Durable, Portable Research through Partnerships with Interdisciplinary Advocacy Groups, Specific Research Topics, and Larger Data Sets

Relying on the case of a mixed-methods study centered on patients' strategies for establishing their credibility in clinical conversations, this essay argues that the more intentional and effective the participant recruitment and the more specific the inquiry, the more likely technical communic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Technical communication quarterly Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 165 - 176
Main Author: Molloy, Cathryn
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Routledge 03.04.2019
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Advocacy
Credibility
Health/medical communication
Interdisciplinary aspects
Interdisciplinary research
Partnerships
Patients
qualitative data coding
Recruitment
research methods
Researchers
Rhetoric
rhetoric of health and medicine
rhetoric of science
Science
Technical communication
Technical writing
ISSN:1057-2252, 1542-7625
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Relying on the case of a mixed-methods study centered on patients' strategies for establishing their credibility in clinical conversations, this essay argues that the more intentional and effective the participant recruitment and the more specific the inquiry, the more likely technical communication and rhetoric of science researchers are to encounter potentially powerful partners through which they might get and analyze compelling data and, thus, gain engaged audiences outside of their disciplines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1057-2252
1542-7625
DOI:10.1080/10572252.2019.1588375