Do scaling agile frameworks address global software development risks? An empirical study

Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile development teams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensive organizations are turning to scaling agile software development frameworks. Despite the growing adoption of various scaling agile frameworks, there is l...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:The Journal of systems and software Ročník 171; s. 110823
Hlavní autoři: Beecham, Sarah, Clear, Tony, Lal, Ramesh, Noll, John
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elsevier Inc 01.01.2021
Témata:
ISSN:0164-1212, 1873-1228
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile development teams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensive organizations are turning to scaling agile software development frameworks. Despite the growing adoption of various scaling agile frameworks, there is little empirical evidence of how effective their practices are in mitigating risk, especially in global software development (GSD), where project failure is a known problem. In this study, we develop a GSD Risk Catalog of 63 risks to assess the degree to which two scaling agile frameworks–Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD) and the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)–address software project risks in GSD. We examined data from two longitudinal case studies implementing each framework to identify the extent to which the framework practices address GSD risks. Scaling agile frameworks appear to help companies eliminate or mitigate many traditional risks in GSD, especially relating to users and customers. However, several important risks were not eliminated or mitigated. These persistent risks in the main belonged to the Environment quadrant highlighting the inherent risk in developing software across geographic boundaries. Perhaps these frameworks (and arguably any framework), would have difficulty alleviating, issues that appear to be outside the immediate control of the organization. •63 risks in our GSD Risk Catalog support decision makers and reduce uncertainty.•Risks arise both when teams are distributed, and individuals work from home.•Both DAD and SAFe theoretically address almost all risks in this expanded catalog.•Empirical evidence suggests SAFe and DAD eliminate nearly half of GSD risks.•Some GSD risks cannot be eliminated, but their impact can be mitigated.
AbstractList Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile development teams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensive organizations are turning to scaling agile software development frameworks. Despite the growing adoption of various scaling agile frameworks, there is little empirical evidence of how effective their practices are in mitigating risk, especially in global software development (GSD), where project failure is a known problem. In this study, we develop a GSD Risk Catalog of 63 risks to assess the degree to which two scaling agile frameworks–Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD) and the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)–address software project risks in GSD. We examined data from two longitudinal case studies implementing each framework to identify the extent to which the framework practices address GSD risks. Scaling agile frameworks appear to help companies eliminate or mitigate many traditional risks in GSD, especially relating to users and customers. However, several important risks were not eliminated or mitigated. These persistent risks in the main belonged to the Environment quadrant highlighting the inherent risk in developing software across geographic boundaries. Perhaps these frameworks (and arguably any framework), would have difficulty alleviating, issues that appear to be outside the immediate control of the organization. •63 risks in our GSD Risk Catalog support decision makers and reduce uncertainty.•Risks arise both when teams are distributed, and individuals work from home.•Both DAD and SAFe theoretically address almost all risks in this expanded catalog.•Empirical evidence suggests SAFe and DAD eliminate nearly half of GSD risks.•Some GSD risks cannot be eliminated, but their impact can be mitigated.
ArticleNumber 110823
Author Noll, John
Clear, Tony
Beecham, Sarah
Lal, Ramesh
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sarah
  surname: Beecham
  fullname: Beecham, Sarah
  email: sarah.beecham@lero.ie
  organization: Lero - the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tony
  surname: Clear
  fullname: Clear, Tony
  email: Tony.clear@aut.ac.nz
  organization: School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ramesh
  surname: Lal
  fullname: Lal, Ramesh
  email: ramesh.lal@aut.ac.nz
  organization: School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
– sequence: 4
  givenname: John
  surname: Noll
  fullname: Noll, John
  email: j.noll@herts.ac.uk
  organization: School of Physics, Engineering, and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK
BookMark eNp9kMtKAzEUhoNUsFYfwF1eYGqSmWmmuJBSr1BwowtXIZeTkunMpCSxpW9vSl256OqcA_934P-u0WjwAyB0R8mUEjq7b6dtjFNGWL4paVh5gca04WVBGWtGaJwzVd4pu0LXMbaEEJ7DY_T95HHUsnPDGsu16wDbIHvY-7CJWBoTIEa87rySHY7epr0MgA3soPPbHoaEg4ub-IgXA4Z-64LTx2D6MYcbdGllF-H2b07Q18vz5_KtWH28vi8Xq0KXFUnFrKbK1pJYVXFKZnPFTClJXfFmXhFLOSgOuYfSnKnaclsrabVuFDeMGVubcoLo6a8OPsYAVmyD62U4CErE0Y1oRXYjjm7EyU1m-D9GuyST80MK0nVnyYcTCbnSzkEQUTsYNBgXQCdhvDtD_wKgyoJC
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2024_107605
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2022_3224447
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2025_107727
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2023_3312728
crossref_primary_10_1108_JSMA_03_2021_0071
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2021_3101963
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10664_022_10211_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10664_023_10420_w
crossref_primary_10_1145_3447870
crossref_primary_10_1002_sys_21739
crossref_primary_10_3390_informatics9010020
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_025_05489_1
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2022_3178301
crossref_primary_10_2478_emj_2023_0005
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13042465
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10664_023_10334_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13132_024_02095_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asoc_2023_109998
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infsof_2022_107131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2024_06_185
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomp_2024_1400750
Cites_doi 10.1145/1985793.1985816
10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.005
10.1145/1978802.1978803
10.1145/3234152.3234177
10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00021-3
10.1016/j.infsof.2018.10.008
10.18517/ijaseit.6.6.1374
10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_1
10.1109/TEM.2009.2013827
10.1016/j.csi.2016.02.004
10.1145/1835428.1835445
10.1109/ICGSE-W.2011.16
10.1016/j.infsof.2013.06.005
10.1145/3084226.3084277
10.1145/3193965.3193967
10.1145/975817.975819
10.1109/52.62930
10.1007/s10664-008-9065-9
10.1016/j.im.2003.12.007
10.1016/j.jss.2019.110400
10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.015
10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
10.1109/MS.2017.4121226
10.18517/ijaseit.7.2.1830
10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.063
10.1145/3196369.3196375
10.1287/orsc.1.3.248
10.1016/j.infsof.2016.12.005
10.1109/ICGSE.2007.37
10.1109/ICGSE.2008.12
10.1080/07421222.2001.11045662
10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945664
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Authors
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Computer Science
EISSN 1873-1228
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_jss_2020_110823
S0164121220302181
GroupedDBID --K
--M
-~X
.DC
.~1
0R~
1B1
1~.
1~5
29L
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
9JN
9M8
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYFN
AAYOK
ABBOA
ABEFU
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABFSI
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABTAH
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACNNM
ACRLP
ACZNC
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADHUB
ADJOM
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHZHX
AI.
AIALX
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOUOD
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BKOMP
BLXMC
CS3
DU5
E.L
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
G8K
GBLVA
GBOLZ
HLZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LG9
M41
MO0
MS~
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
Q38
R2-
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPZ
RXW
SBC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPC
SPCBC
SSV
SSZ
T5K
TAE
TN5
TWZ
UHS
UNMZH
VH1
WUQ
XPP
ZMT
ZY4
~G-
9DU
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABDPE
ABWVN
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
~HD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-651bf5a0fb471069b2d3a05478940f17eb7e873bc72b5f7f5bafcc8b7d22df5d3
ISICitedReferencesCount 25
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000592499600009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0164-1212
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 07:24:17 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:29:46 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:48:03 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Risks
Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD)
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)
Scaling agile frameworks
Global software development (GSD)
Empirical study
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c340t-651bf5a0fb471069b2d3a05478940f17eb7e873bc72b5f7f5bafcc8b7d22df5d3
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2020_110823
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jss_2020_110823
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jss_2020_110823
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate January 2021
2021-01-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2021
  text: January 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle The Journal of systems and software
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Beck, Gamma (b10) 2000
Noll, J., Razzak, M.A., Beecham, S., 2017. Motivation and autonomy in global software development: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 394–399.
Vizcaíno, García, Piattini, Beecham (b60) 2016; 46
Marinho, Noll, Richardson, Beecham (b35) 2019
Sievi-Korte, Beecham, Richardson (b51) 2019; 106
Wallace, Keil (b61) 2004; 47
Ågerfalk, Fitzgerald, Holmström, Lings, Lundell, Conchúir (b2) 2005
Šmite, D., 2007. Project outcome predictions: Risk barometer based on historical data. In: International Conference on Global Software Engineering. ICGSE 2007, pp. 103–112.
Abdullah, Verner (b1) 2009
Noll, Beecham, Richardson (b39) 2010; 1
Razzak, Richardson, Noll, Nic Canna, Beecham (b48) 2018
Alqudah, Razali (b4) 2017; 7
Beecham, Noll (b13) 2015; vol. 9459
Razzak, Noll, Richardson, Nic Canna, Beecham (b47) 2017
Sinha, Shameem, Kumar (b53) 2020
McLeod, MacDonell (b36) 2011; 43
Oehmen, Olechowski, Kenley, Ben-Daya (b43) 2014; 34
Wallace, Keil, Rai (b62) 2004; 42
Alqudah, Razali (b3) 2016; 6
Verner, Sampson, Tosic, Bakar, Kitchenham (b59) 2009
Bass, J.M., Beecham, S., Noll, J., 2018. Experience of industry case studies: A comparison of multi-case and embedded case study methods. In: Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry. Gothenburg, Sweden.
Vaidya, A., 2014. Does DAD know best, is it better to do LeSS or just be SAFe? Adapting scaling agile practices into the enterprisea. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference. PNSQ, pp. 1–18.
Ebert, Paasivaara (b23) 2017; 34
Verner, Brereton, Kitchenham, Turner, Niazi (b58) 2014; 56
Dingsoyr, T., Moe, N.B., 2014. Towards principles of large-scale agile development A summary of the workshop at XP2014 and a revised research agenda. In: 15th International Conference on Agile Software Development (XP), May 26–30, 2014, Rome, ITALY, pp. 1–8.
Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D., 2011. Factors leading to integration failures in global feature-oriented development: an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 161–170.
.
Lal, R., Clear, T., 2017. Scaling agile at the program level in an Australian software vendor environment: A case study. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–12.
Lincoln, Guba (b34) 1985
Nurdiani, I., Jabangwe, R., Šmite, D., Damian, D., 2011. Risk identification and risk mitigation instruments for global software development: Systematic review and survey results. In: 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshop, pp. 36–41.
Tell, Klünder, Küpper, Raffo, MacDonell, Münch, Pfahl, Linssen, Kuhrmann (b55) 2019
Beecham, Clear, Lal, Noll (b12) 2020
Diebold, P., Schmitt, A., Theobald, S., 2018. Scaling agile: how to select the most appropriate framework. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Agile Software Development: Companion, pp. 1–4.
Schmidt, Lyytinen, Keil, Cule (b49) 2001; 17
Paasivaara (b44) 2017
Kitchenham, Pfleeger, McColl, Eagan (b28) 2002; 64
Noll, Beecham (b38) 2019
Boehm (b15) 1991; 8
Noll, Beecham, Richardson, NicCanna (b40) 2016
Beecham, Noll, Razzak (b14) 2017
Yin (b63) 2018
Shrivastava, Rathod (b50) 2017; 85
Fitzgerald, Stol (b24) 2017; 123
Leonard-Barton (b33) 1990; 1
Chadli, S.Y., Idri, A., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Ros, J.N., Toval, A., 2016. Identifying risks of software project management in global software development: An integrative framework. In: 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications. AICCSA, pp. 1–7.
Lal, Clear (b30) 2018
Ebert, C., Murthy, B.K., Jha, N.N., 2008. Managing risks in global software engineering: Principles and practices. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 131–140.
Bass, J.M., Beecham, S., Razzak, M.A., Noll, J., 2018. Employee retention and turnover in global software development: Comparing in-house offshoring and offshore outsourcing. In: International Conference on Global Software Engineering. Gothenburg, Sweden.
Analysis.net Research (b7) 2018
Ambler, Lines (b5) 2011
Sievi-Korte, Richardson, Beecham (b52) 2019; 158
Hall, Beecham, Verner, Wilson (b26) 2008
Dikert, Paasivaara, Lassenius (b19) 2016; 119
Leffingwell, Yakyma, Knaster, Jemilo, Oren (b31) 2016
Uludaǧ, Kleehaus, Xu, Matthes (b56) 2017
Gotterbarn, Rogerson (b25) 2005; 15
Ambler, Lines (b6) 2012
Persson, Mathiassen, Boeg, Madsen, Steinson (b45) 2009; 56
Lehtinen, Mäntylä, Vanhanen, Itkonen, Lassenius (b32) 2014; 56
Pikkarainen, Haikara, Salo, Abrahamsson, Still (b46) 2008; 13
Kalenda, Hyna, Rossi (b27) 2018; 30
Dybå, Dingsøyr (b21) 2008; 50
Noll, J., Beecham, S., 2016. Measuring global distance: A survey of distance factors and interventions. In: International SPICE Conference on Process Improvement and Capability Determination in Software, Systems Engineering and Service Management. Dublin, Ireland, URL
Beck, Grenning, Martin, Beedle, Highsmith, Mellor, Bennekum, Hunt, Schwaber (b11) 2001
Leffingwell (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b31) 2016
Ågerfalk (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b2) 2005
Oehmen (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b43) 2014; 34
Razzak (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b48) 2018
Wallace (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b61) 2004; 47
Shrivastava (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b50) 2017; 85
Tell (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b55) 2019
Lincoln (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b34) 1985
Ambler (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b6) 2012
Persson (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b45) 2009; 56
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b54
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b16
McLeod (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b36) 2011; 43
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b57
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b17
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b18
Beck (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b11) 2001
Verner (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b59) 2009
Alqudah (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b3) 2016; 6
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b8
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b9
Gotterbarn (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b25) 2005; 15
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b22
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b20
Noll (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b40) 2016
Pikkarainen (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b46) 2008; 13
Ambler (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b5) 2011
Noll (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b38) 2019
Abdullah (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b1) 2009
Schmidt (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b49) 2001; 17
Beecham (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b12) 2020
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b29
Vizcaíno (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b60) 2016; 46
Hall (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b26) 2008
Lehtinen (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b32) 2014; 56
Marinho (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b35) 2019
Beck (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b10) 2000
Analysis.net Research (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b7) 2018
Paasivaara (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b44) 2017
Kalenda (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b27) 2018; 30
Uludaǧ (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b56) 2017
Wallace (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b62) 2004; 42
Verner (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b58) 2014; 56
Boehm (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b15) 1991; 8
Dikert (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b19) 2016; 119
Ebert (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b23) 2017; 34
Sievi-Korte (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b51) 2019; 106
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b37
Kitchenham (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b28) 2002; 64
Beecham (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b13) 2015; vol. 9459
Beecham (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b14) 2017
Sievi-Korte (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b52) 2019; 158
Sinha (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b53) 2020
Alqudah (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b4) 2017; 7
Dybå (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b21) 2008; 50
Fitzgerald (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b24) 2017; 123
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b41
Lal (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b30) 2018
Yin (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b63) 2018
Leonard-Barton (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b33) 1990; 1
10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b42
Noll (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b39) 2010; 1
Razzak (10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b47) 2017
References_xml – year: 2016
  ident: b31
  article-title: SAFe 4.0 Reference Guide: Scaled Agile Framework for Lean Software and Systems Engineering
– reference: Dingsoyr, T., Moe, N.B., 2014. Towards principles of large-scale agile development A summary of the workshop at XP2014 and a revised research agenda. In: 15th International Conference on Agile Software Development (XP), May 26–30, 2014, Rome, ITALY, pp. 1–8.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 248
  year: 1990
  end-page: 266
  ident: b33
  article-title: A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites
  publication-title: Organ. Sci.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 833
  year: 2008
  end-page: 859
  ident: b21
  article-title: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
– year: 2019
  ident: b35
  article-title: Plan-driven approaches are alive and kicking in agile Global Software Development
  publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
– year: 2001
  ident: b11
  article-title: Manifesto for agile software development
– volume: 8
  start-page: 32
  year: 1991
  end-page: 41
  ident: b15
  article-title: Software risk management: principles and practices
  publication-title: IEEE Softw.
– year: 2020
  ident: b12
  article-title: Scaling Agile Frameworks and Global Software Development Risk: Supplementary Data
– start-page: 179
  year: 2016
  end-page: 188
  ident: b40
  article-title: A global teaming model for global software development governance: A case study
  publication-title: International Conference on Global Software Engineering
– reference: Nurdiani, I., Jabangwe, R., Šmite, D., Damian, D., 2011. Risk identification and risk mitigation instruments for global software development: Systematic review and survey results. In: 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshop, pp. 36–41.
– volume: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: b39
  article-title: Global software development and collaboration: Barriers and solutions
  publication-title: ACM Inroads
– start-page: 123
  year: 2017
  end-page: 132
  ident: b56
  article-title: Investigating the role of architects in scaling agile frameworks
  publication-title: 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference
– reference: Noll, J., Beecham, S., 2016. Measuring global distance: A survey of distance factors and interventions. In: International SPICE Conference on Process Improvement and Capability Determination in Software, Systems Engineering and Service Management. Dublin, Ireland, URL
– volume: 34
  start-page: 441
  year: 2014
  end-page: 453
  ident: b43
  article-title: Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs
  publication-title: Technovation
– volume: 6
  start-page: 828
  year: 2016
  end-page: 837
  ident: b3
  article-title: A review of scaling agile methods in large software development
  publication-title: Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.
– volume: vol. 9459
  start-page: 193
  year: 2015
  end-page: 209
  ident: b13
  article-title: What motivates software engineers working in global software development?
  publication-title: Product-Focused Software Process Improvement
– volume: 7
  start-page: 526
  year: 2017
  end-page: 537
  ident: b4
  article-title: Key factors for selecting an agile method: A systematic literature review
  publication-title: Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 303
  year: 2008
  end-page: 337
  ident: b46
  article-title: The impact of agile practices on communication in software development
  publication-title: Empir. Softw. Eng.
– volume: 119
  start-page: 87
  year: 2016
  end-page: 108
  ident: b19
  article-title: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
– start-page: 59
  year: 2018
  end-page: 68
  ident: b30
  article-title: Enhancing product and service capability through scaling agility in a global software vendor environment
  publication-title: Proceedings 2018 IEEE 13th International Conference on Global Software Engineering
– year: 1985
  ident: b34
  article-title: Naturalistic Inquiry
– volume: 17
  start-page: 5
  year: 2001
  end-page: 36
  ident: b49
  article-title: Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study
  publication-title: J. Manag. Inf. Syst.
– year: 2012
  ident: b6
  article-title: Disciplined Agile Delivery: A Practitioner’s Guide to Agile Software Delivery in the Enterprise
– reference: Lal, R., Clear, T., 2017. Scaling agile at the program level in an Australian software vendor environment: A case study. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–12.
– year: 2011
  ident: b5
  article-title: Disciplined Agile Delivery: An Introduction
– reference: Noll, J., Razzak, M.A., Beecham, S., 2017. Motivation and autonomy in global software development: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 394–399.
– start-page: 313
  year: 2009
  end-page: 324
  ident: b59
  article-title: Guidelines for industrially-based multiple case studies in software engineering
  publication-title: 2009 Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science
– start-page: 341
  year: 2019
  end-page: 349
  ident: b38
  article-title: How agile is hybrid agile? An analysis of the HELENA data
  publication-title: Product-Focused Software Process Improvement
– year: 2017
  ident: b14
  article-title: Lean Global Project Interview Protocol
– reference: Ebert, C., Murthy, B.K., Jha, N.N., 2008. Managing risks in global software engineering: Principles and practices. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 131–140.
– reference: Bass, J.M., Beecham, S., Noll, J., 2018. Experience of industry case studies: A comparison of multi-case and embedded case study methods. In: Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry. Gothenburg, Sweden.
– year: 2020
  ident: b53
  article-title: SWOT: Strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for scaling agile methods in global software development
  publication-title: Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference
– volume: 42
  start-page: 115
  year: 2004
  end-page: 125
  ident: b62
  article-title: Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis
  publication-title: Inf. Manag.
– volume: 30
  year: 2018
  ident: b27
  article-title: Scaling agile in large organizations: Practices, challenges, and success factors
  publication-title: J. Softw.: Evol. Process
– volume: 46
  start-page: 66
  year: 2016
  end-page: 78
  ident: b60
  article-title: A validated ontology for global software development
  publication-title: Comput. Stand. Interfaces
– reference: Šmite, D., 2007. Project outcome predictions: Risk barometer based on historical data. In: International Conference on Global Software Engineering. ICGSE 2007, pp. 103–112.
– start-page: 30
  year: 2008
  end-page: 39
  ident: b26
  article-title: The impact of staff turnover on software projects: the importance of understanding what makes software practitioners tick
  publication-title: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Doctoral Consortium and Research
– reference: Chadli, S.Y., Idri, A., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Ros, J.N., Toval, A., 2016. Identifying risks of software project management in global software development: An integrative framework. In: 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications. AICCSA, pp. 1–7.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 98
  year: 2017
  end-page: 103
  ident: b23
  article-title: Scaling agile
  publication-title: IEEE Softw.
– start-page: 573
  year: 2017
  end-page: 585
  ident: b47
  article-title: Transition from plan driven to SAFe®: Periodic team self-assessment
  publication-title: International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement
– volume: 158
  year: 2019
  ident: b52
  article-title: Software architecture design in global software development: An empirical study
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
– volume: 64
  start-page: 57
  year: 2002
  end-page: 77
  ident: b28
  article-title: An empirical study of maintenance and development estimation accuracy
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
– start-page: 36
  year: 2017
  end-page: 40
  ident: b44
  article-title: Adopting SAFe to scale agile in a globally distributed organization
  publication-title: 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Software Engineering
– volume: 106
  start-page: 234
  year: 2019
  end-page: 253
  ident: b51
  article-title: Challenges and recommended practices for software architecting in global software development
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
– volume: 56
  start-page: 54
  year: 2014
  end-page: 78
  ident: b58
  article-title: Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: A tertiary study
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
– reference: Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D., 2011. Factors leading to integration failures in global feature-oriented development: an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 161–170.
– volume: 56
  start-page: 623
  year: 2014
  end-page: 643
  ident: b32
  article-title: Perceived causes of software project failures–an analysis of their relationships
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
– start-page: 105
  year: 2019
  end-page: 114
  ident: b55
  article-title: What are hybrid development methods made of?: an evidence-based characterization
  publication-title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 15
  ident: b50
  article-title: A risk management framework for distributed agile projects
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
– reference: Vaidya, A., 2014. Does DAD know best, is it better to do LeSS or just be SAFe? Adapting scaling agile practices into the enterprisea. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference. PNSQ, pp. 1–18.
– year: 2018
  ident: b63
  article-title: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods
– volume: 56
  start-page: 508
  year: 2009
  end-page: 532
  ident: b45
  article-title: Managing risks in distributed software projects: an integrative framework
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
– volume: 123
  start-page: 176
  year: 2017
  end-page: 189
  ident: b24
  article-title: Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
– year: 2018
  ident: b7
  article-title: 12th Annual State of Agile Report
– year: 2000
  ident: b10
  article-title: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
– start-page: 116
  year: 2018
  end-page: 125
  ident: b48
  article-title: Scaling agile across the global organization: an early stage industrial SAFe self-assessment
  publication-title: 13th International Conference on Global Software Engineering
– start-page: 47
  year: 2005
  end-page: 61
  ident: b2
  article-title: A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development
  publication-title: International Workshop on Distributed Software Development
– reference: .
– reference: Bass, J.M., Beecham, S., Razzak, M.A., Noll, J., 2018. Employee retention and turnover in global software development: Comparing in-house offshoring and offshore outsourcing. In: International Conference on Global Software Engineering. Gothenburg, Sweden.
– volume: 47
  start-page: 68
  year: 2004
  end-page: 73
  ident: b61
  article-title: Software project risks and their effect on outcomes
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
– volume: 15
  start-page: 730
  year: 2005
  end-page: 750
  ident: b25
  article-title: Responsible risk analysis for software development: Creating the software development impact statement
  publication-title: Commun. AIS
– volume: 43
  start-page: 24
  year: 2011
  ident: b36
  article-title: Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research
  publication-title: ACM Comput. Surv.
– start-page: 275
  year: 2009
  end-page: 286
  ident: b1
  article-title: Outsourced strategic IT systems development risk
  publication-title: Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science
– reference: Diebold, P., Schmitt, A., Theobald, S., 2018. Scaling agile: how to select the most appropriate framework. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Agile Software Development: Companion, pp. 1–4.
– start-page: 47
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b2
  article-title: A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b16
  doi: 10.1145/1985793.1985816
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b31
– start-page: 36
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b44
  article-title: Adopting SAFe to scale agile in a globally distributed organization
– volume: 34
  start-page: 441
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b43
  article-title: Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs
  publication-title: Technovation
  doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.005
– volume: 43
  start-page: 24
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b36
  article-title: Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research
  publication-title: ACM Comput. Surv.
  doi: 10.1145/1978802.1978803
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b18
  doi: 10.1145/3234152.3234177
– year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b11
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b5
– volume: 64
  start-page: 57
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b28
  article-title: An empirical study of maintenance and development estimation accuracy
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
  doi: 10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00021-3
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b29
– volume: 106
  start-page: 234
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b51
  article-title: Challenges and recommended practices for software architecting in global software development
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.10.008
– volume: 6
  start-page: 828
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b3
  article-title: A review of scaling agile methods in large software development
  publication-title: Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.
  doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.6.6.1374
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b7
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b20
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_1
– volume: 56
  start-page: 508
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b45
  article-title: Managing risks in distributed software projects: an integrative framework
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
  doi: 10.1109/TEM.2009.2013827
– start-page: 30
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b26
  article-title: The impact of staff turnover on software projects: the importance of understanding what makes software practitioners tick
– start-page: 341
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b38
  article-title: How agile is hybrid agile? An analysis of the HELENA data
– volume: 46
  start-page: 66
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b60
  article-title: A validated ontology for global software development
  publication-title: Comput. Stand. Interfaces
  doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2016.02.004
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b10
– volume: 1
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b39
  article-title: Global software development and collaboration: Barriers and solutions
  publication-title: ACM Inroads
  doi: 10.1145/1835428.1835445
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b42
  doi: 10.1109/ICGSE-W.2011.16
– volume: 56
  start-page: 54
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b58
  article-title: Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: A tertiary study
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.06.005
– year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b34
– start-page: 105
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b55
  article-title: What are hybrid development methods made of?: an evidence-based characterization
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b41
  doi: 10.1145/3084226.3084277
– start-page: 573
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b47
  article-title: Transition from plan driven to SAFe®: Periodic team self-assessment
– start-page: 59
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b30
  article-title: Enhancing product and service capability through scaling agility in a global software vendor environment
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b35
  article-title: Plan-driven approaches are alive and kicking in agile Global Software Development
– volume: 15
  start-page: 730
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b25
  article-title: Responsible risk analysis for software development: Creating the software development impact statement
  publication-title: Commun. AIS
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b8
  doi: 10.1145/3193965.3193967
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b63
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b37
– volume: 47
  start-page: 68
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b61
  article-title: Software project risks and their effect on outcomes
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
  doi: 10.1145/975817.975819
– volume: 8
  start-page: 32
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b15
  article-title: Software risk management: principles and practices
  publication-title: IEEE Softw.
  doi: 10.1109/52.62930
– start-page: 123
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b56
  article-title: Investigating the role of architects in scaling agile frameworks
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b12
– volume: 13
  start-page: 303
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b46
  article-title: The impact of agile practices on communication in software development
  publication-title: Empir. Softw. Eng.
  doi: 10.1007/s10664-008-9065-9
– volume: 42
  start-page: 115
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b62
  article-title: Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis
  publication-title: Inf. Manag.
  doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.007
– start-page: 275
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b1
  article-title: Outsourced strategic IT systems development risk
– volume: 158
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b52
  article-title: Software architecture design in global software development: An empirical study
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.110400
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b14
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b53
  article-title: SWOT: Strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for scaling agile methods in global software development
– volume: 56
  start-page: 623
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b32
  article-title: Perceived causes of software project failures–an analysis of their relationships
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.015
– volume: 119
  start-page: 87
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b19
  article-title: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
– volume: 34
  start-page: 98
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b23
  article-title: Scaling agile
  publication-title: IEEE Softw.
  doi: 10.1109/MS.2017.4121226
– volume: vol. 9459
  start-page: 193
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b13
  article-title: What motivates software engineers working in global software development?
– start-page: 313
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b59
  article-title: Guidelines for industrially-based multiple case studies in software engineering
– volume: 7
  start-page: 526
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b4
  article-title: Key factors for selecting an agile method: A systematic literature review
  publication-title: Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.
  doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.7.2.1830
– volume: 50
  start-page: 833
  issue: 9–10
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b21
  article-title: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
– volume: 123
  start-page: 176
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b24
  article-title: Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda
  publication-title: J. Syst. Softw.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.063
– start-page: 179
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b40
  article-title: A global teaming model for global software development governance: A case study
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b9
  doi: 10.1145/3196369.3196375
– volume: 1
  start-page: 248
  issue: 3
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b33
  article-title: A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites
  publication-title: Organ. Sci.
  doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.3.248
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b50
  article-title: A risk management framework for distributed agile projects
  publication-title: Inf. Softw. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2016.12.005
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b6
– start-page: 116
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b48
  article-title: Scaling agile across the global organization: an early stage industrial SAFe self-assessment
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b54
  doi: 10.1109/ICGSE.2007.37
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b22
  doi: 10.1109/ICGSE.2008.12
– volume: 17
  start-page: 5
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b49
  article-title: Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study
  publication-title: J. Manag. Inf. Syst.
  doi: 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045662
– volume: 30
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b27
  article-title: Scaling agile in large organizations: Practices, challenges, and success factors
  publication-title: J. Softw.: Evol. Process
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b57
– ident: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823_b17
  doi: 10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945664
SSID ssj0007202
Score 2.4945822
Snippet Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile development teams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensive...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 110823
SubjectTerms Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD)
Empirical study
Global software development (GSD)
Risks
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)
Scaling agile frameworks
Title Do scaling agile frameworks address global software development risks? An empirical study
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823
Volume 171
WOSCitedRecordID wos000592499600009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-1228
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007202
  issn: 0164-1212
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEF6loYdeCqWtSiloD-XSyMhex177VEV5qEURqqq0CifL-0JE1I5wmkb8evZpJ1AQHLhYlmWPrZ3Pu-PxN98A8DmPiZ8Thj0ai8TrchR4CQliT65UuY95ypmu8P49xqenyXSa_mi1rl0tzPISF0WyWqXzZ3W1PCadrUpnn-Du2qg8IPel0-VWul1uH-X4Qdmp5MDr4sNz-c53hONfKf0mpktDrAxIJefgf4r6xRrqkCabV0fhSOUL-Z_5hdEQaWRoZw2-1qJZowhtBJ-d2fpTn3Nqy7E3EtB91bJCA6Ys6sz-WHcg6PxU7N0mVV1aLo4jDts8BQrW8hQ2dRkrhcRgc-41_Vfs7KlKEkz18Z2J3eQYZsezSmmsI1O-YM7dFNG-tbjVlEPHZptl0kSmTGTGxAuwhXCUJm2w1fs-nJ7U6zhGmrFaP7f7J67Zgbee4_9RzVqkMtkBr61TYM9A4w1o8WIXbLv2HdDO5m_B2aCEFilQIwU2SIEWKdAgBTqXwjWkQI2Ur7BXwBonUOPkHfg1Gk763zzbacOjYddfeHEUECFfTkFkrOLHKUEszH0l9ZZ2fRFgTjBPcEgoRiQSWEQkF5QmBDOEmIhY-B60i7LgHwDELEAc05ypL_ucJ0T9l8cR8WNGQ4qiPeC7kcqolaFX3VAus3s9tAe-1JfMjQbLQyd33fBnNog0wWEmoXT_ZR-fco998KpB-CfQXlz95QfgJV0uLqqrQ4ujG9WHk50
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do+scaling+agile+frameworks+address+global+software+development+risks%3F+An+empirical+study&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+systems+and+software&rft.au=Beecham%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Clear%2C+Tony&rft.au=Lal%2C+Ramesh&rft.au=Noll%2C+John&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.issn=0164-1212&rft.volume=171&rft.spage=110823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jss.2020.110823&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jss_2020_110823
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0164-1212&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0164-1212&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0164-1212&client=summon