A randomized controlled trial of real versus sham acupuncture for basal thumb joint arthritis

We report a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing acupuncture to sham (non-penetrating) needling for relief of symptoms of basal thumb joint arthritis. Seventy acupuncture naive patients with basal thumb joint arthritis were randomized to receive true acupuncture or sham needling with...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:The Journal of hand surgery, European volume Ročník 45; číslo 5; s. 488
Hlavní autoři: Barnard, Anna, Jansen, Victoria, Swindells, Mark G, Arundell, Melanie, Burke, Frank D
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England 01.06.2020
Témata:
ISSN:2043-6289, 2043-6289
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:We report a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing acupuncture to sham (non-penetrating) needling for relief of symptoms of basal thumb joint arthritis. Seventy acupuncture naive patients with basal thumb joint arthritis were randomized to receive true acupuncture or sham needling with 35 patients in each arm. Blinded baseline and post-treatment assessments included visual analogue pain scores for different grips and movement. Function was assessed using the Nelson questionnaire. Both groups showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in pain at week one post-treatment compared with baseline, but there was no difference between the treatment groups. The pain relief was comparable with published data for some standard treatments. Acupuncture did not perform better than sham needling in this study, indicating that pain relief may have been achieved through non-specific mechanisms. I.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:2043-6289
2043-6289
DOI:10.1177/1753193420911326