The Implicated Subject in Four South African Autobiographical Texts

Finding new ways to address oppressive pasts has been a prominent theme in South African nonfiction since the end of apartheid, writers often seeking to explore personal and collective implication and guilt. The legacies of oppression and discrimination spill over into the South African present of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of southern African studies Vol. 48; no. 5; pp. 843 - 859
Main Author: Englund, Lena
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Routledge 03.09.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Afrikaners
Apartheid
autobiographical writing
beneficiary
Black people
Borders
Discrimination
Economic inequality
Guilt
implicated subject
implication
Nonfiction
Oppression
Social inequality
South Africa
South African English
South Africa
ISSN:0305-7070, 1465-3893
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Finding new ways to address oppressive pasts has been a prominent theme in South African nonfiction since the end of apartheid, writers often seeking to explore personal and collective implication and guilt. The legacies of oppression and discrimination spill over into the South African present of social and economic inequality. This article examines four autobiographical texts that address notions of personal and collective implication in South Africa's apartheid past and its present-day inequality. At the centre of the analysis are Rian Malan's My Traitor's Heart from the end of the apartheid era, which offers a personal exploration of Afrikaner history in South Africa, and Christopher Hope's The Café de Move-on Blues, which attempts to determine the role of English-speaking white South Africans. In addition, Sisonke Msimang writes about class divides and implication crossing racial borders in Always Another Country, and Haji Mohamed Dawjee offers a forceful critique of seemingly well-meaning, guilt-ridden whiteness in Sorry, Not Sorry. The article draws on Michael Rothberg's theorisation of the implicated subject as beneficiary of oppressive pasts beyond simple distinctions of victim and perpetrator. All four texts portray a South Africa in which boundaries are increasingly blurred, and implication transgresses temporal, spatial and racial lines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0305-7070
1465-3893
DOI:10.1080/03057070.2022.2100149