A Behavioral Theory for Distributed Systems with Weak Recovery

Distributed systems can be subject to various kinds of partial failures, therefore building fault-tolerance or failure mitigation mechanisms for distributed systems remains an important domain of research. In this paper, we present a calculus to formally model distributed systems subject to crash fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Logical methods in computer science Jg. 21, Issue 3; H. 3
Hauptverfasser: Fabbretti, Giovanni, Lanese, Ivan, Stefani, Jean-Bernard
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Logical Methods in Computer Science Association 01.07.2025
Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1860-5974, 1860-5974
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Distributed systems can be subject to various kinds of partial failures, therefore building fault-tolerance or failure mitigation mechanisms for distributed systems remains an important domain of research. In this paper, we present a calculus to formally model distributed systems subject to crash failures with recovery. The recovery model considered in the paper is weak, in the sense that it makes no assumption on the exact state in which a failed node resumes its execution, only its identity has to be distinguishable from past incarnations of itself. Our calculus is inspired in part by the Erlang programming language and in part by the distributed $π$-calculus with nodes and link failures (D$π$F) introduced by Francalanza and Hennessy. In order to reason about distributed systems with failures and recovery we develop a behavioral theory for our calculus, in the form of a contextual equivalence, and of a fully abstract coinductive characterization of this equivalence by means of a labelled transition system semantics and its associated weak bisimilarity. This result is valuable for it provides a compositional proof technique for proving or disproving contextual equivalence between systems.
ISSN:1860-5974
1860-5974
DOI:10.46298/lmcs-21(3:1)2025