The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa's Land Governance Policy

This article discusses the implication of the 2021 CASAC v Ingonyama Trust judgment on South Africa's land governance policy trajectories. It explores the extent to which there are missing links between policy imperatives, the legal system, court processes and socio-economic emancipation. It ar...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	African studies (Johannesburg) Ročník 82; číslo 2; s. 181 - 199
Hlavní autori:	Manona, Siyabulela, Kepe, Thembela
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Abingdon Routledge 03.04.2023 Taylor & Francis Ltd
Predmet:	Apartheid Colonial present Colonialism Competing jurisdictions Confusion Constitutions Court decisions Courts Emancipation Governance Indigenous peoples Ingonyama trust Intersectionality Judgment Land governance Land tenure Land trusts Legal system Legislation Legislatures Rights Rural communities Socioeconomic factors South Africa Trust Women South Africa
ISSN:	0002-0184, 1469-2872
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Abstract	This article discusses the implication of the 2021 CASAC v Ingonyama Trust judgment on South Africa's land governance policy trajectories. It explores the extent to which there are missing links between policy imperatives, the legal system, court processes and socio-economic emancipation. It argues that the failure of the state in policy design and implementation has turned courts into contradictory sites of struggle for emancipating land rights. In particular, we examine some of the key specific and broader implications that emanate from the landmark ruling in the case that was lodged by the Council for the Advancement of South African Constitution and Rural Women's Movement against the Ingonyama Trust and Board, where the conduct of Ingonyama Trust was found to be illegal and unconstitutional, as it undermined the indigenous land rights of people occupying the land by converting their land tenure rights into leasehold. The verdict was a huge affirmation of indigenous land rights, but the judgment is unlikely to translate into clear policy. Instead, it has unleashed confusion and dilemma tied to colonial and apartheid legacies as well as competing jurisdictions. Our main argument is that court judgments become de facto policy statements, but those policies are not easily implemented because they are intersectional. We show that current land policies, including the one involving the Ingonyama Trust, has an intersectional genesis that includes old apartheid legislation and policies, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, as well as legislature and other political deals (such as negotiations to bring about reconciliation) that cannot be easily undone by any one court judgment.
AbstractList	This article discusses the implication of the 2021 CASAC v Ingonyama Trust judgment on South Africa’s land governance policy trajectories. It explores the extent to which there are missing links between policy imperatives, the legal system, court processes and socio-economic emancipation. It argues that the failure of the state in policy design and implementation has turned courts into contradictory sites of struggle for emancipating land rights. In particular, we examine some of the key specific and broader implications that emanate from the landmark ruling in the case that was lodged by the Council for the Advancement of South African Constitution and Rural Women’s Movement against the Ingonyama Trust and Board, where the conduct of Ingonyama Trust was found to be illegal and unconstitutional, as it undermined the indigenous land rights of people occupying the land by converting their land tenure rights into leasehold. The verdict was a huge affirmation of indigenous land rights, but the judgment is unlikely to translate into clear policy. Instead, it has unleashed confusion and dilemma tied to colonial and apartheid legacies as well as competing jurisdictions. Our main argument is that court judgments become de facto policy statements, but those policies are not easily implemented because they are intersectional. We show that current land policies, including the one involving the Ingonyama Trust, has an intersectional genesis that includes old apartheid legislation and policies, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, as well as legislature and other political deals (such as negotiations to bring about reconciliation) that cannot be easily undone by any one court judgment.
Author	Kepe, Thembela Manona, Siyabulela
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Siyabulela surname: Manona fullname: Manona, Siyabulela organization: Phuhlisani NPC, Cape Town – sequence: 2 givenname: Thembela surname: Kepe fullname: Kepe, Thembela email: thembela.kepe@utoronto.ca organization: University of Toronto
BookMark	eNqFkE1PAjEQhhuDiYD-BJMmHjwt9mN36epFQhRISDSK56bb7ULJ0mLb1fDvLYIXD3qazOR5ZzJPD3SMNQqAS4wGGDF0gxAiCLN0QBChA0JyTFl-Aro4zYuEsCHpgO6eSfbQGeh5v44tpYR2gVqsFJzq5QqObesCfGkbbZZwtBTa-ABnZmnNTmwEXLjWh1s422wbLUXQ1nhYWwdfbRtWcFS7OL32cC5MBSf2QzkjjFTw2UZ8dw5Oa9F4dXGsffD2-LAYT5P502Q2Hs0TSSkLCc2kShlWJRO4RClWpEiJRMOc4JIgyaRUtCYZykqaF0OVYlkVTDJc1bJiZV3QPrg67N06-94qH_g6fmXiSU4Yw1maEpZH6u5ASWe9d6rmUofvl4ITuuEY8b1X_uOV773yo9eYzn6lt05vhNv9m7s_5LSJ3jbi07qm4kHsGutqF2Vpz-nfK74AWFCQPA
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_17645_up_8909
Cites_doi	10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.003 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039 10.1017/CBO9780511790997 10.1177/0964663909103622 10.4159/9780674042605 10.18820/2415-0495/trp75i1.3 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x 10.1177/0048393107307663 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x 10.18772/22021056796.13 10.7551/mitpress/9232.003.0014 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00497.x 10.1080/02582473.2021.1909116 10.1080/02589340500353474 10.1093/lril/lrt009 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 10.1093/oso/9780199280452.003.0002 10.1515/9780773581708 10.1068/a43534 10.1080/09502380601162514 10.3138/9781487515720 10.1080/13562576.2016.1174557 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00438.x 10.1111/tran.12065 10.1177/0306312712471581 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686 10.2307/j.ctvgc60w8.12 10.1093/afraf/adh003 10.1177/1350506806065751 10.18772/22021056796.12 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01075.x 10.1215/9780822386735-013 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 10.4324/9781315192321 10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007 10.1016/j.knosys.2009.05.005 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716 10.1007/s11625-018-0543-8
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of the University of Witwatersrand 2023 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of the University of Witwatersrand
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of the University of Witwatersrand 2023 – notice: 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of the University of Witwatersrand
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE
DOI	10.1080/00020184.2023.2261386
DatabaseName	CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Black Studies Center Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Languages & Literatures Anthropology History & Archaeology Political Science
EISSN	1469-2872
EndPage	199
ExternalDocumentID	10_1080_00020184_2023_2261386 2261386
Genre	Research Article
GeographicLocations	South Africa
GeographicLocations_xml	– name: South Africa
GroupedDBID	-ET -~X .4H .7I .QK 0BK 0R~ 23M 2DF 3LD 4.4 5GY 5VS AAGDL AAGZJ AAHIA AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABJNI ABLIJ ABLJU ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACTIO ACTOA ACUHS ACZ ADAHI ADCVX ADKVQ ADLRE ADMHG ADXPE ADZJE AECIN AEFOU AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AFRVT AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AIYEW AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ANHLU AQTUD AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO EAP EBS EHI EIS EMK EPL ESI ESO ESX E~B E~C F5P FIL G-F GINNV GTTXZ H13 HF~ HMHOC HZ~ IPNFZ J.O KYCEM LCRDH LJTGL M4Z MLAFT NA5 NZ. O9- P2P PQQKQ RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TASJS TBQAZ TDBHL TEP TFH TFL TFW TN5 TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ UPT UT5 UT9 VAE ~01 ~S~ AAYXX CITATION 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-35ce481eb8a1b041e2942c07621b20c8cce3f2505b3697e41cd98c81dfcd8bf93
IEDL.DBID	TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount	1
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001076459200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0002-0184
IngestDate	Sat Nov 08 03:35:42 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:28:01 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:40:27 EST 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:45:23 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	2
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-35ce481eb8a1b041e2942c07621b20c8cce3f2505b3697e41cd98c81dfcd8bf93
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14
PQID	2881544286
PQPubID	186267
PageCount	19
ParticipantIDs	proquest_journals_2881544286 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00020184_2023_2261386 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_00020184_2023_2261386 crossref_primary_10_1080_00020184_2023_2261386
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2023-04-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2023-04-03
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 04 year: 2023 text: 2023-04-03 day: 03
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Abingdon
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle	African studies (Johannesburg)
PublicationYear	2023
Publisher	Routledge Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References	e_1_3_4_3_1 Gregory Derek. (e_1_3_4_18_1) 2004 Manona Siyabulela S. (e_1_3_4_36_1) Land and Accountability Research Centre (e_1_3_4_28_1) 2021 e_1_3_4_61_1 Naidoo Cindhamani (e_1_3_4_42_1) 2015 e_1_3_4_7_1 PAPoLRA (Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture) (e_1_3_4_45_1) 2019 e_1_3_4_5_1 Harper Paddy. (e_1_3_4_22_1) 2019; 1 e_1_3_4_46_1 e_1_3_4_69_1 e_1_3_4_21_1 e_1_3_4_44_1 e_1_3_4_27_1 e_1_3_4_65_1 e_1_3_4_25_1 Chakrabarty Dipesh. (e_1_3_4_9_1) 2000 e_1_3_4_29_1 Morrow Seán (e_1_3_4_39_1) 2005 Mailovich Claudi. (e_1_3_4_34_1) 2019; 28 Kepe Thembela (e_1_3_4_26_1) 2008 Cameron Robert (e_1_3_4_8_1) 2009; 44 e_1_3_4_53_1 e_1_3_4_30_1 e_1_3_4_70_1 e_1_3_4_13_1 e_1_3_4_59_1 e_1_3_4_32_1 e_1_3_4_17_1 e_1_3_4_38_1 Yende Sizwe Sama. (e_1_3_4_67_1) 2022; 24 e_1_3_4_15_1 e_1_3_4_57_1 Bentley Kristina (e_1_3_4_6_1) 2006 Dussel Enrique. (e_1_3_4_14_1) 1977 Bauder Harald (e_1_3_4_4_1) 2008 Cousins Ben. (e_1_3_4_12_1) 2021; 22 e_1_3_4_19_1 Staff Writer (e_1_3_4_55_1) 2022; 3 e_1_3_4_2_1 e_1_3_4_62_1 e_1_3_4_64_1 e_1_3_4_41_1 e_1_3_4_60_1 e_1_3_4_24_1 e_1_3_4_43_1 Chipkin Ivor (e_1_3_4_11_1) 2011 e_1_3_4_49_1 e_1_3_4_66_1 e_1_3_4_47_1 e_1_3_4_68_1 Rautenbach Christa (e_1_3_4_51_1) 2016 Steyn Lala. (e_1_3_4_56_1) 1994 Hacker Jacob (e_1_3_4_20_1) 2005 e_1_3_4_31_1 e_1_3_4_52_1 e_1_3_4_50_1 e_1_3_4_58_1 e_1_3_4_10_1 e_1_3_4_33_1 e_1_3_4_54_1 e_1_3_4_16_1 e_1_3_4_37_1 Harper Paddy. (e_1_3_4_23_1) 2021; 25 Mossman Mary Jane. (e_1_3_4_40_1) 1998; 10 Van Wyk Jeannie. (e_1_3_4_63_1) 2012 Picard Louis A. (e_1_3_4_48_1) 2005
References_xml	– ident: e_1_3_4_5_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x – ident: e_1_3_4_65_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.003 – ident: e_1_3_4_52_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039 – ident: e_1_3_4_60_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790997 – volume-title: Baseline Report Longitudinal Study: The Effect of the Legislated Powers of Traditional Authorities on Rural Women’s Rights in South Africa year: 2006 ident: e_1_3_4_6_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_61_1 doi: 10.1177/0964663909103622 – ident: e_1_3_4_50_1 doi: 10.4159/9780674042605 – ident: e_1_3_4_66_1 doi: 10.18820/2415-0495/trp75i1.3 – volume-title: ‘Ingonyama Trust Lease Case: What are the Judgment’s Implications for Tenure Security of Rural South Africans?’ year: 2021 ident: e_1_3_4_28_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_68_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x – ident: e_1_3_4_64_1 doi: 10.1177/0048393107307663 – volume-title: Planning Law year: 2012 ident: e_1_3_4_63_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x – ident: e_1_3_4_13_1 doi: 10.18772/22021056796.13 – ident: e_1_3_4_70_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9232.003.0014 – volume-title: Filosofía de la Liberacíon year: 1977 ident: e_1_3_4_14_1 – volume-title: Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historic Difference year: 2000 ident: e_1_3_4_9_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_21_1 doi: 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196 – start-page: 143 volume-title: The New South African Key Words year: 2008 ident: e_1_3_4_26_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_32_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00497.x – volume: 44 start-page: 380 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: e_1_3_4_8_1 article-title: Minnowbrook, Mount Grace and the State of the Discipline publication-title: Journal of Public Administration – volume: 28 year: 2019 ident: e_1_3_4_34_1 article-title: Land Panel Recommends Ingonyama Trust Act be Scrapped or Reviewed publication-title: Business Day – ident: e_1_3_4_33_1 doi: 10.1080/02582473.2021.1909116 – volume-title: Final Report of the Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture year: 2019 ident: e_1_3_4_45_1 – volume: 22 year: 2021 ident: e_1_3_4_12_1 article-title: What the Landmark Kwazulu-Natal Court Ruling Means for Land Reform in South Africa publication-title: The Conversation – volume: 25 year: 2021 ident: e_1_3_4_23_1 article-title: Didiza Unveils Plan to Reverse Ingonyama Trust Leases publication-title: Mail&Guardian – volume-title: Final Report, prepared for the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, Democracy, Governance and Service Delivery Research Programme of the Human Sciences Research Council in partnership with the Nelson R Mandela School of Law of the University of Fort Hare year: 2015 ident: e_1_3_4_42_1 – volume-title: The State of the State: Institutional Transformation, Capacity and Political Change in South Africa year: 2005 ident: e_1_3_4_48_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_3_1 doi: 10.1080/02589340500353474 – ident: e_1_3_4_44_1 doi: 10.1093/lril/lrt009 – ident: e_1_3_4_24_1 doi: 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 – ident: e_1_3_4_36_1 article-title: Contradictions in the Management of Legal Pluralism in Post-Apartheid South Africa’s Land Governance: Policy Dilemmas Explored publication-title: Journal article under review – start-page: 40 volume-title: Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies year: 2005 ident: e_1_3_4_20_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199280452.003.0002 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 1998 ident: e_1_3_4_40_1 article-title: Feminism and the Law: Challenges and Choices publication-title: Canadian Journal of Women and the Law – ident: e_1_3_4_15_1 doi: 10.1515/9780773581708 – ident: e_1_3_4_43_1 doi: 10.1068/a43534 – ident: e_1_3_4_19_1 doi: 10.1080/09502380601162514 – ident: e_1_3_4_41_1 doi: 10.3138/9781487515720 – ident: e_1_3_4_16_1 doi: 10.1080/13562576.2016.1174557 – issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: e_1_3_4_11_1 article-title: Why the Past Matters publication-title: PARI Short Essays – ident: e_1_3_4_10_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00438.x – ident: e_1_3_4_30_1 doi: 10.1111/tran.12065 – ident: e_1_3_4_29_1 doi: 10.1177/0306312712471581 – ident: e_1_3_4_53_1 doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123 – ident: e_1_3_4_31_1 doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686 – ident: e_1_3_4_54_1 – volume-title: Closing the Door: The Implications of Implementation of the 1993 Land Legislation year: 1994 ident: e_1_3_4_56_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_46_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_38_1 doi: 10.2307/j.ctvgc60w8.12 – volume-title: The Colonial Present year: 2004 ident: e_1_3_4_18_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_69_1 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adh003 – ident: e_1_3_4_47_1 doi: 10.1177/1350506806065751 – volume: 24 year: 2022 ident: e_1_3_4_67_1 article-title: Court Dismisses Ingonyama Trust Appeal, Orders it to Refund Residents publication-title: News – start-page: 313 volume-title: The State of the Nation: South Africa year: 2005 ident: e_1_3_4_39_1 – volume: 3 year: 2022 ident: e_1_3_4_55_1 article-title: South Africa Starting to Show Signs of a Failing State: Treasury publication-title: BusinessTech – ident: e_1_3_4_49_1 doi: 10.18772/22021056796.12 – ident: e_1_3_4_62_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01075.x – volume-title: Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings year: 2008 ident: e_1_3_4_4_1 – volume-title: Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa year: 2016 ident: e_1_3_4_51_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_2_1 doi: 10.1215/9780822386735-013 – ident: e_1_3_4_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 – ident: e_1_3_4_37_1 doi: 10.4324/9781315192321 – volume: 1 year: 2019 ident: e_1_3_4_22_1 article-title: Parliament Backs Move to Scrap Ingonyama Trust publication-title: Mail&Guardian – ident: e_1_3_4_59_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007 – ident: e_1_3_4_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2009.05.005 – ident: e_1_3_4_25_1 – ident: e_1_3_4_57_1 doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716 – ident: e_1_3_4_58_1 doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0543-8
SSID	ssj0003323
Score	2.2486434
Snippet	This article discusses the implication of the 2021 CASAC v Ingonyama Trust judgment on South Africa's land governance policy trajectories. It explores the... This article discusses the implication of the 2021 CASAC v Ingonyama Trust judgment on South Africa’s land governance policy trajectories. It explores the...
SourceID	proquest crossref informaworld
SourceType	Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	181
SubjectTerms	Apartheid Colonial present Colonialism Competing jurisdictions Confusion Constitutions Court decisions Courts Emancipation Governance Indigenous peoples Ingonyama trust Intersectionality Judgment Land governance Land tenure Land trusts Legal system Legislation Legislatures Rights Rural communities Socioeconomic factors South Africa Trust Women
Title	The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa's Land Governance Policy
URI	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00020184.2023.2261386 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2881544286
Volume	82
WOSCitedRecordID	wos001076459200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-2872 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0003323 issn: 0002-0184 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 19420301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1RaxQxEA5SfBDB1rNqtco8iD7tednk9hLfinhYOIrIqX1bkrnkKOhWulvh_r0zm-xxRaQP-phdJrtsJpNvspPvE-KVc3Lq41QWXiElKATBC--sLdCa6CylP7qnXfy6mJ2dmfNz-ylXE7a5rJJz6JiIIvpYzZPb-XaoiHvb_z6jzGTM0t9jwg9SGSbdJmTPPr6cf9vGYqVKNQBgNhnO8Pytlxur0w3u0j9idb8Azff_w6sfiAcZfcJJcpeH4k5oRuL-jljCZiQOE3PIBl4D09K6kK8_WeStzZbuLLZszO1IHOQiOuo5h4pHIpD_AReRAKvidfCZK97XcLJ2FwRI4bRZXzYb98PBkg99vIPTncp2oO8BvbYfJBmjNy3Qw1eQhIHZTyHxGR-KL_MPy_cfiyzpUCDlwl2hphi0kcEbJ_1Ey1BaXeKEIrL05QQNYlCRUZlXlZ0FLXFlDRKmjrgyPlr1WOw1l014KsBVelbJKmqNpQ7TaOMKNTUDUoYbUR8JPQxljZnvnGU3vtdyS4uaBqPmwajzYByJ8dbsZyL8uM3A7vpJ3fU7LTHJotTqFtvjwanqHDvaujSGKZJKUz37h66fi3vc7IuM1LHY666uwwtxF391F-3Vy36W_Aa-BAuM
linkProvider	Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Rb9MwED7BQAIhwSgDBgPuAcFTSh07qc3bhKhWEfqACuzNcly7mgQZWgJS_z2-2Kk6IbQHeEwsO1HufL5zPn8fwEtjWFH7gmU1t6FACSl4VhulMqukNyqUP6KnXfxSTRcLeXqqds_CEKySamgfiSL6WE2TmzajB0jcm_7_WShNxqT9PQ4JBOOyvA43irDWEqxvOfu6jcac53xIganPcIrnb8NcWp8usZf-Ea37JWh273-8_D7cTQkoHkePuQ_XXDOCOzt6CZsRHETykA2-QmKmNS7df1Sl3c02tFRbQuZ2BPsJRxdGTtHiAbjggkg4EiRhvA4_Eeh9jcdrcxZyUpw36_NmY74bXNK5j7c43wG3Y_gg2Mv7YVQyet1iePgKozYwuSpGSuMD-Dx7v3x3kiVVh8yGcrjLeGGdkMzV0rB6IpjLlcjtJARlVucTK6113FNiVvNSTZ1gdqWkDWm1tytZe8Ufwl5z3rjHgKYU05KVXgibC1d45VdWhEtnQ5HrrTgEMdhS20R5Tsob3zTbMqNGY2gyhk7GOITxttuPyPlxVQe16yi66zdbfFRG0fyKvkeDV-kUPlqdS0ksSbksn_zD0C_g1snyY6Wr-eLDU7hNTT3miB_BXnfx0z2Dm_ZXd9ZePO-nzG-W0Q-t
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fb9MwED6NgRBCglHGfjDADwieUurYTW3eJraKiqqaUIG9Wc7FriaxbFoypP73869UnRDaw3hMrHOi-Hy-cz5_H8B7remwtEOalQxdgeJS8KzUUmYohdXSlT880C7-nI5mM3F6Kk8SmrBJsEpfQ9tIFBFitZ_cl5XtEHGfwu8zV5n0vfR33-UPlIniATwM5FjOpefjX6tgzFjOugzY23SHeP7Vza3l6RZ56V_BOqxA4-f_4d234FlKP8lh9JcXsGHqHjxdU0tY9mA7UocsyQfieWm1Sfd3pmlvs3Et0xUdc9ODrYSicz2nWPESjHNA4lEkxMviteS7h7wvyOFCn7mMlEzqxUW91OeazP2pj89ksgZtJ-57kCDuR6KO0ceGuIdXJCoDe0clkdB4G36Mj-dfvmZJ0yFDVwy3GRui4YKaUmhaDjg1ueQ5DlxIpmU-QIFomPVpWckKOTKcYiUFuqTaYiVKK9kr2KwvarMLRBd8VNDCco45N0MrbYXcXRp0Ja5Fvge8G0qFifDc6278VnTFixoHQ_nBUGkw9qC_MruMjB93Gch1P1Ft2GqxURdFsTtsDzqnUil4NCoXwnMk5aLYv0fX7-DxydFYTSezb6_hiW8JgCN2AJvt1bV5A4_wT3vWXL0NE-YGHdwOUQ
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+High+Court+Ruling+Against+Ingonyama+Trust%3A+Implications+for+South+Africa%E2%80%99s+Land+Governance+Policy&rft.jtitle=African+studies+%28Johannesburg%29&rft.au=Manona%2C+Siyabulela&rft.au=Kepe%2C+Thembela&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0002-0184&rft.eissn=1469-2872&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F00020184.2023.2261386&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-0184&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-0184&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-0184&client=summon