Tacit attitudinal principles for evaluating digital preservation success

Digital preservation fulfills a critical role in the digital continuity of individual, institutional, and cultural memory. It is important for archival stewards and stakeholders to know whether or not those activities have been successful in order to deploy finite programmatic resources most relevan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archival science Jg. 21; H. 3; S. 295 - 315
1. Verfasser: Abrams, Stephen
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.09.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
Anthropology
Archival studies
Archives & records
Ascription
Attitudes
Collective memory
Computer Appl. in Arts and Humanities
Content analysis
Credibility
Cultural and Media Studies
Cultural Heritage
Digital preservation
Evaluation
Information Storage and Retrieval
Library Science
Literature
Management
Norms
Original Paper
Preservation
Qualitative analysis
Service contracts
Stakeholders
Success
Policy
Digital preservation
Success
Communicology
Content analysis
ISSN:1389-0166, 1573-7500, 1573-7519
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Digital preservation fulfills a critical role in the digital continuity of individual, institutional, and cultural memory. It is important for archival stewards and stakeholders to know whether or not those activities have been successful in order to deploy finite programmatic resources most relevantly, effectively, and productively. While preservation trustworthiness has been subject to extensive examination, the complementary evaluative quality of success has received less critical consideration. This study looks at how the preservation community ascribes meaning to the concept of success through attitudinal norms tacitly embedded in domain discourse. These are recovered through qualitative content analysis of selected preservation policy statements, which act as public affirmations of the archival service “contract” regarding stewardship intention and reciprocal stakeholder expectation. Success is a measure of the alignment between anticipated outcomes and actual preserved state resulting from intentional intervention. Communicological critique of the norms illuminates why the measure of success remains problematic and suggests avenues by which metrical practice can be augmented to enhance its evaluative power. This includes repositioning evaluative prerogatives to incorporate concern for the persistence not only of authentic digital information objects but also legitimate communicative experiences.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1389-0166
1573-7500
1573-7519
DOI:10.1007/s10502-021-09360-5