Mapping ecosystem services on brownfields in Leipzig, Germany
•Ecosystem service use has been mapped with users on green urban brownfields.•Recreational activities dominated the use of cultural ecosystem services.•Urban brownfields were appreciated for providing less regulated, wilder green spaces.•Brownfields complement ecosystem services provided by formal u...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Ecosystem services Vol. 30; pp. 73 - 85 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V
01.04.2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2212-0416, 2212-0416 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | •Ecosystem service use has been mapped with users on green urban brownfields.•Recreational activities dominated the use of cultural ecosystem services.•Urban brownfields were appreciated for providing less regulated, wilder green spaces.•Brownfields complement ecosystem services provided by formal urban green.
Urban green brownfields are a particular type of urban green space and contribute to the quality of life by providing a variety of ecosystem services (ES). In this study, we mapped the use of ES and perception of disservices (EDS) on brownfields in the city of Leipzig using the smartphone application MapNat. We assessed the personal valuation and motives of users in relation to site and vicinity characteristics. Results suggest that brownfields play a particular role in the set of urban green spaces, providing characteristic ES such as opportunities to recreate, relax and retreat, partly differing from or complementing ES in formal urban green spaces. We identified spatial use patterns depending on local characteristics and personal preferences. For example, less accessible sites were relatively high valued and often used for dog-walking. Vice versa, better accessible sites were rather visited for informal stays and ‘hang-outs’. The patterns of use identified in this study may be of interest for urban management and planning of public green spaces, especially if no immediate follow up use or conversion of brownfields is planned. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Urban green brownfields are a particular type of urban green space and contribute to the quality of life by providing a variety of ecosystem services (ES). In this study, we mapped the use of ES and perception of disservices (EDS) on brownfields in the city of Leipzig using the smartphone application MapNat. We assessed the personal valuation and motives of users in relation to site and vicinity characteristics. Results suggest that brownfields play a particular role in the set of urban green spaces, providing characteristic ES such as opportunities to recreate, relax and retreat, partly differing from or complementing ES in formal urban green spaces. We identified spatial use patterns depending on local characteristics and personal preferences. For example, less accessible sites were relatively high valued and often used for dog-walking. Vice versa, better accessible sites were rather visited for informal stays and ‘hang-outs’. The patterns of use identified in this study may be of interest for urban management and planning of public green spaces, especially if no immediate follow up use or conversion of brownfields is planned. •Ecosystem service use has been mapped with users on green urban brownfields.•Recreational activities dominated the use of cultural ecosystem services.•Urban brownfields were appreciated for providing less regulated, wilder green spaces.•Brownfields complement ecosystem services provided by formal urban green. Urban green brownfields are a particular type of urban green space and contribute to the quality of life by providing a variety of ecosystem services (ES). In this study, we mapped the use of ES and perception of disservices (EDS) on brownfields in the city of Leipzig using the smartphone application MapNat. We assessed the personal valuation and motives of users in relation to site and vicinity characteristics. Results suggest that brownfields play a particular role in the set of urban green spaces, providing characteristic ES such as opportunities to recreate, relax and retreat, partly differing from or complementing ES in formal urban green spaces. We identified spatial use patterns depending on local characteristics and personal preferences. For example, less accessible sites were relatively high valued and often used for dog-walking. Vice versa, better accessible sites were rather visited for informal stays and ‘hang-outs’. The patterns of use identified in this study may be of interest for urban management and planning of public green spaces, especially if no immediate follow up use or conversion of brownfields is planned. |
| Author | Haase, Dagmar Pueffel, Catharina Priess, Joerg A. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Catharina surname: Pueffel fullname: Pueffel, Catharina organization: Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: Dagmar surname: Haase fullname: Haase, Dagmar organization: Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Joerg A. surname: Priess fullname: Priess, Joerg A. email: joerg.priess@ufz.de organization: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany |
| BookMark | eNqFUE1LAzEUDFLBWvsPPOzRg7u-ZNP9EBSkaBUqXvQcstm3JWWbrMm2Un-9KetBPCgMvOG9meExp2RkrEFCzikkFGh2tU5QWY8uYUCLBGgAPSJjxiiLgdNs9IOfkKn3a4AgyXnJszG5eZZdp80qOoTsfY-bKGTttEIfWRNVzn6YRmNb-0ibaIm6-9Sry2iBbiPN_owcN7L1OP2eE_L2cP86f4yXL4un-d0yVmla9jEHxvO6Ri4pFJVqOJ2lVXiilFzV0MwqLtOU84IFhoxls7AOMpZjzSFLq3RCLobcztn3LfpebLRX2LbSoN16waDgkENRlkHKB6ly1nuHjeic3ki3FxTEoTCxFkNh4lCYABpAg-36l03pXvbamt5J3f5nvh3MGDrY6XD1SqNRWGuHqhe11X8HfAGjvoqB |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2018_12_006 crossref_primary_10_3390_land13020168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_158608 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15097392 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_03446_x crossref_primary_10_3390_en14144300 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2023_101558 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11050677 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geosus_2024_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_20964129_2020_1743206 crossref_primary_10_4000_developpementdurable_19864 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10020154 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_020_01004_w crossref_primary_10_3390_land7040112 crossref_primary_10_3390_land9050150 crossref_primary_10_3390_su141710751 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15043256 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2022_106125 crossref_primary_10_2478_jlecol_2025_0026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scs_2020_102236 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2024_128642 crossref_primary_10_1080_08941920_2023_2188502 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106746 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_149880 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14061151 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15043842 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_021_16245_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_22797254_2022_2162441 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1137442 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2018_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecocom_2020_100852 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_110009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geosus_2022_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landurbplan_2025_105340 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2020_00226 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2024_128311 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2024_101627 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2021_127304 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12051031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11769_024_1486_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148293 crossref_primary_10_3390_f13030444 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 10.1080/13549830600853510 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000275 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.004 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004 10.1126/science.1150198 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 10.1016/j.cities.2013.09.002 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00149-4 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.004 10.1080/15693430802055524 10.1177/0263276409358728 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003 10.1111/conl.12091 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.002 10.1177/0042098016658231 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.008 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.015 10.1177/1536867X0500500206 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2018 Elsevier B.V. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 Elsevier B.V. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Ecology |
| EISSN | 2212-0416 |
| EndPage | 85 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_ecoser_2018_01_011 S2212041617302127 |
| GeographicLocations | Germany |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
| GroupedDBID | --M .~1 0R~ 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 7-5 8P~ AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAPFB AAQFI AATLK AAXUO ABFYP ABGRD ABLST ABMAC ABMMH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADFHU ADQTV AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEQOU AEYQN AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGTHC AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AIEXJ AIIAU AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK AVARZ AXJTR AXLSJ BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CBWCG EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IXIXF KCYFY KOM M41 MO0 O-L O9- OAUVE P-8 P-9 PC. PRBVW Q38 RIG ROL SDF SPCBC SSA SSB SSF SSJ SSO SSZ T5K ~G- AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABJNI ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-40247dde4a108bcf4153b0019a4cd0f5b4a3344825b4e22654cdbcf27ed4063b3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 52 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000428532600009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2212-0416 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:21:11 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:48:58 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:50:38 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:18:33 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Ecosystem disservices Green space Urban brownfields Mapping ecosystem service use Cultural and recreational ecosystem services |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c339t-40247dde4a108bcf4153b0019a4cd0f5b4a3344825b4e22654cdbcf27ed4063b3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PQID | 2084070899 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2084070899 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2018_01_011 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ecoser_2018_01_011 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ecoser_2018_01_011 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | April 2018 2018-04-00 20180401 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2018 text: April 2018 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Ecosystem services |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
| References | Rall, Haase (b0185) 2011; 100 Haase, Haase, Rink (b0115) 2014; 132 Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No. EE/IEA/09/003. Retrieved from Von Döhren, Haase (b0230) 2015; 52 Bertram, Rehdanz (b0020) 2015; 12 Swyngedouw (b0220) 2010; 27 Schröter, van der Zanden, van Oudenhoven, Remme, Serna-Chavez, de Groot, Opdam (b0195) 2014; 7 Larson, Keith, Fernandez, Hallo, Shafer, Jennings (b0145) 2016; 22 Haines-Young, Potschin (b0120) 2010 Barbosa, Tratalos, Armsworth, Davies, Fuller, Johnson, Gaston (b0015) 2007; 83 Dye (b0090) 2008; 319 Lyytimäki, Petersen, Normander, Bezák (b0155) 2008; 5 Dormann, C.F., 2013. Parametrische Statistik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. Retrieved from Brown, Montag, Lyon (b0035) 2012; 25 Cord, Roeßiger, Schwarz (b0060) 2015; 144 CABERNET (Concerted Action on Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network), 2006. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration. Retrieved from Jacobs, Dendoncker, Martín-López, Barton, Gomez-Baggethun, Boeraeve, Washbourne (b0130) 2016; 22 R Core Team (b0190) 2014 Stadt Leipzig, 2016b. Leipzig-Informations System LIS. Bevölkerung am Jahresende. Retrieved from Wickham (b0235) 2009 Breuste, J., Schnellinger, J., Qureshi, S., Faggi, A., 2013. Investigations on habitat provision and recreation as ecosystem services in urban parks – two case studies in Linz und Buenos Aires. In: Breuste, J., Pauleit, S., Pain, J. (Eds.), Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung, Proceedings of the CONTUREC (Competence Network of Urban Ecology), vol. 5, pp. 7–22. . Kabisch, Qureshi, Haase (b0135) 2015; 50 Atkinson, Doick, Burningham, France (b0010) 2014; 13 Burkhard, Kandziora, Hou, Müller (b0050) 2014; 1–32 Gómez-Baggethun, Gren, Barton, Langemeyer, McPhearson, O’Farrell, Kremer (b0110) 2013 Andersson, Tengö, McPhearson, Kremer (b0005) 2015; 12 Wolff, Haase, Haase (b9010) 2017; 54 Shackleton, Ruwanza, Sinasson Sanni, Bennett, De Lacy, Modipa, Thondhlana (b0200) 2016; 19 Gómez-Baggethun, Barton (b0105) 2013; 86 Bolund, Hunhammar (b0025) 1999; 29 De Sousa (b0075) 2006; 11 Mathey, Arndt, Banse, Rink (b0165) 2016 Lyytimäki (b0150) 2015; 12 Rall, Bieling, Zytynska, Haase (b0180) 2017; 77 Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie., 2014. Datenbestände des ATKIS Basis-DLM der Länder. De Sousa (b0070) 2003; 62 Priess, J.A., Elger, R., Hauck, J., 2014. The ESM-App – a new smartphone application to mapecosystem services. In: Ames, D.P., Quinn, N.W.T., Rizzoli, A.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, June 15–19, San Diego, California, USA. ISBN: 978-88-9035-744-2. Muschak, C., Weiland, U., Banzhaf, E., 2009. Brachflächen in Stadtentwicklung und kommunalen Planungen am Bespiel der Städte Leipzig und Stuttgart (UFZ-Bericht No. 02/2009). Helmhotz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ. StadtLeipzig, 2016a. IKOBRA - Brachflächenkataster. Version of July 21 2016. Amt fürStadtgrün und Gewässer, Abteilung Wasserwirtschaft/ Flächenmanagement. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB), 2015. Grün in der Stadt − Für eine lebenswerte Zukunft. Grünbuch Stadtgrün. Retrieved from Dovey, K., 2000. Spaces of “becoming”. Fox, J., 2016. polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations (Version R package version 0.7-9). Retrieved from Daniel, Muhar, Arnberger, Aznar, Boyd, Chan, von der Dunk (b0065) 2012; 109 Thompson (b0225) 2002; 60 Siebielec, G., Rabl-Berger, S., Bluemlein, P., Schweiker, M., Huber, S., Wieshofer, I., et al., 2012. Brownfield Redevelopment as an Alternative to Greenfield Consumption in Urban Development in Central Europe (URBAN SMS Soil Management Strategy No. 6.1.3). Kohler, Luniak (b0140) 2005; 5 Lyytimäki, Sipilä (b0160) 2009; 8 Mathey, Rößler, Banse, Lehmann, Bräuer (b0170) 2015; 141 Foster (b0095) 2014; 40 Barbosa (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0015) 2007; 83 Kohler (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0140) 2005; 5 Larson (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0145) 2016; 22 Cord (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0060) 2015; 144 Atkinson (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0010) 2014; 13 Lyytimäki (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0155) 2008; 5 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b9000 R Core Team (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0190) 2014 Dye (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0090) 2008; 319 Rall (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0185) 2011; 100 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b5000 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0030 De Sousa (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0070) 2003; 62 Haase (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0115) 2014; 132 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0100 Brown (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0035) 2012; 25 Gómez-Baggethun (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0110) 2013 Shackleton (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0200) 2016; 19 Bolund (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0025) 1999; 29 Rall (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0180) 2017; 77 Von Döhren (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0230) 2015; 52 Lyytimäki (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0160) 2009; 8 Kabisch (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0135) 2015; 50 Andersson (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0005) 2015; 12 Mathey (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0170) 2015; 141 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0055 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0210 Wolff (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b9010) 2017; 54 Mathey (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0165) 2016 Schröter (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0195) 2014; 7 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0175 Gómez-Baggethun (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0105) 2013; 86 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0045 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0205 Wickham (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0235) 2009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0125 Lyytimäki (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0150) 2015; 12 De Sousa (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0075) 2006; 11 Burkhard (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0050) 2014; 1–32 Daniel (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0065) 2012; 109 Thompson (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0225) 2002; 60 Bertram (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0020) 2015; 12 Swyngedouw (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0220) 2010; 27 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0080 Foster (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0095) 2014; 40 Jacobs (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0130) 2016; 22 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0040 Haines-Young (10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0120) 2010 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0085 |
| References_xml | – volume: 8 start-page: 309 year: 2009 end-page: 315 ident: b0160 article-title: Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. – volume: 132 start-page: 159 year: 2014 end-page: 169 ident: b0115 article-title: Conceptualizing the nexus between urban shrinkage and ecosystem services publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – reference: CABERNET (Concerted Action on Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network), 2006. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration. Retrieved from: < – reference: Dovey, K., 2000. Spaces of “becoming”. – reference: Stadt Leipzig, 2016b. Leipzig-Informations System LIS. Bevölkerung am Jahresende. Retrieved from: < – volume: 22 start-page: 111 year: 2016 end-page: 116 ident: b0145 article-title: Ecosystem services and urban greenways: what’s the public’s perspective? publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. – volume: 27 start-page: 213 year: 2010 end-page: 232 ident: b0220 article-title: Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change publication-title: Theory Cult. Soc. – volume: 86 start-page: 235 year: 2013 end-page: 245 ident: b0105 article-title: Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning publication-title: Ecol. Econ. – reference: Siebielec, G., Rabl-Berger, S., Bluemlein, P., Schweiker, M., Huber, S., Wieshofer, I., et al., 2012. Brownfield Redevelopment as an Alternative to Greenfield Consumption in Urban Development in Central Europe (URBAN SMS Soil Management Strategy No. 6.1.3). – volume: 52 start-page: 490 year: 2015 end-page: 497 ident: b0230 article-title: Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities publication-title: Ecol. Indic. – volume: 100 start-page: 189 year: 2011 end-page: 201 ident: b0185 article-title: Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – start-page: 175 year: 2013 end-page: 251 ident: b0110 article-title: Urban ecosystem services publication-title: Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities – reference: Dormann, C.F., 2013. Parametrische Statistik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. Retrieved from: < – volume: 83 start-page: 187 year: 2007 end-page: 195 ident: b0015 article-title: Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – volume: 22 start-page: 213 year: 2016 end-page: 220 ident: b0130 article-title: A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. – volume: 109 start-page: 8812 year: 2012 end-page: 8819 ident: b0065 article-title: Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. – volume: 5 start-page: 208 year: 2005 end-page: 223 ident: b0140 article-title: Data inspection using biplots publication-title: Stata J. – volume: 25 start-page: 633 year: 2012 end-page: 651 ident: b0035 article-title: Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services publication-title: Soc. Nat. Resour. – year: 2009 ident: b0235 article-title: Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis – reference: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB), 2015. Grün in der Stadt − Für eine lebenswerte Zukunft. Grünbuch Stadtgrün. Retrieved from: < – volume: 60 start-page: 59 year: 2002 end-page: 72 ident: b0225 article-title: Urban open space in the 21st century publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – volume: 5 start-page: 161 year: 2008 end-page: 172 ident: b0155 article-title: Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle publication-title: Environ. Sci. – volume: 12 start-page: 136 year: 2015 ident: b0150 article-title: Ecosystem disservices: embrace the catchword publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. – reference: StadtLeipzig, 2016a. IKOBRA - Brachflächenkataster. Version of July 21 2016. Amt fürStadtgrün und Gewässer, Abteilung Wasserwirtschaft/ Flächenmanagement. – volume: 141 start-page: A4015001 year: 2015 ident: b0170 article-title: Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into urban areas publication-title: J. Urban Plan. Dev. – volume: 12 start-page: 165 year: 2015 end-page: 168 ident: b0005 article-title: Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. – volume: 7 start-page: 514 year: 2014 end-page: 523 ident: b0195 article-title: Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments: ecosystem services as a contested concept publication-title: Conserv. Lett. – volume: 19 start-page: 587 year: 2016 end-page: 600 ident: b0200 article-title: Unpacking Pandora’s Box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing publication-title: Ecosystems – volume: 50 start-page: 25 year: 2015 end-page: 34 ident: b0135 article-title: Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces – a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research publication-title: Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. – volume: 1–32 year: 2014 ident: b0050 article-title: Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation publication-title: Indic. Quant. Landsc. Online – volume: 13 start-page: 586 year: 2014 end-page: 594 ident: b0010 article-title: Brownfield regeneration to greenspace: delivery of project objectives for social and environmental gain publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. – reference: Muschak, C., Weiland, U., Banzhaf, E., 2009. Brachflächen in Stadtentwicklung und kommunalen Planungen am Bespiel der Städte Leipzig und Stuttgart (UFZ-Bericht No. 02/2009). Helmhotz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ. – reference: Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie., 2014. Datenbestände des ATKIS Basis-DLM der Länder. – volume: 62 start-page: 181 year: 2003 end-page: 198 ident: b0070 article-title: Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – reference: Fox, J., 2016. polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations (Version R package version 0.7-9). Retrieved from: < – reference: Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No. EE/IEA/09/003. Retrieved from: < – reference: Priess, J.A., Elger, R., Hauck, J., 2014. The ESM-App – a new smartphone application to mapecosystem services. In: Ames, D.P., Quinn, N.W.T., Rizzoli, A.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, June 15–19, San Diego, California, USA. ISBN: 978-88-9035-744-2. – year: 2014 ident: b0190 article-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing – volume: 12 start-page: 187 year: 2015 end-page: 199 ident: b0020 article-title: Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: comparing attitudes, perception, and use publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. – reference: Breuste, J., Schnellinger, J., Qureshi, S., Faggi, A., 2013. Investigations on habitat provision and recreation as ecosystem services in urban parks – two case studies in Linz und Buenos Aires. In: Breuste, J., Pauleit, S., Pain, J. (Eds.), Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung, Proceedings of the CONTUREC (Competence Network of Urban Ecology), vol. 5, pp. 7–22. – volume: 40 start-page: 124 year: 2014 end-page: 132 ident: b0095 article-title: Hiding in plain view: vacancy and prospect in Paris’ Petite Ceinture publication-title: Cities – start-page: 110 year: 2010 end-page: 139 ident: b0120 article-title: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being publication-title: Ecosystem Ecology – reference: >. – volume: 319 start-page: 766 year: 2008 end-page: 769 ident: b0090 article-title: Health and urban living publication-title: Science – volume: 144 start-page: 151 year: 2015 end-page: 162 ident: b0060 article-title: Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services in urban areas: exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. – volume: 11 start-page: 577 year: 2006 end-page: 600 ident: b0075 article-title: Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: an examination of project use and quality of life impacts publication-title: Local Environ. – volume: 77 start-page: 80 year: 2017 end-page: 95 ident: b0180 article-title: Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use publication-title: Ecol. Ind. – volume: 29 start-page: 293 year: 1999 end-page: 301 ident: b0025 article-title: Ecosystem services in urban areas publication-title: Ecol. Econ. – year: 2016 ident: b0165 article-title: Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas – results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany) publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. – volume: 54 start-page: 2683 year: 2017 end-page: 2700 ident: b9010 article-title: The impact of urban regrowth on the built environment publication-title: Urban Stud. – volume: 25 start-page: 633 issue: 7 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0035 article-title: Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services publication-title: Soc. Nat. Resour. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511 – volume: 1–32 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0050 article-title: Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation publication-title: Indic. Quant. Landsc. Online – volume: 109 start-page: 8812 issue: 23 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0065 article-title: Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 – volume: 11 start-page: 577 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0075 article-title: Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: an examination of project use and quality of life impacts publication-title: Local Environ. doi: 10.1080/13549830600853510 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0190 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0080 – volume: 52 start-page: 490 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0230 article-title: Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities publication-title: Ecol. Indic. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0045 – volume: 132 start-page: 159 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0115 article-title: Conceptualizing the nexus between urban shrinkage and ecosystem services publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.003 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0125 – volume: 12 start-page: 165 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0005 article-title: Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002 – volume: 141 start-page: A4015001 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0170 article-title: Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into urban areas publication-title: J. Urban Plan. Dev. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000275 – volume: 86 start-page: 235 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0105 article-title: Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning publication-title: Ecol. Econ. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 – volume: 22 start-page: 111 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0145 article-title: Ecosystem services and urban greenways: what’s the public’s perspective? publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.004 – start-page: 110 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0120 article-title: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0205 – volume: 83 start-page: 187 issue: 2–3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0015 article-title: Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004 – volume: 319 start-page: 766 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0090 article-title: Health and urban living publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1150198 – start-page: 175 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0110 article-title: Urban ecosystem services – volume: 22 start-page: 213 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0130 article-title: A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 – volume: 40 start-page: 124 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0095 article-title: Hiding in plain view: vacancy and prospect in Paris’ Petite Ceinture publication-title: Cities doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.09.002 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0085 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b9000 – volume: 62 start-page: 181 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0070 article-title: Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00149-4 – volume: 100 start-page: 189 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0185 article-title: Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.004 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0235 – volume: 5 start-page: 161 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0155 article-title: Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle publication-title: Environ. Sci. doi: 10.1080/15693430802055524 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0165 article-title: Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas – results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany) publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. – volume: 27 start-page: 213 issue: 2–3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0220 article-title: Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change publication-title: Theory Cult. Soc. doi: 10.1177/0263276409358728 – volume: 12 start-page: 187 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0020 article-title: Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: comparing attitudes, perception, and use publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0030 – volume: 60 start-page: 59 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0225 article-title: Urban open space in the 21st century publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0175 – volume: 19 start-page: 587 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0200 article-title: Unpacking Pandora’s Box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing publication-title: Ecosystems doi: 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0100 – volume: 8 start-page: 309 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0160 article-title: Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003 – volume: 7 start-page: 514 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0195 article-title: Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments: ecosystem services as a contested concept publication-title: Conserv. Lett. doi: 10.1111/conl.12091 – volume: 13 start-page: 586 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0010 article-title: Brownfield regeneration to greenspace: delivery of project objectives for social and environmental gain publication-title: Urban For. Urban Green. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.002 – volume: 54 start-page: 2683 issue: 12 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b9010 article-title: The impact of urban regrowth on the built environment publication-title: Urban Stud. doi: 10.1177/0042098016658231 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0040 – volume: 50 start-page: 25 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0135 article-title: Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces – a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research publication-title: Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b5000 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0210 – volume: 12 start-page: 136 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0150 article-title: Ecosystem disservices: embrace the catchword publication-title: Ecosyst. Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.008 – volume: 29 start-page: 293 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0025 article-title: Ecosystem services in urban areas publication-title: Ecol. Econ. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0 – volume: 77 start-page: 80 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0180 article-title: Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use publication-title: Ecol. Ind. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001 – volume: 144 start-page: 151 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0060 article-title: Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services in urban areas: exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations publication-title: Landsc. Urban Plan. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.015 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0055 – volume: 5 start-page: 208 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011_b0140 article-title: Data inspection using biplots publication-title: Stata J. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0500500206 |
| SSID | ssj0001174946 |
| Score | 2.3499033 |
| Snippet | •Ecosystem service use has been mapped with users on green urban brownfields.•Recreational activities dominated the use of cultural ecosystem services.•Urban... Urban green brownfields are a particular type of urban green space and contribute to the quality of life by providing a variety of ecosystem services (ES). In... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 73 |
| SubjectTerms | brownfields Cultural and recreational ecosystem services Ecosystem disservices ecosystem services energy-dispersive X-ray analysis Germany green infrastructure Green space Mapping ecosystem service use planning quality of life telephones Urban brownfields urban development |
| Title | Mapping ecosystem services on brownfields in Leipzig, Germany |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2084070899 |
| Volume | 30 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000428532600009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 2212-0416 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001174946 issn: 2212-0416 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 20120701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bbtMw1IINJF4QVzFuMhLiZXhKYnt2HifIBKiUPXSob5aTulWn4YZe0ODrOb6lHRvaeECqoshynOqck3O_IPTajQwxNSvIiNWCMMM10UJzojk1IA-FEb6R9tee6PflcFgexbTmhR8nIKyVZ2dl-19RDWuAbFc6-w_o7g6FBbgHpMMV0A7XayH-s259DRTYlaFN8-4i8gMXGKid2e3T1nwibM9M21_TSfCOu_qBc1He6sIRHSdduUSQ01RDCAa31WtmpsO0xvd68k13yb9HziiPUQczn0QnanQ45HIjT8XzpaJw2Rwsjx2sL1mLjJVmu-2eoETyDQ4ZBpckWcsv5eLBoXCy5wBlXNPWXPreqpEtn2ua3f-iDo97PTWohoM37Xfi5om5uHscrnITbReCl8Dvtg8-VsNPa_8bmGKlr-Pq_nuqrPTpfxff_TfN5Q8Z7hWTwT10N1oU-CBQwn10w9gH6Hblu5H_fIgSPeCOHnBCJp5ZvEEPeGpxpIe3OFLDI3R8WA3efSBxZgZpKC2Xzh3ABIgspvNM1s0Y9DPqFONSs2aUjXnNNKVgkhdwZ0D15rAM2wphRqDa0Zo-Rlt2Zs0ThLMm19k-HCJqzqiQNXzVcC6cJcf7TW52EE3wUE1sKO_mmpyqlDl4ogIUlYOiynL45TuIdE-1oaHKFftFArWKSmFQ9hRQyxVPvkqYUcAzXSBMWzNbLWCTZCDqZFk-vcaeZ-jO-jN4jraW85V5gW41P5bTxfxlpKvf-9iMew |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping+ecosystem+services+on+brownfields+in+Leipzig%2C+Germany&rft.jtitle=Ecosystem+services&rft.au=Pueffel%2C+Catharina&rft.au=Haase%2C+Dagmar&rft.au=Priess%2C+Joerg+A&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.issn=2212-0416&rft.eissn=2212-0416&rft.volume=30+p.73-85&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=85&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ecoser.2018.01.011&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2212-0416&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2212-0416&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2212-0416&client=summon |