Effect of an Intensive Nurse Home Visiting Program on Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Birth Spacing: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina. We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partner...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Jg. 145; H. 1; S. 3
Hauptverfasser: Steenland, Maria W, Oviedo, Dea, Bates, Mary Ann, Zhou, Annetta, Zera, Chloe, Baicker, Katherine, McConnell, Margaret A
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.01.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1873-233X, 1873-233X
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina. We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data. A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use. Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.
AbstractList To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.METHODSWe conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.RESULTSA total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.CONCLUSIONHome visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.
To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina. We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data. A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use. Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.
Author Steenland, Maria W
Bates, Mary Ann
Zhou, Annetta
Oviedo, Dea
Baicker, Katherine
Zera, Chloe
McConnell, Margaret A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Maria W
  surname: Steenland
  fullname: Steenland, Maria W
  organization: Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; the Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the RAND Corporation, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts; the Cradle-to-Career Data System, State of California, Sacramento, California; and the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dea
  surname: Oviedo
  fullname: Oviedo, Dea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mary Ann
  surname: Bates
  fullname: Bates, Mary Ann
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Annetta
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Annetta
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Chloe
  surname: Zera
  fullname: Zera, Chloe
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Katherine
  surname: Baicker
  fullname: Baicker, Katherine
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Margaret A
  surname: McConnell
  fullname: McConnell, Margaret A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39671266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujkQ_9B8b06AXcftDuekOCQEKEKBhvpOzOYs1uu7ZdE736x10DJsxl3rx5njlMB50aawChKxL1SZTI2-Fi0o-OZiBjcYLaJJasRxl7PT3KLdTx_r2BiEjYOWqxREhChWijn3GeQxqwzbEyeGYCGK8_AT_WzgOe2hLwi_Y6aLPDS2d3TpXYGry0PlTKhbrEI2uCUylU4c9bN5YyGb7XLrzh50qljXmHh_ipaW2pvyHbG7YomrhyWhUX6CxXhYfLw-6i9cN4NZr25ovJbDSc91JGpegRSLZKRYwTHkUAFAY5yQhJYsEljSkHwjNIpYBEKpUpSbYZJ6lknHJOtiKnXXSzv1s5-1GDD5tS-xSKQhmwtd8wwoWMkjiSDXp9QOttCdmmcrpU7mvz_zj6CxKVcxg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1001_jamapediatrics_2025_1600
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-233X
ExternalDocumentID 39671266
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
South Carolina
GeographicLocations_xml – name: South Carolina
– name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Children's Trust of South Carolina, Arnold Ventures, Duke Endowment, BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundation, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
GroupedDBID ---
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
123
1J1
2CO
354
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
5RE
5VS
77Y
7O~
85S
AAAAV
AAAXR
AACTN
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAWTL
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIJW
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHPY
AEBDS
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKRWK
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
BAWUL
BOYCO
BQLVK
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FD6
FDB
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
MZP
N9A
NEJ
NPM
N~7
N~B
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
ODMTH
OHH
OHYEH
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
TWZ
UHB
V2I
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
ZB8
~S-
7X8
ABPXF
ADKSD
ADSXY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-1e9baa0341400ee2e5f1d11986472824e14dec76e97aada71bd41c7342441b6f2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1873-233X
IngestDate Mon Sep 08 11:47:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:15 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3276-1e9baa0341400ee2e5f1d11986472824e14dec76e97aada71bd41c7342441b6f2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11630657
PMID 39671266
PQID 3146709807
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3146709807
pubmed_primary_39671266
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-January
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-January
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
PublicationTitleAlternate Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0001693
Score 2.4700623
Snippet To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 3
SubjectTerms Adult
Birth Intervals
Contraception
Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Family Planning Services
Female
House Calls - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Medicaid
Postnatal Care
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
South Carolina
United States
Young Adult
Title Effect of an Intensive Nurse Home Visiting Program on Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Birth Spacing: A Randomized Controlled Trial
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39671266
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3146709807
Volume 145
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELaAIsTC-_3QIbFG1HEaNyyoIB4DlApa1K1y7At0aFJaysDKH-cuSWFCQiJDhlgnRfZn-3x3_j4hjqNEKZ8rakKFygtQoRehDjxfYhz71OLnckBPt7rZrHe7UasMuI3Lssrpmpgv1C6zHCM_UTylq1G9qs-Grx6rRnF2tZTQmBUVRa4Mo1p3f9jCmWiED1x1rTxfqe706lykTxr31wV1YfkQcMPfncx8s7la_u9vroil0s2ERoGLVTGD6ZpYuCsT6evis2AthiwBk8J3HTtw8ACBtdPhqc_lXOkztIoSLshSYGnfIYFtMgCmtRqZvCiG7DpkZVIH5_3R2ws80kGcLE-hAQ_0NRv0P9AVFhyncNBm2G-IztVl--LGK_UYPKtoyDyJUWxMlfY9mviIPtYS6aRkgndNJ7cAZeDQ6hAjbYwzWsYukFYrvksn4zDxN8VcmqW4LSCMEyutQUV9FcTa1bVTxtWsQ2nDAKs74mjavT3COycxTIrZZNz76eAdsVWMUW9YEHP0VBRqSR7H7h-s98Siz1K-eTRlX1QSmu14IObt-1t_PDrMgUTvZuvuCzVJ0iA
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+an+Intensive+Nurse+Home+Visiting+Program+on+Postpartum+Contraceptive+Use+and+Birth+Spacing%3A+A+Randomized+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics+and+gynecology+%28New+York.+1953%29&rft.au=Steenland%2C+Maria+W&rft.au=Oviedo%2C+Dea&rft.au=Bates%2C+Mary+Ann&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Annetta&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.issn=1873-233X&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FAOG.0000000000005786&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1873-233X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1873-233X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1873-233X&client=summon