Sample size estimation for power and accuracy in the experimental comparison of algorithms

Experimental comparisons of performance represent an important aspect of research on optimization algorithms. In this work we present a methodology for defining the required sample sizes for designing experiments with desired statistical properties for the comparison of two methods on a given proble...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of heuristics Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 305 - 338
Main Authors: Campelo, Felipe, Takahashi, Fernanda
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.04.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1381-1231, 1572-9397
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Experimental comparisons of performance represent an important aspect of research on optimization algorithms. In this work we present a methodology for defining the required sample sizes for designing experiments with desired statistical properties for the comparison of two methods on a given problem class. The proposed approach allows the experimenter to define desired levels of accuracy for estimates of mean performance differences on individual problem instances, as well as the desired statistical power for comparing mean performances over a problem class of interest. The method calculates the required number of problem instances, and runs the algorithms on each test instance so that the accuracy of the estimated differences in performance is controlled at the predefined level. Two examples illustrate the application of the proposed method, and its ability to achieve the desired statistical properties with a methodologically sound definition of the relevant sample sizes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1381-1231
1572-9397
DOI:10.1007/s10732-018-9396-7