Mathematical Arguments in Context

Except in very poor mathematical contexts, mathematical arguments do not stand in isolation of other mathematical arguments. Rather, they form trains of formal and informal arguments, adding up to interconnected theorems, theories and eventually entire fields. This paper critically comments on some...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Foundations of science Ročník 14; číslo 1-2; s. 45 - 57
Hlavní autoři: Van Bendegem, Jean Paul, Van Kerkhove, Bart
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.03.2009
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
Education
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical Logic and Foundations
Methodology of the Social Sciences
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Mathematical arguments
Toulmin
Mathematical practice
Contextual knowledge
Rhetoric
ISSN:1233-1821, 1572-8471
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Except in very poor mathematical contexts, mathematical arguments do not stand in isolation of other mathematical arguments. Rather, they form trains of formal and informal arguments, adding up to interconnected theorems, theories and eventually entire fields. This paper critically comments on some common views on the relation between formal and informal mathematical arguments, most particularly applications of Toulmin’s argumentation model, and launches a number of alternative ideas of presentation inviting the contextualization of pieces of mathematical reasoning within encompassing bodies of explicit and implicit, formal and informal background knowledge.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1233-1821
1572-8471
DOI:10.1007/s10699-008-9146-7