Model‐based systems engineering and safety assessment: A workflow for mechatronic systems design

Mechatronic systems become ever more complex because of their increasing number of interconnected safety critical components and sophistication. MBSE (Model‐based Systems Engineering) and MBSA (Model‐Based Safety Assessment) are the most commonly adopted approaches to deal with the design and safety...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systems engineering Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 238 - 254
Main Authors: Bouhali, Imane, Pasquariello, Agnese, Mhenni, Faida, Vitolo, Ferdinando, Hehenberger, Peter, Patalano, Stanislao, Choley, Jean‐Yves
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2025
Subjects:
Critical components
design workflow
Failure modes
Fault tree analysis
Hazard assessment
Information flow
Information systems
MBSA
MBSE
mechatronics
multiphysics
RFLP
Safety critical
Simulation
Systems design
Systems engineering
UAV
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Verification
Workflow
ISSN:1098-1241, 1520-6858
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mechatronic systems become ever more complex because of their increasing number of interconnected safety critical components and sophistication. MBSE (Model‐based Systems Engineering) and MBSA (Model‐Based Safety Assessment) are the most commonly adopted approaches to deal with the design and safety analysis of mechatronic systems. Unfortunately, both approaches are normally adopted separately, especially in the earlier phases of system design, thus leading to a lack of communication between system engineers and the safety team. This work aims to fill that gap at a high level, that is, through process interaction. This paper proposes an enhanced V‐model for the design of safety‐critical mechatronic systems. It relates a system development process with specific safety assessment methods. Specifically, the proposed workflow details exchange flows between the RFLP (Requirements, Functional, Logical, Physical) method, the FHA (Functional Hazard Analysis), the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), the MBSA and simulation, and the FTA (Fault Tree Analysis). These analyses are complemented with multiphysics modeling and simulation to observe system behavior in functional and failure scenarios, with the aim of requirements verification. The design workflow has been applied to a winged Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to apply the parallel process and the necessary interaction of MBSE and MBSA approaches. The information flows between the individual activities proved effective for designing a safe system before the verification phase. The main benefit of the proposed workflow is providing both the design and safety team with some interaction points, thus avoiding a lack of safety‐critical analysis in the early phases of system design.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1098-1241
1520-6858
DOI:10.1002/sys.21791