The marginalisation of voice in the fight against climate change: The case of Lusophone Africa

•English-only searches for African climate change science introduce language-bias.•Non-English literature is poorly represented on Web of Science and Scopus.•Google Scholar incorporates a non-English voice, important for global assessments.•Supporting non-English authors may improve the global uptak...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & policy Jg. 120; S. 213 - 221
Hauptverfasser: Hunter, N.B., North, M.A., Slotow, R.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Schlagworte:
Africa
Anglophone
biodiversity
climate change
English
environmental science
Google Scholar
issues and policy
Knowledge production
Language-bias
Local knowledge
Portuguese
risk
stakeholders
Africa
English
Portuguese
Anglophone
Language-bias
Local knowledge
Google Scholar
Knowledge production
ISSN:1462-9011, 1873-6416
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•English-only searches for African climate change science introduce language-bias.•Non-English literature is poorly represented on Web of Science and Scopus.•Google Scholar incorporates a non-English voice, important for global assessments.•Supporting non-English authors may improve the global uptake of their work.•English-language research translated into local languages may encourage local use. Disregarding research not published in English may pose a risk to finding solutions for urgent global concerns, such as biodiversity loss, or climate change. To assess the extent of this ‘missing voice’, we compared the representation of 22 languages in scientific publications on climate change in Africa, indexed by widely used databases. Between 87 % and 95 % of publications were in English, with a small, but noteworthy, number in languages of the former European colonisers of Africa. We then assessed undergraduate monographs, master’s dissertations, doctoral theses, and peer-reviewed papers derived from the doctoral theses, that are about Lusophone Africa and written in Portuguese, and found this research largely not accessible in English on online databases. If the goal of researchers, practitioners and policy makers is to obtain climate change information on, or present solutions for, individual developing countries, cultures, or localised issues, then searching in English may exclude local, context specific knowledge. This may prevent global assessments from being truly global, or locally down-scalable, by biasing science towards a single world view that marginalises key local stakeholders.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-9011
1873-6416
DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.012