An extended probabilistic demand model with optimal intensity measures for seismic performance characterization of isolated bridges under coupled horizontal and vertical motions

Intensity Measures (IMs) provide the relationship between Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and seismic hazard characteristics for different structures and hence, their role in performance-based bridge design is significant. A few studies have investigated the optimal IMs for bridges under horizo...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Bulletin of earthquake engineering Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 2291 - 2323
Main Authors:	Dehghanpoor, Ahmad, Thambiratnam, David, Zhang, Wenyang, Chan, Tommy, Taciroglu, Ertugrul
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.03.2021 Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:	Acceleration Bridge design Bridges Civil Engineering Displacement Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground motion Hydrogeology Mathematical models Original Article Parameters Pile foundations Piles Seismic activity Seismic hazard Seismic response Seismology Soil properties Soil-structure interaction Soils Spectra Structural Geology Uncertainty Velocity Combined horizontal and vertical components Planar probabilistic seismic demand models Soil-pile-bridge (SPB) system Optimal intensity measures
ISSN:	1570-761X, 1573-1456
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	Intensity Measures (IMs) provide the relationship between Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and seismic hazard characteristics for different structures and hence, their role in performance-based bridge design is significant. A few studies have investigated the optimal IMs for bridges under horizontal ground motions, however, detailed studies to explore the optimal IMs for isolated-bridges under the coupled vertical and horizontal records are very rare. This paper presents a procedure for the selection of optimal IMs for seismic-isolated bridges under the combined strong Horizontal Component (HC) and Vertical Component (VC) seismic excitations. Soil-Structure-Interaction (SSI) effects, the high level of uncertainties for soil properties, uncertainties for structural and geotechnical issues and advanced plasticity model for non-liquefied soil are included to explore the optimal vector-valued IMs. Four individual situations are considered to investigate the geometry effects on the selected optimal IMs. Optimal IMs criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency and sufficiency are investigated and developed to achieve a set of optimal vector-valued IMs for critical EDPs: drift ratio, pile-cap displacement and bearing displacement, which are affected by both HC and VC in isolated Soil-Pile-Bridge (SPB) systems. The results show that velocity-related IMs: peak ground velocity (PGV H ), Housner spectrum intensity (HI H ) and root mean square of velocity (V RMSH ) are optimal IMs as representative of HCs. In addition, structure-dependent spectral IMs: vertical spectral acceleration at T = 0.2 s ( S a 0.2 V ) and square-root-of-the-sum-of-square of vertical spectral acceleration at the first and second vertical periods ( S a V T s ) are the appropriate optimal IMs as representative of VCs. However, the displacement-related IM, peak ground displacement of HCs (PGD H ), may be treated as optimal IMs for SPB system supported by inclined pile foundations to investigate pile-cap displacement. In addition, the sufficiency term is investigated extensively with respect to seismological parameters.
AbstractList	Intensity Measures (IMs) provide the relationship between Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and seismic hazard characteristics for different structures and hence, their role in performance-based bridge design is significant. A few studies have investigated the optimal IMs for bridges under horizontal ground motions, however, detailed studies to explore the optimal IMs for isolated-bridges under the coupled vertical and horizontal records are very rare. This paper presents a procedure for the selection of optimal IMs for seismic-isolated bridges under the combined strong Horizontal Component (HC) and Vertical Component (VC) seismic excitations. Soil-Structure-Interaction (SSI) effects, the high level of uncertainties for soil properties, uncertainties for structural and geotechnical issues and advanced plasticity model for non-liquefied soil are included to explore the optimal vector-valued IMs. Four individual situations are considered to investigate the geometry effects on the selected optimal IMs. Optimal IMs criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency and sufficiency are investigated and developed to achieve a set of optimal vector-valued IMs for critical EDPs: drift ratio, pile-cap displacement and bearing displacement, which are affected by both HC and VC in isolated Soil-Pile-Bridge (SPB) systems. The results show that velocity-related IMs: peak ground velocity (PGVH), Housner spectrum intensity (HIH) and root mean square of velocity (VRMSH) are optimal IMs as representative of HCs. In addition, structure-dependent spectral IMs: vertical spectral acceleration at T = 0.2 s (Sa0.2V) and square-root-of-the-sum-of-square of vertical spectral acceleration at the first and second vertical periods (SaVTs) are the appropriate optimal IMs as representative of VCs. However, the displacement-related IM, peak ground displacement of HCs (PGDH), may be treated as optimal IMs for SPB system supported by inclined pile foundations to investigate pile-cap displacement. In addition, the sufficiency term is investigated extensively with respect to seismological parameters. Intensity Measures (IMs) provide the relationship between Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and seismic hazard characteristics for different structures and hence, their role in performance-based bridge design is significant. A few studies have investigated the optimal IMs for bridges under horizontal ground motions, however, detailed studies to explore the optimal IMs for isolated-bridges under the coupled vertical and horizontal records are very rare. This paper presents a procedure for the selection of optimal IMs for seismic-isolated bridges under the combined strong Horizontal Component (HC) and Vertical Component (VC) seismic excitations. Soil-Structure-Interaction (SSI) effects, the high level of uncertainties for soil properties, uncertainties for structural and geotechnical issues and advanced plasticity model for non-liquefied soil are included to explore the optimal vector-valued IMs. Four individual situations are considered to investigate the geometry effects on the selected optimal IMs. Optimal IMs criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency and sufficiency are investigated and developed to achieve a set of optimal vector-valued IMs for critical EDPs: drift ratio, pile-cap displacement and bearing displacement, which are affected by both HC and VC in isolated Soil-Pile-Bridge (SPB) systems. The results show that velocity-related IMs: peak ground velocity (PGV H ), Housner spectrum intensity (HI H ) and root mean square of velocity (V RMSH ) are optimal IMs as representative of HCs. In addition, structure-dependent spectral IMs: vertical spectral acceleration at T = 0.2 s ( S a 0.2 V ) and square-root-of-the-sum-of-square of vertical spectral acceleration at the first and second vertical periods ( S a V T s ) are the appropriate optimal IMs as representative of VCs. However, the displacement-related IM, peak ground displacement of HCs (PGD H ), may be treated as optimal IMs for SPB system supported by inclined pile foundations to investigate pile-cap displacement. In addition, the sufficiency term is investigated extensively with respect to seismological parameters.
Author	Chan, Tommy Zhang, Wenyang Dehghanpoor, Ahmad Thambiratnam, David Taciroglu, Ertugrul
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Ahmad orcidid: 0000-0001-8425-358X surname: Dehghanpoor fullname: Dehghanpoor, Ahmad email: ahmad.dehghanpoorsichani@hdr.qut.edu.au organization: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology – sequence: 2 givenname: David orcidid: 0000-0001-8486-5236 surname: Thambiratnam fullname: Thambiratnam, David organization: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology – sequence: 3 givenname: Wenyang surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Wenyang organization: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California – sequence: 4 givenname: Tommy orcidid: 0000-0002-5410-8362 surname: Chan fullname: Chan, Tommy organization: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology – sequence: 5 givenname: Ertugrul orcidid: 0000-0001-9618-1210 surname: Taciroglu fullname: Taciroglu, Ertugrul organization: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California
BookMark	eNp9kc9O3DAQxq2KSgXaF-jJUs-BsRMnmyNCFJCQeqFSb5bXnrBGiZ3aDgu8Vd-ws7uVKnHg5H_fb77xfCfsKMSAjH0VcCYAuvMsQIlVBVJUIKBpqu0HdixUV1eiUe3Rfg9V14pfn9hJzo8AUnU9HLM_F4Hjc8Hg0PE5xbVZ-9Hn4i13OJng-BQdjnzry4bHufjJjNwHArIvL3xCk5eEmQ8x8Yw-TwTOmOhIsEVuNyYZWzD5V1N8DDwO3Oc4mkJ-6-TdA8ELuSdu4zKPdLuJJI6hkNHO_wkTdUOHKe4K5M_s42DGjF_-rafs5_er-8ub6u7H9e3lxV1la9GXymHtrOqxM7a10iA0cpByhU2tsB66tnHK9Gt66qEVIDuBFkUrUSrVGeNEfcq-HerSVH4vmIt-jEsKZKmlAgVN29QtqVYHlU0x54SDtr7sf1qS8aMWoHcB6UNAmgLS-4D0llD5Bp0TjTe9vA_VByiTODxg-t_VO9RfHcCr-A
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cma_2024_116775 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engstruct_2024_118020 crossref_primary_10_1177_13694332251348616 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10518_023_01827_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_stc_2838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engstruct_2025_121175 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_istruc_2025_108453 crossref_primary_10_3390_app112210745 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soildyn_2022_107657 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engstruct_2024_119128 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_istruc_2023_105029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soildyn_2023_108128 crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930241236762 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10518_024_01903_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soildyn_2024_109106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soildyn_2021_107095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jlp_2025_105581 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcns_2023_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_13632469_2024_2308612 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40808_025_02421_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engstruct_2023_115871 crossref_primary_10_1002_eqe_4068 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40030_022_00701_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engstruct_2024_118063
Cites_doi	10.1193/053115EQS081M 10.1002/nag.2702 10.1002/eqe.782 10.1007/s10518-017-0199-2 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000565 10.1002/eqe.3027 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750) 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.012 10.1193/1.4000170 10.1080/13632469.2016.1264323 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.12.001 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526) 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.033 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105753 10.1193/1.3675580 10.1002/eqe.506 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<401::AID-EQE551>3.0.CO;2-B 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.12.002 10.1080/13632469.2019.1625829 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.013 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001266 10.1002/eqe.141 10.1002/eqe.1123 10.1002/eqe.474 10.1002/eqe.2226 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.013 10.1139/t99-038 10.1002/eqe.696 10.1007/s10518-015-9755-9 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.022 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.036 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000231 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.058 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468) 10.1080/13632460109350404 10.1002/eqe.2774 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005161 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1165)
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.
Copyright_xml	– notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021 – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7ST 7TG 7TN 7UA 7XB 88I 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W FR3 GNUQQ H96 HCIFZ KL. KR7 L.G L6V M2P M7S PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY Q9U SOI
DOI	10.1007/s10518-021-01044-w
DatabaseName	CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Environment Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central (subscription) Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Civil Engineering Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Engineering Collection Science Database Engineering Database Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic Environment Abstracts
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Engineering Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList	Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Engineering
EISSN	1573-1456
EndPage	2323
ExternalDocumentID	10_1007_s10518_021_01044_w
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: Queensland University of Technology funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001793
GroupedDBID	-5A -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 203 23N 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 5GY 5VS 67M 67Z 6J9 6NX 7XC 88I 8FE 8FG 8FH 8TC 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHSB ACHXU ACIHN ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACREN ACSNA ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG ATCPS AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ BSONS CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP D1K DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DWQXO EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HLICF HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ K6- KDC KOV L6V L8X LAK LK5 LLZTM M2P M4Y M7R M7S MA- N2Q NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9J OAM OVD P2P PATMY PCBAR PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PTHSS PYCSY Q2X QOS R89 R9I RNI RNS ROL RPX RSV RZC RZE S16 S1Z S27 S3B SAP SDH SEV SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TUC TUS U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7Y Z7Z Z85 ZMTXR ~02 ~A9 AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PQGLB 7ST 7TG 7TN 7UA 7XB 8FD 8FK C1K F1W FR3 H96 KL. KR7 L.G PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U SOI
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-de3dc59e7ac6c2ae042f228e435e3f764d5a9b6c290610271ece162e2557aad13
IEDL.DBID	RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount	26
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000614667500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1570-761X
IngestDate	Sat Nov 08 17:03:02 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:59:26 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:42:17 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:49:37 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	5
Keywords	Combined horizontal and vertical components Planar probabilistic seismic demand models Soil-pile-bridge (SPB) system Optimal intensity measures
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c319t-de3dc59e7ac6c2ae042f228e435e3f764d5a9b6c290610271ece162e2557aad13
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14
ORCID	0000-0001-8425-358X 0000-0001-9618-1210 0000-0002-5410-8362 0000-0001-8486-5236
PQID	2505046436
PQPubID	55380
PageCount	33
ParticipantIDs	proquest_journals_2505046436 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10518_021_01044_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s10518_021_01044_w springer_journals_10_1007_s10518_021_01044_w
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	20210300 2021-03-00 20210301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2021-03-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 3 year: 2021 text: 20210300
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Dordrecht
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Dordrecht
PublicationSubtitle	Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering
PublicationTitle	Bulletin of earthquake engineering
PublicationTitleAbbrev	Bull Earthquake Eng
PublicationYear	2021
Publisher	Springer Netherlands Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml	– name: Springer Netherlands – name: Springer Nature B.V
References	MirzaSAMacGregorJGHatzinikolasMStatistical descriptions of strength of concreteJ Struct Division1979105610211037 CollierCElnashaiAA procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effectsJ Earthquake Eng2001504521539 BarbatoMGuQConteJPProbabilistic push-over analysis of structural and soil-structure systemsJ Struct Eng20101361113301341 Standard B (2005) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1:1998–1991 KohrangiMBazzurroPVamvatsikosDVector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation, part II: building demand assessmentEarthq Spectra201632315251543 CelarecDDolšekMThe impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildingsEng Struct201352340354 Silva W (1997) Characteristics of Vertical Strong Ground Motions for Applications to Engineering Design. In: Friedland IM, Power MS, Mayes RL (eds) Proceedings of the FHWA/NCEER Workshop on the National Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities, Technical Report NCEER-97-0010. PhoonK-KKulhawyFHCharacterization of geotechnical variabilityCan Geotech J1999364612624 ElnashaiAPapazoglouAProcedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loadsJ Earthquake Eng1997101121155 WeiBZuoCHeXJiangLWangTEffects of vertical ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railwaySoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2018115281290 ZhangWEsmaeilzadeh SeylabiETacirogluEValidation of a three-dimensional constitutive model for nonlinear site response and soil-structure interaction analyses using centrifuge test dataInt J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2017411818281847 Abaqus 6.14 (2018). Dassault systèmes SIMULIA Corporation, Minneapolis. Hariri-ArdebiliMSaoumaVProbabilistic seismic demand model and optimal intensity measure for concrete damsStruct Safety2016596785 KostinakisKFontaraI-KAthanatopoulouAMScalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for assessing the seismic performance of structures: a reviewJ Earthquake Eng2016224630665 AbrahamsonNSilvaWJEmpirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakesSeismol Res Lett199768194127 Ayyub BM, Lai K-L (1989) Structural reliability assessment using latin hypercube sampling. Paper presented at the Struct Safety Reliability. Lacasse S, Nadim F, (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soilproperties. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 58, pp49–75. KimSJHolubCJElnashaiASExperimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motionEng Struct201133722212235 WangZDueñas-OsorioLPadgettJESeismic response of a bridge–soil–foundation system under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal ground motionsEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2013424545564 Matlab. The MathWorks, Inc., Matlab user's guide (2017). PangYWuXShenGYuanWSeismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertaintiesJ Bridge Eng201319404013015 SakellariadisLAgalianosAAnastasopoulosISimplified method for real-time seismic damage assessment of motorway bridges: transverse direction—accounting for abutment stoppersEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn201847614961521 WangXShafieezadehAYeAOptimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading groundBull Earthquake Eng2018161229257 CornellCAJalayerFHamburgerROFoutchDAProbabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelinesJ Struct Eng2002128526533 DehghanpoorAThambiratnamDTacirogluEChanTSoil-pile-superstructure interaction effects in seismically isolated bridges under combined vertical and horizontal strong ground motionsSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2019126105753 WangXYeAShafieezadehAPadgettJEFractional order optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefiable and laterally spreading groundSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2019120301315 Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Taciroglu E (2019b) Significance of vertical ground motions on soil-pile-superstructure systems. In: Paper presented at the Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,(ICEGE 2019), June 17–20, 2019, Rome, Italy. Nielson BG (2005) Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Georgia Institute of Technology. Jones AL, Kramer SL, Arduino P (2002) Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performance-based earthquake engineering: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering. ElgamalAHeLVertical earthquake ground motion records: an overviewJ Earthquake Eng2004805663697 EbrahimianHJalayerFLucchiniAMollaioliFManfrediGPreliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shakingBull Earthquake Eng2015131028052840 StefanidouSPKapposAJMethodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curvesEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn20174617393 XieYZhengQYangC-SWZhangWDesRochesRPadgettJETacirogluEProbabilistic models of abutment backfills for regional seismic assessment of highway bridges in CaliforniaEng Struct2019180452467 XieYZhangJHuoYSimplified drift demand prediction of bridges under liquefaction-induced lateral spreadingJ Bridge Eng201823804018053 Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Chan T, Taciroglu E, Kouretzis G, Li Z (2019a) Coupled horizontal and vertical component analysis of strong ground motions for soil–pile–superstructure systems: application to a bridge Pier with soil–structure interaction. J Earthquake Eng, 1–29. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology: University Science Books. BradleyBACubrinovskiMDhakalRMacRaeGIntensity measures for the seismic response of pile foundationsSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng200929610461058 Kaviani P, Zareian F, Taciroglu E (2014) Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. BakerJWCornellCAA vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilonEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2005341011931217 Shome N (1999) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures: Stanford University. TothongPLucoNProbabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motions intensity measuresEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2007361318371860 VamvatsikosDCornellCAIncremental dynamic analysisEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2002313491514 AmbraseysNuSimpsonKPrediction of vertical response spectra in EuropeEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn1996254401412 PadgettJENielsonBGDesRochesRSelection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfoliosEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2008375711725 BoulangerRWCurrasCJKutterBLWilsonDWAbghariASeismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysesJ Geotech Geoenviron Eng19991259750759 BozorgniaYCampbellKWThe vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectraJ Earthquake Eng2004802175207 ElgamalAYanLYangZConteJPThree-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground systemJ Structural Eng2008134711651176 BradleyBAEmpirical correlations between cumulative absolute velocity and amplitude-based ground motion intensity measuresEarthq Spectra2012283754 KavianiPZareianFTacirogluESeismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutmentsEng Struct201245137150 WangZPadgettJDueñas-OsorioLInfluence of vertical ground motions on the seismic fragility modeling of a bridge-soil-foundation systemEarthquake Spectra2013293937962 GulerceZErduranEKunnathSKAbrahamsonNASeismic demand models for probabilistic risk analysis of near fault vertical ground motion effects on ordinary highway bridgesEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2012412159175 LeeTHMosalamKMSeismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM methodEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2005341417191736 MackieKStojadinovićBProbabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridgesJ Bridge Eng200166468481 StefanidouSPSextosAGKotsoglouANLesgidisNKapposAJSoil-structure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedureEng Struct2017151366380 K Mackie (1044_CR32) 2001; 6 SJ Kim (1044_CR27) 2011; 33 W Zhang (1044_CR54) 2017; 41 K-K Phoon (1044_CR38) 1999; 36 D Celarec (1044_CR12) 2013; 52 1044_CR16 1044_CR15 1044_CR41 X Wang (1044_CR48) 2019; 120 1044_CR42 1044_CR40 A Dehghanpoor (1044_CR17) 2019; 126 TH Lee (1044_CR31) 2005; 34 H Ebrahimian (1044_CR18) 2015; 13 X Wang (1044_CR47) 2018; 16 RW Boulanger (1044_CR8) 1999; 125 Y Xie (1044_CR53) 2019; 180 A Elgamal (1044_CR19) 2004; 8 N Abrahamson (1044_CR2) 1997; 68 M Hariri-Ardebili (1044_CR23) 2016; 59 Y Xie (1044_CR52) 2018; 23 Z Wang (1044_CR50) 2013; 29 1044_CR30 SP Stefanidou (1044_CR43) 2017; 46 Y Bozorgnia (1044_CR9) 2004; 8 1044_CR33 JE Padgett (1044_CR36) 2008; 37 Z Wang (1044_CR49) 2013; 42 L Sakellariadis (1044_CR39) 2018; 47 1044_CR1 1044_CR3 1044_CR5 A Elgamal (1044_CR20) 2008; 134 CA Cornell (1044_CR14) 2002; 128 1044_CR35 SP Stefanidou (1044_CR44) 2017; 151 Y Pang (1044_CR37) 2013; 19 B Wei (1044_CR51) 2018; 115 Nu Ambraseys (1044_CR4) 1996; 25 BA Bradley (1044_CR10) 2009; 29 D Vamvatsikos (1044_CR46) 2002; 31 JW Baker (1044_CR6) 2005; 34 Z Gulerce (1044_CR22) 2012; 41 M Kohrangi (1044_CR28) 2016; 32 M Barbato (1044_CR7) 2010; 136 C Collier (1044_CR13) 2001; 5 P Kaviani (1044_CR25) 2012; 45 SA Mirza (1044_CR34) 1979; 105 A Elnashai (1044_CR21) 1997; 1 P Tothong (1044_CR45) 2007; 36 K Kostinakis (1044_CR29) 2016; 22 1044_CR24 BA Bradley (1044_CR11) 2012; 28 1044_CR26
References_xml	– reference: ElnashaiAPapazoglouAProcedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loadsJ Earthquake Eng1997101121155 – reference: XieYZhengQYangC-SWZhangWDesRochesRPadgettJETacirogluEProbabilistic models of abutment backfills for regional seismic assessment of highway bridges in CaliforniaEng Struct2019180452467 – reference: MirzaSAMacGregorJGHatzinikolasMStatistical descriptions of strength of concreteJ Struct Division1979105610211037 – reference: PadgettJENielsonBGDesRochesRSelection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfoliosEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2008375711725 – reference: CornellCAJalayerFHamburgerROFoutchDAProbabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelinesJ Struct Eng2002128526533 – reference: Jones AL, Kramer SL, Arduino P (2002) Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performance-based earthquake engineering: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering. – reference: WangXShafieezadehAYeAOptimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading groundBull Earthquake Eng2018161229257 – reference: WangZDueñas-OsorioLPadgettJESeismic response of a bridge–soil–foundation system under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal ground motionsEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2013424545564 – reference: Abaqus 6.14 (2018). Dassault systèmes SIMULIA Corporation, Minneapolis. – reference: Standard B (2005) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1:1998–1991 – reference: Lacasse S, Nadim F, (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soilproperties. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 58, pp49–75. – reference: ZhangWEsmaeilzadeh SeylabiETacirogluEValidation of a three-dimensional constitutive model for nonlinear site response and soil-structure interaction analyses using centrifuge test dataInt J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2017411818281847 – reference: StefanidouSPSextosAGKotsoglouANLesgidisNKapposAJSoil-structure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedureEng Struct2017151366380 – reference: Kaviani P, Zareian F, Taciroglu E (2014) Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. – reference: PangYWuXShenGYuanWSeismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertaintiesJ Bridge Eng201319404013015 – reference: AbrahamsonNSilvaWJEmpirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakesSeismol Res Lett199768194127 – reference: KimSJHolubCJElnashaiASExperimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motionEng Struct201133722212235 – reference: KohrangiMBazzurroPVamvatsikosDVector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation, part II: building demand assessmentEarthq Spectra201632315251543 – reference: GulerceZErduranEKunnathSKAbrahamsonNASeismic demand models for probabilistic risk analysis of near fault vertical ground motion effects on ordinary highway bridgesEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2012412159175 – reference: MackieKStojadinovićBProbabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridgesJ Bridge Eng200166468481 – reference: Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology: University Science Books. – reference: BarbatoMGuQConteJPProbabilistic push-over analysis of structural and soil-structure systemsJ Struct Eng20101361113301341 – reference: KavianiPZareianFTacirogluESeismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutmentsEng Struct201245137150 – reference: TothongPLucoNProbabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motions intensity measuresEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2007361318371860 – reference: Hariri-ArdebiliMSaoumaVProbabilistic seismic demand model and optimal intensity measure for concrete damsStruct Safety2016596785 – reference: BozorgniaYCampbellKWThe vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectraJ Earthquake Eng2004802175207 – reference: BradleyBAEmpirical correlations between cumulative absolute velocity and amplitude-based ground motion intensity measuresEarthq Spectra2012283754 – reference: BradleyBACubrinovskiMDhakalRMacRaeGIntensity measures for the seismic response of pile foundationsSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng200929610461058 – reference: CelarecDDolšekMThe impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildingsEng Struct201352340354 – reference: Matlab. The MathWorks, Inc., Matlab user's guide (2017). – reference: AmbraseysNuSimpsonKPrediction of vertical response spectra in EuropeEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn1996254401412 – reference: BakerJWCornellCAA vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilonEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2005341011931217 – reference: DehghanpoorAThambiratnamDTacirogluEChanTSoil-pile-superstructure interaction effects in seismically isolated bridges under combined vertical and horizontal strong ground motionsSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2019126105753 – reference: Silva W (1997) Characteristics of Vertical Strong Ground Motions for Applications to Engineering Design. In: Friedland IM, Power MS, Mayes RL (eds) Proceedings of the FHWA/NCEER Workshop on the National Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities, Technical Report NCEER-97-0010. – reference: Shome N (1999) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures: Stanford University. – reference: KostinakisKFontaraI-KAthanatopoulouAMScalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for assessing the seismic performance of structures: a reviewJ Earthquake Eng2016224630665 – reference: LeeTHMosalamKMSeismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM methodEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2005341417191736 – reference: BoulangerRWCurrasCJKutterBLWilsonDWAbghariASeismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysesJ Geotech Geoenviron Eng19991259750759 – reference: WangXYeAShafieezadehAPadgettJEFractional order optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefiable and laterally spreading groundSoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2019120301315 – reference: XieYZhangJHuoYSimplified drift demand prediction of bridges under liquefaction-induced lateral spreadingJ Bridge Eng201823804018053 – reference: Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Chan T, Taciroglu E, Kouretzis G, Li Z (2019a) Coupled horizontal and vertical component analysis of strong ground motions for soil–pile–superstructure systems: application to a bridge Pier with soil–structure interaction. J Earthquake Eng, 1–29. – reference: ElgamalAYanLYangZConteJPThree-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground systemJ Structural Eng2008134711651176 – reference: Nielson BG (2005) Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Georgia Institute of Technology. – reference: WangZPadgettJDueñas-OsorioLInfluence of vertical ground motions on the seismic fragility modeling of a bridge-soil-foundation systemEarthquake Spectra2013293937962 – reference: Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Taciroglu E (2019b) Significance of vertical ground motions on soil-pile-superstructure systems. In: Paper presented at the Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,(ICEGE 2019), June 17–20, 2019, Rome, Italy. – reference: PhoonK-KKulhawyFHCharacterization of geotechnical variabilityCan Geotech J1999364612624 – reference: Ayyub BM, Lai K-L (1989) Structural reliability assessment using latin hypercube sampling. Paper presented at the Struct Safety Reliability. – reference: ElgamalAHeLVertical earthquake ground motion records: an overviewJ Earthquake Eng2004805663697 – reference: SakellariadisLAgalianosAAnastasopoulosISimplified method for real-time seismic damage assessment of motorway bridges: transverse direction—accounting for abutment stoppersEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn201847614961521 – reference: EbrahimianHJalayerFLucchiniAMollaioliFManfrediGPreliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shakingBull Earthquake Eng2015131028052840 – reference: CollierCElnashaiAA procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effectsJ Earthquake Eng2001504521539 – reference: VamvatsikosDCornellCAIncremental dynamic analysisEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn2002313491514 – reference: StefanidouSPKapposAJMethodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curvesEarthquake Eng Struct Dyn20174617393 – reference: WeiBZuoCHeXJiangLWangTEffects of vertical ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railwaySoil Dyn Earthquake Eng2018115281290 – volume: 32 start-page: 1525 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 1044_CR28 publication-title: Earthq Spectra doi: 10.1193/053115EQS081M – ident: 1044_CR16 – ident: 1044_CR41 – volume: 41 start-page: 1828 issue: 18 year: 2017 ident: 1044_CR54 publication-title: Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech doi: 10.1002/nag.2702 – volume: 8 start-page: 663 issue: 05 year: 2004 ident: 1044_CR19 publication-title: J Earthquake Eng – volume: 37 start-page: 711 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 1044_CR36 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.782 – volume: 16 start-page: 229 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1044_CR47 publication-title: Bull Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0199-2 – volume: 19 start-page: 04013015 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 1044_CR37 publication-title: J Bridge Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000565 – ident: 1044_CR26 – volume: 8 start-page: 175 issue: 02 year: 2004 ident: 1044_CR9 publication-title: J Earthquake Eng – volume: 47 start-page: 1496 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 1044_CR39 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.3027 – volume: 125 start-page: 750 issue: 9 year: 1999 ident: 1044_CR8 publication-title: J Geotech Geoenviron Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750) – volume: 120 start-page: 301 year: 2019 ident: 1044_CR48 publication-title: Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.012 – volume: 29 start-page: 937 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 1044_CR50 publication-title: Earthquake Spectra doi: 10.1193/1.4000170 – volume: 22 start-page: 630 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 1044_CR29 publication-title: J Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1264323 – ident: 1044_CR42 – volume: 59 start-page: 67 year: 2016 ident: 1044_CR23 publication-title: Struct Safety doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.12.001 – ident: 1044_CR3 – volume: 128 start-page: 526 year: 2002 ident: 1044_CR14 publication-title: J Struct Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526) – volume: 151 start-page: 366 year: 2017 ident: 1044_CR44 publication-title: Eng Struct doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.033 – volume: 126 start-page: 105753 year: 2019 ident: 1044_CR17 publication-title: Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105753 – volume: 28 start-page: 37 year: 2012 ident: 1044_CR11 publication-title: Earthq Spectra doi: 10.1193/1.3675580 – ident: 1044_CR35 – volume: 34 start-page: 1719 issue: 14 year: 2005 ident: 1044_CR31 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.506 – volume: 25 start-page: 401 issue: 4 year: 1996 ident: 1044_CR4 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<401::AID-EQE551>3.0.CO;2-B – volume: 29 start-page: 1046 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 1044_CR10 publication-title: Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.12.002 – ident: 1044_CR15 doi: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1625829 – volume: 68 start-page: 94 issue: 1 year: 1997 ident: 1044_CR2 publication-title: Seismol Res Lett doi: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94 – volume: 33 start-page: 2221 issue: 7 year: 2011 ident: 1044_CR27 publication-title: Eng Struct doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.013 – ident: 1044_CR24 – ident: 1044_CR30 – volume: 23 start-page: 04018053 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1044_CR52 publication-title: J Bridge Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001266 – volume: 31 start-page: 491 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: 1044_CR46 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.141 – volume: 41 start-page: 159 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 1044_CR22 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.1123 – volume: 1 start-page: 121 issue: 01 year: 1997 ident: 1044_CR21 publication-title: J Earthquake Eng – volume: 34 start-page: 1193 issue: 10 year: 2005 ident: 1044_CR6 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.474 – ident: 1044_CR40 – volume: 42 start-page: 545 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 1044_CR49 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.2226 – volume: 45 start-page: 137 year: 2012 ident: 1044_CR25 publication-title: Eng Struct doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.013 – volume: 36 start-page: 612 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 1044_CR38 publication-title: Can Geotech J doi: 10.1139/t99-038 – volume: 36 start-page: 1837 issue: 13 year: 2007 ident: 1044_CR45 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.696 – volume: 13 start-page: 2805 issue: 10 year: 2015 ident: 1044_CR18 publication-title: Bull Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9755-9 – volume: 115 start-page: 281 year: 2018 ident: 1044_CR51 publication-title: Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.022 – ident: 1044_CR1 – volume: 52 start-page: 340 year: 2013 ident: 1044_CR12 publication-title: Eng Struct doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.036 – volume: 136 start-page: 1330 issue: 11 year: 2010 ident: 1044_CR7 publication-title: J Struct Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000231 – volume: 180 start-page: 452 year: 2019 ident: 1044_CR53 publication-title: Eng Struct doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.058 – volume: 6 start-page: 468 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 1044_CR32 publication-title: J Bridge Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468) – ident: 1044_CR33 – volume: 5 start-page: 521 issue: 04 year: 2001 ident: 1044_CR13 publication-title: J Earthquake Eng doi: 10.1080/13632460109350404 – volume: 46 start-page: 73 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1044_CR43 publication-title: Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn doi: 10.1002/eqe.2774 – ident: 1044_CR5 – volume: 105 start-page: 1021 issue: 6 year: 1979 ident: 1044_CR34 publication-title: J Struct Division doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005161 – volume: 134 start-page: 1165 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 1044_CR20 publication-title: J Structural Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1165)
SSID	ssj0025790
Score	2.3697264
Snippet	Intensity Measures (IMs) provide the relationship between Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and seismic hazard characteristics for different structures and...
SourceID	proquest crossref springer
SourceType	Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	2291
SubjectTerms	Acceleration Bridge design Bridges Civil Engineering Displacement Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground motion Hydrogeology Mathematical models Original Article Parameters Pile foundations Piles Seismic activity Seismic hazard Seismic response Seismology Soil properties Soil-structure interaction Soils Spectra Structural Geology Uncertainty Velocity
SummonAdditionalLinks	– databaseName: Engineering Database dbid: M7S link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwELUo9NAeKP1SFyiaQ2-t1diJk_UJIVTUE6oElfYWObajrsQmy2Ypgn_Vf9gZx9m0SOXSS6TEiZNoxvbMeOY9xj4olbs8MZpLi4fMm4pXyqGzUpHLnNlEuCqQTRTn59PZTH-LAbcuplUOc2KYqF1rKUb-mZZq2oZL8-PlNSfWKNpdjRQaT9gOoSTIkLp3sXG4VBFiLEIVCUd3fRaLZmLpnBJTTgkK5JFk_PbvhWm0Nh9skIZ15-zF_37xHtuNFiec9Crykm355hV7_gcO4Wv266SBIRoORDETYHcJwRmcX5jGQSDMAQraQouTzAI7nPfJ7-s7WPRxxg7QAIbOz7sFPrgcKxLAblCh-6JPaGuYo9KjnesgAk0AVbOtwLY3yyu8-gP_5L6lUk2g9wfWaFQn6FmHujfs-9mXy9OvPHI5cIuDfM2dT51V2hfG5lYaj3NFLeXUo7Xm07rIM6eMrrBJo4GBrrLw1otcevR4CmOcSN-y7aZt_DsGRtZaZJVO66nJ0DvSSaU1nic6FbWSasLEIMjSRqBz4tu4KkeIZhJ-icIvg_DL2wn7uHlm2cN8PHr34SDxMg75rhzFPWGfBp0Zm__d2_7jvR2wZzKoKeW9HbLt9erGv2dP7c_1vFsdBYX_DeuECw8 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest
Title	An extended probabilistic demand model with optimal intensity measures for seismic performance characterization of isolated bridges under coupled horizontal and vertical motions
URI	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-021-01044-w https://www.proquest.com/docview/2505046436
Volume	19
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000614667500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1456 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0025790 issn: 1570-761X databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20030101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED-tHQ_wMMaXKIzqHniDSLETJ_HjhjbxQlVtA_UtcmxHVGqTqumo9mftP-TsJO1AgMReLCX-SKS7s-93vg-A90IkJgmVDLimJraqCAphCKwUDjLHOmSm8MUm0skkm83ktAsKa3pv9_5K0u_U94LdBMsC51LgMEQcbAdwSMdd5sTx8urbDmaJ1FtWmEjDgED6rAuV-fMavx5Hex3zt2tRf9pcPH3Yfx7DUadd4mnLDs_gwFbP4cm9nIMv4O60wt7yja6cjE-x67I1o7FLVRn0xXHQGWixpg1lSQvOW0f3zS0uW5tig6TsYmPnzZImrvbRB6h3GaDbAE-sS5wTg5NOa7BLKoEucm2Nur5ZLejt95oG1y4sE933fYVoYh1sKww1L-Hrxfn1p89BV7ch0CTQm8DYyGghbap0ormytC-UnGeWNDMblWkSG6FkQV2SlAmCxcxqyxJuCd2kShkWvYJhVVf2NaDipWRxIaMyUzEhIRkWUtJzKCNWCi5GwHry5bpLau5qayzyfTpmR46cyJF7cuTbEXzYzVm1KT3-Ofqk54q8E-8md3qjuxOOkhF87Llg3_331d783_C38Jh7RnI-bycw3Kxv7Dt4pH9s5s16DIdn55Pp5RgGX_jUtenV2IvCTxAVBT4
linkProvider	Springer Nature
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELZKQQIO5a0uLTAHOEHU2ImT9QGhCqhatayQKNLegmM7YqVust1sWZUfVan_kBkn2QASvfXAJVJejuR8M54Zz8zH2EspE5uEWgXC4CF2Og9yadFZyclljk3Ibe7JJtLRaDgeq89r7KKrhaG0yk4nekVtK0Mx8h1aqmkbLkrezU4DYo2i3dWOQqOBxaE7X6LLVr89-ID_95UQex-P3-8HLatAYBBui8C6yBqpXKpNYoR2iNpCiKFDu8FFRZrEVmqV4y2FSx06bdwZxxPh0PZOtbY8wnFvsJsxaX-fKvhl5eDJ1Md0uEzDIE34uC3SaUv1JB8GlBBBHlAcLP9cCHvr9q8NWb_O7d3732boPttoLWrYbUTgAVtz5UN297c-i4_Y5W4JXbQfiELHtxWmDtVg3VSXFjwhEFBQGipUolMccNIk9y_OYdrEUWtAAx9qN6mn-OKsr7gAs-p63RS1QlXABIUa7XgLbSMNoGq9OZjqbHaCV7_jzP2sqBQV6PueFRvFBRpWpfox-3otc_aErZdV6TYZaFEoHucqKoY6Ru9PhblSeB6qiBdSyAHjHXAy0zZyJz6Rk6xvQU1gyxBsmQdbthyw16t3Zk0bkyuf3u4QlrUqrc56eA3Ymw6j_e1_j_b06tFesNv7x5-OsqOD0eEWuyO8iFCO3zZbX8zP3DN2y_xYTOr5cy9swL5dN3Z_ASGQaBg
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lj9MwEB4tXYTgwHMRhQXmACeINnbiJD4gVHapWC2qKgRSb8GxHVFpm5SmS7X8K678OsZ5NIDE3vbAJVLi2JGcb-yZ8cx8AM-EiEzkK-lxTZfQqszLhCFjJXMmc6h9ZrKabCKeTJLZTE534GeXC-PCKrs1sV6oTamdj_zAbdXuGC6IDvI2LGJ6NH69_Oo5Bil30trRaTQQObHnGzLfqlfHR_Svn3M-fvvx8J3XMgx4mqC39owNjBbSxkpHmitLCM45TyzpEDbI4yg0QsmMmiRte2TAMasti7glPTxWyrCAxr0Cu0lEcjOA3enhm9GHrbkn4trDw0Tse3HEZm3KTpu4J1jiufAIZw-F3ubPbbHXdf86nq13vfGt_3m-bsPNVtfGUSMcd2DHFnfhxm8VGO_Bj1GB3TkAOnKduuCwq12Nxi5UYbCmCkLnrsaSltcFDThvwv7X57hoPKwVkuqPlZ1XC-q47HMxUG_rYTfprljmOCdxJw3fYFtiA10e3wp1ebY8padfaOa-ly5JFd33a75sEiRs-JaqPfh0KXN2HwZFWdgHgIrnkoWZDPJEhWQXSj-Tku59GbBccDEE1oEo1W2Jd8c0cpr2xakd8FICXloDL90M4cW2z7IpcHLh2_sd2tJ2savSHmpDeNnhtW_-92gPLx7tKVwjyKbvjycnj-A6r6XFBf_tw2C9OrOP4ar-tp5Xqyet5CF8vmzw_gL8DXII
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+extended+probabilistic+demand+model+with+optimal+intensity+measures+for+seismic+performance+characterization+of+isolated+bridges+under+coupled+horizontal+and+vertical+motions&rft.jtitle=Bulletin+of+earthquake+engineering&rft.au=Dehghanpoor%2C+Ahmad&rft.au=Thambiratnam%2C+David&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Wenyang&rft.au=Chan%2C+Tommy&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.pub=Springer+Netherlands&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2291&rft.epage=2323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10518-021-01044-w&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s10518_021_01044_w
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1570-761X&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1570-761X&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1570-761X&client=summon