Genetic Load, Eco-Evolutionary Feedback, and Extinction in Metapopulations

AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local populations to increase, thereby increasing genetic load. Higher load causes population numbers to decline, which reduces the efficiency of selection a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist Jg. 205; H. 6; S. 617
Hauptverfasser: Olusanya, Oluwafunmilola, Khudiakova, Ksenia, Sachdeva, Himani
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.06.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1537-5323, 1537-5323
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local populations to increase, thereby increasing genetic load. Higher load causes population numbers to decline, which reduces the efficiency of selection and further increases load, resulting in a positive feedback that may drive entire populations to extinction. Here, we investigate this eco-evolutionary feedback in a metapopulation consisting of local demes connected via migration, with individuals subject to deleterious mutation at a large number of loci. We first analyze the determinants of load under soft selection, where population sizes are fixed, and then build on this to understand hard selection, where population sizes and load coevolve. We show that under soft selection, very little gene flow (less than one migrant per generation) is enough to prevent fixation of deleterious alleles. By contrast, much higher levels of migration are required to mitigate load and prevent extinction when selection is hard, with critical migration thresholds for metapopulation persistence increasing sharply as the genome-wide deleterious mutation rate becomes comparable to the baseline population growth rate. Moreover, critical migration thresholds are highest if deleterious mutations have intermediate selection coefficients but lower if alleles are predominantly recessive rather than additive (due to more efficient purging of recessive load within local populations). Our analysis is based on a combination of analytical approximations and simulations, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing load and extinction in fragmented populations.
AbstractList AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local populations to increase, thereby increasing genetic load. Higher load causes population numbers to decline, which reduces the efficiency of selection and further increases load, resulting in a positive feedback that may drive entire populations to extinction. Here, we investigate this eco-evolutionary feedback in a metapopulation consisting of local demes connected via migration, with individuals subject to deleterious mutation at a large number of loci. We first analyze the determinants of load under soft selection, where population sizes are fixed, and then build on this to understand hard selection, where population sizes and load coevolve. We show that under soft selection, very little gene flow (less than one migrant per generation) is enough to prevent fixation of deleterious alleles. By contrast, much higher levels of migration are required to mitigate load and prevent extinction when selection is hard, with critical migration thresholds for metapopulation persistence increasing sharply as the genome-wide deleterious mutation rate becomes comparable to the baseline population growth rate. Moreover, critical migration thresholds are highest if deleterious mutations have intermediate selection coefficients but lower if alleles are predominantly recessive rather than additive (due to more efficient purging of recessive load within local populations). Our analysis is based on a combination of analytical approximations and simulations, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing load and extinction in fragmented populations.
AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local populations to increase, thereby increasing genetic load. Higher load causes population numbers to decline, which reduces the efficiency of selection and further increases load, resulting in a positive feedback that may drive entire populations to extinction. Here, we investigate this eco-evolutionary feedback in a metapopulation consisting of local demes connected via migration, with individuals subject to deleterious mutation at a large number of loci. We first analyze the determinants of load under soft selection, where population sizes are fixed, and then build on this to understand hard selection, where population sizes and load coevolve. We show that under soft selection, very little gene flow (less than one migrant per generation) is enough to prevent fixation of deleterious alleles. By contrast, much higher levels of migration are required to mitigate load and prevent extinction when selection is hard, with critical migration thresholds for metapopulation persistence increasing sharply as the genome-wide deleterious mutation rate becomes comparable to the baseline population growth rate. Moreover, critical migration thresholds are highest if deleterious mutations have intermediate selection coefficients but lower if alleles are predominantly recessive rather than additive (due to more efficient purging of recessive load within local populations). Our analysis is based on a combination of analytical approximations and simulations, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing load and extinction in fragmented populations.AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local populations to increase, thereby increasing genetic load. Higher load causes population numbers to decline, which reduces the efficiency of selection and further increases load, resulting in a positive feedback that may drive entire populations to extinction. Here, we investigate this eco-evolutionary feedback in a metapopulation consisting of local demes connected via migration, with individuals subject to deleterious mutation at a large number of loci. We first analyze the determinants of load under soft selection, where population sizes are fixed, and then build on this to understand hard selection, where population sizes and load coevolve. We show that under soft selection, very little gene flow (less than one migrant per generation) is enough to prevent fixation of deleterious alleles. By contrast, much higher levels of migration are required to mitigate load and prevent extinction when selection is hard, with critical migration thresholds for metapopulation persistence increasing sharply as the genome-wide deleterious mutation rate becomes comparable to the baseline population growth rate. Moreover, critical migration thresholds are highest if deleterious mutations have intermediate selection coefficients but lower if alleles are predominantly recessive rather than additive (due to more efficient purging of recessive load within local populations). Our analysis is based on a combination of analytical approximations and simulations, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing load and extinction in fragmented populations.
Author Sachdeva, Himani
Khudiakova, Ksenia
Olusanya, Oluwafunmilola
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Oluwafunmilola
  surname: Olusanya
  fullname: Olusanya, Oluwafunmilola
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ksenia
  surname: Khudiakova
  fullname: Khudiakova, Ksenia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Himani
  surname: Sachdeva
  fullname: Sachdeva, Himani
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40446297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNj01LxDAYhIOsuB_qT5AcPWw1302OsnRXZcWLnkuSvoVqN6mbVvTf28UVPM0wMww8czQJMQBCl5TcUKLVbc6lVOwEzajkeSY545N_formKb0RQoww8gxNBRFCMZPP0OMGAvSNx9toqyUufMyKz9gOfROD3X_jNUDlrH9fYhsqXHz1TfCHDjcBP0Fvu9gNrT0k6Ryd1rZNcHHUBXpdFy-r-2z7vHlY3W0zz7nuM089EM6ElHUOmjhjgHNulVVQ1yNDDVRZXxlpK0et1k5T5Qx4bp0WvhZsga5_f7t9_Bgg9eWuSR7a1gaIQyo5o4JTPeKN06vjdHA7qMpu3-xGqvKPn_0AwxNcjw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1086_735562
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1086/735562
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1537-5323
ExternalDocumentID 40446297
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
-~X
..I
0R~
123
23M
2AX
4.4
42X
5.N
53G
5GY
692
6J9
79B
85S
9EF
9EJ
AACYF
AAEDO
AAHKG
AAISJ
AAKGQ
AAUTI
AAXPP
AAYJJ
ABABT
ABBHK
ABDPE
ABEFU
ABPEO
ABPLY
ABPPZ
ABSQW
ABTLG
ABXSQ
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACHIC
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACPVT
ACSTJ
ADMHG
ADTZG
ADULT
ADXHL
AEGXH
AENEX
AEUPB
AFAZZ
AFFNX
AFQQW
AFRAH
AGUYK
AHXOZ
AI.
AIDAL
AILXY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQVQM
ARNXZ
AS~
BKOMP
CBGCD
CGR
CJ0
CS3
CUY
CUYZI
CVF
D0L
DEVKO
DGPHC
EBD
EBS
ECM
EDH
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
EZTEY
F5P
GTFYD
HF~
HGD
HQ2
HTVGU
HZ~
IPSME
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JEB
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JST
K-O
KQ8
L7B
LU7
MVM
NEJ
NHB
NPM
O9-
OK1
P-O
P2P
PQQKQ
QZG
RCP
SA0
SV3
TN5
UFCQG
UHB
UKR
V62
VH1
VJK
WH7
XOL
XSW
YR5
YZZ
Z0I
ZCA
ZCG
ZXP
~02
~KM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c1ce032455f7e80b99e333a6a6eff562fe16acd95adb1a88b816b9ec3ab84cf42
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001473510300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1537-5323
IngestDate Wed Jul 02 02:49:29 EDT 2025
Sun Jun 01 01:35:31 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords hard selection
migration
extinction
genetic load
population fragmentation
soft selection
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-c1ce032455f7e80b99e333a6a6eff562fe16acd95adb1a88b816b9ec3ab84cf42
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 40446297
PQID 3214318297
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3214318297
pubmed_primary_40446297
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-Jun
20250601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-Jun
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The American naturalist
PublicationTitleAlternate Am Nat
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0009495
Score 2.4757323
Snippet AbstractHabitat fragmentation poses a significant risk to population survival, causing both demographic stochasticity and genetic drift within local...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 617
SubjectTerms Animal Migration
Biological Evolution
Ecosystem
Extinction, Biological
Gene Flow
Genetic Drift
Genetic Load
Models, Genetic
Mutation
Population Density
Selection, Genetic
Title Genetic Load, Eco-Evolutionary Feedback, and Extinction in Metapopulations
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40446297
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3214318297
Volume 205
WOSCitedRecordID wos001473510300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3bS8MwFMaDOgVfvF_mjQg-Lrg2SZM8iUiHyDb2oLK3kqQJDKGdax3uvzdpO-eLIPhSKKFQPr7kHM5pzw-AG0aZFMIGiBEbIaIwRZIzg7QL9oGxVHcrxtJrnw2HfDwWo6bgVjSfVS7PxOqgTnPta-S3Hqjj_BcKdjd9R54a5burDUJjHbSwS2W8q9l4NS1ckIq64jY1QxSH-AdbiLk46wk5v6WVVXjp7f73xfbATpNYwvvaCftgzWQHYKtGTS4OwZOfL-2WYD-XaQfGOkfxvLGdnC1gz0UxJfVbB8oshfFnOcmqPx7gJIMDU8rpN-irOAIvvfj54RE1HAWnOOYl0oGHgoWEUssM7yohDMZYRjIy1joVrAkiqVNBZaoCybniQaSE0VgqTrQl4THYyPLMnAIYuFuqcOSn7pFUppwpwkVgCZEiDLukDa6XIiXOp775IDOTfxTJSqY2OKmVTqb1QI2E-K6yWzn7w9PnYDv0CN6qEHIBWtbtUnMJNvW8nBSzq8oA7jocDb4Ayba6eg
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic+Load%2C+Eco-Evolutionary+Feedback%2C+and+Extinction+in+Metapopulations&rft.jtitle=The+American+naturalist&rft.au=Olusanya%2C+Oluwafunmilola&rft.au=Khudiakova%2C+Ksenia&rft.au=Sachdeva%2C+Himani&rft.date=2025-06-01&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086%2F735562&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40446297&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40446297&rft.externalDocID=40446297
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1537-5323&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1537-5323&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1537-5323&client=summon