Testing a novel extended educational technology acceptance model using student attitudes towards virtual classrooms

Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study extends Davis' technology acceptance model to specifically evaluate educational technologies in higher education, focusing on virtual clas...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:British journal of educational technology Ročník 55; číslo 5; s. 2110 - 2131
Hlavní autoři: Kemp, Andrew, Palmer, Edward, Strelan, Peter, Thompson, Helen (Mery)
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Coventry Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2024
Témata:
ISSN:0007-1013, 1467-8535
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study extends Davis' technology acceptance model to specifically evaluate educational technologies in higher education, focusing on virtual classrooms. Prior research informed the construction of the model, which contains perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioural intent, access and convenience, system attributes and self‐efficacy. Education‐specific constructs include cognitive engagement, feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication. Additionally, a new construct called comfort and well‐being is introduced. A total of 427 valid responses on a 5‐point Likert scale were received from university students. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data. The model accounted for 78% of variance of behavioural intent, with comfort and well‐being demonstrating the strongest influence. Cognitive engagement, access and convenience influenced perceived usefulness, and system attributes and self‐efficacy influenced perceived ease of use. Feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication were not significant as educational constructs for this cohort. Based on this analysis, a final extended educational technology acceptance model (EETAM) is proposed for further use and testing.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Most technology acceptance models used in education were made for general technologies, or do not include factors specific to learning and pedagogy. Most students prefer face‐to‐face learning experiences and active class engagement. Qualitative research shows that instructional attributes and student comfort and well‐being are known to be important for students. What this paper adds A novel extended educational technology acceptance model, informed by prior empirical research, is presented. Confirmation of the importance of including student comfort and well‐being in technology acceptance models used in education. The model revealed the heterogeneous nature of the student learning experience. Implications for practice and research Technology acceptance models used in educational settings should include factors specific for education and learning, and student comfort and well‐being. We encourage use of the presented model in educational settings to further test the model.
AbstractList Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study extends Davis' technology acceptance model to specifically evaluate educational technologies in higher education, focusing on virtual classrooms. Prior research informed the construction of the model, which contains perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioural intent, access and convenience, system attributes and self‐efficacy. Education‐specific constructs include cognitive engagement, feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication. Additionally, a new construct called comfort and well‐being is introduced. A total of 427 valid responses on a 5‐point Likert scale were received from university students. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data. The model accounted for 78% of variance of behavioural intent, with comfort and well‐being demonstrating the strongest influence. Cognitive engagement, access and convenience influenced perceived usefulness, and system attributes and self‐efficacy influenced perceived ease of use. Feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication were not significant as educational constructs for this cohort. Based on this analysis, a final extended educational technology acceptance model (EETAM) is proposed for further use and testing.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topicMost technology acceptance models used in education were made for general technologies, or do not include factors specific to learning and pedagogy.Most students prefer face‐to‐face learning experiences and active class engagement.Qualitative research shows that instructional attributes and student comfort and well‐being are known to be important for students.What this paper addsA novel extended educational technology acceptance model, informed by prior empirical research, is presented.Confirmation of the importance of including student comfort and well‐being in technology acceptance models used in education.The model revealed the heterogeneous nature of the student learning experience.Implications for practice and researchTechnology acceptance models used in educational settings should include factors specific for education and learning, and student comfort and well‐being.We encourage use of the presented model in educational settings to further test the model.
Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study extends Davis' technology acceptance model to specifically evaluate educational technologies in higher education, focusing on virtual classrooms. Prior research informed the construction of the model, which contains perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioural intent, access and convenience, system attributes and self‐efficacy. Education‐specific constructs include cognitive engagement, feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication. Additionally, a new construct called comfort and well‐being is introduced. A total of 427 valid responses on a 5‐point Likert scale were received from university students. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data. The model accounted for 78% of variance of behavioural intent, with comfort and well‐being demonstrating the strongest influence. Cognitive engagement, access and convenience influenced perceived usefulness, and system attributes and self‐efficacy influenced perceived ease of use. Feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication were not significant as educational constructs for this cohort. Based on this analysis, a final extended educational technology acceptance model (EETAM) is proposed for further use and testing. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Most technology acceptance models used in education were made for general technologies, or do not include factors specific to learning and pedagogy. Most students prefer face‐to‐face learning experiences and active class engagement. Qualitative research shows that instructional attributes and student comfort and well‐being are known to be important for students. What this paper adds A novel extended educational technology acceptance model, informed by prior empirical research, is presented. Confirmation of the importance of including student comfort and well‐being in technology acceptance models used in education. The model revealed the heterogeneous nature of the student learning experience. Implications for practice and research Technology acceptance models used in educational settings should include factors specific for education and learning, and student comfort and well‐being. We encourage use of the presented model in educational settings to further test the model.
Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study extends Davis' technology acceptance model to specifically evaluate educational technologies in higher education, focusing on virtual classrooms. Prior research informed the construction of the model, which contains perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioural intent, access and convenience, system attributes and self‐efficacy. Education‐specific constructs include cognitive engagement, feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication. Additionally, a new construct called comfort and well‐being is introduced. A total of 427 valid responses on a 5‐point Likert scale were received from university students. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data. The model accounted for 78% of variance of behavioural intent, with comfort and well‐being demonstrating the strongest influence. Cognitive engagement, access and convenience influenced perceived usefulness, and system attributes and self‐efficacy influenced perceived ease of use. Feedback, instructor practice and class interaction and communication were not significant as educational constructs for this cohort. Based on this analysis, a final extended educational technology acceptance model (EETAM) is proposed for further use and testing.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Most technology acceptance models used in education were made for general technologies, or do not include factors specific to learning and pedagogy. Most students prefer face‐to‐face learning experiences and active class engagement. Qualitative research shows that instructional attributes and student comfort and well‐being are known to be important for students. What this paper adds A novel extended educational technology acceptance model, informed by prior empirical research, is presented. Confirmation of the importance of including student comfort and well‐being in technology acceptance models used in education. The model revealed the heterogeneous nature of the student learning experience. Implications for practice and research Technology acceptance models used in educational settings should include factors specific for education and learning, and student comfort and well‐being. We encourage use of the presented model in educational settings to further test the model.
Author Kemp, Andrew
Thompson, Helen (Mery)
Palmer, Edward
Strelan, Peter
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Andrew
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2135-6634
  surname: Kemp
  fullname: Kemp, Andrew
  email: andrew.c.kemp@adelaide.edu.au
  organization: The University of Adelaide
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Edward
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9654-5213
  surname: Palmer
  fullname: Palmer, Edward
  organization: The University of Adelaide
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Peter
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3796-1935
  surname: Strelan
  fullname: Strelan, Peter
  organization: The University of Adelaide
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Helen (Mery)
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7006-3646
  surname: Thompson
  fullname: Thompson, Helen (Mery)
  organization: Queensland University of Technology
BookMark eNp9kE1LAzEURYNUsK1u_AUBd8LUl8l8damlflFwU9dDmrypU6ZJTTKt_fdmOq5EzCYJnPN4947IQBuNhFwzmLBw7lYb9BPGkwTOyJAlWR4VKU8HZAgAecSA8Qsycm4TvsDTZEjcEp2v9ZoKqs0eG4pfHrVCRVG1UvjaaNFQj_JDm8asj1RIiTsvtES6NSoIret051uF2lPhfd09HfXmIKxydF9b34YZshHOWWO27pKcV6JxePVzj8n743w5e44Wb08vs_tFJDnPIcpyUExinsVFrgrI-KrgouBTENW04ikKUaUrnhSsiGNAJQMCU85TYKoSLFN8TG76uTtrPtuQs9yY1oY8ruQwjVkc89DOmEBPSWvCgliVsvan4N6KuikZlF21ZVdteao2KLe_lJ2tt8Ie_4ZZDx_qBo__kOXD63zZO98LMI3v
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_iot6030042
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOTB_04_2025_0103
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10671_025_09401_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2025_1642266
crossref_primary_10_1177_13621688241277911
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_025_07460_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sftr_2025_100531
crossref_primary_10_3390_su17083592
crossref_primary_10_21833_ijaas_2025_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1155_hbe2_5599169
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2025_3557006
crossref_primary_10_24193_ed21_2024_28_12
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssaho_2025_101831
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2025_3535618
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13591_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_025_07705_7
Cites_doi 10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174
10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991
10.1080/10705519909540118
10.3758/s13428‐015‐0619‐7
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
10.1080/13502930701321378
10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.005
10.28945/3522
10.1111/bjet.13044
10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
10.29333/iji.2019.1241a
10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
10.14742/ajet.2890
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854
10.18637/jss.v048.i02
10.1037/edu0000241
10.1002/cae.22301
10.1177/0735633120988530
10.1111/j.1468‐5914.1983.tb00469.x
10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
10.1111/j.1540‐5915.2008.00192.x
10.1007/s11135‐008‐9190‐y
10.20853/35‐2‐4025
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003
10.1080/02681102.2018.1476831
10.1080/01449290600958965
10.1007/s11423‐019‐09650‐x
10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621
10.3316/informit.392608095416995
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
10.3390/su13052531
10.1177/0033688219890350
10.4018/ijwltt.2014070103
10.1007/s10639‐018‐9720‐8
10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2008.00913.x
10.1111/bjet.12798
10.1111/j.1467‐9620.2006.00684.x
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103713
10.1111/bjet.12833
10.1007/s10639‐019‐09916‐0
10.1108/17415651211258281
10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
10.17718/tojde.762034
10.2190/EC.49.1.e
10.2307/249008
10.1007/s10639‐018‐9761‐z
10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11660
10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
10.1037/0033‐2909.103.3.411
10.14742/ajet.7388
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
10.1111/bjet.13298
10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.024
10.3991/ijac.v9i2.6000
10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
10.1111/bjet.12465
10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16821
10.1007/s00340‐009‐3513‐0
10.2307/30036540
10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2995
10.1007/BF00117714
10.5465/ambpp.2012.15828abstract
10.1023/A:1008191211004
10.1016/S1047‐8310(02)00049‐4
10.2307/3151312
10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2011.01232.x
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
10.1111/nejo.12339
10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
10.17718/tojde.285715
10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732
10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2010.01109.x
10.1007/s11423‐018‐9581‐2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association.
2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association.
– notice: 2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
7SC
8FD
AHOVV
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
DOI 10.1111/bjet.13440
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Education Research Index
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitleList Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1467-8535
EndPage 2131
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_bjet_13440
BJET13440
Genre article
GroupedDBID -W8
-~X
.3N
.GA
.GO
.Y3
05W
07C
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
23N
24P
31~
33P
3EH
4.4
41~
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A04
AABNI
AAESR
AAHQN
AAHSB
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYJJ
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABDPE
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABSOO
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNMO
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AHBTC
AHEFC
AI.
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMBU
DRSSH
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBS
EDJ
EJD
EMK
EST
ESX
F00
F01
F5P
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
G50
GODZA
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LPU
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MXFUL
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P4C
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QF4
QM7
QN7
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPD
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TUS
UB1
V8K
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WGMDG
WH7
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WQZ
WSUWO
WXSBR
XG1
XOL
ZCA
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
AAYXX
AIQQE
CITATION
O8X
7SC
8FD
AHOVV
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-670d1ce76287d8063b83a8390af9f35eaaf5b34818220edc8060933501dfa16d3
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISICitedReferencesCount 16
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001215309500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0007-1013
IngestDate Sat Aug 23 13:30:20 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:38:16 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:59:51 EST 2025
Sun Jul 06 04:45:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3370-670d1ce76287d8063b83a8390af9f35eaaf5b34818220edc8060933501dfa16d3
Notes Correction added on 13th March 2024, after first online publication: The second author’s ORCID iD has been added in this version.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-2135-6634
0000-0002-3796-1935
0000-0001-7006-3646
0000-0001-9654-5213
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbjet.13440
PQID 3092122385
PQPubID 47505
PageCount 22
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_3092122385
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_bjet_13440
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13440
wiley_primary_10_1111_bjet_13440_BJET13440
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2024
2024-09-00
20240901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2024
  text: September 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Coventry
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Coventry
PublicationTitle British journal of educational technology
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 2017; 1
2019; 50
2017; 48
2000; 46
2009a; 40
2002; 13
2013; 61
2019; 12
2023; 2023
2019; 14
2008; 39
1988; 103
2020; 15
2008; 6
2017; 111
2009b; 52
2012; 13
2017; 115
1983; 13
2009; 12
2021; 35
2009; 52
2015; 49
2009; 53
2000
2020; 51
2019; 24
2017; 33
2000; 11
2019; 67
2008; 27
1986
2014; 9
2009; 19
1989; 35
2016; 48
2022; 38
2013; 49
2022; 191
2020; 41
2017; 25
2010
2020; 143
2008
2005; 42
2020; 107
2020; 36
2020; 144
2012; 38
2018; 23
2018; 66
2016; 16
2021; 52
1999; 6
2016; 15
2010; 41
2016; 56
2007; 15
2018; 24
2010; 44
2021; 13
2021; 16
2018; 110
2021; 59
2006; 108
2013; 33
2023
2020; 151
2020
2006; 47
2020; 28
2011; 42
2019
2003; 27
1981; 18
2016
2017; 18
2015
2020; 21
2013
2012; 48
2014; 30
1989; 13
2016; 9
1989; 18
2007; 49
2012; 9
e_1_2_11_93_1
e_1_2_11_91_1
Tobing V. (e_1_2_11_85_1) 2008
e_1_2_11_55_1
e_1_2_11_78_1
e_1_2_11_30_1
e_1_2_11_57_1
e_1_2_11_36_1
e_1_2_11_51_1
e_1_2_11_74_1
e_1_2_11_13_1
e_1_2_11_34_1
e_1_2_11_53_1
e_1_2_11_76_1
e_1_2_11_95_1
e_1_2_11_11_1
e_1_2_11_29_1
e_1_2_11_6_1
e_1_2_11_27_1
e_1_2_11_4_1
e_1_2_11_48_1
e_1_2_11_2_1
Kline R. B. (e_1_2_11_42_1) 2016
RStudio Team (e_1_2_11_72_1) 2015
e_1_2_11_83_1
e_1_2_11_60_1
e_1_2_11_81_1
Revelle W. (e_1_2_11_70_1) 2019
e_1_2_11_20_1
e_1_2_11_45_1
e_1_2_11_66_1
e_1_2_11_47_1
e_1_2_11_68_1
e_1_2_11_89_1
e_1_2_11_24_1
e_1_2_11_41_1
e_1_2_11_62_1
e_1_2_11_87_1
e_1_2_11_8_1
e_1_2_11_22_1
e_1_2_11_43_1
e_1_2_11_64_1
e_1_2_11_17_1
e_1_2_11_15_1
e_1_2_11_59_1
Hamilton L. S. (e_1_2_11_32_1) 2020
e_1_2_11_38_1
e_1_2_11_19_1
e_1_2_11_94_1
e_1_2_11_50_1
e_1_2_11_71_1
e_1_2_11_92_1
e_1_2_11_90_1
e_1_2_11_56_1
e_1_2_11_77_1
e_1_2_11_58_1
e_1_2_11_79_1
e_1_2_11_14_1
e_1_2_11_52_1
e_1_2_11_73_1
e_1_2_11_33_1
e_1_2_11_54_1
e_1_2_11_75_1
e_1_2_11_96_1
e_1_2_11_7_1
e_1_2_11_28_1
e_1_2_11_5_1
Askew S. (e_1_2_11_10_1) 2000
e_1_2_11_26_1
e_1_2_11_3_1
e_1_2_11_49_1
Hooper D. (e_1_2_11_35_1) 2008; 6
Hair J. F. (e_1_2_11_31_1) 2010
e_1_2_11_82_1
e_1_2_11_61_1
e_1_2_11_80_1
e_1_2_11_21_1
e_1_2_11_44_1
e_1_2_11_67_1
e_1_2_11_46_1
e_1_2_11_69_1
e_1_2_11_88_1
e_1_2_11_25_1
e_1_2_11_40_1
e_1_2_11_63_1
e_1_2_11_86_1
e_1_2_11_9_1
e_1_2_11_23_1
e_1_2_11_65_1
e_1_2_11_84_1
e_1_2_11_18_1
e_1_2_11_16_1
Bandura A. (e_1_2_11_12_1) 1986
e_1_2_11_37_1
e_1_2_11_39_1
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 155
  issue: 2
  year: 1983
  end-page: 164
  article-title: Ajzen and Fishbein's “theory of reasoned action”: A critical assessment
  publication-title: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
– volume: 24
  start-page: 3205
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  end-page: 3218
  article-title: Re‐examining the relationship between ease of use and usefulness for the net generation
  publication-title: Education and Information Technologies
– volume: 9
  start-page: 20
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 27
  article-title: Virtual environments in higher education—Immersion as a key construct for learning
  publication-title: International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1139
  issue: 6
  year: 2009a
  end-page: 1141
  article-title: Is there an attitude problem? Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: Colloquium
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Investigating student's acceptance of an EDMODO content management system
  publication-title: International Journal of Instruction
– volume: 56
  start-page: 238
  year: 2016
  end-page: 256
  article-title: Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E‐learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 24
  start-page: 582
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  end-page: 611
  article-title: Investigating critical success factors in online learning environments in higher education systems in the Caribbean
  publication-title: Information Technology for Development
– volume: 9
  start-page: 37
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 52
  article-title: Investigating students' acceptance and self‐efficacy of E‐learning at Al‐Aqsa university based on TAM model
  publication-title: International Journal of Web‐Based Learning and Teaching Technologies
– volume: 27
  start-page: 495
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  end-page: 505
  article-title: A technological acceptance of e‐learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area
  publication-title: Behaviour & Information Technology
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Zoom in, zoom out: The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the classroom
  publication-title: Sustainability (Switzerland)
– volume: 33
  start-page: 50
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  end-page: 62
  article-title: A study of students' attitudes towards using ICT in a social constructivist environment
  publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 44
  start-page: 153
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 166
  article-title: Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables
  publication-title: Quality and Quantity
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2005
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2008
  article-title: The role of attitudes in the TAM: A theoretically unnecessary construct?
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 112
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  end-page: 139
  article-title: The influence of technical support, perceived self‐efficacy, and instructional design on students' use of learning management systems
  publication-title: Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE)
– volume: 13
  start-page: 319
  issue: 3
  year: 1989
  end-page: 340
  article-title: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
  publication-title: MIS Quarterly
– volume: 191
  start-page: 1
  issue: September 2021
  year: 2022
  end-page: 15
  article-title: How do social presence and active learning in synchronous and asynchronous online classes relate to students' perceived course gains?
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 18
– volume: 33
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 80
  article-title: Exploring the roles of interaction and flow in explaining nurses' e‐learning acceptance
  publication-title: Nurse Education Today
– volume: 52
  start-page: 599
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 607
  article-title: Impact of media richness and flow on e‐learning technology acceptance
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 9
  start-page: 171
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 183
  article-title: Predicting college students' acceptance of podcasting as a learning tool
  publication-title: Interactive Technology and Smart Education
– year: 1986
– volume: 11
  start-page: 261
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 275
  article-title: A meta‐analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis
  publication-title: Marketing Letters
– volume: 16
  start-page: 60
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  end-page: 79
  article-title: Antecedents of blackboard adoption by lecturers at a south African higher education institution—Extending GETAMEL
  publication-title: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
– volume: 14
  start-page: 4
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students' use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education
  publication-title: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
– volume: 67
  start-page: 749
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  end-page: 766
  article-title: Factors that influence university students' intention to use Moodle: A study in Macau
  publication-title: Educational Technology Research & Development
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1036
  issue: 6
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1055
  article-title: Who's there? Characterizing interaction in virtual classrooms
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– volume: 52
  start-page: 879
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  end-page: 898
  article-title: Perceived teacher support and students' acceptance of mobile‐assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2341
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2361
  article-title: E‐learning services acceptance in higher educational institutes: A case study in Brunei
  publication-title: Education and Information Technologies
– volume: 25
  start-page: 513
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 527
  article-title: The influence of teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance
  publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments
– volume: 48
  start-page: 940
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 949
  article-title: Explaining the discrepancy in the mediating role of attitude in the TAM
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 35
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice‐oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB
  publication-title: International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning
– volume: 36
  start-page: 535
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 560
  article-title: Designing binge‐worthy courses: Pandemic pleasures and COVID‐19 consequences
  publication-title: Negotiation Journal
– volume: 13
  start-page: 228
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 261
  article-title: Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms
  publication-title: International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
– volume: 11
  start-page: 342
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  end-page: 365
  article-title: Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Information Systems Research
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 36
  article-title: Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling
  publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software
– volume: 27
  start-page: 425
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 478
  article-title: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view
  publication-title: MIS Quarterly
– volume: 52
  start-page: 302
  issue: 2
  year: 2009b
  end-page: 312
  article-title: Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre‐service teachers
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 15
  start-page: 158
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 178
  article-title: An empirical investigation on students' acceptance of (SM) use for teaching and learning
  publication-title: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
– volume: 38
  start-page: 15
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Exploring the specification of educational compatibility of virtual reality within a technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 18
  issue: 1
  year: 1981
  article-title: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
– year: 2008
– volume: 24
  start-page: 79
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 102
  article-title: Decision to adopt online collaborative learning tools in higher education: A case of top Malaysian universities
  publication-title: Education and Information Technologies
– volume: 103
  start-page: 411
  issue: 3
  year: 1988
  end-page: 423
  article-title: Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two‐step approach
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 15
  start-page: 253
  year: 2016
  end-page: 282
  article-title: The adoption of blended e‐learning technology in Vietnam using a revision of the technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Journal of Information Technology Education: Research
– volume: 39
  start-page: 273
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 315
  article-title: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions
  publication-title: Decision Sciences
– volume: 19
  start-page: 158
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 170
  article-title: The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e‐learning in statistics
  publication-title: Learning and Instruction
– volume: 12
  start-page: 150
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 162
  article-title: An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university Students' behavioral intention to use e‐learning
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Technology & Society
– volume: 48
  start-page: 936
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  end-page: 949
  article-title: Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1278
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1290
  article-title: Understanding student perceptions of worked example videos through the technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Computer Applications in Engineering Education
– volume: 18
  start-page: 119
  issue: 2
  year: 1989
  end-page: 144
  article-title: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
  publication-title: Instructional Science
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design
  publication-title: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
– year: 2019
– volume: 115
  start-page: 153
  year: 2017
  end-page: 160
  article-title: Effects of different interactions on students' sense of community in e‐learning environment
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 18
  start-page: 52
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 62
  article-title: The role of self‐efficacy in predicting use of distance education tools and learning management systems
  publication-title: Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE)
– volume: 15
  start-page: 167
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 181
  article-title: Juggling the balls—Study, work, family and play: Student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy
  publication-title: European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
– year: 2015
– volume: 42
  start-page: 317
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  end-page: 327
  article-title: The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on‐line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Information and Management
– volume: 46
  start-page: 186
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  end-page: 204
  article-title: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies
  publication-title: Management Science
– volume: 107
  year: 2020
  article-title: Network path analysis for developing an enhanced TAM model: A user‐centric e‐learning perspective
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 110
  start-page: 785
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  end-page: 797
  article-title: Learning science in immersive virtual reality
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology
– volume: 50
  start-page: 2394
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2413
  article-title: A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1017
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1054
  article-title: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge
  publication-title: Teachers College Record (1970)
– volume: 2023
  start-page: 857
  year: 2023
  end-page: 877
  article-title: Video demonstrations can predict the intention to use digital learning technologies
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 55
  article-title: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
  publication-title: Structural Equation Modeling
– volume: 61
  start-page: 193
  year: 2013
  end-page: 208
  article-title: User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 13
  start-page: 203
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  end-page: 223
  article-title: Managing the on‐line classroom. A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web‐based MBA courses
  publication-title: Journal of High Technology Management Research
– year: 2020
  article-title: Teaching and leading through a pandemic: Key findings from the American educator panels spring 2020 COVID‐19 surveys
  publication-title: Insights from the American Educator Panels
– volume: 6
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 60
  article-title: Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit
  publication-title: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
– volume: 144
  issue: 152
  year: 2020
  article-title: Instructor presence in video lectures: Eye gaze matters, but not body orientation
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 41
  start-page: E142
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  end-page: E145
  article-title: Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: An answer to Teo (2009a)
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 49
  start-page: 396
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 413
  article-title: Critical success factors for e‐learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 35
  start-page: 188
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  end-page: 206
  article-title: External factors affecting blackboard learning management system adoption by students: Evidence from a historically disadvantaged higher education institution in South Africa
  publication-title: South African Journal of Higher Education
– volume: 30
  start-page: 562
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  end-page: 579
  article-title: An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing E‐learning acceptance
  publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 151
  issue: September 2019
  year: 2020
  article-title: Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 111
  start-page: 128
  year: 2017
  end-page: 143
  article-title: Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e‐learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for E‐learning approach
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 53
  start-page: 216
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 227
  article-title: The role of perceived user‐interface design in continued usage intention of self‐paced e‐learning tools
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 35
  start-page: 982
  issue: 8
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1003
  article-title: User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models
  publication-title: Management Science
– volume: 49
  start-page: 111
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 132
  article-title: Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self‐efficacy in Mobile learning adoption
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– year: 2016
– year: 2010
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Effective use of zoom technology and instructional videos to improve engagement and success of distance students in engineering
  publication-title: Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2017)
– volume: 41
  start-page: 429
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 452
  article-title: Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience
  publication-title: Distance Education
– volume: 47
  start-page: 222
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 244
  article-title: The influence of system characteristics on e‐learning use
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– year: 2023
– volume: 51
  start-page: 198
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 204
  article-title: Using Mentimeter to elicit student responses in the EAP/ESP classroom
  publication-title: RELC Journal
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1141
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1164
  article-title: A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education
  publication-title: Educational Technology Research and Development
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1320
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1329
  article-title: Learners' acceptance of e‐learning in South Korea: Theories and results
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– volume: 50
  start-page: 2414
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2432
  article-title: Examination of students' acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 127
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 149
  article-title: Assessing acceptance toward wiki technology in the context of higher education
  publication-title: The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
– volume: 49
  start-page: 272
  year: 2015
  end-page: 281
  article-title: Modeling the acceptance of e‐learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 16
  start-page: 537
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 552
  article-title: Using Horn's parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors
  publication-title: Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri
– volume: 143
  start-page: 1
  issue: April 2019
  year: 2020
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students' engagement and the effect of quizzes
  publication-title: Computers and Education
– year: 2013
– volume: 6
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_11_35_1
  article-title: Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit
  publication-title: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
– ident: e_1_2_11_83_1
  doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
– ident: e_1_2_11_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
– ident: e_1_2_11_54_1
  doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174
– ident: e_1_2_11_93_1
  doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991
– ident: e_1_2_11_36_1
  doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
– ident: e_1_2_11_47_1
  doi: 10.3758/s13428‐015‐0619‐7
– ident: e_1_2_11_51_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
– ident: e_1_2_11_9_1
  doi: 10.1080/13502930701321378
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Feedback for learning
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_11_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.005
– ident: e_1_2_11_39_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_86_1
  doi: 10.28945/3522
– volume-title: Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_11_70_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.13044
– ident: e_1_2_11_20_1
  doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
– ident: e_1_2_11_96_1
  doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.1241a
– ident: e_1_2_11_78_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
– ident: e_1_2_11_94_1
  doi: 10.14742/ajet.2890
– volume-title: Social foundations of thought and action—A social cognitive theory
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_11_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_73_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854
– ident: e_1_2_11_71_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
– ident: e_1_2_11_62_1
  doi: 10.1037/edu0000241
– ident: e_1_2_11_22_1
  doi: 10.1002/cae.22301
– ident: e_1_2_11_91_1
  doi: 10.1177/0735633120988530
– volume-title: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_11_42_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_76_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468‐5914.1983.tb00469.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_16_1
  doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
– ident: e_1_2_11_88_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540‐5915.2008.00192.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_34_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11135‐008‐9190‐y
– ident: e_1_2_11_57_1
  doi: 10.20853/35‐2‐4025
– ident: e_1_2_11_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003
– ident: e_1_2_11_14_1
  doi: 10.1080/02681102.2018.1476831
– ident: e_1_2_11_55_1
  doi: 10.1080/01449290600958965
– ident: e_1_2_11_84_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11423‐019‐09650‐x
– ident: e_1_2_11_69_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621
– volume-title: 5th international conference on eLearning for knowledge‐based society, Special Issue of the International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_11_85_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_77_1
  doi: 10.3316/informit.392608095416995
– ident: e_1_2_11_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
– ident: e_1_2_11_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
– ident: e_1_2_11_67_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
– ident: e_1_2_11_38_1
  doi: 10.3390/su13052531
– ident: e_1_2_11_59_1
  doi: 10.1177/0033688219890350
– volume-title: RStudio: Integrated Development for R
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_11_72_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_52_1
  doi: 10.4018/ijwltt.2014070103
– ident: e_1_2_11_68_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10639‐018‐9720‐8
– ident: e_1_2_11_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
– ident: e_1_2_11_81_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2008.00913.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_30_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_28_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12798
– ident: e_1_2_11_58_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9620.2006.00684.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_64_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103713
– ident: e_1_2_11_40_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12833
– ident: e_1_2_11_79_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10639‐019‐09916‐0
– ident: e_1_2_11_95_1
  doi: 10.1108/17415651211258281
– ident: e_1_2_11_89_1
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
– ident: e_1_2_11_87_1
  doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
– ident: e_1_2_11_74_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
– ident: e_1_2_11_66_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_3_1
  doi: 10.17718/tojde.762034
– ident: e_1_2_11_13_1
  doi: 10.2190/EC.49.1.e
– ident: e_1_2_11_24_1
  doi: 10.2307/249008
– ident: e_1_2_11_92_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10639‐018‐9761‐z
– ident: e_1_2_11_5_1
  doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11660
– ident: e_1_2_11_21_1
  doi: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
– ident: e_1_2_11_25_1
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
– ident: e_1_2_11_6_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.103.3.411
– ident: e_1_2_11_41_1
  doi: 10.14742/ajet.7388
– ident: e_1_2_11_48_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
– ident: e_1_2_11_80_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.13298
– ident: e_1_2_11_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.024
– ident: e_1_2_11_37_1
  doi: 10.3991/ijac.v9i2.6000
– ident: e_1_2_11_23_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_65_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
– ident: e_1_2_11_50_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12465
– ident: e_1_2_11_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
– ident: e_1_2_11_56_1
  doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16821
– ident: e_1_2_11_61_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00340‐009‐3513‐0
– year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_11_32_1
  article-title: Teaching and leading through a pandemic: Key findings from the American educator panels spring 2020 COVID‐19 surveys
  publication-title: Insights from the American Educator Panels
– ident: e_1_2_11_90_1
  doi: 10.2307/30036540
– ident: e_1_2_11_4_1
  doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2995
– ident: e_1_2_11_75_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
– ident: e_1_2_11_46_1
  doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2012.15828abstract
– ident: e_1_2_11_63_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1008191211004
– ident: e_1_2_11_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1047‐8310(02)00049‐4
– ident: e_1_2_11_29_1
  doi: 10.2307/3151312
– ident: e_1_2_11_49_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2011.01232.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_82_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
– ident: e_1_2_11_27_1
  doi: 10.1111/nejo.12339
– ident: e_1_2_11_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
– volume-title: Multivariate data analysis
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_11_31_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_8_1
  doi: 10.17718/tojde.285715
– ident: e_1_2_11_15_1
  doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732
– ident: e_1_2_11_60_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2010.01109.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_53_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11423‐018‐9581‐2
SSID ssj0000354
Score 2.480106
Snippet Many technology acceptance models used in education were originally designed for general technologies and later adopted by education researchers. This study...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2110
SubjectTerms Acceptance tests
Classrooms
Colleges & universities
Comfort
Discriminant analysis
Education
Educational technology
Effectiveness
Factor analysis
Feedback
Learning
Learning Experience
Likert Scales
Online instruction
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative research
student well‐being
Students
Teachers
Technology Acceptance Model
technology acceptance models
Technology assessment
Virtual Classrooms
Title Testing a novel extended educational technology acceptance model using student attitudes towards virtual classrooms
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbjet.13440
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3092122385
Volume 55
WOSCitedRecordID wos001215309500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1467-8535
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000354
  issn: 0007-1013
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fS8MwEA7D-eCLv8XpHAF9UaikTbum4Is_NkRkDNlgbyVJ0zGRKmvd3-9d2m4TRBDf-nAtJcndfTm--46Qi64vhSvBARnTqeOHSjgiNYETauX5KUsjoYQdNhEOBmIyiYYNclP3wpT6EMuCG3qGjdfo4FLla06uXk1x7XLfhwt703W5wMENnj9cxWEelBrMKIMISKcSJ0Uez-rd7-lohTHXkapNNf2d__3kLtmuICa9Lc_EHmmYbB-nM1dMjgOSj1BaI5tSSbP3hXmjdSWcmtoI3i-WRXcqNZJf8HxQOzmHIlt-SvNSF5PKAvkGiclpYUm4OV3M5tiXQnWNzfNDMu73RvePTjV8wdGch9gSwBJXG4iVIkwEABkluAQ0xWQapTwwUqaBwi5eQBjMJBpMsDgSMDdJpdtN-BHZyN4zc0woIEZPG0h7AC98w6R0VTfwVKQBGkEw9lvkst6DWFfK5Dgg4y2ubyi4jLFdxhY5X9p-lHocP1q1662MK5_MY84iyNMAUYIWubKb9ssX4run3sg-nfzF-JRseYB6ShJam2wU809zRjb1opjl8449nx3SfHjpj5-_AKy06v8
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF6kFfTiW6xWXdCLQmTzajZHHy1VaxFJobew2eyWSkmlif39zuTRVhBBvOUwCWF3Zvbb4ZtvCLlsOYKbAgKQMakNx4u4wbVyDU9GlqOZ9nnE82ETXr_Ph0P_teTmYC9MoQ-xKLhhZOT5GgMcC9IrUR69q-zGtB0Hbux1B_wIHLz-8NYZ9Jap2HYLGWZUQgSwU-qTIpVn-fb3E2kJM1fBan7adLb_-Z87ZKuEmfS28ItdsqaSPZzQXLI59kkaoLxGMqKCJtO5mtCqGk5VZQTvZ4vCOxUSCTDoIzSfnkORMT-iaaGNSUWGnINYpTTLibgpnY9n2JtCZYXP0wMy6LSD-65RDmAwpG172BbAYlMqyJfcizmAmYjbAhAVE9rXtquE0G6EnbyAMpiKJZhggcRlZqyF2YrtQ1JLpok6IhRQoyUVHH0AMRzFhDCjlmtFvgR4BAnZaZCrahNCWaqT45CMSVjdUnAZw3wZG-RiYftRaHL8aNWs9jIs4zINbebDWQ0wxW2Q63zXfvlCePfUDvKn478Yn5ONbvDSC3uP_ecTsmkBCipIaU1Sy2af6pSsy3k2Tmdnpbt-AaME7uU
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF6kFfHiW6xWXdCLQmTzajZHtQYfpRRpobew2eyWSklLE_v7ncmjrSCCeMthEsLuzsy3wzffEHLdcgQ3BTggY1Ibjhdxg2vlGp6MLEcz7fOI58MmvG6XD4d-r-TmYC9MoQ-xLLihZ-TxGh1czWK95uXRh8ruTNtx4MZed3CKTI3U2-_BoLMKxbZbyDCjEiKAnVKfFKk8q7e_Z6QVzFwHq3m2CXb_-Z97ZKeEmfS-OBf7ZEMlBzihuWRzHJK0j_IayYgKmkwXakKrajhVlRG8ny0L71RIJMDgGaH59ByKjPkRTQttTCoy5BzEKqVZTsRN6WI8x94UKit8nh6RQfDUf3w2ygEMhrRtD9sCWGxKBfGSezEHMBNxWwCiYkL72naVENqNsJMXUAZTsQQTLJC4zIy1MFuxfUxqyTRRJ4QCarSkgtQHEMNRTAgzarlW5EuARxCQnQa5qTYhlKU6OQ7JmITVLQWXMcyXsUGulrazQpPjR6tmtZdh6ZdpaDMfcjXAFLdBbvNd--UL4cPrUz9_Ov2L8SXZ6rWDsPPSfTsj2xaAoIKT1iS1bP6pzsmmXGTjdH5RntYvR-fuYA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing+a+novel+extended+educational+technology+acceptance+model+using+student+attitudes+towards+virtual+classrooms&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+educational+technology&rft.au=Kemp%2C+Andrew&rft.au=Palmer%2C+Edward&rft.au=Strelan%2C+Peter&rft.au=Helen+%28Mery%29+Thompson&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2110&rft.epage=2131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fbjet.13440&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-1013&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-1013&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-1013&client=summon