Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries

Smartphone ownership and screen time are increasing across the world, but there have been few attempts to quantify smartphone addiction on a global scale. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published between 2014 and 2020 that used the Smartphone Addiction Scale, the most common measure of prob...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Computers in human behavior Ročník 129; s. 107138
Hlavní autoři: Olson, Jay A., Sandra, Dasha A., Colucci, Élissa S., Al Bikaii, Alain, Chmoulevitch, Denis, Nahas, Johnny, Raz, Amir, Veissière, Samuel P.L.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elmsford Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2022
Elsevier Science Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:0747-5632, 1873-7692
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Smartphone ownership and screen time are increasing across the world, but there have been few attempts to quantify smartphone addiction on a global scale. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published between 2014 and 2020 that used the Smartphone Addiction Scale, the most common measure of problematic smartphone use. We focused on adolescents and young adults (aged 15 to 35) since they tend to have the highest screen time and smartphone ownership rates. Across 24 countries, 83 samples, and 33,831 participants, we demonstrate that problematic smartphone use is increasing across the world. China, Saudi Arabia, and Malaysia had the highest scores while Germany and France had the lowest. We suggest that the clinical interpretation of these scores should be updated given current global trends. •We conducted a meta-analysis of problematic smartphone use, focusing on young adults.•The analysis (2014–2020) included 24 countries, 83 samples, and 33,831 participants.•The results showed that problematic smartphone use is increasing across the world.•China and Saudi Arabia had the highest rates while Germany and France had the lowest.•Updating the clinical interpretation of these scores may be needed in some countries.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ISSN:0747-5632
1873-7692
DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107138