HyperLTL Satisfiability Is Highly Undecidable, HyperCTL$^$ is Even Harder

Temporal logics for the specification of information-flow properties are able to express relations between multiple executions of a system. The two most important such logics are HyperLTL and HyperCTL*, which generalise LTL and CTL* by trace quantification. It is known that this expressiveness comes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Logical methods in computer science Vol. 21, Issue 1
Main Authors: Fortin, Marie, Kuijer, Louwe B., Totzke, Patrick, Zimmermann, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Logical Methods in Computer Science Association 01.01.2025
Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1860-5974, 1860-5974
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Temporal logics for the specification of information-flow properties are able to express relations between multiple executions of a system. The two most important such logics are HyperLTL and HyperCTL*, which generalise LTL and CTL* by trace quantification. It is known that this expressiveness comes at a price, i.e. satisfiability is undecidable for both logics. In this paper we settle the exact complexity of these problems, showing that both are in fact highly undecidable: we prove that HyperLTL satisfiability is $\Sigma_1^1$-complete and HyperCTL* satisfiability is $\Sigma_1^2$-complete. These are significant increases over the previously known lower bounds and the first upper bounds. To prove $\Sigma_1^2$-membership for HyperCTL*, we prove that every satisfiable HyperCTL* sentence has a model that is equinumerous to the continuum, the first upper bound of this kind. We also prove this bound to be tight. Furthermore, we prove that both countable and finitely-branching satisfiability for HyperCTL* are as hard as truth in second-order arithmetic, i.e. still highly undecidable. Finally, we show that the membership problem for every level of the HyperLTL quantifier alternation hierarchy is $\Pi_1^1$-complete. Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2105.04176
ISSN:1860-5974
1860-5974
DOI:10.46298/lmcs-21(1:3)2025