xFvoNnvcMypZ1U-ZHDojRX0s3i0FMN2UQ8mfDZTHwaDH50tTCbRVwU_PJSVP9V1DAGwsbS2X8Qt70pDMBnEDpcQexw_SvBn8tqno31xiyCAY2i7e5dLZqkF2y2gZxmYGo2_b6V1X_LhmbG5nsUZT2WyLGMcSvswIrBw741i4xH9bjr4wS26ud6XddfZVsG9AGVfnHVizVMQHktrmUpHq2X36TN82vzFlerrFw2vSLP7OAaq8PKjdxGX02kAoujwn6k4s_6sKeHwYpzeOS2uk93Y9zB9nt95d2WVxuQBj1NHJo-ttp84zecF9UifY3xOG97KHaJAJOz5OTi9DSZHs-mL6vvDtKV4Wt9w92yQ3b9OBR8SHaPzmGifYHFRMO8bf-HaWqFSWR2teum0G_8m8bOmd4ht42DQt-2wLpLBrq4R_beleBEXN0nXxp0UYsuOi9oiy7aootu0UUBXXSLLtpD1xsK2KKSGmxRg60H5OLkePr-o2MYOhwVMF47vpYsVm6YeoGCoxOcC-bFGXgcjOfSk1pHOZicbqQ5sjCwSMY6VSJnfhbkeSZY8JAMi7LQ-4RmgQhUmvvcVTETQSaU66Us074vpeCZGJFX3WYlyrSvRxaVRdK5sbCvSbOvI_LcTq3ani2_mnTQ7Xhint5V4vsueJvgQ7AReWZ_BoWLb9Fkocs1zHG5QFpbFozIo1ZSdpUAS9F5JB7ffPMn5Nb2-Tggw3q51k_JntrU89XykOzEM35oAPUTs1et0g
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid+evolution+in+native+plants+cultivated+for+ecological+restoration%3A+not+a+general+pattern&rft.jtitle=Plant+biology+%28Stuttgart%2C+Germany%29&rft.au=Nagel%2C+R&rft.au=Durka%2C+W&rft.au=Bossdorf%2C+O&rft.au=Bucharova%2C+A&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1435-8603&rft.eissn=1438-8677&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fplb.12901&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon