Review of “grey box” lifetime modeling for lithium-ion battery: Combining physics and data-driven methods
Lithium-ion batteries are a popular choice for a wide range of energy storage system applications. The current motivation to improve the robustness of lithium-ion battery applications has stimulated the need for in-depth research into aging effects and the establishment of lifetime prediction models...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of energy storage Vol. 56; p. 105992 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2352-152X, 2352-1538 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Lithium-ion batteries are a popular choice for a wide range of energy storage system applications. The current motivation to improve the robustness of lithium-ion battery applications has stimulated the need for in-depth research into aging effects and the establishment of lifetime prediction models. This paper reviews different combination approaches of physics-based models and data-driven models. The three basic physics-based battery lifetime models are introduced, and requirements and features are compared from an application perspective. Then, state-of-the-art approaches for integrating physics and data-driven methods are systematically reviewed. Flowcharts present each approach to offer the readers a clear understanding. Next, the publication trends are represented by line graphs, and pie charts, including data-driven assisted physical models and physics-guided data-driven, different physical model applications, and data-driven approaches. It is concluded that electrochemical models have great potential to describe complex aging behavior under various conditions. Moreover, machine learning is a promising tool to overcome mechanistic absence and highly nonlinear performance, occupying 78 % of all data-driven methods. Physics-guided data-driven approach started to emerge as an innovative lifetime prediction method after 2020. The application advantages and limitations are compared according to the description of different methods. Furthermore, future perspectives are discussed, with opportunities and challenges. The Prospect of applying physics-guided machine learning looks forward to more inspiration.
[Display omitted]
•Physics-based lifetime modeling for lithium-ion batteries is classified into three broad categories. The requirements and capabilities of these models are compared from an application perspective.•The combination of physical and data-driven approaches is divided into two main categories. The first one is data-driven assisted physical models, termed as physical model prediction is the primary driver, and data-driven methods assist it. The other one is physics guided data-driven, where a physical model is used to guide and constrain data-driven predictions. The different approaches are illustrated with flowcharts.•The publication trend of selected papers is presented as line graphs. Different trends in the application of physical models and trends in the application of data-driven methods are discussed. The requirements, advantages, and disadvantages of different integration methods are compared. Readers can select an appropriate method based on their available resources.•Future development based on physic guided data-driven is proposed. Considering EM-PINN is recognized as a promising direction. It is challenging to simultaneously overcome the high complexity of EMs and combine it with machine learning to improve the computational efficiency of online applications. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-152X 2352-1538 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.est.2022.105992 |