Deep learning-based open API recommendation for Mashup development

Mashup developers often need to find open application programming interfaces (APIs) for their composition application development. Although most enterprises and service organizations have encapsulated their businesses or resources online as open APIs, finding the right high-quality open APIs is not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science China. Information sciences Vol. 66; no. 7; p. 172102
Main Authors: Wang, Ye, Chen, Junwu, Huang, Qiao, Xia, Xin, Jiang, Bo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Beijing Science China Press 01.07.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1674-733X, 1869-1919
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mashup developers often need to find open application programming interfaces (APIs) for their composition application development. Although most enterprises and service organizations have encapsulated their businesses or resources online as open APIs, finding the right high-quality open APIs is not an easy task from a library with several open APIs. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a deep learning-based open API recommendation (DLOAR) approach. First, the hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with a noise topic model is constructed to build topic models for Mashup clusters. Second, developers’ requirement keywords are extracted by the TextRank algorithm, and the language model is built. Third, a neural network-based three-level similarity calculation is performed to find the most relevant open APIs. Finally, we complement the relevant information of open APIs in the recommended list to help developers make better choices. We evaluate the DLOAR approach on a real dataset and compare it with commonly used open API recommendation approaches: term frequency-inverse document frequency, latent dirichlet allocation, Word2Vec, and Sentence-BERT. The results show that the DLOAR approach has better performance than the other approaches in terms of precision, recall, F1-measure, mean average precision, and mean reciprocal rank.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1674-733X
1869-1919
DOI:10.1007/s11432-021-3531-0