Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards

Early meta‐analyses in management research sought primarily to resolve seemingly conflicting findings by estimating a relationship’s population‐level effect size. Since then, management researchers have adopted increasingly sophisticated approaches that permit new theorizing, testing and comparing s...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of management studies Ročník 56; číslo 1; s. 1 - 18
Hlavní autoři: Combs, James G., Crook, T. Russell, Rauch, Andreas
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2019
Témata:
Disputes
Management
Management theory
Meta-analysis
meta‐analytic structural equation modelling
meta‐regression
Operations research
qualitative meta‐analysis
Structural equation modeling
ISSN:0022-2380, 1467-6486
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Early meta‐analyses in management research sought primarily to resolve seemingly conflicting findings by estimating a relationship’s population‐level effect size. Since then, management researchers have adopted increasingly sophisticated approaches that permit new theorizing, testing and comparing sophisticated models, and identifying boundary conditions. We summarize three of these approaches – i.e., qualitative meta‐analysis (QMA), meta‐analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM), and meta‐analytic regression analysis (MARA) – along with the special issue papers that adopt each approach. We conclude by raising three unresolved controversies that we believe deserve more attention and by offering our thoughts about how to maximize a meta‐analytic study’s chances for publication and impact.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-2380
1467-6486
DOI:10.1111/joms.12427