Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: A tutorial

The aim of this article is to present the most common statistical errors in meta‐analyses included in systematic reviews; these are confusing standard deviation and standard error, using heterogeneity estimators for choosing between a common‐effect and random‐effects model, improper handling of mult...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods Ročník 3; číslo 2; s. e70013 - n/a
Hlavní autori: Kanellopoulou, Afroditi, Dwan, Kerry, Richardson, Rachel
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.03.2025
Wiley
Predmet:
ISSN:2832-9023, 2832-9023
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:The aim of this article is to present the most common statistical errors in meta‐analyses included in systematic reviews; these are confusing standard deviation and standard error, using heterogeneity estimators for choosing between a common‐effect and random‐effects model, improper handling of multiarm trials, and unnecessary and misinterpreted subgroup analyses. We introduce some useful terminology and explain what authors can do to avoid these errors and how peer reviewers can spot them. We have also developed a micro‐learning module to provide practical hands‐on tutorial. The aim of this article is to present the most common statistical errors in meta‐analyses included in systematic reviews; these are confusing standard deviation and standard error, using heterogeneity estimators for choosing between a common‐effect and random‐effects model, improper handling of multiarm trials, and unnecessary and misinterpreted subgroup analyses. We introduce some useful terminology and explain what authors can do to avoid these errors and how peer reviewers can spot them. We have also developed a micro‐learning module to provide practical hands‐on tutorial. Common Statistical Errors micro learning module
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2832-9023
2832-9023
DOI:10.1002/cesm.70013