3D and 2D left ventricular systolic function imaging - from ejection fraction to deformation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy - substudy

Introduction 3D echocardiography off ers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Acta Cardiologica Ročník 70; číslo 1; s. 21 - 30
Hlavní autori: Szulik, Mariola, ŒLiwiñska, Anna, Lenarczyk, Radoslaw, Szyma£A, Magdalena, Kalinowski, Mariusz E., Markowicz-Pawlus, Ewa, Kalarus, Zbigniew, Kukulski, Tomasz
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Taylor & Francis 01.02.2015
Predmet:
ISSN:0001-5385, 0373-7934
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Introduction 3D echocardiography off ers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of 3D echocardiography vs 2D in the assessment of response to resynchronization. Methods The fi rst retrospective study group comprises 42 subjects: 23 consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and 19 healthy control subjects. The left ventricle was assessed by: 2D-Simpson's biplane, 3D-triplane and -automated volumetric method. Next, 24 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively assessed before and after 6 months. A haemodynamic response criterion of 15% left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction was used. Results The 3D volumetric method was the fastest method for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (bi-33 vs tri-53 vs145 sec, ANOVA P< 0.001). In heart failure the only strain parameter associated with QRS width was global peak longitudinal strain (r = 0.47, P= 0.023). A high agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes between methods was observed. The following measures select resynchronization candidates in the heart failure group: (1) 3D global longitudinal strain (AUC-0.756; P= 0.022; the cut-off value > -9.52%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specifi city), radial strain (AUC-0.739; P= 0.086; cut-off value ≤ 20%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specifi city) and area strain (AUC-0.733; P= 0.045; cut-off value > -13.5%; 67% sensitivity, 80% specifi city). The agreement between the response assessment by Simpson's biplane and 3D was 78% with a negative predictive value of 100%. The lack of global area strain improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy has a negative predictive value of 100% in the selection of non-responders. Conclusions 3D echocardiography is applicable in the assessment of both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This assessment is fast and requires minimal user intervention. 3D strain may help in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates and response assessment. After cardiac resynchronization, none of the patients were incorrectly identifi ed as responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy by 3D algorithms compared to 2D Simpson's reference.
AbstractList Introduction 3D echocardiography off ers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of 3D echocardiography vs 2D in the assessment of response to resynchronization. Methods The fi rst retrospective study group comprises 42 subjects: 23 consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and 19 healthy control subjects. The left ventricle was assessed by: 2D-Simpson's biplane, 3D-triplane and -automated volumetric method. Next, 24 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively assessed before and after 6 months. A haemodynamic response criterion of 15% left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction was used. Results The 3D volumetric method was the fastest method for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (bi-33 vs tri-53 vs145 sec, ANOVA P< 0.001). In heart failure the only strain parameter associated with QRS width was global peak longitudinal strain (r = 0.47, P= 0.023). A high agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes between methods was observed. The following measures select resynchronization candidates in the heart failure group: (1) 3D global longitudinal strain (AUC-0.756; P= 0.022; the cut-off value > -9.52%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specifi city), radial strain (AUC-0.739; P= 0.086; cut-off value ≤ 20%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specifi city) and area strain (AUC-0.733; P= 0.045; cut-off value > -13.5%; 67% sensitivity, 80% specifi city). The agreement between the response assessment by Simpson's biplane and 3D was 78% with a negative predictive value of 100%. The lack of global area strain improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy has a negative predictive value of 100% in the selection of non-responders. Conclusions 3D echocardiography is applicable in the assessment of both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This assessment is fast and requires minimal user intervention. 3D strain may help in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates and response assessment. After cardiac resynchronization, none of the patients were incorrectly identifi ed as responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy by 3D algorithms compared to 2D Simpson's reference.
3D echocardiography offers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of 3D echocardiography vs 2D in the assessment of response to resynchronization. The first retrospective study group comprises 42 subjects: 23 consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and 19 healthy control subjects. The left ventricle was assessed by: 2D-Simpson's biplane, 3D-triplane and -automated volumetric method. Next, 24 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively assessed before and after 6 months. A haemodynamic response criterion of 15% left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction was used. The 3D volumetric method was the fastest method for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (bi-33 vs tri-53 vs145 sec, ANOVA P < 0.001). In heart failure the only strain parameter associated with QRS width was global peak longitudinal strain (r = 0.47, P = 0.023). A high agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes between methods was observed. The following measures select resynchronization candidates in the heart failure group: (1) 3D global longitudinal strain (AUC-0.756; P = 0.022; the cut-off value > -9.52%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity), radial strain (AUC-0.739; P = 0.086; cut-off value 20%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity) and area strain (AUC-0.733; P = 0.045; cut-off value > -13.5%; 67% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The agreement between the response assessment by Simpson's biplane and 3D was 78% with a negative predictive value of 100%. The lack of global area strain improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy has a negative predictive value of 100% in the selection of non-responders. 3D echocardiography is applicable in the assessment of both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This assessment is fast and requires minimal user intervention. 3D strain may help in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates and response assessment. After cardiac resynchronization, none of the patients were incorrectly identified as responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy by 3D algorithms compared to 2D Simpson's reference.
3D echocardiography offers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of 3D echocardiography vs 2D in the assessment of response to resynchronization.INTRODUCTION3D echocardiography offers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography, to test 3D regional measurements (with area strain) among a spectrum of patients and then to check prospectively the value of 3D echocardiography vs 2D in the assessment of response to resynchronization.The first retrospective study group comprises 42 subjects: 23 consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and 19 healthy control subjects. The left ventricle was assessed by: 2D-Simpson's biplane, 3D-triplane and -automated volumetric method. Next, 24 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively assessed before and after 6 months. A haemodynamic response criterion of 15% left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction was used.METHODSThe first retrospective study group comprises 42 subjects: 23 consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and 19 healthy control subjects. The left ventricle was assessed by: 2D-Simpson's biplane, 3D-triplane and -automated volumetric method. Next, 24 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively assessed before and after 6 months. A haemodynamic response criterion of 15% left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction was used.The 3D volumetric method was the fastest method for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (bi-33 vs tri-53 vs145 sec, ANOVA P < 0.001). In heart failure the only strain parameter associated with QRS width was global peak longitudinal strain (r = 0.47, P = 0.023). A high agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes between methods was observed. The following measures select resynchronization candidates in the heart failure group: (1) 3D global longitudinal strain (AUC-0.756; P = 0.022; the cut-off value > -9.52%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity), radial strain (AUC-0.739; P = 0.086; cut-off value 20%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity) and area strain (AUC-0.733; P = 0.045; cut-off value > -13.5%; 67% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The agreement between the response assessment by Simpson's biplane and 3D was 78% with a negative predictive value of 100%. The lack of global area strain improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy has a negative predictive value of 100% in the selection of non-responders.RESULTSThe 3D volumetric method was the fastest method for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (bi-33 vs tri-53 vs145 sec, ANOVA P < 0.001). In heart failure the only strain parameter associated with QRS width was global peak longitudinal strain (r = 0.47, P = 0.023). A high agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes between methods was observed. The following measures select resynchronization candidates in the heart failure group: (1) 3D global longitudinal strain (AUC-0.756; P = 0.022; the cut-off value > -9.52%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity), radial strain (AUC-0.739; P = 0.086; cut-off value 20%; 78% sensitivity, 80% specificity) and area strain (AUC-0.733; P = 0.045; cut-off value > -13.5%; 67% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The agreement between the response assessment by Simpson's biplane and 3D was 78% with a negative predictive value of 100%. The lack of global area strain improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy has a negative predictive value of 100% in the selection of non-responders.3D echocardiography is applicable in the assessment of both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This assessment is fast and requires minimal user intervention. 3D strain may help in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates and response assessment. After cardiac resynchronization, none of the patients were incorrectly identified as responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy by 3D algorithms compared to 2D Simpson's reference.CONCLUSIONS3D echocardiography is applicable in the assessment of both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This assessment is fast and requires minimal user intervention. 3D strain may help in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates and response assessment. After cardiac resynchronization, none of the patients were incorrectly identified as responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy by 3D algorithms compared to 2D Simpson's reference.
Author Kalarus, Zbigniew
Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
ŒLiwiñska, Anna
Szyma£A, Magdalena
Kalinowski, Mariusz E.
Markowicz-Pawlus, Ewa
Szulik, Mariola
Kukulski, Tomasz
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mariola
  surname: Szulik
  fullname: Szulik, Mariola
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Anna
  surname: ŒLiwiñska
  fullname: ŒLiwiñska, Anna
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Radoslaw
  surname: Lenarczyk
  fullname: Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Magdalena
  surname: Szyma£A
  fullname: Szyma£A, Magdalena
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mariusz E.
  surname: Kalinowski
  fullname: Kalinowski, Mariusz E.
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ewa
  surname: Markowicz-Pawlus
  fullname: Markowicz-Pawlus, Ewa
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Zbigniew
  surname: Kalarus
  fullname: Kalarus, Zbigniew
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Tomasz
  surname: Kukulski
  fullname: Kukulski, Tomasz
  organization: Dept. of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Silesian University of Medicine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kUtv1DAUhS1UREvpmh3ykk2mdhzHDrtRykuqxAbW1o0fravEHmwHFH4Cv5pMM90gdeVzrfMd6Z77Gp2FGCxCbynZUSLJ9b7fiVXuGGkb3pEX6IIwwSrRseZs1YTQijPJz9FVzg_HkVDetc0rdF63lAlJyAX6y24wBIPrGzxaV_AvG0ryeh4h4bzkEkevsZuDLj4G7Ce48-EOV9ilOGH7YLd_l2ATJWJjXUwTHMcd7iEZDxonm5eg71MM_g9sznub4LCsUXkecpnN8ga9dDBme3V6L9GPTx-_91-q22-fv_b720qzRpaqFpIT6YzVgwZqDXMCgNaOdQOYmvPBDU1bC8Idbe3AQVIhhQA6ECplawy7RO-33EOKP2ebi5p81nYcIdg4Z0XbjgkiSE1W67uTdR4ma9QhrQ2kRT31txr4ZtAp5pysU9qXxwVLAj8qStTxVGrfK7FKdTrVyl3_xz1FP0982AgfHvv9HdNoVIFljGmtP2ifFXsO_gcBnKnF
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12947_020_00204_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12072522
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14112
crossref_primary_10_1530_ERP_18_0071
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11216307
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 2015
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/AC.70.1.3064590
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 0373-7934
EndPage 30
ExternalDocumentID 26137800
10_1080_AC_70_1_3064590
11875615
Genre Article
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23M
4.4
5GY
5RE
AAGDL
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABBKH
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABUPF
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACENM
ACIEZ
ADBBV
AECIN
AENEX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIRBT
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
AQTUD
BAWUL
BLEHA
CCCUG
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
H13
KYCEM
L7B
M4Z
P6G
RNANH
RVRKI
RWP
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFL
TFW
TR2
TUROJ
UEQFS
.GJ
53G
AAJKZ
AAYXX
ACOPL
ACYZI
AEIIZ
AFFNX
CITATION
LJTGL
RIG
ZGI
ZXP
ADYSH
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-278508fdecbca1ed3f7aa12f39bad255bfb462705f16eb5a817877a1b01886dd3
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 6
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000350011600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0001-5385
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 10:02:37 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:48 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:14:48 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:27:38 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:46:01 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c348t-278508fdecbca1ed3f7aa12f39bad255bfb462705f16eb5a817877a1b01886dd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 26137800
PQID 1693707020
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_26137800
proquest_miscellaneous_1693707020
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_AC_70_1_3064590
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_AC_70_1_3064590
crossref_primary_10_1080_AC_70_1_3064590
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Acta Cardiologica
PublicationTitleAlternate Acta Cardiol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
SSID ssj0001015964
ssj0045173
Score 2.0320227
Snippet Introduction 3D echocardiography off ers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D...
3D echocardiography offers options of left ventricular systolic function analysis. The aims of this study are: to assess the usefulness of 3D echocardiography,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 21
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods
echocardiography
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart failure
Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Failure - therapy
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Heart Ventricles - physiopathology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
left ventricle
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
resynchronization
Retrospective Studies
strain
Stroke Volume - physiology
Systole
Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
Title 3D and 2D left ventricular systolic function imaging - from ejection fraction to deformation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy - substudy
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/AC.70.1.3064590
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137800
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1693707020
Volume 70
WOSCitedRecordID wos000350011600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 0373-7934
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045173
  issn: 0001-5385
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 20000201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwELYoqqpeKKUt0AKaSj30ku06XseOelotXXFoUQ-g7i2ynbEEgizaDUj8BX41YzvZFlV7aW9WFDsPz9Mz8w1jn5A8HIeKiNfJPBuZnGdWocyK0pG2cloLEwuFv6vTUz2blT832Ne-FiakVQYf2iegiCirA3Mbu-wz4r6MJwNFw0EwnmUZ_HWy6UM639n01-_zFdJzMaKYpPJI9tFmcp-JyWUP8_P3ek801BP80vVWaNRG01f_9R3bbKszQmGcqOY128Bmh7340YXZ37AHcQy0KuTHcIW-hZATGQ8KzQIC9HPAEoagEcOuwsV17HQEGYRaFcBLTNf9IhVNQDuHGldVkgOYRKp0QJ7-feMiOm8qBoVUDXZPSy1JoAXk27fsfPrtbHKSdU0bMidGus1ypcnm8zU66wzHWnhlDM-9KK2pyX-x3o6KXA2l5wVaaTQnkaEMt0OudVHX4h3bbOYN7jEoJJI7M6yN0QF3rDR5gfXQGUsmBxbc7bNBv1GV6xDNQ2ONq4p3wKfjSaVoWHV_eJ99Xk24SWAe628Vf-581cbzE5-anVRi7ayPPYFUxKYh9mIanN8uq4B5o0i85nTPbqKc1SuQEysUGe7v_-mZH9hLMuJkyiQ_YJvt4hYP2XN3114sF0fsmZrpo8gajxc-C1w
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LbxMxELaqFgGX8iyU5yBx4LJpvI7XXolLlBIVkUYcgujN8nptqVXZoGSL1L_Ar2bG3g1UKBe4Wau19-HxzHxjzzeMvfWIcJxXKLxO5tnI5jyrlJdZUTq0Vk5rYWOi8EzN5_rsrPy8w973uTB0rJIwdEhEEVFX0-KmYHR_JO5oPBkobA7Ie5YlAvY9qktH0Gsx_fo7woKWLu4pJr08kv1-MwJoXOayJ_r5e8AbNuoGg-l2PzTao-m9__uS-2y_80NhnATnAdvxzUN2-7TbaX_EfopjwGEhP4ZLH1qgY5ExVmhXQOzPRCcMZBRpYuH8Wyx2BBlQugr4C5-uh1XKm4B2CbXfJEoOYBIF0wGC_evGRYLelA8KKSHsGodao04j8tvH7Mv0w2JyknV1GzInRrrNcqXR7Qu1d5Wz3NciKGt5HkRZ2RohTBWqUZGroQy88JW0mqPWUJZXQ651UdfigO02y8Y_ZVBIj4hmWFuriXqstHnh66GzFXodvuDukA36mTKuIzWn2hqXhnfcp-OJUdg03R8-ZO82Hb4nPo_tt4o_p960MYQSUr0TI7b2etNLiMGVStsvtvHLq7Uh2huFGjbHe54k0dm8AuJYodB3f_ZPz3zN7pwsTmdm9nH-6Tm7iz6dTAfLX7DddnXlX7Jb7kd7vl69iivkF4sHDpc
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LTxsxELYQINRLC31QCm0HqYdeNo3X8dorTlHSqFUh4kBVbpbXDwkEG5QsSPwFfjVjezctqnJpb9Zq7X14np6Zbwj55NDDMU4g8RqeZwOd06wSjmdFaVBbGSmZjoXCx2I6lefn5ekaOepqYUJaZfChfQKKiLI6MPeN9V1G3JfhqCdw2AvGMy_RX99Ao5kHkj6b_Pp9wIKKLoYUk1ge8C7cjP4zcjnvcH7-XvCJinoCYLraDI3qaPLivz5kmzxvrVAYJrLZIWuufkm2Tto4-yvywMaAq0I-hivnGwhJkfGkUM8hYD8HMGEIKjFsK1xcx1ZHkEEoVgF36dJ1P09VE9DMwLplmWQPRpEsDaCrf1-bCM-bqkEhlYPd41ILlGgB-vY1-Tn5ejb6lrVdGzLDBrLJciHR6PPWmcpo6izzQmuae1ZW2qIDU_lqUOSizz0tXMW1pCgzhKZVn0pZWMvekPV6Vru3BAru0J_pW61lAB4rdV442ze6QpvDFdTskV63Ucq0kOahs8aVoi3y6XCkBA5V-4f3yOflhJuE5rH6VvbnzqsmHqD41O1EsZWzDjsCUcinIfiiaze7XagAeiNQvuZ4z26inOUroBfLBFru7_7pmR_J1ul4oo6_T3_sk2do0PGUVX5A1pv5rXtPNs1dc7GYf4j88QhYgw1J
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D+and+2D+left+ventricular+systolic+function+imaging--+from+ejection+fraction+to+deformation.+Cardiac+resynchronization+therapy--substudy&rft.jtitle=Acta+cardiologica&rft.au=Szulik%2C+Mariola&rft.au=%C5%9Aliwi%C5%84ska%2C+Anna&rft.au=Lenarczyk%2C+Radoslaw&rft.au=Szyma%C5%82a%2C+Magdalena&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.issn=0001-5385&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2Fac.70.1.3064590&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-5385&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-5385&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-5385&client=summon