Branch-and-cut for the forest harvest scheduling subject to clearcut and core area constraints

•A new model in integer programming for the forest harvest scheduling is proposed.•The model mitigates forest fragmentation caused by harvestings.•A branch-and-cut is proposed to solve the model.•The results proved to be very satisfactory from a practical point of view. Integrating forest fragmentat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of operational research Vol. 265; no. 2; pp. 723 - 734
Main Authors: Constantino, Miguel, Martins, Isabel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01.03.2018
Subjects:
ISSN:0377-2217, 1872-6860
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A new model in integer programming for the forest harvest scheduling is proposed.•The model mitigates forest fragmentation caused by harvestings.•A branch-and-cut is proposed to solve the model.•The results proved to be very satisfactory from a practical point of view. Integrating forest fragmentation into forest harvest scheduling problems adds substantial complexity to the models and solution techniques. Forest fragmentation leads to shrinking of the core habitat area and to weakening of the inter-habitat connections. In this work, we study forest harvest scheduling problems with constraints on the clearcut area and constraints on the core area. We propose a mixed integer programming formulation where constraints on the clearcut area are the so-called cover constraints while constraints on the core area are new in the literature as far as we know. As the number of constraints can be exponentially large, the model is solved by branch-and-cut, where the spatial constraints are generated only as necessary or not before they are needed. Branch-and-cut was tested on real and hypothetical forest data sets ranging from 45 to 1363 stands and temporal horizons ranging from three to seven periods were employed. Results show that the solutions obtained by the proposed approach are within or slightly above 1% of the optimal solution within three hours at the most.
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.060