Performance analysis of the approximate dynamic programming algorithm for parameter estimation of superimposed signals
We consider the classical problem of fitting a model composed of multiple superimposed signals to noisy data using the criteria of maximum likelihood (ML) or subspace fitting, jointly termed generalized subspace fitting (GSF). We analyze a previously proposed approximate dynamic programming algorith...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on signal processing Jg. 48; H. 5; S. 1274 - 1286 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
IEEE
01.05.2000
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1053-587X, 1941-0476 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | We consider the classical problem of fitting a model composed of multiple superimposed signals to noisy data using the criteria of maximum likelihood (ML) or subspace fitting, jointly termed generalized subspace fitting (GSF). We analyze a previously proposed approximate dynamic programming algorithm (ADP), which provides a computationally efficient solution to the associated multidimensional multimodal optimization problem. We quantify the error introduced by the approximations in ADP and deviations from the key local interaction signal model (LISMO) modeling assumption in two ways. First, we upper bound the difference between the exact minimum of the GSF criterion and its value at the ADP estimate and compare the ADP with GSF estimates obtained by exhaustive multidimensional search on a fine lattice. Second, motivated by the similar accuracy bounds, we use perturbation analysis to derive approximate expressions for the MSE of the ADP estimates. These various results provide, for the first time, an effective tool to predict the performance of the ADP algorithm for various signal models at nonasymptotic conditions of interest in practical applications. In particular, they demonstrate that for the classical problems of sinusoid retrieval and array processing, ADP performs comparably to exact (but expensive) maximum likelihood (ML) over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and is therefore an attractive algorithm. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1053-587X 1941-0476 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/78.839975 |