The effect of content and language integrated learning on students' English and history competences – Killing two birds with one stone?

By failing to appropriately control for selection effects, most previous research has overestimated the effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) on the development of students' foreign language skills. Furthermore, the CLIL-effect on the content subject is still widely unknown...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Learning and instruction Vol. 41; pp. 23 - 31
Main Authors: Dallinger, Sara, Jonkmann, Kathrin, Hollm, Jan, Fiege, Christiane
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2016
Subjects:
Confounding variables
Content and language integrated learning (CLIL)
English as a foreign language
History
Skill development
Confounding variables
Skill development
History
English as a foreign language
Content and language integrated learning (CLIL)
ISSN:0959-4752, 1873-3263
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:By failing to appropriately control for selection effects, most previous research has overestimated the effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) on the development of students' foreign language skills. Furthermore, the CLIL-effect on the content subject is still widely unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated skill development of 1806 German CLIL and non-CLIL eighth-graders in English and History controlling for a wide range of student, classroom and teacher characteristics. Results of multilevel modelling confirmed that CLIL-classrooms showed greater increases in English listening comprehension but not general English skills as measured by a C-test than non-CLIL-classrooms. In History, the increases in subject knowledge over one school year were comparable despite CLIL-students' larger amount of instruction (three instead of two hours per week). The results confirm previous, differential findings for English. For the content subject, they indicate that CLIL-classrooms need to invest substantially more time to achieve comparable learning outcomes. •Content and language integrated learning had positive effects on English listening comprehension.•There was no positive effect on general English skills after considering confounding variables.•Gains in historical knowledge were comparable between CLIL- and non-CLIL-classrooms.•Multilevel modelling allowed to consider classroom composition and teacher characteristics.•Controlling for student- and classroom-variables explained big proportions of variance.
ISSN:0959-4752
1873-3263
DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003