Modeling stimulus-dependent variability improves decoding of population neural responses

Neural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in response to different stimuli or during different movements (tuning curves) has been extensively modeled in a wide variety of neural systems. Howe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neural engineering Vol. 16; no. 6; p. 066018
Main Authors: Ghanbari, Abed, Lee, Christopher M, Read, Heather L, Stevenson, Ian H
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 25.10.2019
ISSN:1741-2552, 1741-2552
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Neural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in response to different stimuli or during different movements (tuning curves) has been extensively modeled in a wide variety of neural systems. However, the variability of neural responses can also have clear tuning independent of the tuning in the mean firing rate. This suggests that the variability could contain information regarding the stimulus/movement beyond what is encoded in the mean firing rate. Here we demonstrate how taking variability into account can improve neural decoding. In a typical neural coding model spike counts are assumed to be Poisson with the mean response depending on an external variable, such as a stimulus or movement. Bayesian decoding methods then use the probabilities under these Poisson tuning models (the likelihood) to estimate the probability of each stimulus given the spikes on a given trial (the posterior). However, under the Poisson model, spike count variability is always exactly equal to the mean (Fano factor  =  1). Here we use two alternative models-the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model and negative binomial (NB) model-to more flexibly characterize how neural variability depends on external stimuli. These models both contain the Poisson distribution as a special case but have an additional parameter that allows the variance to be greater than the mean (Fano factor  >  1) or, for the CMP model, less than the mean (Fano factor  <  1). We find that neural responses in primary motor (M1), visual (V1), and auditory (A1) cortices have diverse tuning in both their mean firing rates and response variability. Across cortical areas, we find that Bayesian decoders using the CMP or NB models improve stimulus/movement estimation accuracy by 4%-12% compared to the Poisson model. Moreover, the uncertainty of the non-Poisson decoders more accurately reflects the magnitude of estimation errors. In addition to tuning curves that reflect average neural responses, stimulus-dependent response variability may be an important aspect of the neural code. Modeling this structure could, potentially, lead to improvements in brain machine interfaces.
AbstractList Neural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in response to different stimuli or during different movements (tuning curves) has been extensively modeled in a wide variety of neural systems. However, the variability of neural responses can also have clear tuning independent of the tuning in the mean firing rate. This suggests that the variability could contain information regarding the stimulus/movement beyond what is encoded in the mean firing rate. Here we demonstrate how taking variability into account can improve neural decoding.OBJECTIVENeural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in response to different stimuli or during different movements (tuning curves) has been extensively modeled in a wide variety of neural systems. However, the variability of neural responses can also have clear tuning independent of the tuning in the mean firing rate. This suggests that the variability could contain information regarding the stimulus/movement beyond what is encoded in the mean firing rate. Here we demonstrate how taking variability into account can improve neural decoding.In a typical neural coding model spike counts are assumed to be Poisson with the mean response depending on an external variable, such as a stimulus or movement. Bayesian decoding methods then use the probabilities under these Poisson tuning models (the likelihood) to estimate the probability of each stimulus given the spikes on a given trial (the posterior). However, under the Poisson model, spike count variability is always exactly equal to the mean (Fano factor  =  1). Here we use two alternative models-the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model and negative binomial (NB) model-to more flexibly characterize how neural variability depends on external stimuli. These models both contain the Poisson distribution as a special case but have an additional parameter that allows the variance to be greater than the mean (Fano factor  >  1) or, for the CMP model, less than the mean (Fano factor  <  1).APPROACHIn a typical neural coding model spike counts are assumed to be Poisson with the mean response depending on an external variable, such as a stimulus or movement. Bayesian decoding methods then use the probabilities under these Poisson tuning models (the likelihood) to estimate the probability of each stimulus given the spikes on a given trial (the posterior). However, under the Poisson model, spike count variability is always exactly equal to the mean (Fano factor  =  1). Here we use two alternative models-the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model and negative binomial (NB) model-to more flexibly characterize how neural variability depends on external stimuli. These models both contain the Poisson distribution as a special case but have an additional parameter that allows the variance to be greater than the mean (Fano factor  >  1) or, for the CMP model, less than the mean (Fano factor  <  1).We find that neural responses in primary motor (M1), visual (V1), and auditory (A1) cortices have diverse tuning in both their mean firing rates and response variability. Across cortical areas, we find that Bayesian decoders using the CMP or NB models improve stimulus/movement estimation accuracy by 4%-12% compared to the Poisson model.MAIN RESULTSWe find that neural responses in primary motor (M1), visual (V1), and auditory (A1) cortices have diverse tuning in both their mean firing rates and response variability. Across cortical areas, we find that Bayesian decoders using the CMP or NB models improve stimulus/movement estimation accuracy by 4%-12% compared to the Poisson model.Moreover, the uncertainty of the non-Poisson decoders more accurately reflects the magnitude of estimation errors. In addition to tuning curves that reflect average neural responses, stimulus-dependent response variability may be an important aspect of the neural code. Modeling this structure could, potentially, lead to improvements in brain machine interfaces.SIGNIFICANCEMoreover, the uncertainty of the non-Poisson decoders more accurately reflects the magnitude of estimation errors. In addition to tuning curves that reflect average neural responses, stimulus-dependent response variability may be an important aspect of the neural code. Modeling this structure could, potentially, lead to improvements in brain machine interfaces.
Neural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in response to different stimuli or during different movements (tuning curves) has been extensively modeled in a wide variety of neural systems. However, the variability of neural responses can also have clear tuning independent of the tuning in the mean firing rate. This suggests that the variability could contain information regarding the stimulus/movement beyond what is encoded in the mean firing rate. Here we demonstrate how taking variability into account can improve neural decoding. In a typical neural coding model spike counts are assumed to be Poisson with the mean response depending on an external variable, such as a stimulus or movement. Bayesian decoding methods then use the probabilities under these Poisson tuning models (the likelihood) to estimate the probability of each stimulus given the spikes on a given trial (the posterior). However, under the Poisson model, spike count variability is always exactly equal to the mean (Fano factor  =  1). Here we use two alternative models-the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model and negative binomial (NB) model-to more flexibly characterize how neural variability depends on external stimuli. These models both contain the Poisson distribution as a special case but have an additional parameter that allows the variance to be greater than the mean (Fano factor  >  1) or, for the CMP model, less than the mean (Fano factor  <  1). We find that neural responses in primary motor (M1), visual (V1), and auditory (A1) cortices have diverse tuning in both their mean firing rates and response variability. Across cortical areas, we find that Bayesian decoders using the CMP or NB models improve stimulus/movement estimation accuracy by 4%-12% compared to the Poisson model. Moreover, the uncertainty of the non-Poisson decoders more accurately reflects the magnitude of estimation errors. In addition to tuning curves that reflect average neural responses, stimulus-dependent response variability may be an important aspect of the neural code. Modeling this structure could, potentially, lead to improvements in brain machine interfaces.
Author Ghanbari, Abed
Stevenson, Ian H
Lee, Christopher M
Read, Heather L
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Abed
  surname: Ghanbari
  fullname: Ghanbari, Abed
  organization: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Christopher M
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Christopher M
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Heather L
  surname: Read
  fullname: Read, Heather L
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ian H
  surname: Stevenson
  fullname: Stevenson, Ian H
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUEtLxDAYDKK4D717khy91G3SPNqjLL5gxYuCt5I0XySSJrVpFvbfu-IqnmYYZoZhFug4xAAIXZDympR1vSKSkYJyTldKV0rUR2j-Jx3_4zO0SOmjLCsim_IUzSrCStYQPkdvT9GAd-Edp8n12edUGBggGAgT3qrRKe28m3bY9cMYt5CwgS6a70C0eIhD9mpyMeAAeVQej5CGGBKkM3RilU9wfsAler27fVk_FJvn-8f1zaboqkpMBdeM100DTCvDrKg71gBIIRsmFLGKUC6t5KQRVhBNSt1JKjvJwRomtLJAl-jqp3c_7zNDmtrepQ68VwFiTi2l-0TFuCR76-XBmnUPph1G16tx1_6-Qb8AuPRllg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1162_neco_a_01593
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13010134
crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0250296
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12264_024_01242_x
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3a68
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1741-2552
ExternalDocumentID 31404915
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
1JI
4.4
53G
5B3
5GY
5VS
5ZH
7.M
7.Q
AAGCD
AAJIO
AAJKP
AATNI
ABHWH
ABJNI
ABQJV
ABVAM
ACAFW
ACGFS
ACHIP
ADEQX
AEFHF
AENEX
AFYNE
AKPSB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOAED
ASPBG
ATQHT
AVWKF
AZFZN
CEBXE
CJUJL
CRLBU
CS3
DU5
EBS
EDWGO
EMSAF
EPQRW
EQZZN
F5P
IHE
IJHAN
IOP
IZVLO
KOT
LAP
M45
N5L
N9A
NPM
P2P
PJBAE
RIN
RO9
ROL
RPA
SY9
W28
XPP
7X8
AEINN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-5b45899e4bad4f68c49ee767946a1fa1257f75196f61b10bc727c75efd46bafe2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 8
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000493111700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1741-2552
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 09:16:14 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:15 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c336t-5b45899e4bad4f68c49ee767946a1fa1257f75196f61b10bc727c75efd46bafe2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 31404915
PQID 2272734571
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2272734571
pubmed_primary_31404915
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-10-25
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-10-25
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-10-25
  day: 25
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of neural engineering
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neural Eng
PublicationYear 2019
SSID ssj0031790
Score 2.3183825
Snippet Neural responses to repeated presentations of an identical stimulus often show substantial trial-to-trial variability. How the mean firing rate varies in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 066018
Title Modeling stimulus-dependent variability improves decoding of population neural responses
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404915
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2272734571
Volume 16
WOSCitedRecordID wos000493111700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NS8MwFA_qPHjxa37MLyKIt7C1-WpPMsThxbGDQm8lSRMYuHau3WD_vS9tN0-C4KWH0tD25SXv9z7yfgg9cJuBIY8ywpRRBPwvSTQTGjbDgQkBHyk3aMgm5HgcJUk8aQNuZVtWudkT6406K4yPkffD0FtaxmXwNP8injXKZ1dbCo1d1KEAZXxJl0y2WQTqu081ByIDAtA5bNOUsLD623t9pakS0e8AszY0o6P_fuIxOmwhJh42OnGCdmx-irrDHNzr2Ro_4rros46md1HiudD8iXQMS322_FyWZEOLW-EV-NFNG-81ntbBB1viDPxVb-9w4fB8y_6FfV9MeOmiKbm15Rn6GL28P7-SlmyBGEpFRbhmHHwvy7TKmBORYbG1Uvj-8ypwCnCQdBLgnnAi0MFAG_hXI7l1GUytcjY8R3t5kdtLhBU3IVUAXTRnLKNGw2NKOMlAX0DWrofuN_JLQZl9hkLltliW6Y8Ee-iimYR03nTdSKlvBBQH_OoPo6_RAQCb2NuYkN-gjoOlbG_RvllV03JxV2sJXMeTt2-T5Mmb
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling+stimulus-dependent+variability+improves+decoding+of+population+neural+responses&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neural+engineering&rft.au=Ghanbari%2C+Abed&rft.au=Lee%2C+Christopher+M&rft.au=Read%2C+Heather+L&rft.au=Stevenson%2C+Ian+H&rft.date=2019-10-25&rft.issn=1741-2552&rft.eissn=1741-2552&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=066018&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1741-2552%2Fab3a68&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1741-2552&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1741-2552&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1741-2552&client=summon